OS X Leopard Ships On October 26th 762
David in AZ writes "According to the Apple website, Mac OS X Leopard will start shipping on October 26! From their blurb: 'Packed with more than 300 new features, Mac OS X Leopard goes on sale Friday, October 26, at 6:00 p.m. at Apple's retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers, Apple announced today. And, beginning today, customers can place pre-orders on Apple's online store. "Leopard, the sixth major release of Mac OS X, is the best upgrade we've ever released," said Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. "And everyone gets the 'Ultimate' version, packed with all the new innovative features, for just $129.""
The student edition is now $47 more (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:The student edition is now $47 more (Score:5, Insightful)
So get over yourself, it obviously isn't for you. And before the "Linux noob" comments come; my servers are Slackware and have been since at least ten years ago.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:The student edition is now $47 more (Score:4, Informative)
Any utility you can get on Linux, you can get on OSX by a recompile. The most popular are as far away as 'sudo port install XXXX'. And you get rsync, tar, bzip2, ssh as standard anyway. As a technical OSX user, I've been using ssh/rsync for a while now, but it's way way over the head of my parents, and they want their digital photos (with which to bore their guests) just as much as I want my '~/src' directory.
Not to mention that 'Apple Backup' has been around for ages. Does incremental/full backups, even off-site to
Some fact-checking required before you spout off about "the fact of the matter", methinks.
Simon.
Re:Bittorrent edition a non starter... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:The student edition is now $47 more (Score:5, Informative)
Re:The student edition is now $47 more (Score:4, Funny)
I just can't separate that from price discrimination against those not in school.
Ooh, wait.
1) Create fake school.
2) ???
3) PROFIT
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
...and they seem to have their own exchange rates (Score:3, Interesting)
129 USD In SEK:
129 U.S. dollars = 828.979584 Swedish kronor
and the list price for apple store sweden:
1.195,00
hmm
1195 SEK in USD:
1 195 Swedish kronor = 185.957535 U.S. dollars
So thats a 56$ premium. I don't think so.
Congrats, apple. You just won a pirated copy of Leopard!
That sucks, but it's not Apple's fault. (Score:5, Informative)
I doubt that you'd be able to order a US version and have it shipped to Sweden for less than $10 in shipping.
Seems like a pretty fair price to me. Maybe you should vote for politicians who support lower taxes if you don't like it?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re:The student edition is now $47 more (Score:4, Informative)
Single User $116.00
Maybe it depends on the school?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Find 4 friends, buy a family pack. 4 of my friends at school are doing the same. Thus, $40 apiece.
yeah yeah yeah.. we're not "family", but we live on the same damn floor, so whatever. My department eventually gets a license and I get it for free 2-3 months later. But I'm happy to pay 40 for it right away.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:The student edition is now $47 more (Score:4, Funny)
Re:The student edition is now $47 more (Score:5, Informative)
My apologies. I checked the institutional price, not the student/faculty price which does indeed show up as $116. I guess the Tiger troll left me hyper-sensitive!
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:The student edition is now $47 more (Score:4, Informative)
The retail versions, by contrast, will run on any machine that's listed as capable of running the software. (Which sometimes is slightly different than the machines that are *actually* capable of running the software; Apple specs systems that are capable of running the OS comfortably, but some people have found acceptable results after forcing it onto older machines.)
If you wait around until the next paid-upgrade OS release though, you can get the older version, in retail packaging, quite cheap. Either eBay or some of the used-Mac stores like Smalldog regularly have new-old-stock retail OS packages.
Macbooks (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Macbooks (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.apple.com/macosx/uptodate/ [apple.com]
More than a Service Pack(as made famous by Boston) (Score:5, Funny)
Let's see (Score:5, Insightful)
hmmm...
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm trying to avoid the whole fanboy thing, but it's hard to not like it. I mean, the pricing of the hardware is certainly high, but once you dive it it's quite nice.
Re:Interesting (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Interesting (Score:5, Insightful)
Apple are not perfect - they have priorities and make assumptions that may not suit everyone. They tend towards a "closed" PC-as-appliance mentality, and would probably be just as monopolistic as MS if they could get away with it. They over-hype things. Sometimes they just plain screw up...
but...
...you at least get the impression that you have been deprioritised, locked-in, monopolized and possibly screwed by someone with some sort of vision making an intelligent and possibly risky effort to turn out a better product rather than a committee of PHBs and marketdroids taking input from a focus group.
Also, Apple have managed to take UNIX and wrap it in a genuinely friendly GUI front end, c.f. KDE/Gnome/X who have taken Linux and wrapped it in a usable but clunky and over-engineered GUI that is still suffering from its ancestry as a way of letting Unix geeks run 8 simultaneous instances of their favorite CLI shell in translucent windows.
