"he problem with the anti-Apple crowd is its sheer ignorance of reality just to make their distorted views seem accurate. The fact of the matter is that in the mobile market Apple simply has the best products, as is evidenced by sales figures [ijailbreak.com] and customer opinions [changewaveresearch.com]. I know the truth hurts, but put on your big boy pants and accept reality for what it is."

So we measure sales figures as representing product quality? You do realize you're essentially admitting that Windows is a far better operating system than OS X in that case?

"iOS crashes more than Android"

The article promised us a "surprising" result. Where is it?

I think the other characters didn't think it was justified, they just figured that now that it's done at least reap the benefit. They still wish they'd prevented it in the first place.

Yep I have always been amazed at the disconnect between how Wine really runs and how the linux kool-aid drinkers think it runs.

You could pick one that doesn't violate the DMCA and probably be safe.

I've only seen people speculating that if either the U.S. or U.K. government was irritated enough by Sealand they could take it over quite easily, thus disproving the theory that this would be some way to protect wikipedia servers. "Fear" doesn't enter the picture.

Alternately, the Royal Navy can say "hey, what are you doing on HM Fort Roughs? That's a naval installation."

"I find it amusing that Americans could be so fearful of a couple of guys thousands of miles away marooned on a platform in the ocean."

Uhhh...huh? Can you name a single person who has indicated fear?

True, there are a lot of grey areas in international law; I just don't think Sealand is anywhere near one of these grey areas. Under every legitimate theory I am aware of Sealand is the property of the UK.

It was never a sovereign state, though; the UK certainly never recognized it as such.