IBM Watson Now Being Used To Catch Rogue Traders

IBM is piloting its Jeopardy-winning Watson technology as a tool for catching rogue traders at large financial institutions, executives said in an interview Monday. From a report: Referred to as Watson Financial Services, the new product will become a monitoring tool within companies to search through every trader's emails and chats, combining it with the trading data on the floor. The objective? To see if there are any correlations between suspicious conversations online and activity that could be construed as rogue trading.

Re:

[Tablizer]

And you can have all my base while you are at it.

Re:

[Anonymous Coward]

I'm a sysadmin, I read all your emails anyway.

You really should reply to your mom

Do the Emails belong to company?

[charlie merritt]

Do the Emails belong to company? If so I see no problem with this. If this becomes common practice then company Email won't used in the future. But if they can catch crooked traders NOW for past deeds...

Re:

[networkBoy]

Of course they do, anything you do on your employer's network (including this /. post) is legally inspectable by your employer.

Anything I don't want my employer to know isn't done on their network. If I was a rogue trader and colluding with others you better believe we'd all have burner phones and using something out of band.

Hay WATSON, Difference Between A Pig and A Hog?

[LifesABeach]

One of'em goes to market.

Misleading Title!

[sciengin]

This is false advertising: Watson is not used at all to find old and rare edition of Games Workshop's "Rogue Trader"!
Classic example of fake news.

Re:

[phantomfive]

And that's totally true: Watson was a program built to play Jeopardy, but now has become a blanket marketing term for many products inside IBM, some of which have nothing to do with AI at all. So who knows what they are even doing there. Some kind of data mining, but other than that........

Re:

[Anonymous Coward]

+1 true. Right after the Jeopardy event, some key members left and very little of the technology was commercialized. What's often called Watson is a series of rebranded IBM and open source projects. Watson for Machine Learning (or whatever they call it) is just a hosted version of Apache Spark. It used to be SAS.

Some of the NLP technology was open sourced and available in Apache UIMA. However, UIMA is just a framework for managing NLP projects. Any NLP or machine learning break throughs were kept under lock

Re:

[jbmartin6]

Why? All of this is already being done by other processes, such as manual review and other forms of automation.

Re:

[frank_adrian314159]

You answered your own question. You can get rid of the manual review. Plus, if you can just point a big-ass data stream at Watson and it can actually ferret out malfeasance, you can also get rid of the folks who program those "other forms of automation".

Instead, you'll be replacing them with a smaller number of people who can choose training sets and interpret Watson's output. You'll also see savings in your programming costs, as you've replaced several fraud detection systems with a single, unified system.

Re:

[Anonymous Coward]

Cracker Jack just called and asked for the law "degree" you got from them back. The corporations own the emails their employee's produce. If the corporation hires IBM to do this, what is not legal about it?

Finding Patterns in Crime

[WDot]

I recently listened to a talk by a Dr. Jeremy Pickens talking about this problem (I'm not his student or employee or associated with him). He argued that this is actually a tough problem to solve because there aren't obvious patterns in criminal activity. Sometimes they use code words, but the code words are different for every criminal. Sometimes they have suspicious conversations after hours, but not always. The people involved in the LIBOR scandal talked openly about their cheating, during work hours. There wasn't anything "unusual" about it to a statistical model, but it was brazen to a human investigator!

Helpful insights.

[Futurepower(R)]

Interesting.

One answer to a corrupt financial system is to have better, more complete laws, and follow them.

Re:

[DickBreath]

The criminal traders will simply find different ways to communicate which are not monitored.

Re:

[DickBreath]

How do you know a trader knows something? Maybe his trade was just a lucky, an extremely luck, an unbelievably extremely lucky guess. You have no record that he received insider knowledge.

Re:

[ark1]

This is precisely what these organization want. It is a way to turn your head the other way. "Look we know in order to remain competitive, rules have to be bent but we would prefer if you don't leave a trace within our infrastructure".

Re:

[Tablizer]

there aren't obvious patterns in criminal activity. Sometimes they use code words, but the code words are different for every criminal.

I heavily used code-words at one place simply because the office politics were so intense that little things created drama storms.

Bob: "How's the hopper rider and the green peas?"

Me: "Oh, the Flanagan popped a rabbit, which agitated the mountaineer again."

