Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Moore's Law For Razor Blades?

Posted by Zonk on Thu Oct 26, 2006 03:05 PM
from the slownewsday dept.
BartlebyScrivener writes "An article in The Economist examines Moore's Law as applied to razor blade technology: 'For the most cynical shavers, this evolution is mere marketing. Twin blades seemed plausible. Three were a bit unlikely. Four, ridiculous. And five seems beyond the pale. Few people, though, seem willing to bet that Gillette's five-bladed Fusion is the end of the road for razor-blade escalation. More blades may seem impossible for the moment — though strictly speaking the Fusion has six, because it has a single blade on its flip-side for tricky areas — but anyone of a gambling persuasion might want to examine the relationship between how many blades a razor has, and the date each new design was introduced'" I'm legally obligated to mention the Onion article that predicted this.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Moore's Law For Razor Blades? | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 591 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • Damned liars ! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Irish-DnB (161087) * on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:06PM (#16599492)
    (http://www.irishdrumandbass.com/)
    God I hate razor blade ads. Why do Gilette et al always use an actor who's clearly been clean shaven before they do the shot where he pulls the blade from his ear to his chin in one fell swoop. It's hardly a ringing endorsement of their product if they won't show someone with a day or two's worth of stubble doing the same thing.

    Here's my favourite parody of the gilette ads:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wd6BjAj9Zag [youtube.com]
  • Who needs (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:07PM (#16599496)
    640k blades
  • Prior art (Score:4, Informative)

    by $RANDOMLUSER (804576) on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:07PM (#16599498)
    There was a Saturday Night Live "commercial" back in the seventies - "Track 3 - bacause you'll beleive anything".
    • Re:Prior art by cbuskirk (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:15PM
    • Re:Prior art by hal2814 (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:18PM
      • Re:Prior art by hal2814 (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:22PM
      • Re:Prior art by NatteringNabob (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:28PM
        • Re:Prior art by nasch (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:22PM
          • Re:Prior art by hal2814 (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @07:49PM
            • Re:Prior art by nasch (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @10:58AM
              • Re:Prior art by hal2814 (Score:2) Friday October 27 2006, @12:28PM
              • Re:Prior art by nasch (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @02:41PM
        • Re:Prior art by Your Pal Dave (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @10:31PM
    • Re:Prior art by el_gordo101 (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:21PM
    • Re:Prior art (Score:5, Interesting)

      by doom (14564) <doom@kzsu.stanford.edu> on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:30PM (#16599994)
      (http://obsidianrook.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday October 16, @01:48AM)
      There was a Saturday Night Live "commercial" back in the seventies - "Track 3 - bacause you'll beleive anything".

      Yeah, back in the quaint old days when three blades seemed like an absurdity.

      Nit: I think the slogan was "For you.... Because you'll believe anything."

      I use single-bladed Bic disposables myself, which are great except that you have to keep track of how sharp they are and adjust your shaving style accordingly. Presumably this is because they're made of intentionally corrosive metal, razor blades being one of the classic examples of planned obsolescence in action. I keep wondering if it might be possible to hack my own razor blades: stainless steel isn't terribly easy to sharpen, but I bet it would hold an edge forever. I'd prefer some sort of "saftey" arrangement, rather than the old fashioned straight-edged razor. Has anyone out there looked into this?

      Funny, I just remembered that once I tried a different approach: it seemed to me that if I stored a disposable razor in oil, I might be able to prevent it from corroding... I quickly discovered the obvious problem: if I wanted to use soap for lubrication, I was going to have to completely clean off all of the oil before each use. I don't remember if I looked into using oil as a shaving lubricant, that seems like an obvious thought to me now, but I might've missed it back then. Why not stash your razor in olive oil, and wash your face after shaving rather than before?

      Though what would be really nifty is to figure out a way of using an electrochemical effect to suppress corrosion... how hard could it be to nickle-plate a "disposable" razor? Hm.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Prior art (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Fordiman (689627) <fordiman@@@gmail...com> on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:37PM (#16600136)
        (http://www.elflord.net/ | Last Journal: Monday March 19 2007, @10:35AM)
        Why not make the blades out of ceramics? Tungsten carbide's a good one; you just need a mold that will stably hold its shape to a microscopic vertex.

