Places Rated, Skeptically 125
Reader nick_davison has some thoughts on the cost of living:
- Job A: $50,000/year, $10,000 annual rent.
- Job B: $100,000/year, $40,000 annual rent.
Relative to the cost of rent, Job A is phenomenal: You're making five times the cost of rent. Job B sucks: you're only earning 2.5 times rent. By this measure, job A is far and away the better option - by a factor of 2.
The thing is, once you've paid the varying rent, where do you spend the rest of your money? The decent spec new PC will be $2,000 in Rancho Santa Fe, Manhattan or BFI. The new $25,000 car will be $25,000 wherever you buy it. The big TV is the same price wherever. And, most important of all, the internet porn subscriptions run the same wherever you are too.
At that point, would you rather the job that's 5 times "cost of living" but only leaves you with $40,000 or the one that gives a sucky 2.5x but leaves you with $60,000 extra.
Next, on the simple level, let's look at that cost of living. Assuming you get on, buy and pay a mortgage off, in 20 years time the place with the poor salary relative to cost of living will leave you with a $500,000-$1,000,000 home vs. the $200,000-$250,000 place in the "better" area. Now, aged 40, you can up and move to the cheap place, selling your home, buying one of the nicest places in the cheap area and having a nice large nest egg lfet over to let you get to retire early. My in-laws have just done exactly that and apparently a lot of people in Texas are getting seriously pissed at all the Californians coming in, buying huge homes after selling up smaller places in CA and pushing up the Texan cost of living for people who're still paid no more.
And, finally, there's a reason rent and property are so expensive in some areas. Go to California and look out of the window. Rumor has it that other parts of the world have a condition called Seasonal Affective Disorder. Land is expensive in California because you never shovel snow, you rarely deal with crazy humidity, you rarely have the insane heat of Arizona, you rarely get mosquitoes the size of Volkswagens and you can sit on the beach on New Year's Day. In short, supply and demand means that when there's a crazy price, there's generally a great reason for it.
So, yes, some areas have high costs of living and lower salaries in relation to that cost. But I.T. is famous for the fact that we out earn most other professions and, once you get past earning about three times cost of average rent, everything else is gravy. Sure, you reach that point faster elsewhere — but once you do reach it (and you do in I.T.), you keep going even further when the numbers are bigger.
I've watched a lot of friends leave California because they're in other fields and it's just too expensive to live here if you don't earn well. But once you get to the kind of salaries I.T. tends to pay, the cost of rent becomes a relatively minimal part of the total cost of living a great life.
Job mobility (voluntary or involuntary) plays a big role, too: razvedchik writes
Similarly, reader osho_gg highlights the difference between a high salary in local terms and possibilities for advancement in the future:The biggest factor for me is to consider the possibility that if your job goes south (project ends, company folds, you don't like your boss), then you are stuck in the middle of nowhere. If you are relocating, you need to understand that at some point you will need to move again.
If you are used to an environment where you can lose your job today and have a new one by the end of the week, then you will be shocked when you spend 6 months unemployed.
One could go for one of these highest paying jobs in obscure locations where few companies are there. However, what is the growth potential in such locations? How many companies are there to work for in such locations that can pay high salaries for specialized skills? How many companies can pay more than 100k in places like Idaho Falls, ID? And, what happens if that company goes bust/one is laid off in such areas?
I dislike the high cost of living, traffic, unaffordability of houses etc. in places such as Silicon Valley. But there are lot more companies where one can work for with decent salary. One's chances of finding another job with close to maximum salary in one's field are lot higher there without having to move.
These are not just idle concerns. I have been asking many such questions to myself recently as I am not in high-tech area such as Silicon Valley. There are no easy answers to such questions. These become even more difficult once one has family, house etc. and has established roots in one place.
Several readers contributed endorsements for (and critiques of) locations around the United States and Canada:
"Go to Alberta," says reader Easy2RememberNick:If you want to know where high paying jobs are go to Alberta, Canada it's insane!
McDonald's workers are getting $15/hour, signing bonuses and $100 extra pay if you show up for all your shifts that week.
Housing is a bit of a problem, there's a booming business finding old homes, ripping them off their foundation and dragging them to Calgary.
Calgary is sprawling outward at an incredible rate, it's bigger in area than NY city.
It's all from oil, tar sands that is, Canada exports oil since we make more than we use. The U.S. gets about 10% of its oil from Canada and that will probably increase due to the U.S. public's of growing concern about "foreign oil."
