Bitcoin Hits Record as Mastercard, BNY Mellon Embrace Crypto (bloomberg.com) 81
Bitcoin jumped to a record high after Mastercard and Bank of New York Mellon moved to make it easier for customers to use cryptocurrencies. From a report: The largest digital asset rose as much as 7.4% to $48,364, surpassing the all-time high reached Monday after Tesla announced it would hold $1.5 billion of the cryptocurrency on its balance sheet. The wider Bloomberg Galaxy Crypto Index also touched a record. "The crypto-asset world is bursting into the realms of traditional finance at a staggering pace," said Simon Peters, an analyst at investment platform eToro. Mastercard singled out so-called "stablecoins," which often peg their value to that of another asset, such as the U.S. dollar. Mastercard has already partnered with crypto card providers such as Wirex and BitPay, but has required digital currencies to be converted into fiat before processing payments for transactions on its network.
Even harder now... (Score:2)
to buy a video card, if you can imagine. GTX1030's are selling for over $100.
Re: (Score:2)
-Time to find another narrative instead of blaming crypto.
Re: (Score:2)
No, it's crypto. Not necessarily bitcoin, but bitcoin hype generally brings up others like ETH and XRP (ripple) trying to get in on the game. Just like how the GameStop hype brought up AMC and BlackBerry as people too late to the party try to find alternatives that will likely be #2 and #3 as well.
And ETH miners are buyi
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's COVID related chip shortages. It's not due to bitcoin, which stopped being mined on video cards years ago.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You can pay for food delivery in many countries from takeaway.com's sites.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh yeah they still think its a scam along with electric cars. They'll mention something smug about tulips to try and sound intelligent. Go back and read the comments for when the first iPod was released. Everyone here said it was a terrible idea that would never sell and would ruin Apple.
Re: (Score:2)
Go back and read the comments for when the first iPod was released. Everyone here said it was a terrible idea that would never sell and would ruin Apple.
To be fair, I'd say the Apple that was around back then no longer exists and Apple is now much more of a lifestyle company instead of a computer company. It's definitely financially better off than it was then, but I'd say it's not the same company.
Re: (Score:2)
So you're saying the iPod did indeed ruin Apple? I would have to agree.
Re: (Score:2)
In my opinion, and obviously yours, yes. I understand there are differing opinions on the matter, but there's obviously going to be differing opinions there.
Re: (Score:2)
Merely being a computer company wasn't enough to sustain Apple. They used the lifestyle angle to keep the computer part alive. You have to be impressed with their tech accomplishments since then. Creating OSX and moving to Intel processors. Who else makes a modern day UNIX desktop? Now they've had enough of Intel and created their own chip.
Re: (Score:2)
Merely being a computer company wasn't enough to sustain Apple. They used the lifestyle angle to keep the computer part alive. You have to be impressed with their tech accomplishments since then. Creating OSX and moving to Intel processors. Who else makes a modern day UNIX desktop? Now they've had enough of Intel and created their own chip.
Buying NeXT happened well before the iPod. NeXTSTEP became OS X which was released almost 6 months before the iPod, so you cannot credit the lifestyle angle with the modern day UNIX desktop at all. Moving to Intel was the logical step for a computer company at that point when it became clear that the Power architecture wasn't progressing the way it needed to for PCs and (this is off memory, so if I'm wrong I apologize) Apple was still primarily (from a financial standpoint) a computer company.
About the on
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Are you considering the USD or the EUR as a multi-level marketing scam? Now, these currencies are backed by nothing. Before 1971, the currencies were convertible in Gold.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Here you go:
https://slashdot.org/story/01/... [slashdot.org]
"No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame." :)
Re: (Score:1)
When the 1st gen iPod was released...
It had a tiny black&white screen.
It had a mini spinning disk HDD inside, making it vulnerable to getting fucking REKT if you went jogging with it like in the commercials
It only played MP3s.
Cost $399.
The Creative Nomad that already existed--
Had a larger color screen.