        It would never break. You could make it now, shave your face for thirty years, and still accidentally slash your wrists with it.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Prior art by nasch (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:24PM
          • Re:Prior art by Ekasus (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @01:34AM
            • Re:Prior art by nasch (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @11:01AM
          • Re:Prior art by Kaki Nix Sain (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @11:37AM
            • Re:Prior art by nasch (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @02:37PM
        • Re:Prior art (Score:4, Interesting)

          by Jah-Wren Ryel (80510) on Thursday October 26 2006, @04:25PM (#16600948)
          The guys who make ceramic kitchen knives - Kyocera - had something about ceramic shaving blades on their website - they still might, but I am too lazy to dig for it. They said that the edge was too sharp, metal blades tend to have a rounded edge at the micro-level, but ceramic blades just have corners. The end result was that in their testing they found that men cut their faces a whole lot more with the ceramic blades than the old fashioned kind.
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Prior art by nizo (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @05:25PM
          • Re:Prior art by kiddygrinder (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @06:33PM
            • so round them? by Animaether (Score:2) Friday October 27 2006, @01:49AM
        • Re:Prior art by Joebert (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @06:22PM
        • Re:Prior art by rabiddeity (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @06:41PM
          • Re:Prior art by Fordiman (Score:2) Saturday October 28 2006, @01:25PM
      • Re:Prior art by damiangerous (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:50PM
      • Re:Prior art by Noexit (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:19PM
      • Re:Prior art by Ctrl-Z (Score:3) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:20PM
      • Re:Prior art by Jerry Coffin (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:24PM
        • Re:Prior art by doom (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @05:54PM
          • Re:Prior art by Velox_SwiftFox (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @10:20PM
      • Re:Prior art by Jah-Wren Ryel (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:30PM
        • Re:Prior art by RESPAWN (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @05:13PM
          • Re:Prior art by lucas teh geek (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @05:55PM
          • Re:Prior art by Jah-Wren Ryel (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @06:12PM
      • Stainless steel blades by Tetravus (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @05:41PM
      • Re:Prior art by maxume (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @06:41PM
      • Re:Prior art by Quadraginta (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @06:43PM
      • Re:Prior art by Gnomes of Zurich (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @11:12PM
      • Re:Prior art by NekSnappa (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @08:32AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Prior art by Trixter (Score:2) Friday October 27 2006, @01:42PM
    • Re:Prior art by aplusjimages (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:29PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Holey Wars (Score:4, Interesting)

    by MBCook (132727) <foobarsoft@foobarsoft.com> on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:10PM (#16599544)
    (http://www.foobarsoft.com/)

    Sounds a bit like the "Holey Wars" I once heard of. A quick check of Wikipedia and Google didn't turn it up. The idea is that the first steam irons for homes had one hole in them. Some other manufacturer topped this with 2, then 3, etc. This continued until we ended up with irons with tons of holes like we have today.

    And that was the Holey Wars.

    Now at 5 the blade density is already getting up there so I'm not quite sure how much higher they can go (without pointless tricks like splitting the blades in half and calling it "10 bladed").

    • Re:Holey Wars by treeves (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:13PM
      • Obligatory (Score:5, Funny)

        by Pharmboy (216950) on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:33PM (#16600062)
        (http://www.tanningbeds4less.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday November 05 2006, @07:23AM)
        Yea, but image a beowulf of those. You could shave your face, your ass, your balls, your back and your legs in half a second. Put a small motor and a AAA in the thing, make it look like a 1950s lawn mower. You can shave on the way to work, talk on your cell phone AND drink that mocha latte at the same time. Fuck, you could shave a rottweiler with that bad boy and he wouldn't know what hit him till he was balder than a baby's ass.

        (Sorry, got caught up in the Onion article, and I *DO* work in marketing for a living...)
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Obligatory by Nimey (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:40PM
        • Re:Obligatory by Rodness (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:08PM
        • Re:Obligatory by LordVader717 (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:14PM
        • Re:Obligatory by WillAffleckUW (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:29PM
        • Re:Obligatory by theskipper (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:41PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Holey Wars (Score:5, Funny)

      by Mr. Underbridge (666784) on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:18PM (#16599726)

      Now at 5 the blade density is already getting up there so I'm not quite sure how much higher they can go (without pointless tricks like splitting the blades in half and calling it "10 bladed").