People are going there by the thousands every day, it's crazy!
Reader NoHandleBars wasn't happy with a move from expensive California to Texas:
That comment drew some spirited disagreement from reader DaFallus:I once oversaw moving a firms's HQ and IT functions from Silicon Valley to San Antonio, TX because of the "math" some white collar genius put together like this Forbes nonsense. Sure, the "average" wage was one-half of what it was in Palo Alto, but because of the "quality" of local talent, we ended up hiring THREE TIMES as many staff to do the same amount of work. (For the math-challenged, that meant productivity sucked by 50%.) This wasn't just a drain on company resources, but on the few people who DID know their chops and had to hoist it in for the dullards. Those that made the move and saw the disaster had to in turn move completely out of the area to restore sanity to their careers. And the "icing on the cake" is that San Antonio is the only place I've stood hip deep in mud and had sand blow in my face. No thanky-thanky.
That's odd. Southwest Research Institute is based in San Antonio and although they primarily do a lot of government funded research they have a lot of talented people working for them. There are also a large number of smaller technical companies based in San Antonio. I have a number of friends who still live there working in various tech jobs.
San Antonio is a great place to live if you don't mind the slow pace of the city. It is one of the few cities I've lived in where you can do pretty well for yourself making around $30k. There is also a lot of cultural diversity, and I'm not just talking about the Hispanic influence.
I myself would have been happy to stay there after graduating but I just couldn't handle the slow pace that everyone lives at there. Also, the city itself is pretty poor and the roads are in horrible condition, there is a large gap between the rich all bundled away in Alamo Heights, Olmos Park, etc and the rest of the population. The crime there is also relatively high compared to what I've experienced while living in Houston and parts of Southern California. I've had my car broken into at least twice, witnessed a robbery at a gas station, and saw my friend get pistol whipped in the face and pulled out of the window of his car by would-be thieves. So, if you're thinking about moving there, buy a gun and stay in well-lit areas.
And reader kabocox says
This just tell's me that your firm doesn't know how to hire people. There are plenty of talented people in Texas. Heck, there are plenty of talented homegrown people in the Litte Rock, AR area. If your company can't find them, don't blame the area. I personally believe this applies to all of the US. There are plenty of trainable college grads in most major US cities. If you think the talent/gurus are much better in a tech hot spot, then you are willing to pay a premium for equal talent, not better talent. I'd think that most businesses that move to area's where the cost of living is lower end up hiring more people not to do the same amount of work. They hire more people because its cheaper and can get more done if the organization is properly run.
Tink2000 wrote in with comments on a few of the places picked out in the article, specifically Idaho Falls and the state of Alabama:
As someone who lived in Idaho Falls, Idaho, I strongly advise against it unless you think man-made falls are cool and love a few of the Temple at night, and like the idea of living in a city that has nothing around it for miles except scenery, where the tallest building is nine stories tall and it's a hotel.
I lived there for a year and pretty much loathed every moment of it. Of course, I came there from Atlanta, Georgia, so ... it was a bit of culture shock for me.
If you're going to live in Montgomery, you might as well consider Huntsville as well. Although it might be slightly harder to get a job there as everyone has some sort of technical background for the most part, it's a fairly agreeable city and not at all representative of the rest of Alabama.
Burdell wrote to agree with that analysis of Huntsville verus Montgomery:
As someone who lives in Huntsville (born and raised here) and also does some business in Montgomery, I'd have to agree. I'm not aware of a whole lot of tech jobs available in Montgomery; there's always demand in Huntsville (especially as another 7-12 thousand Army and contractor jobs come to Huntsville in the next few years). I don't know how the cost of living compares (Huntsville is a good bit lower than the Atlanta area though). The "metro" areas around Montgomery and Huntsville are about the same size IIRC, but Huntsville has a lot more "outside" influence (German rocket scientists in the 1950s and people from all over the world since).
Huntsville can be an odd place sometimes; mixing rocket scientists and rednecks has interesting results.
(See also everphilski's description of Huntsville as an interesting, affordable place to live.)
Reader Hoi Polloi isn't quite so happy with Huntsville:I had to travel to Huntsville a few times for NASA work. It got barren pretty quickly when you drove anywhere and it was brutally hot. People who lived there said it was too hot in the summer to do much of anything and the lack of any pedestrian features (like sidewalks) encouraged a lot of the waistlines I saw. One local even said he felt safer visiting Boston than being in downtown Huntsville after dark. Most of the jobs and companies down there are dependent on government which means that they are at the mercy of politics. The focus on the military also means there is little variety in the types of jobs available.