Flash memory.
Played many types of audio and video formats.
Cost $199.
No one could have predicted consumers were that fucking s
They are not actually trading bit coin (Score:2)
For nearly all of these transactions they are just denominating the the purchase in bitcoin but not actuially exchanging bitcoin. They can "loan" bit coin to the buyer and write that on their credit card statment but no bit coin was actuall given to the buyer since it was given to the seller on their behalf. Liewise the seller didn't actually get any bit coin. They just goit a credit for bit coin. If they ask for the bit coin to be cashed out they will probably ask for it in dollars. And so no where
Re: (Score:2)
Enough already (Score:4, Insightful)
The flood of Bitcoin reporting almost makes me pine for the bad old days when every second story was about Trump instead. This is a tech site, not a second-rate investment advice column.
Technical developments of cryptocurrency: ok
incessant cheerleading over the value of BTC: not ok
Re: (Score:3)
Mad that your $1 investment a decade ago would be worth over $100k now?
Re: (Score:2)
Mad that people are pushing for a currency that costs $570 per transaction, and pollutes more than the state of Switzerland.
Re: Enough already (Score:2)
And has been tied to organized crime activities in the past, like drug markets and murder for hire.
We always have to hear about it bc its about investment from perception, not real value. Same way perception (limited awareness of cost) drives choices which destroy environments. Same w gamestop bubble: Those first to obey dog trainer and get out early are rewarded, second group looking at trends are punished. The whole thing is a vulnerability brought about by inequality: A small amount of people can create
Re: (Score:2)
Might as well do away with physical cash then because it's also used for illegal purposes. Also people never bought drugs before bitcoin...
Re: (Score:2)
Mad that people are pushing for a currency that costs $570 per transaction, and pollutes more than the state of Switzerland.
And one that tops put at 10 transactions per second.Globally. Even if it did not have all its other severe problems, as a "currency" this thing is a bad joke.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I for one am perfectly happy not to be associated with a mess of cranks, idiots, scammers, and alt-righters.
Re: (Score:2)
I mean, do I regret not buying Bitcoin then? Yes. I doubt I would have continued holding when it went 100x. But the reason I didn't buy then is that I think it's stupid and useless and the fact that some people are making fortunes doesn't mean it's not stupid and useless. I mean, I also regret not buying lottery tickets with certain numbers on them. That doesn't mean that I think the lottery is a great investment going forward. Certainly, the era of 100x returns is completely gone.
Re: (Score:2)
Its called "counting the hits and ignoring the misses". How many coins have failed and how many bitcoin exchanges have been thinly veiled scams?
Re: (Score:2)
The flood of Bitcoin reporting almost makes me pine for the bad old days when every second story was about Trump instead. This is a tech site, not a second-rate investment advice column.
Technical developments of cryptocurrency: ok
incessant cheerleading over the value of BTC: not ok
Same here. At least Trump was a different kind of stupid every day and some times he was hilarious. BTC is just the same old boring set of lies over and over again.
Re: (Score:2)
I will voice the completely opposite opinion— I want to better understand why the hell Bitcoin still survives from a tech standpoint, and how these companies will serve to overcome those limitations to make it a viable investment or currency. Because from everything I know in my heart and brain (and gut), Bitcoin is a miserable technical solution for widespread adoption. Will these companies go for the bait-and-switch approach and switch to a Proof-of-Stake solution of an alternative cryptocurrency?
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, those would be interesting topics to address. But the majority of the articles we're seeing now is just breathless "ZOMG BTC has risen in value again" with no technical substance whatsoever.
Failure of the money system (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Regulators, act now (Score:2)
The Trump era of financial regulators being asleep at the switch led to this, cryptocurrencies should've been nuked from orbit the instant they appeared, as with all previous internet funny monies. Act now before this gets further out of hand.
Re: (Score:2)
Require EnergyStar rated coins! Because EnergyStar worked for my dehumidifiers that need replacing every 18 months and wind up in a landfill. -oh wait.
