Google Working To Make 'iPod/iTunes for Books'

nettamere writes to mention an initiative by Google to take the library online. The end result of the Google Book Search, the company hopes to see a future where they are not merely referring customers to Amazon, but instead offering them the ability to download books directly. According to the Times Online, Google hopes to 'do for books what the iPod did for music.' From the article: "One of Google's partners, Evan Schnittman of Oxford University Press, said he foresaw a number of categories becoming popular downloads: 'Do you really want to go on holiday carrying four novels and a guide book?' The book initiative would be part of Google's Book Search service and its partnership with publishers, which will make books searchable online with publishers' approval. At present, only a sample of each book is available online."

Something more

Today's tech just makes for a not very pleasing alternative to a paper-based book. And who want a book that withholds its content because the battery has gone dead? I am glad Google is working to digitize books that have not yet been digitized. And more

Re:

I dunno, maybe if they display it with electronic paper, which doesn't use energy except to change the screen. Could even attach some photovoltaic cells and get power from your reading lamp.

Re:

But the screen needs to be great (since it is taking the place of a book, which can have a crisp sheet of perfectly white paper as its page base). And the text exceptional. How do they make a super-high resolution screen (to match or exceed the 300+ x 300

Re:

Well it doesn't have to be cheap because you are only buying it once while you will be (realistically) downloading text or pdf files from the internets.

Would you take it with you to the bathroom? Would you mind reading in bed knowing that you might fall a

The hardware is there, just

There are some quite capable eBook readers on the market, lead by the Sony Reader and the iRex iLiad. Both feature an e-ink screen which uses a matrix of charged dark and light particles at a resolution of around 160 dpi to represent a paper page.

There is no backlight and power is only consumed when the black/white charges are flipped to rebuild the page. The Sony Reader is rated at about 7000 page turns before a battery recharge is necessary. It can be happily left on without worrying about the battery going flat, and owners report in excess of months between charges.

Without a fluorescent backlight, the screen is far easier on the eyes than reading on a LCD screen, provided the ambient light in the room is good. The screen readability is roughly equivalent to a pulp paperback novel. (The texture is smoother but the white is not pure white, rather a very light gray.)

The main limitations are getting the content onto them. The Sony Reader accepts text, RTF, PDF and Sony's own proprietary eBook format, which is what books bought from the Sony Connect store are supplied in (DRM protected).

RTF is generally accepted as the best form to obtain and create books in, as PDF has to be specifically make to the 600x800 screen resolution (larger PDFs scale poorly) and is slower for the device to render.

Buying books from the Sony Connect store is acceptable in theory, but in practice the range is somewhat limited to recent bestsellers and popular classics, and the price is only discounted around 20% from a pulped tree equivalent (for something that is less tangible and less shareable).

Books from the Gutenberg project and other sources can be freely downloaded and transferred as text (plain) or RTF (moderately formatted) although these of course are classic, out of copyright works. More modern books, for which a legitimate or illicit PDF or CHM has been obtained (eg, O'Reilly manuals) can be converted from their original form into RTF, but the process is somewhat tedious and more work than the drag-and-drop method of say transferring a downloaded MP3.

(This is also not helped by poor Sony Connect software (intended to be iTunes for eBooks, and clearly UI inspired by it), which is slow and poorly designed.)

Still, with the Sony Reader and similar devices accepting up to 4GB SD cards, able to store a library of many thousands of books in a quite readable format which is slimmer than a potboiler novel, the hardware certainly shows promise. This is a first generation line of products, so inevitably it will improve for the next rev.

Filling them is the hard part, which is where Google could help.