Bob: "Yeah, their fiddle-sticks pack a punch. Good thing the Flux Whopper can plug the hole, otherwise Mr. Owl's tree bra

Re:

[anonymous cupboard]

At the moment, everything to or from a trader is recorded whether Emails or Voice. Nobody goes near it unless there is an official enquiry or funny price patterns are observed. So a "Can you nudge it a bit up" may be obvious when talking about interest rates and if a human listens in. Currently, without full language recognition and some very clever analysis is that can be done is to look at whether prices seem "wrong" when compared with other data.

Shouldn't be too hard to catch...

[__aaclcg7560]

Rogue traders do it from behind.

Re:

[__aaclcg7560]

What the hell are you talking about?

Uh, seriously? Turn in your geek creds and don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.

http://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0879/1412/products/rogue-hoodie-red.jpeg?v=1453674518 [shopify.com]

Re:

[__aaclcg7560]

That still doesn't explain what you're talking about. I assume it's some kind of dice game?

Kids these days...

The rogue or thief is one of the standard playable character classes in most editions of the Dungeons & Dragons fantasy role-playing game. A rogue is a versatile character, capable of sneaky combat and nimble tricks. The rogue is stealthy and dextrous, and in 2nd edition was the only official base class from the Player's Handbook capable of finding and disarming many traps and picking locks. The rogue also has the ability to "sneak attack" ("backstab" in previous editions) enemies who are caught off-guard or taken by surprise, inflicting extra damage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogue_(Dungeons_%26_Dragons) [wikipedia.org]

Re:

[__aaclcg7560]

I thank the Emperor that the good people at the Inquisitorial Board of Malfeasance is finally doing something about this filth, what with their bartering with foul xenos.

I didn't think "Mission Earth" [amzn.to] by L. Ron Hubbard was that bad. ;)

Re:

[Enigma2175]

WATSON also needs to have access to the communication of political leaders to avoid their insider trading related to political decision making.

You're hilarious. Do you actually expect that politicians have to follow the same rules as you? Congress and the President are exempt from insider trading laws. [forbes.com] They make the laws and there is a shitload of money to be made so they just exempted themselves. Because fuck you, that's why.

What's the difference?

[rmdingler]

Allowing, nay, encouraging, surveillance by artificial intelligence to nab the evil high volume stock traders would never be misused against a general public eager to see the practice implemented.

That can't be the real motive

[Baron_Yam]

It's too easy to circumvent - use private email, pass notes, take a break and talk outside, etc.

It seems more likely that they're using this project as an opportunity for tuning Watson so it can be developed as a replacement for your average stock analyst.

Re:

[networkBoy]

It's too easy to circumvent - use private email [from a cellular network connection], pass notes, take a break and talk outside, etc.

It seems more likely that they're using this project as an opportunity for tuning Watson so it can be developed as a replacement for your average stock analyst.

FTFY

Re:

[Actually, I do RTFA]

tuning Watson so it can be developed as a replacement for your average stock analyst.

Why would they take the step backwards. After all, a PRNG does better than the average analyst.

Unemployable

[MouseR]

That bit pusher can't hold a job.

It'll end as a burger flipper.

NSA Watson

[thesjaakspoiler]

Not sure if there aint a better purpose for an AI machine else then playing jeapordy and being the next NSA tool. But that exactly points out what it can't do. Watson would be more valuable if it could do the trading but I guess that is just a pipedream.

Point Watson at Congress

[Snotnose]

Let the AI root out the rogue assholes. Ok, I know all of them are corrupt assholes, but Watson could connect the dots to let a good third of them end up in jail.

Re:

[Baron_Yam]

They are the very definition of 'middle-men'. They are the gatekeepers because they're the gatekeepers, not because they're adding value.

Because if they really were adding value, they'd simply enrich themselves with their knowledge instead of hedging their bets by taking a commission off of others.

They're glorified shamans and bookies, offering betting advice based on sheep entrails. But they get lots of coke and hookers, so they have that going for them.

Rogue Traders

[Chris Mattern]

They aren't going to worry about this. After all, they already have an Imperial Warrant. [lexicanum.com]

Rogue traders?

[cyberchondriac]

Can it catch Paladin, Barbarian, Wizard, Cleric, or Bard traders too?