Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

To Verizon, "Unlimited" Means 5 GB

Posted by kdawson on Wed Apr 04, 2007 06:25 AM
from the sue-for-false-advertising dept.
Jason writes "For years there have been stories about people getting their unlimited Verizon EVDO Wireless accounts terminated because of excessive data usage, but Verizon never explicitly said that there is a limit. Now if you dive into the terms of the Unlimited Data Service plan they have put a section in that specifically states that anything over 5GB of data usage in a one month period is considered prima facie evidence that you must be downloading movies, and you will be cut off."

Related Stories

[+] Broadband Providers' Hidden Bandwidth Limits 443 comments
An anonymous reader sends us to the Boston Globe for a story that will come as a surprise to few here: broadband suppliers will cut you off if you download too many bits. It tells the stories of several Comcast users who were warned — without specifics — that they were using "too much" bandwidth, then had their accounts summarily cancelled. Looking into the future: "...even if only a tiny fraction of customers are downloading enough to trigger the policy, that will probably change as more entertainment moves to the Internet."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
To Verizon, "Unlimited" Means 5 GB | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 743 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • What the hell? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Vampyre_Dark (630787) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @06:27AM (#18602091)
    And what if you paid for those movies?
    • Re:What the hell? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by z_gringo (452163) <`z_gringo' `at' `hotmail.com'> on Wednesday April 04 2007, @06:35AM (#18602151)
      Somehow, I don't think they care.

      It is just easier for them to sell something called "unlimited" than it is to sell something called "limited to 5GB".

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:What the hell? (Score:5, Informative)

        by Cragen (697038) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @06:44AM (#18602251)
        At least they are consistent. Verizon gives you 2GB for your FIOS email account, but will not allow any emails older than 30 days to remain in one's email folders. They are simply deleted after 30.00001 days. Thank goodness for Gmail, and all the rest. Verizon email is simply a waste. Perhaps they really don't want anyone to use. it.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:What the hell? by jimstapleton (Score:3) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:06AM
        • Re:What the hell? (Score:5, Insightful)

          by kalirion (728907) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:33AM (#18603743)
          All ISP email accounts are a waste. Why would you want something as important as email tied to a service you may quit?
          [ Parent ]
        • Re:What the hell? (Score:5, Insightful)

          by ByteofK (952750) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:38AM (#18603813)
          (Last Journal: Wednesday January 03 2007, @05:01PM)
          Whereas if you are AT&T they expect you to use their email service. While I have about 6 or 7 domains and an account at each of GMail, Yahoo and Hotmail, I thought I would not need to use the free email account they provided me. During a dispute over billing, they implemented a "soft shutoff" which involved nothing more than blocking the email account. As I was oblivious to this move I had no idea they had given us the soft shutoff so when they pulled the plug, it came as a surprise. Idiots. Even more idiotic, after crediting me the $99 breach of contract charge (even though I didn't sign a contract) and the remainder of my bill for the aggro, they realised they had over-credited me and sent me a check for $0.09. The whole billing argument was about the so-called $11 per month landline service which cost me $25. As a foreign national, US resident, they couldn't say I knew or expected the bill to be that much higher including all the taxes. Or it might have been my first phone bill after leaving home. It's crap like this that needs to be clamped down on in this country, not the illegal (or legal!) downloading of movies, music and software.
          [ Parent ]
        • Re:What the hell? by wireloose (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @12:37PM
        • Re:What the hell? by orielbean (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @12:51PM
        • Re:What the hell? by operagost (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @03:42PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:What the hell? (Score:5, Interesting)

        by squiggleslash (241428) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:35AM (#18602797)
        (Last Journal: Friday November 09, @04:36PM)

        I don't think it's "easier", it's "lazier".

        If I were Verizon, I'd be plugging the hell out of the 5G limit. I'd call it "Data 5G" or something similar, I'd describe the kinds of things you can do with 5G. I'd use the term "Effectively unlimited".

        And then after the sheer enormity of that number had sunk in, I'd create a new plan, costing $10 a month more, called "Data 20G".

