Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror

Submission + - Crop nutrition down 3.2% in under 4 decades due to rising CO2 levels

Submitted by GameboyRMH
GameboyRMH writes: It's a well-understood phenomenon that rising CO2 levels decrease crop nutrition, but now Futurism reports that Dutch researchers have tallied the recent damage: in a survey of 43 different crops, nutrients were found to have fallen an average of 3.2% since the late '80s. Higher CO2 levels cause crops to gain biomass faster without absorbing nutrients at an accelerated rate and with decreased water consumption, resulting in lower nutrient concentration. “The plant is becoming more efficient, but it’s occurring at a price, from a human perspective,” Lewis Ziska, a plant biologist at Columbia University who studied the phenomenon for more than two decades, told WaPo. Previous studies have estimated that by 2050, this effect could cause zinc deficiency to affect an additional 175 million people, protein deficiency to affect an additional 122 million, and could decrease iron uptake by 4% while 1.4 billion women of childbearing age and children under 5 already live in countries with anemia rates of over 20%.

Comment Re:I never tire ... (Score 1) 96

by GameboyRMH (#66111506) Attached to: Maine Governor Vetoes Data Center Moratorium Bill

The only way a discussion board comment will ever end up in an AI data center is after it's ripped from the Internet for training data. They're nothing like a traditional general-purpose data center, you're making an apples-and-hand grenades comparison between two things that are kinda round, handheld-sized and will hurt if they bonk you on the head. If every AI data center burned to the ground tomorrow, only AI services would be lost, and every discussion board could drop these PITA Cloudflare checks needed to keep the AI scrapers from bogging them down.

Comment "Fairly voice their opinions" (Score 1) 81

"We're confident an unbiased court will overturn the original certification, and we look forward to the opportunity for our team to fairly voice their opinions."

Yes, a fair voicing of "opinions" on labor conditions between one human and one globe-spanning immortal megacorporation. Very fair.

Comment Re:Earn less? (Score 1) 81

and not great for those buying the companies products because those higher costs will be passed on to the customers in higher prices.

Only true for goods and services where there is perfectly inelastic demand, which kind of doesn't exist. Even demand for fuel is somewhat elastic. Health care has about the least elastic demand. Junk from Amazon has highly elastic demand.

But maybe Bezos and the other execs will take a pay cut to come up with more money for the warehouse workers and prices will not increase.

This would certainly happen to a large degree, otherwise Amazon could price themselves out of competitiveness fairly easily.

Slashdot Top Deals

Mathematics is the only science where one never knows what one is talking about nor whether what is said is true. -- Russell

Close