      Sir, if you don't patent that - and I mean right now - you're an idiot.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Holey Wars by Mr. Underbridge (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:46PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Holey Wars (Score:5, Funny)

      by kfg (145172) on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:28PM (#16599956)
      I'm not quite sure how much higher they can go (without pointless tricks like splitting the blades in half and calling it "10 bladed").

      "With our new nanotechnology we have been able to create a blade with billions of discrete cutting components per millimeter of blade! Batteries? We don't need no stinking batteries. Our blades are internally powered by atomic quantum energy. But wait, there's more, they contain. . .carbon!; to combine light weight with strength. Let's see the competition match technology like that. And they're, ummmmmmmmm, organic. Yeah, that's the ticket, but you vegetarians will be pleased to learn that they contain no meat."

      KFG
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Holey Wars by kfg (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @12:41AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • I got a free fusion in the mail by Marxist Hacker 42 (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:09PM
    • Re:Holey Wars by jschoenberg (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @05:51PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Holey Wars by dangitman (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @07:23PM
      • Re:Holey Wars by mrscorpio (Score:2) Friday October 27 2006, @03:56AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Wow... by theantipop (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:11PM
    • Re:Wow... by Spug (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:35PM
  • Gillette's blades do rock though by Com2Kid (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:11PM
  • I love em... by consumer_whore (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:11PM
  • Pshaw. by TheSHAD0W (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:11PM
  • Phaser Razor by Bullfish (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:12PM
  • Meh. (Score:4, Funny)

    by Rob T Firefly (844560) on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:14PM (#16599634)
    (http://robvincent.net/ | Last Journal: Tuesday October 09, @01:55PM)
    It's all well and good to go nuts over more blades in a razor, but nobody ever mentions the other side of the equation. I once bought a pack of shavers at the dollar store that somehow left me with the same amount of stubble, but a lot less face.
    • Re:Meh. by Average_Joe_Sixpack (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:38PM
      • Re:Meh. by poot_rootbeer (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:55PM
      • Re:Meh. by Gogo0 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:05PM
        • Re:Meh. by Shano (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @05:24PM
      • Re:Meh. by ObsessiveMathsFreak (Score:2) Friday October 27 2006, @11:56AM
    • Re:Meh. Save face and go to... by davidsyes (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:54PM
    • Re:Meh. by nra1871 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @07:11PM
      • Re:Meh. by Rob T Firefly (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @11:43PM
  • Forget the year 2100 (Score:5, Funny)

    by MassEnergySpaceTime (957330) on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:14PM (#16599640)
    Forget the 14-blade razor in the year 2100. We have a 15 blade [quintippio.co.uk] one now.

  • beware the many skinned onion by SlashSquatch (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:15PM
  • Infinite blades by Ender_Stonebender (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:15PM
  • A little late by lucabrasi999 (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:15PM
  • SNL skit by TechnoLust (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:16PM
    • Re:SNL skit by J. L. Tympanum (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:58PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • This is silly (Score:4, Insightful)

    by eln (21727) * on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:16PM (#16599680)
    I used to use multi-blade expensive razors, but I got tired of spending 15 bucks every time I needed new blades. Now I use cheap twin-blade disposables, and it's fine. Unless you have hair like a yeti, you don't need that many blades. And actually, it seemed to me that I actually got a WORSE shave using the Gillette Mach 3 than I did with a cheap disposable two-blade razor. I don't know if it's because the blades are closer together or what, but I found when I hadn't shaved for a while I had to actually go over some parts of my face multiple times with the Mach 3 that I only had to go over once with the cheap disposable.
  • by BrianRoach (614397) on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:16PM (#16599682)
    Ok, first they made the vibrating razor. Apparently everything that vibrates is better (and I have to say, my toothbrush actually is), so I thought ... I'll try that.

    It didn't make a noticable difference.

    SO ... I see the extra blade thing, and think, "Now there's somthing that actually makes sense", so I get one (you can't use the old handles with the new blades, which is actually a new trick from them - usually you can just buy the new cartiridges).

    Well, it sucks. Completely useless.

    I can only imagine that the were afraid to sell an actual sharp blade that you might be capable of cutting yourself with given today's litigeous environment. It doesn't protrude far enough out of the cartirdge to be usefull.

