Quite so. Measuring anything quickly changing requires relevant reference points. Using age might be convenient, but requires justification especially in something as bursty as human development.
Doing otherwise invites fishing for desired conclusions in a pool of data. Experts know they should not be trusted and need to prove up. Anyone who claims "Trust the Experts" does not understand expertise.
Linked? How, some corelation? What r2? More to the point, how is this possibly free from the "Post hoc, ergo propter hoc" fallacy (it came after so was caused by what came first)?
Most likely, both are symptoms from some underlying cause. Potentially with benefits like IQ.
Well, of course they're going to set defaults by what profits them. Long gone is any consideration of what users might want.
Me, I just invert any default I'm not sure I want. Every last one. Works great when I'm in a hurry.
If you know French, "faible" means weak. Pronounced very close to Fable, and in the usual french order for modifiers after the noun. I'd prefer "infirm" which means lame!
Having worked numeric neural-nets, I'll add that NNs are very hard to tune in any desired direction. Often you have to do the opposite of what you'd expect.
Hardly new, sloppy police work has been around for at least 800 years (Magna Carta) and will persist so long as the drive to punish outweighs the costs of error.
This being egregious, and CA, I do hope the falsely jailed wins supersized compensation to caution others with a higher than zero cost of error. A feature (not bug) of the American system (McD coffee scald).
To cut surface tension, I spray my compressed puck with dilute 1% detergent (dishwashing) and compress again after it soaks in. Espresso comes out stronger and with more crema. I cannot detect the detergent (lemon).
I don't know where to start:
trolling electronic DBs without suspicion? (Laws were written for individual search)
Interstate trolling DBs by non-TN acredited LEOs?
Issuing arrest warrents without any corroboarating evidence?
acting on a warrent without any checking?
Other?
Mistakes will happen, you are guaranteeing more if they are not effectively prevented and ultimately punished.
LEOs are all about seeing people punished for mistakes. They must accept same for their own.
Not only can neural nets "understand" nothing, humans are not tremendously better: Nukes are far more effective as a threat than as delivered. There's so much fear (from Hiro/Nagas horrors) that an actual nuking would recalibrate. Hint, not the end of the world except for small/local values of "World".
Agreed. 40 years ago I read a few to understand what the then-new publishing sensation was all about. Newer stuff might be better, but that stuff did nothing for me. Not stimulating, not even enjoyable. And I was reading Tom Clancy. The blunt fact was even my failed attempts at romance and getting a GF were far more detailed, interesting and compelling to me.
I've come to conclude (contrary to advertising) that far more men are capable of pair-bonding and romance than women. So they have to work at it.
The most probable answer is: passwds stored in plaintext on the few systems they were able to get
I spoke too soon. DNS was fast during the NAm day, but just got worse (timeouts).
I noticed DNS slowness all Sunday. Not enough to break elinks but uncharacteristic. My primary nameserver is in CO, nowhere near MAE-east.
Ever open a warm beer? What happens? CO2 foams out which it does not from cold beer.
CO2 solubility in [rain] water is strongly temperature-influenced (alkalinity of oceans lock it down). The 400mm of annual average rainfall falls through 3mm (as solid) CO2 inventory and does most of the scrubbing.
As for ensh!ttification, is Cory unfamiliar with entropy? Everything, everywhere tends towards lower-value states. Any local contradictions (life) are only explained by greater disorder elsewhere. This applies to communications, too.
Big Brother FCC is likely too stupid, but both of these moves corral the net somewhat (pops elsewhere).
The first Rotarian was the first man to call John the Baptist "Jack." -- H.L. Mencken