Re:The hardware is there, just

*As a device*, I love my Sony Reader. When I can find a good copy of a good book in a format that works with the software, it's a very pleasant experience (and yes, I do bring it into the bathroom, though not into the tub - but then I would never bring a paperback into the tub, either). Unfortunately, the Connect software is so bad that it makes it pretty damned hard to get the kind of use out of it I would prefer. The Connect bookstore is atrocious: I'd say as much as 10% of the books are mis-categorized (since when is St. Augustine's *City of God* "Contemporary Fiction?"), the selection is terrible (10,000 books? That's about the size of a little airport bookstore - and like the airport bookstore, there are multiple copies of some books), the interface is frustrating (nothing like having two scroll bars, and why do ebookstores insist on listing only 10 books per page - well, probably so it will seem like they have a bigger selection), and the quality is very uneven. Converting anything other than an RTF is irritating - for text, Connect can't figure out when it should run lines together and when it should preserve line breaks, and it doesn't ask, and PDFs are simply scaled rather than being reflowed, so most of my PDFs (like O'Reilly books) aren't readable unless I go through a laborious cut-and-paste process or find some software of dubious legality to decrypt them). There's no mechanism for updating fonts (sure, I could hack into the machine, which runs a Linux, and add them myself, but I don't have time for that), and I need to keep a Windows VM for the Connect software (which looks so bad it might as well have been written in Swing and at least been cross-platform). Finally, there's no commercially available software for formatting your own books, except for a Japanese program sold by Canon for the Librie and a bunch of mediocre freeware that never quite does a good enough job.

Re:

I'm a tried-and-true eBook fan. I was happily using a Rocket eBook for six or seven years for almost all of my pleasure reading - 14+ hours of battery life usually got me through at least a week long vacation... no trying to read in the dark using a headl

Misleading: TFA not about new HW

Somewhat misleading: TFA is not about any new hardware, just that Google is scanning in books to make them avialable online. Great, but hardly anything new here.

Re:

Given the rumours coming out of Cupertino, I suspect Apple is making iTunes to be the "iTunes for books". Maybe they'll tell all when a widescreen ipod comes out.

Guide books?

'Do you really want to go on holiday carrying four novels and a guide book?'

Yes, I'd much rather have a guide book in my hand that screams "I'm not from here" than a digital version that could run out of batteries leaving me stranded and lost or, worse yet, the look of "I'm not from here" (generally obvious for tourists, anyways) and focusing all of my attention on an expensive looking toy, which is likely to draw in more problems.

I'll take a good old guide book any day, thanks. The novels, however, we can talk about.

Re:

I would prefer neither. I don't like guide books and I don't really like listening to audiobooks. I just got an audiobook as a present and I really can't stand it at all. For some reason I cannot get into the book while it's playing in the car (or anywh

Re:

If you're worried about people mugging you for a couple hundred dollars worth of electronic equipment I'd suggest leaving that camera back at the hotel as well.

And as for running out of batteries, the same thing could happen to your cellphone but I'm be

Re:

They do allow 3rd party development, much as you can buy 3rd party games for your 5G iPod. It just won't be an open platform, so only regulated 3rd party apps will be allowed (Probably through an iTunes-like interface for purchasing them).

Re:Guide books?

Tourists worry too much. This is why you print "don't panic" in large, friendly letters on digital guide books.

I call bullshit!

From the summary:

Do you really want to go on holiday carrying four novels and a guide book

I'd rather have a book and not have to worry about internet connectivity, worrying about dropping a laptop or other reader into the bathtub or a pool or a sidewalk, battery life, rain, leaving it behind at a restaurant, getting it stolen, and "sorry, you can't take that in here".

Books "just work" - and if you lose it, you only have the cost of a paperback.

And no, I don't want to read a book on my cellphone, either, even though I watch 3gp ripped episodes of The Simpsons on it when I have to kill some time.

Re:I call bullshit!

I lost my Munkres [amazon.com] and it cost me $100 to replace it.

Books don't just work. Books don't work where there is no light - e.g. inside a car.

