Comment: Correction! (Score 1) 292
Comment: This isn't random conjecture by the ill-informed (Score 2, Interesting) 292
Nimmer is the real deal. He wrote the definitive treatise on copyright law. It is cited in more judicial opinions than any other scholarly work on the subject. That doesn't mean Google is necessarily screwed, but it certainly means this is a serious matter.
Despite the persistent belief that copyleft and the GPL are antithetical to copyright law, nothing could be further from the truth. The GPL relies on copyright law; without copyright there could be no GPL. Google's attitude seems to be that copyright is merely a hassle, an obstacle to be routed around. Even if they are not found to be legally in violation of the GPL, they obviously Bionic with the deliberate intent of routing around it.
If openness is a virtue, what is sort-of-openness?
Comment: Re:Which one does the President really believe in? (Score 4, Insightful) 217
OMG! It's like these people in government are human beings with nuanced opinions and conflicting constituencies!
Comment: Don't complain about poor mainstream adoption (Score 3, Insightful) 349
I thought the discussion was about mainstream adoption of open source software.
Comment: An apt comparison (Score 1) 349
Yeah, the title reads like "Adolf Hitler On Tolerance and Equal Opportunities".
Yes, because Microsoft is killing millions and MdI is collaborating with them on a nuclear weapon. This is not a discussion about different approaches to creating and distributing software.
Comment: Bring it! (Score 2) 69
Anything that helps make detecting cancer cheaper, easier, and faster is good in my book.
Comment: 27% for Android - 32% for iPhone (Score 5, Informative) 299
From the press release for the study:
OpenLogic found that among the applications that use the Apache or GPL/LGPL licenses, the compliance rate was only 29%. Android compliance was 27% and iPhone/iOS compliance was 32%. Overall compliance of Android applications using the GPL/LGPL was 0%.
Comment: Re:Why I love Slashdot (Score 1) 424
Experts come up with stupid ideas all the time.
Agreed. But what I find most interesting about this discussion is that the article is thin on facts, so most of us are basing our alternative plans on only the sparsest information. Also, the strong thread of mistrusting government is bleeding over into what is essentially a technical discussion. The merits of compensating the owners or not has nothing to do with the technical solution of how to most safely and efficiently dispose of the explosives. You can say what you want about Homeland Security dipshits, but law enforcement demolitions experts have been doing this sort of work for a long time, and they have demonstrated technical competence. Mistrusting them because they work for government is just as stupid as trusting them merely because they work for the government.
Comment: Horrible Summary (Score 1) 449
From TFA: "It may be seen as a historic shift, but it is one that tells more about the creation of a new market, mobile and tablet computing, than the decline of an older one, the PC. Shipments of personal computers will continue to increase even as they are surpassed by other devices."