    - Roach
  • My vote by dptalia (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:17PM
    • Re:My vote by SoapDish (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:28PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:My vote by dafz1 (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:33PM
      • Re:My vote by 91degrees (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:56PM
      • Re:My vote by SillyNickName4me (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:58PM
      • Re:My vote by dptalia (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:07PM
  • infinity +1 blades! by Kjartan Albertsson (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:18PM
  • by L0neW0lf (594121) on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:18PM (#16599734)
    The only reason they need the silly sixth blade for those "tricky areas" is because with five blades, the head of the razor is so freaking big you can't use it the way you'd use a Mach 3, which works just fine for the same areas without needing the "special blade". Classic case of creating additional problems by "innovating" requiring an even more complex solution.

    Oh, and don't shave unless you're wearing slippers. Drop your Fusion, and that sixth blade can do one heck of a number on one of your toes (ouch).
  • The best shave is with a Straight Razor! by majutsu (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:20PM
  • It's a scam! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by OrangeTide (124937) on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:21PM (#16599820)
    to get you to buy more blades than you really need.

    Just like SUVs are a scam to get you to pay for the equivalent of two cars when you only need one.

    I remember when people had one blade with two sides, and you could just replace the blade and not have to buy a whole new plastic razor. (before disposable razors) You realize that a pack of blades and a non-disposable razor fits in your luggage much better than a 5-pack of disposables. And when the razor gets dull you just flip it over and use the other side, then throw it away after that.

    I prefer electrics, since I can shave but leave things stubbly. perpetually maintaining that "hasn't shaved in 2 days" look, plus you can get them with a beard trimmer which is nice. otherwise any old razor and some hot water does better than all the creams, gels, lubricated strips and polybladed devices.
  • I refuse to shave! (Score:5, Funny)

    by cpuh0g (839926) on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:22PM (#16599834)
    I refuse to shave until the blade vendors give away their ingenious technology for free! I wish they would hurry up, though, my beard keeps getting into my soup.

    -Richard Stallman

  • Who cares? They work! by redelm (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:22PM
  • Double Edged Safety Razors (Score:3, Interesting)

    by cyocum (793488) on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:23PM (#16599856)
    (http://cyocum.blogspot.com/)
    I have a really thick beard growth and none of the multiple blade razors were doing it for me. I was having problems because the razors would blunt in the middle of shaving so I would have to use more than one and the results were bad. My flatmate told me what her dad used to use, a double edged safety razor. We picked up one from Boots and got some razors for it. I have never looked back since. Why have five, seven, twenty blades when they all suck and I can get a saftey razor for £5 and twenty blades for it for the same price? My shave is as good as you can get from a barber. There is the problem of storage if you have children but, otherwise, I do not look back.
  • by ScentCone (795499) on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:24PM (#16599878)
    ... if you try too hard to use it in a complicated way, it just cuts your head off, and saves us from having to hear about it.
  • Shaving without shaving cream (Score:5, Informative)

    by nbauman (624611) on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:27PM (#16599900)
    (http://www.nasw.org/users/nbauman/ | Last Journal: Thursday May 03 2007, @02:50PM)
    Let me add here my great contribution to science and simple living:

    You don't need shaving cream to shave.

    I once read an interview in the Wall Street Journal with a scientist from Gillette. He said that a razor blade can cut a wet beard much more easily than a dry beard. It takes a minute or two for your beard to be soaked through. The only purpose of shaving cream is to hold the water to wet your beard for a minute or two while the hairs gets saturated.

    I thought, "When I step out of the shower in the morning, my beard is soaked. I should be able to shave without any shaving cream."

    I tried it next morning, and I got the smoothest, cleanest shave I ever got in my life.

    I haven't used shaving cream for 30 years.

    (Conversely, if you just spread shaving cream on your face and don't give it a minute or two to wet your beard, you'll get a rough shave.)

  • Blades/heads... by davidsyes (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:32PM
  • Keep your new-fangled gadgets! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by KozmoStevnNaut (630146) <<moc.liamg> <ta> <nvetskirneh>> on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:33PM (#16600060)

    I threw away my Gillette Mach 3 and bought a good old-fashioned safety razor which takes good old-fashioned double-edged razor blades. I pay less than 1/10th the prize for blades now, and they last just as long as the Mach 3 cartridges did. Reading the Shave My Face site [shavemyface.com] helped me find the good stuff.