Not everyone's stab at rating places seemed entirely sincere: reader nick_davison decided to stick up for Iowa rather than the hellish coastal regions:
It's the coolest place ever. I'm in California and it's awful here. We have to walk up hill both ways and the hills are steeper here (the land's scrunched up by our daily earthquakes). And hot? Like you wouldn't believe. Don't believe that stuff about coastal areas being cooler — it's hell here. No one should ever move here because, high salaries or not, life's too expensive. Iowa's the place. Des Moines is just super awesome. Off you go!
Further afield, at least for American readers, several comments described the pros and cons of living in poorer parts of the world:
"Good morning, Vietnam!" writes wisebabo:
Reader owlman17 reports from Manila:Well, that's the time here as I post this. Anyway, it's very interesting living in Ho Chi Min (rated the #12th best major city in the world to live in and the best in Asia)*. I've got to say that, in a country that has a per capita GDP less than a tenth that of the United States a dollar goes a long way.
The key is how to make it. If you can make it by working for a major foreign corporation here (read: oil company) and get a Western salary, you will live like a king. Unfortunately local opportunities to make that kind of money are otherwise almost nil. Even if you can speak Vietnamese you will find that even a very high salary here (doing a job like coding) in not much relative to the U.S. Also you may find yourself thought of being overqualified; I do very high end media and some people here told me they were afraid to contact me after seeing my CV because they thought I'd charge a fortune.
While you can make a good living here teaching English I doubt that would appeal to the skilled professionals that make up Slashdot's readers. No, the best job is one in which you can work "at the end of a wire," that is live here but work for some U.S. company via the internet. The internet infrastructure is just sufficient to do that (which is one reason why I can't live in Cambodia). Internet telephony here is good (at least from my location). If your job is portable so you don't have to physically see your clients more than once or twice a year then this might "work" for you!
the way, the cost of living here is not going to be one-tenth that of the U.S. unless you live like a native. Instead if you insist on all the perks of the U.S. it's probably about half the U.S. cost of living (more if you want a car!). On the other hand, wealth is relative; compared to the natives you WILL be very rich and will be treated as such. That has its own perks. ;)
This recent study (which, to my traveled eyes cannot possibly be true) was based on a bunch of factors including how much (or little) the average person "impacted the environment." Since Vietnamese people are still very poor they don't impact the environment very much which led to a inflated score. Still Ho Chi Minh City has its charms; zero violent crime (it's a police state), pace of life (you can actually meet people and develop friendships), scale of the city (more like one giant neighborhood than a forest of skyscrapers). But act soon, things are changing fast and in 5 years it'll be unrecognizable.
Not everything's rosy on distant shores, though; phantomfive briefly describes life in El Salvador, and adds adds a few caveats about life in Central America, including a fairly tough psychological challenge:In other third world countries where these tech jobs are being outsourced to, $USD400-$600/month is very high. I live in Manila, and the minimum wage is roughly less than $USD 6.00 daily. Those who work in outsourced tech-support call centers make $300 monthly and they're very happy about it. I had a short web-design stint making about $450 monthly and I was really really happy about it, to say the least. Single people here could live like kings on that.
[...] I would like to mention, COCKROACHES FLY!!!! I just tell you that to lessen the shock that we all feel when we see one of those monstrosities flying straight at us. They don't fly well, but the shock of seeing that the first time is something that can give you nightmares. And don't drink the water. Get bottled water from a reliable company. You might even want to test your bottled water. I am serious with this one, get bottled water. For a while I was purifying my water with chlorine, then I found out that the town water had LEAD in it, and I was drinking lead. I found out that no one in that town drank the water. So boiling water and stuff isn't good enough. Get the bottled water. Also, the two most important things that will keep you from getting mugged: learn to pay attention to your surroundings, what is going on, etc; and secondly, learn to look in someone's eyes and understand what he is feeling/thinking.
Many thanks to the readers (especially those quoted above) whose comments informed this discussion.
Re:to block this waste of space (Score:1)
Re:Slashdot on it's deathbed? (Score:2)
A while back I abandoned
Sure the ol' /. has some problems, but it's actually been much better recently (I ass
Re:to block this waste of space (Score:2)
Re:to block this waste of space (Score:5, Funny)
If only slashdot had some sort of moderation system...