You can store the contents of the entire book in flash memory and not have to worry about internet connectivity. Water related problems also occur with paper books. You can buy AA or AAA batteries almost anywhere. If worst comes to worst, there's always the hand crank. Plus, these new readers don't need power to maintain a page on the display - just to change them or other functions.

The only downside I see is that it seems it's more straining on the eye.

hardware is the problem

Until there is decent hardware to read books on, projects like this aren't going anywhere beyond niche markets.

I love books, I own a few thousand of them and buy new ones every few months. I don't own a single ebook and I doubt I ever will because I've yet to see an ebook reader that was superior to an actual book. The only benefit to ebook readers over physical books are portability and storage capacity. The problem with this is that neither of these are big problems with physical books - if I'm going on a long trip it's not a big deal to bring even a few full sized hardbacks along to read. I don't need to have a library of books on my person at any time, the most books I've ever needed to bring with me anywhere at one time (since high school) was 4, and that was to read on a flight to the other side of the planet. I don't often fly to the other side of the planet.

Re:hardware is the problem

I really have to disagree with you there and I am sure I am not the only one. Personally the only books I prefer in print is either reference books or those that use a lot of pictures. Any novels that I buy I first look for the ebook version. There are a few reasons why:

1. I don't need to disturb my wife's sleep with a lamp.
2. I can adjust the type size to suit me.
3. I can read a lot faster on the devices.
4. I predominately read during the evening and the backlight makes things far easier to read and a lot more comfortable since I am not constantly adjusting to book for the best lighting as I change pages.

Re:hardware is the problem

anon because i modded before reading your post.

other than the ones you list, i also like having the following advantages

i have formed a habit of reading till i fall asleep since i got my p910i two years ago

- i don't have to get up or even turn to turn off the light/reading lamp
- the book remembers where i stopped reading. i can carry on reading whenever i get 2,5,10 minutes (good for the climactic parts when reading fiction)
- i can even set it to scroll automatically so i dont have to do anything to keep reading, but i will have to turn it off manuall or lose the other two benefits
- i can carry as many books as i like and they will always take up the same amount of space/weigh the same
- i can annotate, markup, and do anything i like with the content, without damaging the original 'print'
- with mobipocket format i am not bound to a single medium for purchased books. i can read it on my phone, my computer, and any other media that mobipocket may support tomorrow

Re:

Those are good points. Heres more to why e-books are better :-

1. I can search
2. I can annotate easily
3. I can carry more books than in my library, in my pocket!
4. I can make notes on the book, and yet leave it without a single scribble mark
5. I can use the new ap

Re:

Personally the only books I prefer in print is either reference books or those that use a lot of pictures

I've never understood that about reference books. At my desk it's less practical to wield a rather large and heavy book, compared to switching to anoth

Re:

I don't own a single ebook and I doubt I ever will because I've yet to see an ebook reader that was superior to an actual book.

How much are you willing to spend on an e-book reader?

A friend of mine got an Irex iLiad [irextechnologies.com] recently and it is awesome. The "electro

Re:

According to that web site the iLiad is $810.00 US. For the reader.

Do you know how many novels you can buy for that much money?

I like the idea of a e-reader but I am sticking with paperbacks until and e-reader is more cost effective. At that price it loo

Re:

i use my pdas for reading books, for about 5 years now actually. i like it and i think they are superiour to real books - adjustable font sizes, backlight for reading in darkness, real searching, much better bookmarks and of course the portability and stor

Re:

What surprises me is that the Sony Reader [sonystyle.com] has received so little public attention. I tend to keep up with gadgets and have a personal interest in electronic paper tech, but I didn't even hear about that product until very recently.

That thing is definitely

Re:

That's because it sucks. The text is dim and low-contrast, hard to read except in bright light, and it has the exceedingly annoying habit of flickering the entire screen every time you "turn" a page. Add the proprietary DRM and the limited selection plus t

Jewel cases? No, thanks.

Ugh. If you like traveling with a bunch of jewel cases, that's fine, but I, too, remember The Time Before iPods, and I didn't like it one bit.

