They are open-sourcing the platform. It is good news. Even if it cannot be changed, the insight is worth it.

Take, for example, Slashot algorithm. It had some success but has tendency to create echo chambers in its own right. For example, your post has little substance on the topic except some paranoia, self-promotion and your political views, but yet Slashdot moderates it up.

Perhaps someone will create something better by analyzing both

The question is who and why? What if it was a test and not some random event? Spanish government failed its citizens. 50,000 military-age men invaded Spanish enclave with no warning or resistance. Where was intelligence services, border security, army? Europe has hard questions to answer of it it is actually ready to defend itself.

Many countries in continental Europe and around the world have "duty to rescue" laws that impose an affirmative legal duty on citizens to aid individuals in distress. If you are leisurely broadcasting violent crime instead of alerting authorities or trying to help, you are already breaking the law. If on top of that you are trying to cash in on the situation, 5 years in prison sounds about right.

Give it time. Large corporations relocating is a canary in a coal mine. Tech layoffs, manufacturing decline, high tax and regulatory burden, budget deficit, "billionaire tax" - California is barreling toward economic cliff.

Here is a copy of digital confirmation:

# rm -rf /student_data/
#

California legislature is crancking out 2500 new laws per year on top of regulations created by massive government bureaucracy. You are probably breaking some law every day.

People need to understand that it is not that hard to break records. There is only 100+ years of reliable instrumental data and about 50 year of satellite data. You dismiss one "outlier" and your "error rates" and "deviations" change dramatically. One can argue that it is not a trend but rather deviation and that extreme weather events are expected and normal weather patterns.

This is a bit misleading. There is nothing in the law that limits asset types in 401(k) plans. Trustees limit investment choices because of liability attached to it. Alternative assets have been long available in self-directed 401(k) plans. You can load up on Trump coins in your solo 401(k) any time you want.

Content as well. For example, you will be restricted from shouting obscenities or threatening neighbors even in daytime.

For example, the government can restrict your right to free speech if you do it loudly at night in the suburban neighborhood.

Can we claim reimbursement from the companies that increased prices once they get their tariff refunds?

Yes, Grok is faster, more up-to-date, more objective, less restrictive, generous in output, and has an excellent stock personality.

If they keep at it, they will eventually implement emacs.

"Has consciousness" = "we have no clue how the technology works and are not responsible for the consequences"