Re: (Score:2)
Re:To bad... (Score:1)
Re:To bad... (Score:2)
Last year my assessed value increased by 8%, but since the average was 11%, I actually ended up paying a smaller percentage
Re:To bad... (Score:3, Informative)
Now my understanding of California is that your taxes are lo
Re:To bad... (Score:2)
Re:To bad... (Score:2)
Re:To bad... (Score:4, Informative)
So, other people buying property at inflated values doesn't affect your property taxes... until you want to move two blocks down the road, at which point your taxes triple....
Re:To bad... (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re:To bad... (Score:2)
Or maybe they like the fact that if they grow up there, they can then buy a house there, rather than having to move away from where they grew up because the yuppies have moved in and driven up the prices.
Re:To bad... (Score:2)
Re:Rent / Income (Score:3, Insightful)
barely over 12K a year and I have 5 acres, a three car garage, huge workshop, barn and a huge two story house...yep they can keep that california jazz..
Re:Rent / Income (Score:2)
Same here in Tucson. I have a 2100 sq ft second home that we rent to a family from San Diego (who couldn't afford to stay in San Diego, despite making $65k/year).
But Tucson has had the largest house boom in the US in the past 2 years. My primary residence has more than doubled in price since I bought it 4 years ago.
Re:Rent / Income (Score:2)
Re:Rent / Income (Score:2, Informative)
More than rent is higher, look at something as simple as car insurance. It might cost $50 a month if you live in Arkansas, but it could be $350 a month if you live in Boston or Los Angeles. Let's compare utilities as well.
Re:Rent / Income (Score:2)
Car insurance in Boston is a bit of an oddity; The prices are state regulated, so you pay less for insurance in Boston than you would just about anywhere else. I moved from rural New York to metro Boston about a year ago and my insurance premium dropped by 60%. Had I moved from metro NY t
VA (Score:1)
http://www.thesecondchancemovie.com/_site/mediapla yer/index.php?id=9f72b0fbe5bde711a0696cac5b339a5e [thesecondchancemovie.com]
http://www.lynchburgva.gov/ [lynchburgva.gov]
Re:VA (Score:1)
There's gray area too (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm sure many other cities like Minneapolis/St. Paul, Cleveland, Pittsburg, etc are similar in that they have small communities around them that give you all the benefits of inexpensive living combined with the benefits of city life within 30 minutes.
Those types of small towns are the ones to focus on if you're looking to relocate. How many people really relocate JUST to relocate anyway? Don't you normally move to a specific job or family?
Re:There's gray area too (Score:2)
Wisconsin is a little low on the tech/engineering type jobs though.
Re:There's gray area too (Score:1)
I'm done with school. There are a few tech jobs in that area, but they certainly don't pay as well as those in the Silicon Valley. I worked at Cray for 2.5 years, and my dad has worked there since I was born. Cray is an incredi
Surrounding NYC (Score:2)
Re:Surrounding NYC (Score:2)
Re:Surrounding NYC (Score:2)
That said, northern NJ is actually pretty nice. I grew up in a small suburb out there and there was lots of greenery, tons of parks, very little in the way of crime, and it was something like a 20 minute commute into the city without traffic. Cheaper than similar accomodations in the city itself, too, although still expensive. Of course, now
Re:Surrounding NYC (Score:1)
Good point. I'm back in northern Jersey after being away for about 12 years and the sprawl is quite a lot to take in.
I'm living in the small town bordering the small town I grew up in and the changes are incredible. Or maybe scary is a better way of putting it.
Forest land is disappearing. Watershed and park land is being built right up against. Nothing like hiking with a view of a big McMansion development.
I think the worst though is that developers have actually ground down the tops of some of the sm
Why you're better off with a higher sallary: (Score:2)
Job A: $50,000/year, $10,000 annual rent.
Job B: $100,000/year, $40,000 annual rent.
So, Product X, where X is a car, xbox360, etc., costs the same in both locations. In Job A, you have to work longer to be able to buy X, despite things like rent.
Also, despite rent, you net 60K a year from Job B vs 40K a year from Job A.
Also, the weather is always nicer in the bay area, but that doesn't mean we want you moving here and further increasing the population
Re:Why you're better off with a higher sallary: (Score:2)
I'd be more inclined to believe you if you'd said, say, $50k versus $75k. But that defeats your point, since the cheaper place wins.
Plus, you aren't taking into account ot
Re:Why you're better off with a higher sallary: (Score:2)
Re:Why you're better off with a higher sallary: (Score:4, Funny)
Given this is Slashdot, my guess is it's that place... what's it called... oh yeah, "Parent's Basement".