Re:Interesting (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I think they're for if you buy a new Mac and the new OS comes out a week later.
Heck, remember when System updates were free? Take a stack of floppies to your local Apple store (before the Apple Store, of course), and copy their reference system. No worries about authorization: it could only run on a Mac, and all Macs came with System something....
problem is... (Score:2)
The premium price I will have to pay, I usually use the wife's student ID to get it cheap but not anymore with the latest raft of Apple pricing, makes me yawn and let it slide past.
Is there anything that really is important in it that is a must have or is it all eye candy like apples website makes it look like?
Re:problem is... (Score:5, Informative)
Also, some of the "eye candy" will be very useful: easy backup and multiple desktops built in (I've been using a 3rd-party solution [berlios.de] for this for a while now that works remarkably well, but has a number of glitches).
I'm not beating down the door for 10.5, but I am looking forward to some of its conveniences.
Re:problem is... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Best upgrade? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
looking forward to it (Score:2)
I'm looking forward to the release, but I don't think I'll buy it until the first patches come out. A lot of press said Panther and Tiger were pretty solid, but I found a lot of little "quirks" and bugs that needed squishing after the public release. It's also inevitable that I'll have to work around some new "feature" in some of my photography scripts because something tiny changed. And then there's the impact to various macports which I'll have to wait for patches (or learn enough of the codebase to h
Damn, "Time Machine" sounds cool... (Score:5, Interesting)
Automatically hourly incremental backups to an external disk, with everything done readable in the filesystem as simlinks so you can look at arbitrarily hour-snapshots for the past day, day snapshots for the past month, and weekly snapshots thereafter.
COOL!
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Snapshots and Windows' Shadow Copy
Time Machine has been frequently compared to Microsoft's Shadow Copy (or Volume Snapshot Service), because both systems involve file backup. In reality, they are not really very similar at all. Microsoft uses the background Shadow Copy service to duplicate files on the same disk. Those shadow copies record a "snapshot" of the file at a given moment in time, and can be accessed by the user using Previous Versions (which shows up in the file properties viewer), or tapped into by an external network backup system. Backing up these "shadow copies" simply prevents the external backup system from running into problems trying to back up live files that may be locked by the user working on them. The data backup features related to Shadow Copy are only useful if a Windows machine is running in an environment with a server backing them up. Shadow Copy is not in itself a backup system, although it can present a listing of duplicated files that were captured by the shadow copy service. Without a dedicated backup system, Previous Versions only shows local shadows of a file. It does not copy files to an external disk for safekeeping, and its shadow copies can't be browsed through by the user in the file system by date or by query. Shadow Copy is certainly not an easy to use consumer backup solution (nor is intended to be), which is what Time Machine expressly is.
In Windows Vista, Microsoft also tied Shadow Copy into System Restore, which allows users to roll back their entire PC software install to a previous point in time. This is not a backup system either; it's a system wide undo. System Restore is oriented around undoing the problems caused by installing a software title, a Windows software update, an unsigned hardware driver, or some other event that causes problems that need to be rolled back. It doesn't go back and find something lost from the past; it reverts the clock to a previous checkpoint and throws away the future from that point forward. System Restore is not even loosely related to Time Machine in what it does, how it does it, or why it exists.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
300+ features... (Score:5, Informative)
I'm praying that it's not just more bloat like Vista. It seems like Leopard is good on paper, better Boot Camp for those who still need Windows; better iCal for the people who use their Macs for organizing their life; Instruments, Core Animation, Unix certification, built-in Sandboxing for programmers; and other doodads for Joe-user such as a cooler Photobooth... But then, do I need my address book to make calls to Google Maps or the OS-wide dictionary to reach out to Wikipedia? Those last two are cool but I get worried when my "OS experience" is tied in anyway to whether I have network or Internet access.
Re:300+ features... (Score:5, Informative)
All of the new developer toys are nicely exposed through well thought out APIs, with free documentation and were announced two years ago and a pre-release of the OS made available a year ago so developers could get a jump start.
Apple has to put a few nice Joe Public features in the new OS so people will upgrade to it so there's a bigger market for all those third party developers.
Wikipedia built in... (Score:5, Interesting)
"Wikipedia in Dictionary
Harness the power of Wikipedia when you're connected to the Internet -- built right into it's Dictionary. You get a great Mac OS X user interface with super-fast searching and beautifully laid out-results."
From the Parental Controls:
"Wikipedia Content Filter
Limit access to profanity in Wikipedia."
Huh...interesting.
language distortion field? (Score:5, Insightful)
That's it, just a string of buzzwords, not even grammatical, followed by a link to "learn more [apple.com]". Somebody attended too many marketing or web2.0 presentations. Or maybe they want to put the mystery back in. Turns out, it automagically configures an "instant network". The intro is curious. Does the "ethical community" description mean that security sucks?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I suspect someone put in some filler text that someone else forgot to take out...
