Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Batteries (Score 1) 467

I have a true question - exactly WHERE do you recharge while on a road trip?

Unless Canada has a very large network of fast dedicated charge stations compatible with your car model, or you travel only to places where there is always such a station within range, how do you manage to move through the country without fear to run out of batteries? I've never found a place that explains how to do this in detail.

Comment Re:Flat, unintuitive UI? No thanks! (Score 1) 78

That may be because you have only seen UX used for products aimed at a widespread general public, which benefit greatly from feature reduction - as they must support very different workflows, with people who use the product with little training.

UX is the science that got us input forms (it was called ergonomics back then), standard widgets, WYSIWYG and direct manipulation. It has also created the new layout in MS Office (which is successful in its goal to make visible a larger set of the available features), so it's not true that it only supports feature reduction. I work in a company that a very complex software suit, and UX approaches are greatly enhancing the user workflows from its previous, engineer-designed interface, without removing a single feature.

Comment Re:Flat, unintuitive UI? No thanks! (Score 1) 78

Unfortunately, I bet the UIs ARE thought up by experts. This seems to me like a classic disconnect between pie in the sky designers and everyday users.

Experts UI designers are those who test the interface with everyday users.

Therefore, when an interface has been designed by an expert in UI design (NOT visual design, but real interaction design), there is no such disconnect.

Comment Re:That's weird (Score 1) 370

considering nobody has made any decent AI yet.

It doesn't matter. AI works best when there's a human in the loop, piloting the controls anyway.

What matters to a company is that 1 person + bots can now make the job that previously required hundreds of white collar workers, for much less salary. What happens to the other workers should not be a concern of the company managers, according to the modern religious creed - apparently some magical market hand takes care to solve that problem automatically.

Comment Re:Failure of imagination (Score 1) 370

Were those people able to get hired elsewhere? The answer in general was almost certainly yes.

Oh, oh, I know this one! "New jobs being created in the past don't guarantee that new jobs will be created in the future". This is the standard groupthink answer for waiving any responsibility after advice given about the future, right?

Comment Re:What I love (Score 1) 78

Yeah, nothing to object to your accurate summary of how things go on at "the sun of all knowledge".

The thing that keeps me going in and participating (besides the desire to restore some unjustly removed content, and the obvious addictive nature as a social game AND a massive multiplayer game) is a long term vision, which is shared by few people.

Think that 20 or 40 years from now, the current vandals and trolls that own any particular article will be gone (there will likely be new ones, but there's hope that they will camp at some ''other'' article); and, since every edit gets logged and distributed under a classic share-alike license, a future editor really interested in that specific topic will be able to trace back the full history of changes and old versions, probably assisted by some AI machine learning tool that will detect the edit wars and fact-check which side seems more likely to be right.

Assuming that deletionists or some other totalitarian state don't get to lock and burn the whole thing down, the project is the first wide-scale, distributed attempt to create a universal compilation of general knowledge since the times of the first encyclopedia; and this one is self documenting every turn of the way. Even its many failures will allow future researchers to study how not to set up a collaborative project and how early neticens behaved when the internet was young.

I agree with you that being a part of it doesn't necessarily feel nice, though.

Comment Re:What I love (Score 2) 78

My point is that, if you say "this is vandalism" at the talk page, someone else may find it without having to review the full history of article edits.

There's no requirement that you have the lengthy discussion yourself. Wikipedia is a collaborative project after all, and surely there will be someone else willing to spend the time fighting the vandal.

Comment Re:What I love (Score 1) 78

I've read a paper where they found that the most edited articles are almost always the most controversial, not necessarily the most popular. The most obvious themes are politics, religion, and naming of geographical and historic figures, as well as Wikipedia's own rule pages; but large time-spanning edit wars may occur for any obscure topic. They even keep an archive of the lamest edit wars.

Comment Re:What I love (Score 3, Insightful) 78

Talk pages are your friend in these cases. If you post a rationale for your correction there, some experienced editor might be able to intervene and set things straight, or at least start a resolution procedure to gather opinions from more people.

If you're editing as an IP without a user account, this will also make less likely that the spambot will revert your anonymous contribution (although in the case you describe, it might have been an asshole editor instead; the only solution for it is to ask for a third opinion or other conflict resolution procedure).

Comment Re: Safety net for horse shoe makers (Score 2) 635

I've always thought that temporary, transient measures make a lot of sense to alleviate the problems faced by workers in a transitioning industry, to be financed either by mayor players in it or by the government (financed by taxes to the mayor players in the industry), and consisting of early retirements, training in new procedures, or temporal subsidies to the dying industries so that they can adapt. The really bad companies would disappear anyway, but many others could find a way to survive in a new niche, without their workers having to file for bankruptcy.

A smooth transition will benefit society as a whole much more than the recession produced by the economic crash of the failing companies. Had luddites have a safety net, they wouldn't have done the machine-being that have them a bad name.

Comment Re: Sickdays==Lossofprofits, can't have those! (Score 1) 193

That's a category error. Money can only measure the value of transactions; unless you're trading people as vendibles, applying a money count to human lifes is meaningless.

Sure you can count the price of medical care and sanitation, but that's not the value of life any more than the price of food and water is, even if you'd die without then.

Comment Re: No, Aumented Reality is the next big thing. (Score 1) 114

No, by that logic the golden age of the new medium won't happen in the same decade that the first viable commercial products are sold.

It didn't happen for Hollywood or the TV, either. It takes time for creatives to explore the possibilities, and find out how to make good use of them to create something that was not possible in the previous media. "Being fully immersive" is not enough on its own.

Slashdot Top Deals

If a listener nods his head when you're explaining your program, wake him up.

Working...