Re:Why you're better off with a higher sallary: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Why you're better off with a higher sallary: (Score:2)
As far as other non-real estate based cost of living expenses... comparing the greater Boston are where I live, with rural upstate New York, middle of South Carolina where family lives and th
Does X cost the same? (Score:2)
My gut instinct is that the market works pretty well to neutralize any easy ability to arbitrage the higher wage regions
Re:Why you're better off with a higher sallary: (Score:2)
Re:Why you're better off with a higher sallary: (Score:3, Informative)
Job A: $50,000/year, $10,000 annual rent.
Job B: $100,000/year, $40,000 annual rent.
So, Product X, where X is a car, xbox360, etc., costs the same in both locations. In Job A, you have to work longer to be able to buy X, despite things like rent.
Also, despite rent, you net 60K a year from Job B vs 40K a year from Job A.
Not true. First, salaries are not twice as much in the bay area as other places. You might make 80K in the bay area, for the same job that pays 70K in Portland, or 60K in Boise
Re:Why you're better off with a higher sallary: (Score:2)
Yeah, I remember that driving through Oregon I was not able to pump my own gas. What is the reason for that? Is pumping one's own gas in Oregon decidedly more dangerous than in any other location in the United States?
Re:Why you're better off with a higher sallary: (Score:1)
New Jersey passed the law making it illegal to pump your own gas in 1949. At the time, legislators felt it was too dangerous to have untrained people dispensing such a flammable liquid. - http://ask.yahoo.com/20040715.html [yahoo.com]
ORS480.315
1) The dispensing of Class 1 flammable liquids by dispensers properly trained in appropriate safety procedures reduces fire hazards directly associated with the dispensing of Class 1 flammable liquids.
7) Exposu
Re:Why you're better off with a higher sallary: (Score:2)
Re:Why you're better off with a higher sallary: (Score:2, Interesting)
Although this simplistic analysis is true, one must keep in mind that in Job A, your extra money goes a lot further than with Job B. When other variable expenses, such as food,
Re:Why you're better off with a higher sallary: (Score:2)
Re:Why you're better off with a higher sallary: (Score:2)
Of course, I'm also opposed to mandatory insurance. If the state is going to require insurance, the state should have to provide said insurance. It's criminal to require me to give money to a private insurance company to guarantee their profits.
Re:Why you're better off with a higher sallary: (Score:2)
What's wrong with your math (Score:3, Insightful)
How much more? Well, that depends. Are you married or single? Kids? Do you own your home? Do you give to charity? Way too many variables to give a simple answer.
But the simple fact that the federal income tax is not a flat tax blows the parent's math out of the water.
Oh, yeah. "The weather is always nicer in the bay area"? Really? Quoting Mark Twain: "The
Re:What's wrong with your math (Score:2)
As we like to say around here, if you don't like the weather, drive a bit. On extreme days, we can sometimes have a 40 degree temperature spread within the area. (Usually with less than 60 miles between the highs and lows.) The area has tons of microclimates.
Re:What's wrong with your math (Score:2)
All told, my $100k+ salary drops down to about $55k in taxable salary.
And, as others have said, when it comes time to retire, my 401(k) will be quite lar
Re:What's wrong with your math (Score:2)
This really is a misnomer; the Bay Area is 5% San Francisco, and 95% everywhere else. The everywhere else is where the weather really shines. The peninsula in particular has fantastic weather nearly year round. I moved the the central CA valley, and as I sit in 100 degree weather, I really miss the 80 degree summer days in the Bay.
Willie
Re:Why you're better off with a higher salary: (Score:1)
Job A: $50,000/year, $10,000 annual rent.
Job B: $100,000/year, $40,000 annual rent.
Should be more like:
Given:
Job A: $50,000/year, $10,000 annual motgage.
Job B: $100,000/year, $36,000 annual rent.
Given Job A only gives you $40,000/yr vs. $60,000 with Job B.
Assuming you spend the remainder of your salary with 5% sales tax at job A you can spend $38,000 with 8.5% (Bay Area Taxes) [smartvoter.org] taxes at job B you can only spend $54,900.
With Job A you have utility costs of $1,000/year and job B has costs of $
Somebody forgot Uncle Sam (Score:2)
OF coursem you do have the home-value nest egg. A
...and some forgot state income taxes... (Score:2)
I live neither in the boonies nor in a big city.
