Winklevoss Twins' Gemini Cutting 10% of Its Staff, Saying 'Crypto Winter' Is Here (cnbc.com) 39
Billionaire bitcoiners Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss are laying off 10% of the workforce at Gemini, a first for the U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange and custodian. CNBC reports: The twins announced in a blog post on Thursday morning that the industry is in a "contraction phase" known as "crypto winter," which has been "further compounded by the current macroeconomic and geopolitical turmoil." "We are not alone," the memo continued. Fellow crypto exchange Coinbase recently reported that revenue had fallen 27% from a year ago, as had overall usage.
Gemini -- which has been around since 2014 and is valued at $7.1 billion as of its last funding round -- has 1,033 people on its payroll, according to PitchBook, which translates to about 100 employees affected by today's layoffs. CNBC reached out to Gemini to ask for the exact figure, but the press team declined to comment beyond the blog post. As for next steps, Gemini has closed its physical offices today in order to protect employee privacy. Impacted team members will receive a calendar invite for individual conversations about separation packages and health care benefits. On Friday, remaining employees will take part in a "company-wide standup" to talk about its future.
The memo says that Gemini wants to focus only on products that are critical to its mission -- and team leaders will assess whether their teams are "right-sized" for the "current, turbulent market conditions that are likely to persist for some time." "Today is a tough day, but one that will make Gemini better over the long run," the brothers wrote in the staffwide memo.
Gemini -- which has been around since 2014 and is valued at $7.1 billion as of its last funding round -- has 1,033 people on its payroll, according to PitchBook, which translates to about 100 employees affected by today's layoffs. CNBC reached out to Gemini to ask for the exact figure, but the press team declined to comment beyond the blog post. As for next steps, Gemini has closed its physical offices today in order to protect employee privacy. Impacted team members will receive a calendar invite for individual conversations about separation packages and health care benefits. On Friday, remaining employees will take part in a "company-wide standup" to talk about its future.
The memo says that Gemini wants to focus only on products that are critical to its mission -- and team leaders will assess whether their teams are "right-sized" for the "current, turbulent market conditions that are likely to persist for some time." "Today is a tough day, but one that will make Gemini better over the long run," the brothers wrote in the staffwide memo.
Re: (Score:2)
What a coupla douchebags.
Another bullshit company that does nothing of value, on its way out.
Like their previous company, "Face..." something . :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Or how about another bullshit economy that does nothing of value, on its way out.
Re: (Score:2)
First hit, a Nov 2021 article on fool.com (appropriate name) says "Gemini crypto platform announced it closed an equity funding round worth $400 million that pegs the company's total market capitalization at $7.1 billion."
So possibly they hired all those people to milk investors less "savvy" then themselves.
Didn't read the article beyond it, but I search the page for the word "profit" and the browser says 0 matches.
Closed offices to "protect privacy" (Score:1)
Re:Closed offices to "protect privacy" (Score:4, Informative)
That's not all, they're being sued for misrepresenting futures' contracts.
https://www.theverge.com/2022/... [theverge.com]
So are they real billionaires? (Score:2)
Or do they hold "billions" in cryptocurrency?
I know they were involved with FriendFace, but they were always in the news complaining how they got shafted by ZuckerFace.
Re: (Score:1)
They shouldn't have gotten a dime. Not that I think highly of Zuck, but ideas by themselves are worthless - it's being able to capitalize on an idea that has value. There wasn't anything novel about Facebook anyway, it was just a less ugly (by virtue of not letting users customize anything) version of MySpace.
Re: (Score:2)
Or do they hold "billions" in cryptocurrency?
Why not both? [knowyourmeme.com]
The rich rarely invest in a single asset.
So cold (Score:2)
Couldn't have happened to nicer people.
A bit more discreet (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I would say anyone who works for a company with "cryptocurrency" anywhere in their mission statement, should have an up-to-date resume and some money in savings.
just a phase (Score:4)
Re: just a phase (Score:1)
The plural of Winkelvoss... (Score:1)
...is Winkelvi
Not enough fools to be found anymore? (Score:2)
Good.
Re:Not enough fools to be found anymore? (Score:5, Funny)
Those twins have more pyramid schemes than a Goa'uld.
Re: Not enough fools to be found anymore? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Those twins have more pyramid schemes than a Goa'uld.
Are they like the Ferengi? But I don't know much about the Ferengi, either.
further compounded by the current turmoil (Score:3)
further compounded by the current macroeconomic and geopolitical turmoil
What?
But cryptocurrencies are supposed to me magically immune to all that because it's made from maths and unicorn farts!
Isn't that righ, reanjr?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
This is just him getting ready for the recession (Score:1, Troll)
It's a symptom of our failing political and economic system, where the only way we can solve problems is with "Austerity", e.g. screwing over people who work for a living.
The actual solution is to take back the $3.5 trillion given out to the top 1% during the pandemic (and then some) and u
Re: (Score:2)
All the armchair economists think they have the answers.
Re: (Score:3)
It's a symptom of our failing political and economic system, where the only way we can solve problems is with "Austerity", e.g. screwing over people who work for a living.
I've been watching this for two decades now and it's not even funny anymore. When the same alledged "cure" is brought for not just different, but opposite problems, you can be fairly sure there's a snake-oil seller in the room.
Inflation too high? We need more Austerity.
Inflation too low? More Austerity.
Too many unemployed? Austerity!
Not enough jobs? Austerity!
The longer you live, the more you wonder if it's always been like this and you were just too naive to see it, or if it's fairly recent that the whole
Re: (Score:3)
The deficit rose under Reagan in part because he (and Congress) cut taxes and then refused to cut spending. The Republicans then learned the dumb lesson, whine incessantly about taxes but keep the federal spending. Regulation is overhyped by Republicans as somehow shackling the economy. Nothing says shackle like increasing greenhouse gases and other pollutants.
A 1033 people? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
>What do these 1033 people do? What problem are they trying to solve?
Those 1033 people shill crypto obviously. To make more money for the douche twins obviously.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Good riddance (Score:1)
Springtime for Fiat (Score:1)
Matching outfits for them too (Score:2)
The market for pseudorandom numbers are down (Score:1)