        Verizon isn't merely being dishonest in calling it "Unlimited", they're also being very, very, stupid.

        [ Parent ]
        • Re:What the hell? by mgiuca (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:01AM
          • Re:What the hell? (Score:5, Insightful)

            by squiggleslash (241428) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:06AM (#18603283)
            (Last Journal: Friday November 09, @04:36PM)

            No, marketing friendly would provide you with the opportunity to grow, as described above. It's just plain idiotic.

            How, exactly, is Verizon supposed to market its bigger and better service in the future if its describing its current one as "Unlimited"?

            [ Parent ]
          • Re:What the hell? by UnxMully (Score:3) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:49AM
            • Re:What the hell? (Score:4, Interesting)

              by mgiuca (1040724) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:56AM (#18605207)
              Yeah, I totally agree.

              In Australia, no plans are truly unlimited (I think it's because of the high cost to connect us to the rest of the world). For example, I'm with Bigpond. We have the plan called ... surprise, "Unlimited". It's actually 10GB broadband, and after that, capped at about 14kbps or some ridiculous sub-modem speed, and that is truly unlimited.

              It isn't as draconian as Verizon (you don't get "terminated" or charged extra). It just isn't *really* unlimited because the Internet these days is pretty much unusable at 14kbps.
              [ Parent ]
            • Re:What the hell? by gavinjolly (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @12:50PM
            • Re:What the hell? by Some_Llama (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @01:24PM
        • Re:What the hell? (Score:4, Informative)

          by Trailer Trash (60756) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:14AM (#18603417)
          (http://www.michaelchaney.com/)

          Verizon isn't merely being dishonest in calling it "Unlimited", they're also being very, very, stupid.

          That's what rocks about the cellular service industry. Everybody's mouth-breathing stupid so it's not a competitive disadvantage.

          I read Verizon's TOS a couple of months ago when evaluating the service and said "no thanks". They say in no uncertain terms that the service is for web browsing and email only, and if you go over the 5G they'll assume you're using it for something else and cut you off with no recourse.

          While web and email are probably what I spend the most time doing, I still download iso's with bt, use ichat with my mother, stuff that uses more bandwidth. I might also use a vpn or something like that.

          I look at my mother as the quintessential "normal user", and even she is doing stuff that's outside the realm of email and web. Thankfully wifi hotspots are common enough that I'm not too worried about it.

          [ Parent ]
          • Re:What the hell? (Score:5, Interesting)

            by PopeRatzo (965947) * on Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:50AM (#18604019)
            (http://thewaxwingslain.com/)
            Now think about how a company like Verizon is going to act when there's no Net Neutrality. How long you think it's going to take before you are so limited by their TOS that you can ONLY do email and web browsing, and only using their email and approved web sites?
            [ Parent ]
          • Re:What the hell? (Score:4, Informative)

            by Intron (870560) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:02AM (#18604219)
            5GB is the upper limit. Here's the TOS:

            "Unlimited Data Plans and Features (such as NationalAccess, BroadbandAccess, Push to Talk, and certain VZEmail services) may ONLY be used with wireless devices for the following purposes: (i) Internet browsing; (ii) email; and (iii) intranet access (including access to corporate intranets, email, and individual productivity applications like customer relationship management, sales force, and field service automation). The Unlimited Data Plans and Features MAY NOT be used for any other purpose. Examples of prohibited uses include, without limitation, the following: (i) continuous uploading, downloading or streaming of audio or video programming or games; (ii) server devices or host computer applications, including, but not limited to, Web camera posts or broadcasts, automatic data feeds, automated machine-to-machine connections or peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing; or (iii) as a substitute or backup for private lines or dedicated data connections. This means, by way of example only, that checking email, surfing the Internet, downloading legally acquired songs, and/or visiting corporate intranets is permitted, but downloading movies using P2P file sharing services and/or redirecting television signals for viewing on laptops is prohibited. A person engaged in prohibited uses, continuously for one hour, could typically use 100 to 200 MBs, or, if engaged in prohibited uses for 10 hours a day, 7 days a week, could use more than 5 GBs in a month."
            [ Parent ]
            • Re:What the hell? by IgnoramusMaximus (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:46AM
            • Re:What the hell? (Score:4, Interesting)

              by advocate_one (662832) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:51AM (#18605117)
              that's me stuffed then... I took a peek at my Azureus stats... and over the last 250 or so days, I've downloaded 325 GB and uploaded 340 GB... and thats with a paltry 50KB/s upstream... That's a lot of Linux distros... mind you, there's an awful lot of public domain films and music that I download and seed as well.