I live in Bradenton, pop. 60,000, a 1-mile walk from
downtown, a 3-mile bike or car ride from a mall, 30
feet from the nearest art/crafts gallery (my wife's),
and 25 feet from my office.
Nearest launch ramp for my little sailboat: 1.5 miles
Nearest salt water launch ramp: 7.3 miles
Nearest award-winning little theater: 1 mile
Nearest bar:
Nearest live music coffeehouse:
Nearest more-or-less major mus
one idea... (Score:1)
2. Move to Idaho Falls
3. Buy rifle or fishing pole
4. Become Mormon (optional)
5. ?
6. Profit!
Leaving CA isn't as scary as you'd think. (Score:2, Informative)
I make more than I did when I lived in CA. So instead of that theoretical 40/60 quoted above, when I moved it tipped in the other way.
I was surprised to not see any Colorado cities on that list. You can make a very respectable living in IT out here, the cost of living is lower than CA by a longshot, life is at a much more reasonable pace...oh..and we have JOBS.
If you have a brain, you can get a job in Den
Re:Leaving CA isn't as scary as you'd think. (Score:2)
Quote from a friend of mine who lives out there while I was visiting:
Oh, and don't forget the snow. And the THUNDERSTORMS IN THE MIDDLE OF JULY (wtf?!).
But I never laughed so hard as I did when I saw the bathrooms at Denver Int'l double as tornado shelters.
It's one thing to say that there are good jobs, a lower cost of living, etc (and hey, De
Re:Leaving CA isn't as scary as you'd think. (Score:1)
And ohno, thunderstorms!
Seriously, I missed having, you know, WEATHER.
72 and sunny gets freaking OLD after six years. Especially when you know that you'd be dropping a half mil on a condo because it's 72 and sunny all the time.
Re:Leaving CA isn't as scary as you'd think. (Score:2)
Colorado Springs, but we were in Denver.
Dude, I like thunderstorms as much as the next guy, but it's just weird when you're out in shorts on a sunny July day and then out of nowhere... Thunderstorm. I feel like scolding those clouds like I would a small child: "Look, man, there is an appropriate time and place...!". Then I would beat the clouds.
I know of nowhere else where
Re:Leaving CA isn't as scary as you'd think. (Score:2)
Hey, at least storms in the center of the country move in predictable patterns. When I lived in Minneapolis, we knew the day before that a front was cruising in from the Dakotas.
Here in Atlanta you don't
Re:Leaving CA isn't as scary as you'd think. (Score:2)
Please, stay in California.
Re:Leaving CA isn't as scary as you'd think. (Score:2)
Re:Leaving CA isn't as scary as you'd think. (Score:4, Interesting)
1) Buy a cheaper house in Gilroy or Tracy and commute 1.5 hours to Sunnyvale each way to and from work.
2) Roll the dice, take a job in another state, and hope I like it.
To my surprise, I found positions that paid more than what I was making in California elsewhere in the country where the cost of living was considerably less. The smaller cities don't have the same talent pool to pull from when it comes to local IT professionals, so I think they are willing to dish out a bit more to lure in a good experienced candidate. For example, the position I took in North Carolina (Research Triangle Park) offered me a 20% raise and paid all my relocation expenses. I figured what the hell and left the state. After two years, I found another position in Colorado that offered 10% more than what I was making in North Carolina plus total relocation expenses. I've been here in Colorado Springs (less than 1 million population) for 4 years and can't believe how much it sucked working in Silicon Valley.
I travel back about 2x a years on business and visit college friends who are still living with roommates in apartments. Just seems like time stands still there. I ask them why they still in the area and their argument is "you can't make this kind of money elsewhere in the country in an IT position." I tell them you can't look at the salary number by itself. You have to compare it to cost of living and quality of life for gods sake. The difference between salaries in other places compared to California are not all the much different. He is paying $2200 for rent. I tell him he can buy a house 3x the size of his apartment with a mortgage payment $1000 less than his rent. Not only is he paying $12K/year less in "rent" but he gets to write-off the interest on the home (not to mention home appreciation). That's like another $6K. Car insurance, gas, registration are all much cheaper. That's like another $2000 a year difference. Add it all up and your cost of living makes a difference of about $20K/year. Salaries here in Colorado don't differ by that much compared to what you can make in a comparable position in California.
Re:Leaving CA isn't as scary as you'd think. (Score:1)
But now, unless someone like Google hired me on, I'd not go.
