Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:We will have AI *in space* !!! (Score 1) 185

Outdated doesn't mean "stops working" or "isn't useful". I'm highly skeptical because of heat problems, and comments others have made about GPUs/TPUs not being space-rated. They sure aren't radiation hardened. But if they keep working, they don't become less useful, just less competitive against the latest model.

Comment Re:1M satellites? (Score 1) 185

What orbits is he asking for? If it's LEO, then they'll burn out rapidly. If it's geostationary, then it's already crowded. If it's everything in between, then there's (potentially) a lot of space, but it's a bit more expensive to get there. And you'd want everything to have a VERY low eccentricity orbit, so then didn't interact.

One good idea would be to physically link the satellites together, but that would require a lot of development that hasn't really been tested. (It would also mean they keep position as long as any of them keep working.)

And how is he planning to address cooling? That's usually quite difficult and expensive on satellites.

Maybe he (or anyway his company) has answers to those problems, but I sure don't.

Comment Re:Whistling past the graveyard (Score 1) 60

It's too early to be sure how much is going to happen, but it's clear that a LOT is going to happen. The current state is intensely unstable. I *suspect* that AGI will be coming before 2035, but perhaps not. Whether or not it does so, it doesn't change the instability of the current state. Desk jobs that continue to exist are going to change drastically, and we don't yet know in what way. Perhaps AIs will continue to have a really short memory, but perhaps not. Just that one fork in the road will alter things immensely.

Comment Re:Yes, we understand the need (Score 1) 55

That's not a fair description. There are areas where go is a superior choice. Channels are very useful, and could save an immense amount of effort. OTOH, the documentation really NEEDS an AI front end. And there's no decent way to generate local documentation (i.e. documentation for your code that doesn't require setting up a local server).

So I've always avoided it for anything that needed much documentation (i.e. most things). (FWIW, I don 't like Doxygen, but it's the best documentation system I've encountered. Javadoc comes in second.)

Comment Re:My own opinion, take with salt and more salt (Score 1) 55

Most published examples don't handle exception processing, either. But that's something that's easy to add. (OTOH, it can be really tedious. It's really something that AI *should* handle.)
(FWIW, I haven't used any code generator, so I don't know what Claude turns out, maybe it does handle exception. But the published examples sure don't.)

Comment Re:All your base will belong to AI (Score 1) 55

The analogy I use is "John Henry drove 16 feet and the steam drill only drove 9". I don't think one should try to be John Henry, but you can if you want to.

OTOH, the real question is "Is the code good enough?", and that depends on context. Lots of people have been saying they need to spend too much time correcting it. The thing is steam drills kept getting better, and John Henry killed himself trying to outdo them.

Slashdot Top Deals

God made the integers; all else is the work of Man. -- Kronecker

Working...