Especially since "Holisticly" is the wrong spelling.
Re:language distortion field? (Score:4, Informative)
Network your computers and smart devices instantly.
I think it's pretty clear that the culprit was some kind of filler text on a template or a joke. This is probably the web team's fault and no one else's.
The 300 release (Score:2, Funny)
Another 300:
Steve Jobs: [points to Microsoft Programmer behind Baller] You there, 'Softy! What is your profession?
Microsoft Programmer: I am a trainee QA, sir.
Steve Jobs: [points to another 'Softy] And you, what is your profession?
Microsoft Guy: 3rd level branch tester, sir.
Steve Jobs: Branch tester.
[turns to a third 'Softy]
Steve Jobs: And you?
Microsoft Guy: Graphics guy, I repainted XP to make it Vista...
Steve Jobs: [turns around to OSX T
Re:The 300 release (Score:5, Funny)
You must be new here.
Translucency is so overrated (Score:4, Insightful)
I find your lack of vision disturbing (Score:5, Insightful)
Just because you don't do things such as writing on translucent materials or glass things doesn't mean the rest of us don't. Not all technology is for every person. For example, those who actually build things by hand (quilters, seamstresses, wood workers, metal workers, etc.) quite frequently use translucent or clear materials for patterns, templates, and sometimes finished products. How about clear measuring cups? I've seen chefs use clear containers and mark various levels and information on them using erasable markers. Then there is the clear surfaces with map inlays used by tactical planners and tac-rooms. In the Army, decades ago, we would use clear or translucent materials over maps to create different plans and routes, and lay them over various maps. Oh, and waaay back in elementary, junior, and senior high school, and lo even in college, transparencies were used in classrooms with overhead projectors. I've seen the use of transparent or translucent overlay "technology" used in the real world by police, firefighters, medical personnel, construction crews, demolition crews, surveyors, etc..
So since many of us DO use it, translucency (or transparency by your reference to glass) by your own argument IS great, and you simply lack the vision to make use of it, right? It isn't translucency that is overrated, it's your post.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
A translucent terminal let's me read the content under it while doing stuff in it.
Drop shadows helps you know which windows is the front most.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Sounds a bit gimmicky, but I thi
Anybody know? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.apple.com/macosx/uptodate/ [apple.com]
New Systems or just OS upgrades? (Score:4, Interesting)
Consider most iMac users will *require* an enclosure if they want to use Time Machine as it will only work with an add-on drive and not on the system disk.
This leaves me to ask, will we see a go-between on the Mac Pro and the iMac? I'd really love to see a lower cost tower than the Mac Pro. Expandable hard drive bays, upgradable video card and an extra DVD drive in the same case would be most welcome. My iMac G5 is in need of replacement and the footprint of the system when I account for the external DVD and dual-HDD enclosure doesn't make it seem as worthwhile for space saving.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
How do you know the Mini has not sold? (Score:4, Insightful)
I know a number of people that have minis, and like them (the new Intel versions are a lot more powerful than the older G4 ones).
26th October... (Score:5, Funny)
...was the day Doc Brown [imdb.com] completed the first test of his Time Machine. [apple.com]
What a bunch of geeks.
General requirements (Score:3, Informative)
Looks like the rumors were true: G3 support has been dropped. Also my G4 Cube no longer makes the cut.
I guess I won't be buying the 5-seat license version after all.
But can it copy more than 16,400 files? (Score:5, Funny)
What happend to the "Step Back" command in Xcode? (Score:3, Interesting)
Step. Step. Step. Step. Step. Drat! If stepping through code wears you down, you'll love more forgiving debugger in Xcode 3.0. If you step too far, you can rewind to the previous point. That's right, Xcode 3.0 has gone non-linear. Simply click the run button to update your application and start it up. Hover over a variable in your code to see its value in a tooltip. Then just pause when you need to debug. If you go too far, just rewind. No need to start over. No need to set up a debug session. No need to switch focus. Just code, build, run, and debug in Xcode 3.0.
How about the Java 6 Version? (Score:4, Interesting)
You know, the "I wish I didn't regret buying a mac for Java development version". The one on the shelf next to the "Boy I'm glad I didn't donate my old Linux thinkpad since its all I have for Java 6 development" version.
My mac is great -- unfortunately I don't get to turn it on much these days.
Same old story. . .
1) Apple starts doing great
2) Profit!!!
3) Apple gets really egotistical and forgets that other developers exist. (And thinks that archaic languages like Pascal and Objective-C are the only games in town. While coming up with some platforms external developers can't code at _all_ for like the iPhone, early Newton, etc.)
4) ???
5) Struggle for a few years and almost die!