If I were to relocate again, I'd probably look at the Portland area a little more.
Shh... (Score:1)
Here are some quick facts about Colorado for anyone considering moving here:
Re:Shh... (Score:1)
Re:Leaving CA isn't as scary as you'd think. (Score:1)
I'll take those high-tech cowboys any day. At least I know they're keeping it real.
Re:Leaving CA isn't as scary as you'd think. (Score:2)
Re:Leaving CA isn't as scary as you'd think. (Score:2)
ugh. we made the move from boston to colorado a few years ago, and are itching to return return to a coast. Sure, the cost of living is lower (but housing is damned expensive), there are jobs, and there's less congestion. BUT it's like living on the moon -- denver/boulder are a joke, the locals are cowboys trying to be high-tech, and the weather sucks. bad. The talent pool is extremely limited for what I do, so I'm in high demand, but who cares, I'd rather have a life than live like this.
Okay, I've gotta
Re:Leaving CA isn't as scary as you'd think. (Score:2)
It tries to do suburbs but can't do it right. Go to CT, ME, NH for some real ni
California transplants (Score:2)
It's mostly because they bring their 'fruits and nuts' politics along with them.
Re:California transplants (Score:2)
Taxes? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Taxes? (Score:2, Informative)
While that's great for keeping money in my pocket in the short-term, I've been disaoppinted with the lack of state spending on basic needs
Re:Taxes? (Score:1)
The salary for IT jobs is not that great either. My first job out of college I started out making $40k; I have friends
Taxes should not be considered in isolation. (Score:5, Informative)
(This is why poor people are generally screwed with sales taxes, as they spend a much higher percentage of their income just to keep going, and therefore get taxed more heavily. Rich people generally get screwed with State taxes, as they get taxed even on the income they're saving. Being your typical left-leaning Brit, I tend to take the line that the rich can afford to get screwed a little.)
However, we've only factored in the costs here. What about the benefits? A State that has more money to play with can have better roads (so you spend LESS on expensive car maintenance), can have better schools and Universities (so you're not limited to sending the kids to some fundamentalist haven so that they're at least capable of adding correctly), can have decent public transport (saving you gas money and usually time), and can have some excellent public museums, public art galleries, etc, which gets you direct access to stuff only the world's megarich can even think of affording.
So, if taxes are spent by Government wisely (yeah, like that happens!), the net cost can end up being lower than the hidden and not-so-hidden costs of living in areas with lower taxes or no taxes at all. This does, however, require wisdom. High taxes that don't benefit anyone at all are simply a drain on the pocket.
(And, yes, I deliberately said anyone, not just you. If high taxes produce a good schooling environment, then it doesn't matter if it doesn't benefit you directly. Better educated kids will produce a better quality workforce. What does it matter if you're a richly-paid genius, if the rest of the company can't figure its way out of a paper bag and goes under? The brighter your co-workers, the more profitable the company and so the better your job security. Oh, and the better your pay.)
So, to correctly factor in the REAL cost of the taxes, you must factor in the real cost of what those taxes buy you, both directly and indirectly. Let's say your income is I, the total direct tax over the same time is T1, the total average indirect tax is T2, the total direct benefit to you because of superior infrastructure and/or superior facilities is B1, and the total indirect benefit is B2, then your actual salary S is calculated as follows: S = I + B1 + B2 - T1 - T2.
B1 and T2 are extremely hard to calculate. B2 is virtually impossible to know. However, without knowing those values, you cannot say how the real cost of living compares to your effective salary.
Is this the end of it? Uhh, no. Each State, each county, has an effective rate of inflation which is dictated by the change in the price of those goods that have a floating value across the country. Gasoline is an example of something subject to local inflation. When businesses move in, there are more people with disposable income, so prices will rise to what the market will bear and local inflation goes up. When businesses move out, there are fewer people buying, so to conserve profit margins prices must rise and local inflation goes up.
This is why you do not want to be in an area that is undergoing a boom OR a bust. It's expensive. You want an area that has a fairly stable economy and is growing at a fairly steady, gentle pace. How steady and gentle? Well, it needs to grow faster than the population, but not by very much.
You also want an area with superb social welfare. No, I don't mean people get paid for doing nothing - that's what politicians are for. I mean you want to ensure that those who are unemployed are retrained and th
Re:Taxes? (Score:4, Interesting)
Not to mention that, despite severe rises in the past few years, real estate prices are much lower than those for our neighbors to the west in the People's Republic.