              Mind you, I'm with an ISP that does not have one of these stupid "fair use" policies tied to their "unlimited" accounts... I have broadband via my cable account... and there's a fibre optic feed to a splitter thingy in the basement and I get a short coax run to my flat from that. That coax also carries my phone and TV signals.
              [ Parent ]
            • 1994 by fyoder (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @11:14AM
              • Re:1994 by snarkh (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @12:52PM
              • Re:1994 by fyoder (Score:2) Thursday April 05 2007, @08:04PM
              • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
            • 5GB limit? I only see an example. by lmnfrs (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @01:32PM
            • Re:What the hell? by Constantine Evans (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @05:05PM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          • Re:What the hell? by cayenne8 (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @10:40AM
          • FiOS by tepples (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @03:29PM
          • Re:What the hell? by Spy Hunter (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @05:54PM
          • Re:What the hell? by Workaphobia (Score:2) Thursday April 05 2007, @03:12PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:What the hell? by Zapperlink (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:51AM
        • Where the hell do they say "UNLIMITED?" by C10H14N2 (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:01AM
        • Re:What the hell? by drgonzo59 (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @10:53AM
        • Re:What the hell? by Wuhao (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @11:54AM
        • Re:What the hell? by NFN_NLN (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @12:51PM
        • Re:What the hell? by DjRenigade (Score:1) Thursday April 05 2007, @02:41AM
        • Re:What the hell? by Bloke down the pub (Score:2) Thursday April 05 2007, @05:02AM
        • Hahaha by BJH (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:30AM
        • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:What the hell? by JebJoya (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:49AM
        • Nildram... by Phil John (Score:3) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:59AM
          • Re:Nildram... by JebJoya (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:36AM
            • Re:Nildram... by aj50 (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @02:32PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Just marketing... (Score:4, Interesting)

        by xtracto (837672) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:10AM (#18603345)
        (Last Journal: Saturday October 20, @06:40PM)
        Here in the UK the same thing happens. I am always wary of those services providing unlimited *anything*. That is why I am more comfortable with Google's 3GB or 4GB or whatever space they give against say, yahoo's unlimited, because ALWAYS (show me an advertisement that does not have it) the word UNLIMITED comes with the corresponding '*' attached to it, and in the case of the broadband services they use the "Fair use" policy to trivially limit the bandwidth.

        I have also read a lot of times people assuming that the people that download a lot is *pirating* stuff. But with the current rise of multimedia content (VoIP, VoD, online gaming, and the massive amount of flash crap in the web) it is very easy to go over 2GB a month...

        [ Parent ]
      • Re:What the hell? by elrous0 (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:16AM
      • Re:What the hell? by MorderVonAllem (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:35AM
      • Re:What the hell? by alisson (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @11:24AM
      • Re:What the hell? by eonlabs (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @11:49AM
      • Re:What the hell? by Lisandro (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @12:23PM
      • Works both ways, boys. by BillGatesLoveChild (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @04:00PM
    • Re:What the hell? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @06:35AM
    • Re:What the hell? by mwvdlee (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:19AM
    • This is 2007. (Score:4, Funny)

      by MarkByers (770551) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:23AM (#18602679)
      (http://markbyers.com/ | Last Journal: Monday July 24 2006, @12:54PM)
      Paying for movies is so old-fashioned. I don't think people do it any more. If you are downloading more the 5GB then you are definitely a pirate.

      But take comfort in the fact that you are helping stop global warming.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:This is 2007. by Gr8Apes (Score:3) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:33AM
        • Re:This is 2007. (Score:4, Insightful)

          by Rogerborg (306625) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:07AM (#18603299)
          (http://slashdot.org/)

          First: (obligatory IANAL) downloading movies is perfectly legal - uploading them is illegal.