6) Repeat
I wish they'd "Think Different" this time. Here's what I would suggest.
1) Support cross-platform development languages so developers could choose their platform (think Java) above others.
2) Support cross-platform standards for documents like Oasis/open-office formats instead of the egotistical AppleWorks, ClarisWorks, Pages hubris. That way they don't almost die when Microsoft decides not to upgrade Microsoft Office for 8 years or so.
3) Support developers that develop for their devices instead of handcuffing them with bogus languages on their main platform (languages that no-one knows or cares to know in the general industry) or worse, disable them from writing real apps like on the iPhone.
4) Make laptops that don't burn the users' genitals.
5) Be less secretive about things that aren't new features and don't need to be secrets. (Like APIs, and platform development - like JDK development).
6) Listen to the users even _after_ they get popular. It seems they score huge points with users after creating stuff the users want, then they completely ignore them for years until it is too late.
I like Apple, I don't care for the Red Sox. I want Apple to stop playing like the Red Sox.
Re:The Vista bashing is starting to get old.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
BTW Apple actually does release SPs.... they just call them Security updates and point-point releases... ie: 10.4.11 is just around the corner for those who are not going to buy 10.
Nope (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
List Moms....pfftt... (Score:3, Insightful)
You must be new... (Score:2)
C o m p e t i t i o n - the American way.
Reminding your core customers why your product is better than the crap sold by the other guys is not new.
Maybe you'd prefer no advertising at all - wouldn't we all...talk to MS about that idea and let us know when they stop laughing.
Re:The Vista bashing is starting to get old.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
How thoughtful of them to decide not to let you choose for yourself.
Honestly, I hope you're re-posting their justifications and didn't really come up with those yourself.
Re:The Vista bashing is starting to get old.... (Score:4, Insightful)
Because it's an easy and slow moving target?
I don't recall how many versions of Vista exist, and have given up trying to keep track of what is wrong generally with Vista, but if late night talk show hosts were more technically inclined, I'd wager there would be as a steady stream of jokes about Vista, at least as many as there are about embarassing celebrity goofups and blunders of the day.
So laugh. It's funny. Hell, I don't even own a Mac, and I'm laughing. But I doubt I'm alone in saying that I am paying close attention in anticipation of my next computer purchase.
Re: (Score:2)
No, wouldn't matter. The audience isn't; that limits the material.
Re:The Vista bashing is starting to get old.... (Score:4, Interesting)
And "The Steve's" point is spot-on. With Apple, you don't have to decide between levels of product like you do with Windows. Home Basic? Home Premium? Ultimate? Apple is saying they designed an OS with lots of new features, and you get all those features if you buy the product. Simple as that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:The Vista bashing is starting to get old.... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:The Vista bashing is starting to get old.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:The Vista bashing is starting to get old.... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:The Vista bashing is starting to get old.... (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:The Vista bashing is starting to get old.... (Score:5, Insightful)
It's not like charging for a "point release" is unique to Apple. Microsoft did so for the upgrades from Windows 3.0 to 3.1, and from Windows NT 5.0 (Windows 2000) to 5.1 (Windows XP). The thing that determines whether it is worth it to users is what new functionality they get for their money, not which digit of an arbitrary numbering scheme some guy in the marketing department decided to increment.
Re:The Vista bashing is starting to get old.... (Score:5, Informative)
Windows 3.0/3.1/3.11
Windows 4.0 a.k.a. Windows 95
Windows 4.03 a.k.a. Windows 95 OSR2
Windows 4.1 a.k.a. Windows 98
Windows 4.9 a.k.a. Windows ME
Windows NT 5.0 a.k.a. Windows 2000
Windows NT 5.1 a.k.a. Windows XP
Windows NT 5.2 a.k.a. Windows 2003
And the gaps in release dates of the above aren't a lot different from the OS X ones, maybe a bit larger (1.5-2 years vs. 1-1.5 years) and they have some clever naming system since 1995, but then so does Apple (Panther, Tiger, Leopard)
Re:Yes, but... (Score:4, Informative)
867MHz+ PPC.
Re: (Score:2)
But will it run patched on my Athlon 64x2? *ahem*
Re:Yes, but... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Hell Aero doesn't even come with every version of vista. But when you turn it off you basically get a sp3 version of windows XP. I'm not a fan of
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:SLOW (Score:4, Informative)
Short cycle? (Score:3, Insightful)
$100 every few years is much less difficult... (Score:3, Insightful)
It might be exhausting if you didn't feel like you were getting value for the money, but as it stands each release has had a few things that were very useful - and as you said, often with nice updates to system frameworks.
It's also helped that each release has felt faster, so buying a new copy of OSX also replaced a hardware boost I typically underwent with Windows updates.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Cocoa Regular Expressions (Score:4, Informative)