I've always wondered how willing companies would be to hike prices if subscriptions would automatically pause on a price increase, and the consumer would need to approve the new price for the subscription to continue.
It's downloaded, but this provides deminified source. Given how they often claim to use LLMs for everything, presumably no copyrights apply to the code either so their competitors can just use it.
Aside from the general myth of privatization being more efficient its misaligned incentives - the company gets paid more the longer it takes, they aren't incentivized to hire (really outsource to) competent programmers.
Actually most of the gains in the Gamestop "short squeeze" was actually retail investors piling on driving the price up. So the people who made money largely did so on the backs of later investors which does sound a lot like a Ponzi or just a typical pump & dump scheme.