If you're posting on slashdot you should be old enough to recognize that designers cycle through the same trends perpetually.

Just because haptics existed prior to the patent doesn't mean that the method outlined in the patent isn't novel. I'm not a domain expert, and from the contents of your post you obviously aren't either and it wouldn't be the first time that Apple decided to use someone else's technology without paying for it.

Yea, it struck me as OpenAI and Anthropic playing chicken with each other. Training costs are huge, and if they could say push those out of quarterly reports so they can go public with misleading numbers it would benefit both.

CFAA wouldn't apply since the website is... Australian.

He's saying the site is flooded with garbage from third party sellers.

If I were Amazon, I wouldn't want to deal with the returns.

Following someone isn't illegal.

It's one of my favorite things that the majority of the Internet finally caught on how much bullshit Elon spouted for years that people took at face value.

UK only has domestic luxury car manufacturing to my recollection. With them out of the eu they don't have much reason to engage in protectionism

They're still tracking what users are using to sell to them.

They all got together and decided they were fed up with inane questions and decided to unplug themselves.

They've been running ads in the app store since 2016.

I have vague memories of an audacity interview years ago where the dev mentioned they had tight coupling between the UI and features at the time. It might simply be they wanted to get it in people's hands because new features were tied to the new UI.

I'd think Gamescom should have guards at the door scanning badges (so there is a record) as well as cameras covering the conference floor.

When I was interning at a huge company at a small office someone told me that they'd had problems with guard(s) from the previous security company stealing.