    I have great respect for the late King Camp Gillette, who invented the cheap mass-produced double-edged razor blade, and no respect at all for the Gillette Company who seem to have turned into a marketing machine.

    Ideally, I would shave with a straight razor, but I'm kinda scared...

    Dumping cartridge razor was definitely one of the best decisions I ever took, though

  • What I've always loved... by Phroggy (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:34PM
  • What about the Mach 13? Pre The Onion by bjdevil66 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:35PM
  • The mechanism helps, not the blades. by hellomynameisclinton (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:35PM
  • Can't forget Dave Barry by cascino (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:37PM
  • Blade lock-in? by Godji (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:37PM
  • A bit behind Moore's law! by Ancient_Hacker (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:39PM
  • Spishak Mach20 by D-Fens (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:42PM
  • MAD beats Onion (in this case) by JesseL (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:43PM
  • Used to be an Anti-Singularity argument by mixter (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:44PM
  • Gillette vs. Ockham by Sean0michael (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:45PM
  • The Onion as a source of futurism by MarkusQ (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:46PM
  • I let my beard grow... by doit3d (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:47PM
  • Fusion is good... by GreyPoopon (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:48PM
  • by fireman sam (662213) on Thursday October 26 2006, @03:52PM (#16600396)
    (http://www.pctools.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday June 09 2005, @06:08PM)
    On triple M radio in Melbourne, Australia. The breakfast crew with their usual crap skits had one for the "NEW" 4 blade razor.

    From the skit:

    Announcer 1: The first blade cuts, The second blade trims, The third blade shaves...
    Announcer 2: What does the fourth blade do?
    Announcer 1: *thinks* It just sits there and rusts.

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Got a free Fusion in the mail a few days back by dbmasters (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:54PM
  • Fusion only has 5 blades by Caiwyn (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:54PM
  • Sooner or later... by Robotech_Master (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:56PM
  • Occam's razor by bobbaddeley (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:56PM
  • I've perfected shaving by Average_Joe_Sixpack (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:01PM
  • Get a straight razor. by Vellmont (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:02PM
  • The elusive sixth blade by AeroIllini (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:04PM
  • honestly by Tsiangkun (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:05PM
  • From the Onion Article by Databass (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:06PM
  • Since we're sharing grooming tips... by Rude Turnip (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:06PM
  • My Results by nuintari (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:06PM
  • The limit of razor, where n= number of blades, by jpellino (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:07PM
  • Titanium by dlhm (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:10PM
  • It's got "5.1" blades! (and the end-game) by ClayJar (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:12PM
  • The Perfect Shave by digitect (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:13PM
  • Odd news for slashdot by xamomike (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:16PM
  • Fed up with the absurdity by TomorrowPlusX (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:16PM
  • The real question by Moby Cock (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:19PM
  • The only useful innovation was the gel strip by WillAffleckUW (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:19PM
  • Robotman by liak12345 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:21PM
  • Ceramic Blades by labnet (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:24PM
  • As an insider... (Score:5, Informative)

    by RPI Geek (640282) on Thursday October 26 2006, @04:27PM (#16601002)
    (Last Journal: Thursday July 29 2004, @07:56AM)
    I'm posting anonymously because I'm pretty sure I'm not supposed to talk about this, but when I interned at a razor company, much of the research was for new materials, and none of the ones that I tried while I was there lasted through the equivalent of even 1 shave. The technology is nearing the physical limits of the materials. My take on the situation would be that since there are 2 big razor manufacturers in the US, they'll take any advantage they can get to gain a larger market share, no matter how small.

    A lot of the 'shaving comfort' is anecdotal, too. I remember one test that I ran while I was there and I found that a certain coating significantly reduced the force required to cut a hair, so we produced a bunch of razors with that coating for a test. The testers are just people off the street, and in the double-blind trial of the new coating vs the traditional one, the testers overwhelmingly preferred the old coating. My point is basically that the best technical ideas don't necessarily produce the most consumer satisfaction, and maybe 6 or 10 blades will draw a larger market share.
  • All wrong by lonemonk (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:28PM
    • Re:All wrong by kypper (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @08:49PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • That's great! by mohjlir (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:29PM
  • Old methods best? (Score:5, Interesting)

    Since the day I realized girls aren't all that into limp teenage stubble, I've used a certain 3-bladed razor whose name I won't mention because they're not paying me to do so and I don't give out freebies.

