I throw my kindle into my gym bag and then use it on exercise equipment. It occasionally falls out of the bag. My last one stopped refreshing a section of the screen after 10 years.
I make plenty of devices. I could make an epub viewer, using a low power chip and an e-ink display, but I find my manufacturing tolerances to be less than stringent than Amazon's. I'll pay the extra for a fit and finish that might actually last 13 years such that you have to worry about a major electronics company EOLing it.
The world is going to burn, and our descendants will live in a new stone age, but the shareholders will get a great return on their investments this quarter!
Why not just have the AI write directly in assembly? If you are taking away all these layers of abstraction, why not get rid of them all? I'm sure AI will write efficient and effective machine code.
The government's need for secrecy trumps (pun intended) the public's need for affordable, efficient, non-polluting vehicles? This is straight-up astroturfing by Ohio car dealers who are afraid they will not sell a single Ford or Chevrolet if the Chinese enter the market.
If the company is saving money using the digital labels, then they should not have any problem with a ban on dynamic pricing. It seems like changing the shelf price is an opportunity for blatant fraud, since a customer could pick up a product and by the time they got to the register there's a different price in the system.
So, apparently before the invention of AI, there was no such thing as data or process augmentation. We had to kill woolly mammoth with no memory or previous experience, I guess.
It's DOOM. The original sound and audio were on a PC. The whole point with this is that the SNES cartridge sucked- there were audio and video glitches because the hardware wasn't as good as your typical 386. It would be like speeding up the Atari version of PacMan; the game still sucks. It's a nice bit of closure for this guy, but hardly newsworthy.
The full-size panels a home user can buy are just as efficient as what a utility can buy. If a home owner has the space and structure to put the panels on their roof, this saves the transport losses along the utility lines, and reduces the overall land use.
Can you actually explain what the economy of scale is that utility-scale solar would have over a individual, or are you just bootlicking?