Which may explain the significant stream of both small and large businesses escaping across the border to Las Vegas or Reno-Tahoe. In fact, there are a number of small s/w outfits just across the border from CA in the pleasant surrounds of Lake Tahoe. And that short trip from CA to NV usually comes with a massive decrease in insurance costs.
And from Northern NV, I can be in SillyCon Valley with a pleasant drive of a few hours (well, at least up to SacraMoscow).
As someone who lived in LA, CA for many years, and has done biz in SillyCon Valley, I can't imagine why people still consider the Bay Area so damn great. Since it costs the same, but the weather and lifestyle in SoCal is much better, why not get a life while you work ?
Other things to consider:
wrt "what happens when you lose your job", keep in mind that being unemployed in Reno-Tahoe for 6 months - esp during the winter - is often something people look forward to!. Plus the savings from living outside of SillyCon usually mean a 6 to 12 month vacation is actually affordable/survivable. If you make US$120K/year in SillyCon, but lose your job, you damn well better start humping for a new job. If you make US$75K/year in NV and lose your job, you can usually wait until ski season is over.
I guess its a matter of choice: "live to work" vs. "work to live".
In closing: The FOX channel here in Reno is just a feed from the Bay Area. So when I get up in the morning, I turn on the news on FOX...and just laugh and laugh..and laugh!.
On Internet porn subscriptions... (Score:1)
The problem with California.... (Score:5, Informative)
Prop 13 limits property taxes to 1%/yr. of the assessed value, and limits reassessment to sale or major renovation. My parents are paying 1% of the value of their house as assessed in 1978. Ok.. So what, right? Voter revolt and all that... Kali has income tax, and a geek salary will loose 10% for that and another 1% for a nice car registration... But... Those go to the state. Property taxes fund the local schools and municipalities.
The net effect is that cities and towns in California are hostile to housing. They get a bigger take via sales taxes from strip malls and retail operations. Housing demands services that cost money. This hostillity is obvious when you look at permit fees for new houses. One city I'm familiar with slaps almost $100,000 worth of planning & permit fees on a new single family home. That in turn means that every existing house with a valid occupancy permit is worth $100k in that city, no matter what kind of shape it's in or what kind of location its in. That's why housing is so expensive. You're just paying the city all the taxes up front, while the banks laugh at you paying them APR+% on the taxes. You probably thought it was all those green belts surrounding Silicon Valley, and "smart growth". Nope. Those are just the political tools used to refine the system. The tree huggers are played like fiddles out there. They're just a means to an end. It's the perfect "screw you, I got mine" system too. Utterly unrepairable. No existing homeowner is going to willingly give up their tax protection or their obscene capitals gains. Voting to end prop 13 will never happen. The housing market has to implode first.
I made the move to Texas some time ago... Texas has no income taxes, and steep property taxes. So steep that most Californians show up here thinking they can plow all their equity take into their new house, and have a for-real mansion on acreage. And then they find out what the property taxes will be! The result... You can still buy a house 5 minutes from Dell HQ in Round Rock for just a bit above $100k. Not much of a house mind you... But 3bd/2ba on 1/4 acre, and that's enough for most. One of the local high schools has a jumbotron screen on their football field. Yep... I'm hearing tax revolt noises.
Re:The problem with California.... (Score:2)
Re:The problem with California.... (Score:2)
The housing market has to implode first.
5.. 4.. 3..
Re:The problem with California.... (Score:1)
Depends on the life you want (Score:1)
Re:Just to express a different viewpoint... (Score:2)
One man gathers what another man spills (Score:2)
You've prolly never been to california before..... (Score:1)
Montgomery (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re: Relocating company to San Antonio... (Score:1)
Sorry but it's still bullshit from Bug Eye Forbes (Score:2, Flamebait)
This is a typical Forbes "Isn't it great to find a place that pays third world wages in the US!!!" column.
Herd mentality (Score:2)
Many of the places people want to live is the same way. I live in a particular area of town where everyone want to live, so prices are very high. OTOH, there is a bunch of land not far from where I live that is completely undeveloped, and has remained so for
Boulder??? (Score:1)
When I saw the red dot on the map, I thought they were referring to Fort Collins, as it was named the Number 1 city to live in under 50K population. I almost spat coffee on my monitor when I read 'BOULDER'.
Re:HELP PLEASE. Advice on technique or materials p (Score:2)
Living in a rich nataion you could afford to get a Butt Wand. http://www.poopreport.com/Consumer/Content/Bottom