          You are dumber than toast. Downloading a movie makes a copy of it. If you're not authorised to make that copy, you're infringing the owner's rights. Just because the MPAA are only choosing to sue uploaders doesn't make downloading legal.

          [ Parent ]
        • Re:This is 2007. (Score:5, Informative)

          by RevMike (632002) <revMike.gmail@com> on Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:19AM (#18603519)
          (Last Journal: Thursday January 18 2007, @09:10PM)

          Now for the 5GB limit. Get real. 1 DVD ISO for a linux distro is 4GB alone. I could easily reach this limit in about 20 minutes without even trying, just setting up a new machine.

          I think you probably missed an important point. This is not a limit on Verizon's wired DSL or FIOS services, this is VerizonWireless' (a different company) 3G wireless data services.

          With an average download speed of about 400kbs, 5GB represents about 40 hours of continuous download. EvDO is simply not practical for moving about large amounts of data.

          I'm not a great fan of Verizon's business practices, but from a practical perspective the 5 GB limit is unlikely to affect 99.99% of their users. I'm traveling to client sites quite a bit for my job doing software implementations. I use the service extensively, mostly for web access, replicating email, and some Remote Desktop/VNC usage, and I rarely break 1GB in a month.

          [ Parent ]
          • Re:This is 2007. (Score:5, Insightful)

            by aclarke (307017) <spam AT clarke DOT ca> on Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:18AM (#18604497)
            (http://www.clarke.ca/)
            It doesn't matter if it doesn't affect 99.99% of their customers. It's still not unlimited, which is what they're advertising. It is a Big Deal for that 0.001% (higher really) of people who DO go over the value. One of my friends just got kicked off Verizon's service a couple weeks ago. He's a software developer, works at home a lot, and livs in an RV. This service SHOULD have been good for him, but after downloading a few TV shows from iTunes (NOT P2P, notice) and a couple Linux ISOs or whatever, he suddenly got booted. They didn't even give him an option to pay more and stay on the service.

            That's no "unlimited" in any real sense of the word. I don't think anyone would reasonably fault Verizon for putting a 5GB limit on their plan. To call it unlimited though is disingenuous, no matter what the fine print says, and to not offer any other more expensive options for those who do go over the limit is just stupid.
            [ Parent ]
          • Re:This is 2007. by Surt (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @10:34AM
          • Re:This is 2007. by RevMike (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @12:10PM
          • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:This is 2007. by kalirion (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:38AM
        • Re:This is 2007. by Gr8Apes (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:49AM
        • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:This is 2007. by MoHaG (Score:3) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:36AM
      • Re:This is 2007. by TrentC (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:25AM
      • Re:This is 2007. by julesh (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:35AM
      • Re:This is 2007. by nevvamind (Score:1) Thursday April 05 2007, @08:39AM
    • Re:What the hell? by sumdumass (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:11AM
    • Re:What the hell? by EVDOguy (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:39AM
    • Re:What the hell? by torrentami (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:51AM
    • Re:What the hell? by llN3M3515ll (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @10:23AM
    • Re:What the hell? by nurb432 (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @10:58AM
    • Re:What the hell? by Cros13 (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @11:15AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:What the hell? by Asphalt (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @01:02PM
    • Re:What the hell? by neerolyte (Score:1) Thursday April 05 2007, @05:08AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Ah memories... (Score:5, Funny)

    Reminds me of some time ago when I got my first hard drive with "unlimited" capacity... and then accidentally filled it up with 5GB of movies in the first few days of using it.

    I vowed next time to get a hard drive with at least twice unlimited capacity.

  • Limited != Unlimited by Lezarwerks (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @06:34AM
    • Re:Limited != Unlimited by nwbvt (Score:3) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:13AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Limited != Unlimited (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Don_dumb (927108) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:29AM (#18602739)
      Welcome to the internet in the UK, loads of ISPs advertise 'Unlimited' adsl only to actually have limits. One has been found guilty of false advertising.
      In fact many ISPs claim to have unlimited use (despite all ADSL in the UK being limited) most only state in the small print that they have 'Fair Usage Policies' (FUP) which will come in when they decide you have used too much, they always imply that there are no limits (one even states "that you dont have to monitor your usage!").

