Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: The fear machine has been in overdrive (Score 1) 22

The claim assumes that "traditional farming" means low-yield subsistence,
but that assumption is historically and empirically false.

Please don't put words in my mouth.

You should not set policy according to Masanobu Fukuoka's techniques, as they do not and have not scaled. Reproducing his results has been very inconsistent. It turns out the land you grow on matters a lot with these techniques and other permaculture techniques.

The other issue with traditional farming and permaculture is that we already broke things. We have invasive species everywhere and certain crops are incredibly labor intensive without pesticides or GMOs. This is do to the difference in the connectedness of the 20th and 21st century world versus previous centuries.

Modern industrial agriculture maximizes yield per unit of labor and capital,
not yield per unit of land or per unit of energy.

An amusing claim. Not true of course. All of those factor into a modern business operation with different weights, none of them zero.

If the constraint is land area alone, agroecological and natural farming
methods have repeatedly shown yields per acre comparable to industrial
systems

Again, inconsistent results. An inability to reproduce the results throughout the world indicate an immature of the process. There's something missing in the technique. Until that is achieved we can't set policy. If we were to see wide spread usage where it was working most of the time, then sure, let's kill off industrialized farming because this is way simpler and cheaper to do and does less harm.

Historically, famine correlates far more with land enclosure, coercive labor
systems, and distribution failures than with absolute biological yield limits.

Difficult to say how famine works in an era where most of the industrial world's population lives in cities that must have food shipped in every day of the year. So I'd hesitate to predict the future based on past results alone.

Comment Re: The fear machine has been in overdrive (Score 1) 22

Certainly I doubt it's anywhere remotely as bad for plants as modern industrial agriculture.

Modern industrial agriculture feeds the world. You're not going to be able to sustain the likely peak population on traditional farming alone. Of course there is always room to improve and reduce the harm and increase the health. Which is why we also cannot allow profits alone to decide everything in the industry.
We're aware of the problems of monocrops, but that practice is slowly on the decline. And there is more consumer awareness of the ethics in the practice of concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) and other animal welfare issues, and the practice is regulated or outlawed in some countries. GMOs are on the rise, and will likely dominate the industry in the future. GMOs can be a good thing if done carefully, in a regulated, and open manner. And it can be a human caused natural disaster if done without proper safety controls and protocols.

Comment Re:bit late to start working on your fallout shelt (Score 1) 25

I realize it's the TV series tie-in (I haven't watched it, play the original games a lot), but I thought it might bring some levity to take the idea of needing a literal fallout shelter in the current political chaos.

As for the wealthy. Everything is going according to plan. If the housing market collapses then the people who still own property will be renting it to others. We already have some tech companies building company housing that is bundled with your employment contract. The kind of dystopia that you find in cyberpunk novels is apparently being treated as a business strategy.

Kings managed to be surrounded by servants that didn't immediately slit throat the first time they went to sleep. So it is possible to maintain feudalism throughout generations without the peasants revolting. It's usually the other lords that scheme to kill you. While that's how it worked in the past, people's psychology haven't changed much and it should still hold.

For example, we already know you can hire losers and give them authority and weapons and they will be extremely loyal. We see this in private security that is more than a simple contract service to walk around your business's parking lot. And of course we see this loyalty from the handful of people who could manage to pass ICE's fairly low entry qualifications. For some felons and drug addicts, it's been the only way they could legally hold a firearm again.

Comment Re:Mahjong (Score 1) 57

9x9 and 13x13 are fun, I don't have the attention span for full Go.

there's always Gomoku, which I guess you can play using a Go set, but I've only ever played it on paper like dots and boxes.

Slashdot Top Deals

You are always doing something marginal when the boss drops by your desk.

Working...