First, those jewel cases suck. I'd never manage to go more than a few days without cracking one, or breaking the h

What's on the cover?

I'll buy one of these electronic guide books provided it has the words "do not panic" in large, friendly letters on the cover.

If not I'll stick to my hard-edged paper travel guides which also come in useful for swatting the local wildlife without ruining the guarantee.

Re:

My thoughts exactly. It would be exceedingly useful to have a Wikipedia-linked device that is compact and portable, just like the H2G2. And as long as "do not panic" is written across the front, it would sell quite well (even if 90% of the world's popula

Bad article

Ever notice that whenever you read an article in the newspapers about something you know about, it's always riddled with errors? This article made me think of that. In my not so humble opinion, this is just a really, really bad piece of writing. Where do we even start?

Furthermore, since Google is acquiring copyright material at no cost, it seems to be treating books quite differently from all other media. It is prepared to pay for video and music, but not, apparently, for books. The Google defence is that their Book Search system is covered by the legal concept of "fair dealing".

I guess he means fair use, not fair dealing. I'm not sure why he thinks Google is paying for music. This is news to me ...

But the second thing to be said is that I could read whole passages of my books of which I own the copyright. At once a huge intellectual property issue looms.

The ability to quote or use small parts of a work as fair use has always been there as far as I know. This is a new way to use it, that's all. Is this post a looming intellectual property issue now?

Jeanneney says that Google is not what it seems. Its search results are biased by commercial and cultural pressures. He has a point. Try this: go to Google Book Search and enter Gustave Flaubert. The first results are full of English translations of Madame Bovary.

Given that the author points out elsewhere that the American libraries are the first to allow digitization of copyrighted books, I'm not sure why he is surprised by this.

"It's the readers who will have the final say" ... No, it is the teachers who will have the final say. They will determine whether people will read for information, knowledge or, ultimately, wisdom. If they fail and their pupils read only for information, then we are in deep trouble. For the net doesn't educate and the mind must be primed to deal with its informational deluge. On that priming depends the future of civilisation. How we handle the digitising of the libraries will determine who we are to become.

I don't even know what to make of this paragraph. The net doesn't educate? Teachers will dictate how we read books in the future? If students only read books for information, we're doomed? It seems like a random collection of ideas that aren't backed up with logical argument, but exists only to give a punchy ending paragraph.

I admit, I never cared much for The Times, but this sort of writing is below even their standards. It jumps all over the place, gets the facts wrong, generalises too much and is sensationalist in style. Poor show guys.

Re:Bad article

Fair Dealing is a non-US name for Fair Use, so yes, it is a legitimate term and the author was correct to use it. As for Google's use of the books being Fair Use, this is for the courts to decide. There is nothing clear cut about determining Fair Use. Google is not commenting on, critiquing, or parodying the works, they are simply offering a snippet of the work without adding value to the work (no, exposure to the world at large is not an exemption covered by Fair Use).

No, it's still wrong.

The author was incorrect to use it, particularly in quotes, because they were talking about a U.S.-based company and U.S. law. In the United States, the term is "fair use," not "fair dealing," so the former would have been the correct term.

Alternately, the

Re:

Ever notice that whenever you read an article in the newspapers about something you know about, it's always riddled with errors?

Yeah. I therefore assume all articles are of the same quality, especially on subjects I don't know about.

Re:

I guess he means fair use, not fair dealing. I'm not sure why he thinks Google is paying for music. This is news to me ...

No, he means fair dealing. Fair use is an American concept. It is foreign to Britain. As far as Google paying for music and movies,

Sony is already doing this

although not very successfully. I like the store, but the selection sucks. I fail to see how google will get more publishers than Sony, but I guess we will have to wait and see.

About time...

I have very much enjoyed the iPod Nano as a book viewer -- the Notes section lets you read Project Gutenberg texts, and the device's form factor is great for always having handy and stealing moments here and there to read. The big problem with the Notes f

Audio books

MP3 player.
 