    It's always seemed sufficient, but I've never been happy with the red irritation that seems to perpetually inhabit my neckal region.

    I stumbled across this article a while back, which convinced me that razor technology has been pointlessly nursing a fatal blunder made 50 years ago rather than admitting defeat and going back to the way it used to be.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6886845/ [msn.com]

    On the other hand, you might just view disposables as a parallel market - one for people who value a few extra minutes of their time high above comfort, psychological satisfaction, and a smooth babyface.

    I, for one, intend to invest in a nice quality old-school shaving kit very soon rather than pay the 3-blade racketeers their outrageous replacement fees any longer.
  • Razor event horizon by capilot (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:48PM
  • Explanation for this phenomena by Vince8016 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:58PM
  • Venus by Colourspace (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @05:15PM
    • Re:Venus by Joebert (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @07:03PM
  • Moore's Law? How about Occam's Razor by roreos (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @05:21PM
  • worthless by PeelBoy (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @05:22PM
  • great marketing idea: (Score:3, Funny)

    by porky_pig_jr (129948) on Thursday October 26 2006, @05:24PM (#16601732)
    Mach 20: Close To The Bone.
  • I can't wait... by IntergalacticWalrus (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @05:32PM
  • They look like 'planes by Thisfox (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @05:38PM
  • My i be the first to say... by LaurieDash (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @05:41PM
  • But what about the FORD Fusion? by Namlak (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @05:43PM
  • Austrlian Comedy predicted this too! by hoojus (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @05:46PM
  • The Economist doesn't like futurists by Jugurtha (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @05:59PM
  • The Vibrating function was a BAD MOVE by AbRASiON (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @06:53PM
  • For the closest shave ever by Scoldog (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @07:12PM
  • I use a 50 yr old razor by genevaroth (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @07:23PM
  • For all you people advocating cream-free shaving.. by leoboiko (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @07:37PM
  • Triple-Trac: by Digital Pizza (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @07:42PM
  • Metrodot (Score:3, Funny)

    by gelfling (6534) on Thursday October 26 2006, @08:08PM (#16603450)
    (http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Monday October 29, @07:20AM)
    Skin care tips for tasteful men
  • Shaving as science (Score:3, Interesting)

    by M0b1u5 (569472) on Thursday October 26 2006, @08:53PM (#16603824)
    (http://4sure.co.nz/)
    I have made many many experiments with shaving over the years, and tried many many ways of removing the hair from my face. I have a very very heavy beard growth, almost up to my eye sockets, and right down into my chest hair. I had bad acne as a teenager, and adopted a foil electric shaver, a Braun thing which went fine for a few years.

    It wasn't until I discovered that blade shaving was actually better for my acne than an electric shaver that I began experimenting. I will describe my shaving process, because I believe it is superior to all other methods.

    Firstly, I shave in the shower, and this saves having to clean up any mess. If you have a female partner, then it;s likely she insists you spend more time cleaning up after yourself than the time you spend actually shaving.

    The process is this:

    1) In shower, first thing, wash face with soap and water. A face cloth helps to generate enough friction to properly clean behind ears (big place for blackheads) and alongside the nose (another blackhead area) and to ensure that eye sockets and forehead and properly cleaned.

    2) Wash rest of body.

    3) Wash hair.

    4) Rub soap directly on face and then lather some in my hands. Rub soap into a thin lather across the face, neck and cheeks.

    5) Using Gilette M3 Power, shave with AND against the grain of the hair. Clean up any remaining bristles so none can be felt with the hands against the skin. (I mean NONE!)

    6) Rinse WELL. Rinse hair again.

    7) Exit shower. Dry face, body and hair.

    8) Dispense pure cold tap water into clean basin. Splash pure cold water on face. This closes the pores.

    9) Put on Nivea face firming moisturizer, liberally, all over face, including areas not shaven.

    10) Place a little aftershave in the nape of the neck - NEVER on the shaved skin.

    There you go - you now have a perfect shave, and you're skin is smooth, moisturised and you feel and look great.

