Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Go Google Employees! (Score 0) 60

Hrm.

While it would not have a snowballs chance in hell of working, I would be curious to see someone try some kind of unjust enrichment claim. Contracted work was preformed for compensation, but also preformed under the company's written policies, and one could argue that if they would not have performed the work under the new policies, and the company continues to benefit from the work performed, that the benefits were fraudulently gained. Would not work, but it would be interesting to see the legal arguments play out.

Comment Re:Another tool in the toolbox. (Score 1) 81

I wonder how well they handle less common cases though. The classic problem with these systems, while they are always improving, is they follow the 'most of the time it is the most common case' line of reasoning, so most of the time they are right.
 
Though the recurring problem with these tools is that since they tend to give the most common answers, they can easily become a source of bias, making changing course even more difficult.

Comment Re:Double standard? (Score 1) 131

Eh, all it did was codify how law enforcement has always operated in the US, all the way back to the founding and writing of the constitution. The police in the US were a combination of essentially private corporate armies and regional gangs that went 'legitimate' since there was nothing to fight them with.

Comment Re:NSF does outstanding work, most of the time ... (Score 1) 294

Thing is, I would argue 'iffy funding' is part of the point of the NSF. It handles funding for all the experimental stuff that the private sector or DARPA is not interested in, It fill the gaps and takes on risk that other institutions and funding vehicles handle poorly.... and also spackles over other problems like, as you point out, keeps grad students employed since otherwise it would making such education little more than a hobby of the already wealthy like it used to be.

Comment Re:Cui bono? (Score 1) 25

The real argument for mass surveillance is that it is lucrative, which in the US makes it a moral prerogative. That it concentrates power into a god approved hierarchical structure is just a bonus. Anything else is just thin rationalization to comfort people who like to call themselves 'moderate'.

Comment Re:Nice data center ya got there! (Score 1, Insightful) 110

Eh, these people are not nearly conservative enough to get away with something like that. Liberal messes with the water... eco terrorism that must be stopped at all costs! Conservative blows up a dam.. 'look at what those eco radical democrats have driven good patriotic americans to do!'

Slashdot Top Deals

/* Halley */ (Halley's comment.)

Working...