The 4 novel + 1 guidebook holiday

Maybe if I worked at Google I'd have enough vacation time to read 4 novels and use a guidebook to do some sightseeing. :P

Why I wouldn't buy.

a) I don't like reading off a screen as much as off paper. b) There is a thing about turning the page, the smell of a book - for me - is something important.

Re:

I've been reading off a Tungsten E2 palmos device using Palmfiction ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/palmfiction [sourceforge.net] ) (handles txt and rtf better than the built in e-reader) for a while now and I'm pretty happy with it. These e-ink screens are fine but they

Google: A plea

Dear sweet, evil-less overlords,

Please please please PLEASE bring the unwashed masses electronic paper. Thousands of pages, hundreds of hours of power. Please! Break the cartel of book publishers that strangle poor college students' wallets. Give the

The great thing about a book...

is that when you're reading one, the book itself offers you no distractions. The physical book contains just the novel (or guidebook, or collection of short stories, or whatever) you're reading. Nothing gets between you and the content. The book offers esc

iTunes will be the iTunes for Books

Call me crazy, but I think iTunes is more likely to be 'iTunes for Books'. Here you have this hugely popular downloadable content store that already sells every other kind of media, versus Google, which, bless their hearts, has never had much success selling anything but ad space.

I don't think it's such big leap--the store is all ready there. iTunes already distributes some PDFs with music albums, and even supports them in podcast feeds. I assume PDF would be used because it's not yet-another-proprietary format, is extremely versatile, supports content protection, and is easy to produce.

The other part of the equation is the devices -- e-reader devices have traditionally sucked much ass through some combination of being bulky, low-resolution, greyscale, poor format support, poor battery life, and by virtue of being yet-another-device-to-carry-around. Regardless of what you think of the iPhone, I don't think you can argue that it's lacking in any of these areas: It'd make a damn-near perfect ebook reader. It already supports PDF, already syncs with iTunes -- it's begging for content. And I'm begging for a page-flipping gesture.

Maybe I'm wrong, maybe Apple isn't planning to start selling ebooks -- but unless Google can make buying from them not suck (Google Video, I'm looking at you in disgust), and bring something more than a Blackberry as a reader, I still say Apple is in a much better position than Google is.

Are you sure about that?

Google hopes to 'do for books what the iPod did for music'

Convert them into a obscure format and then riddle them with DRM?

Re:How would one install the books?

Alternatives:

Project Gutenberg - 20,000 books free for downloading [gutenberg.org] - listing in zip format [gutenberg.org], rss feed of latest releases [gutenberg.org]

... and for other books [thepiratebay.org] ...

Interesting - the Kamasutra by Vatsyayana [gutenberg.org] is currently the top book today, yesterday, this week, and for the last month [gutenberg.org].

Re:

I realise that French is supposed to be the language of love, but come on - why no English version? And plain text? I would think part of the allure of the Kamasutra is the pictures.

Shame on P.G. for that one

Yeah it's a little embarrassing that they don't have the English version.

A few seconds of Googling turns up the standard English language translation by Sir Richard Burton, available here [sacred-texts.com]. Seeing as it was translated in 1883, I think it's suitably out of c

Re:

LCDs don't refresh. Neither does e-ink. I think you might want to look elsewhere for the cause of your anxiety. :)

Imagine them smoking weed and listening to books!

MP3 players are already making huge volumes of information available to us. Openculture http://www.oculture.com/weblog/2006/10/free_unive r sity_1.html [oculture.com] is a site dedicated to making that information available to us. There is currently more information avail

What iPod did to music.

Yes, I'd rather Google not do to books what iPod did to music. They came late to the party, added DRM and several layers of obfuscation, and gave the entrenched monopolies of the past a toe-hold in the digital future. The net result is that the nicest of