    I have evaluated different razors very methodically, and can confidently assert the following:

    Gilette M3 Power with the Green Blade is the finest razor and blade combination in the world today, bar none. However it is NOT a razor for beginners, and neither is it a razor for those with acne, or other facial blemishes, dips, or risers. The M3 Power requires quite some skill to use correctly, particularly for the first shave when the blade is brand new. (On my heavy growth, I take 10 days of shaving before I replace the blade).

    For those people who are less proficient (or simply can't be bothered concentrating that hard) or those who do no thave very smooth faces, I recommend the quadruple bladed Schick Quattro, with the hair-like wires over the blade. Even when brand new, they are extremely unlikely to cut you, even with ham-fisted use on a nobbly face.

    HOWEVER, the Quattro requires more strokes to remove the same amount of hair as the M3, and the cutting angles are more critical than the M3.

    After 30 years of blade shaving, I can tell you that my system is perfect for ME - but it may not be perfect for YOU. What I can say is that there are several things which absolutely must be true in order to have a goo dshave, and to avoid rashes, pain, blood etc.

    1) ALWAYS shave after a shower.
    2) ALWAYS wash your face thoroughly BEFORE preparing to shave.
    3) When the blade fills, make sure it is COMPLETELY clean and empty before starting more strokes. Wash blade in fast running water, not a basin.
    4) ALWAYS rinse well after shaving.
    5) ALWAYS use a moisturiser after shaving. Non fragranced is best.
    6) NEVER apply aftershave or eau de toilette to shaved areas.
    7) Battery operated vabrating razors are a MUST HAVE.

    In summation, yep - I agree, razors are going to continue to develop, and the best razors genuinely ARE a quantuum leap ahead of el cheapo rubbish. The TCO of owning the latest and greatest razors is only marginally higher than cheap razors: you use less strokes, so the blades last longer.

    I dispute that
  • Cold Water by Mr Bubble (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @09:04PM
  • when old becomes new again.. by modpod (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @09:25PM
  • Personally.... by Theburritobandito (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @09:32PM
  • Better title for this... by Bugs42 (Score:1) Thursday October 26 2006, @11:08PM
  • Marketers are slashdot fans? by Tablizer (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @12:23AM
  • Blades become Obsolete... by pjludlow (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @12:46AM
  • what about electric shavers? by Marsmensch (Score:2) Friday October 27 2006, @01:17AM
  • Windshield-wipers... by 10Ghz (Score:2) Friday October 27 2006, @02:58AM
  • More complicated shavers by Wealcan (Score:2) Friday October 27 2006, @04:09AM
  • marketing by micrometer2003 (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @05:04AM
  • Dystopian future by matt me (Score:2) Friday October 27 2006, @05:18AM
  • Drop Gilette by GNious (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @05:25AM
  • Which straight razor by [000000] (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @05:48AM
  • The Onion is not alone by jacquems (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @06:41AM
  • actually 6 blades. by deviceb (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @07:24AM
  • digital to analog by CrazyTalk (Score:2) Friday October 27 2006, @07:27AM
  • You're all pussies, I wax mine off. by crovira (Score:2) Friday October 27 2006, @07:48AM
  • Great article by fak3r (Score:2) Friday October 27 2006, @09:04AM
  • Braun Syncro by accessdeniednsp (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @09:08AM
  • Maybe it just me.. by Shubydoo (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @09:16AM
  • They are all crap after 2 blades... by Jedi Holocron (Score:2) Friday October 27 2006, @09:40AM
  • Shave with a straight razor by ClayDowling (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @10:34AM
  • Fitting statistical data by GoRK (Score:2) Friday October 27 2006, @11:04AM
  • 5-blade razor introduced 75 years ago by utoddl (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @02:08PM
  • Nevermind Moore's Law, apply Occam's Razor by Arthen (Score:1) Friday October 27 2006, @04:33PM
  • One blade, two edges, is enough by Leisureguy (Score:1) Saturday November 04 2006, @01:30PM
  • Re:Introducing by irn_bru (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:19PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:I disagree by Rosco P. Coltrane (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:24PM
  • Re:Two Blades by SnarfQuest (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @03:30PM
  • Re:Two Blades by SnarfQuest (Score:2) Thursday October 26 2006, @04:05PM
  • 27 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2