Re: (Score:2)
This is too hilarious even for slashdot. Remember when a judge ruled that linking to DeCSS code was illegal so people kept posting it here? Or when another judge wanted 3d printed gun files removed from the internet? Now you want similar data removed for some reason.
Re: Regulators, act now (Score:2)
I'm not asking for information to be censored, I'm asking for consistent application of anti-money-laundering regulations.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not asking for information to be censored, I'm asking for consistent application of anti-money-laundering regulations.
Indeed.
Re: (Score:2)
Prevent the trading or exchange of cryptocurrencies where money can be exchanged with anonymous or pseudonymous peers. Knowing your customer for exchange means jack shit if he can trade those exchanged Bitcoins freely with a peer who could be Kim Jong Un for all you know.
Re: (Score:2)
The Obama-era regulators were doing things. In 2013, mixers and marketplaces were told to comply with anti-money laundering, know your customer, and reporting suspect activities. In 2015, the US CFTC started regulating future contracts surrounding bitcoin. In 2016, the government included bitcoin in regulations that concerned "funds". Then, during the Trump presidency, nothing.
Good Twitter threads about Bitcoin (Score:1)
Here's a couple of good Twitter threads [twitter.com] by Stephen Diehl (@smdiehl) about what Bitcoin really is (with an earlier one further down below).
Re: (Score:2)
-Hell hath frozen over.
Re: (Score:2)
I stand by that decision. (although the greedy side of me keeps looking at me funny).
My conclusion is that bitcoin proponents are greedy bastards that don't care about the environment.
Personally, I prefer BitchCoin (Score:2)
BitchCoin [youtube.com] are far more entertaining.
Crash coming in 3.. 2.. 1.. (Score:2)
What is the value going to be in a decade? I don't think it will be what it is now. To me bitcoin is another flash crash with the timescale in a decade instead of a week.
Re: (Score:2)
"...has become a worldwide transaction of which you cannot even identify who owns what.
It's a bug to the government and others who want total control. It's a feature to actual people.
Re: (Score:2)
What is the value going to be in a decade? I don't think it will be what it is now. To me bitcoin is another flash crash with the timescale in a decade instead of a week.
It will depend on when the supply of idiots runs out, just as any other pyramid scheme. Sure, BTC has been going longer than basically all other such scams, and that deserves respect, but it does not change its nature.
Re: (Score:1)
Luddites, assemble!
Re: (Score:2)
Well, if you take that perspective, Tesla doing a pump-and-dump (-and-pump) might make sense to shake out some of the volatility long-term given the money they have tied up in it. It essentially becomes bounds-testing and could shake out hysterisis. ...but how do you manage the transaction limitation if you actually want to make it viable...
One possible problem with bitcoin is the investors (Score:2)
I don't know if this has been overlooked, not tracked or it has been decided that it wasn't a problem. There are a whole lot of people who, whether by accident or design, have done very well out of it. Some of them have fairly alternate views.
For instance, according to a flakey article in 2017 Roger Ver was the biggest bitcoin millionaire with $52M. Twice as much as the Winklevoss Twins who recently became billionaires because of the surge in price. Mr Ver doesn't appear to be that nice a person. "He sold
Re: (Score:2)
I have a feeling you are right; it becomes self-promoting as an investment (and means to hide cash). I wonder when they choose to sell.
They do not (Score:2)
MC and the others do not "embrace" BTC. They are just after a short-term, cheap (for them) marketing stunt.
Back to "Bitcoin at all time high" spam (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Blah blah blah a decade later and bitcoin is still going.
Re: (Score:2)
Wait until I grab some popcorn.
We're still ignoring the massive environmental (Score:2)
We're still ignoring the massive environmental impact of bitcoin, right? Just checking.
Re: (Score:2)
We're still ignoring the massive environmental impact of bitcoin, right? Just checking.
Only a few people are ignoring it - but they're ignoring it HARD.
Re: (Score:1)