      This is simply illegal IMHO, you cannot state that something is unlimited when it is limited. Even if this contradiction comes in the small print, especially when you do not state how limited it is. A c
      This page http://www.kitz.co.uk/adsl/caps.htm [kitz.co.uk] outlines it perfectly.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Limited != Unlimited by Gr8Apes (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:52AM
    • Re:Limited != Unlimited by westlake (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:01AM
    • Re:Limited != Unlimited by FutureDomain (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:54AM
  • .ca by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @06:34AM
    • Re:.ca (Score:5, Funny)

      by aicrules (819392) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:10AM (#18602513)
      You hit 120GB a month? Do you remember what the outside looks like?
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:.ca by The Dobber (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:26AM
        • Re:.ca by Cereal Box (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:33AM
          • Re:.ca (Score:4, Insightful)

            by EvilGrin666 (457869) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:37AM (#18602819)
            (http://www.edugeek.net/)
            Sure, right now it's only 'Pirates' hitting these limitations. However next week/month/year it'll be 'Average Joe User' with his . For example, how much bandwidth does the average Vonage user munch? What happens when IPTV starts to hit mainstream?
            [ Parent ]
            • Re:.ca (Score:4, Insightful)

              by Cereal Box (4286) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:00AM (#18603181)
              First of all, Vonage hardly uses any bandwidth. It's something like 128kbps, so roughly 16KBps. NO ONE is going to talk 24/7, and even if they did, it's not going to rack up as much bandwidth as say, having several Bittorrents going at once.

              Again, with IPTV, there's a realistic limit on how much you're going to watch in a given month. In other words, there is a clear definition of what "unlimited" means in that context. And there's also no way in hell that someone can possibly watch TV 24/7 for an entire month, so that alone is evidence enough to justify that someone is abusing their connection. And let's not forget that the cable company can easily throttle back your general Internet bandwidth in the case that you're using excessive IPTV bandwidth.

              Now as far as the people in the article, they are CLEARLY using their cellphones as a general Internet connection for their computers. This is FORBIDDEN by the cellphone TOS unless you sign up for a different plan. I just flat out don't believe that someone used 5GB of bandwidth in a month by checking email and surfing web pages using ONLY their cellphone.
              [ Parent ]
              • Re:.ca by djrok212 (Score:3) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:11AM
              • Re:.ca by aicrules (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:12AM
              • Re:.ca by michrech (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:26AM
              • Re:.ca by remmelt (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:45AM
              • Re:.ca by green1 (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @12:08PM
              • a good sized household by alizard (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @04:25PM
              • Re:.ca by mxs (Score:2) Thursday April 05 2007, @04:08AM
              • Re:.ca by SydShamino (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @01:31PM
              • Re:.ca by aicrules (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @02:08PM
              • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
            • Re:.ca by *weasel (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:27AM
            • Re:.ca by -noefordeg- (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:28AM
            • Re:.ca by Gazzonyx (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:52AM
            • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
          • Re:.ca by mysqlrocks (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:28AM
            • Re:.ca by Cereal Box (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:46AM
              • Re:.ca by mysqlrocks (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:16AM
              • Re:.ca by Cereal Box (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:36AM
              • Re:.ca by Shakrai (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:57AM
              • Re:.ca by mysqlrocks (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @10:26AM
              • Re:.ca by Cereal Box (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @10:44AM
              • Re:.ca by Cereal Box (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @10:48AM
              • Re:.ca by Shakrai (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @11:36AM
          • Re:.ca by PetrusMagnusII (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:42AM
          • Re:.ca by Joe The Dragon (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @11:02AM
          • Re:.ca by j-turkey (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @11:16AM
        • Re:.ca by Reece400 (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:27AM
        • Re:.ca by ichigo 2.0 (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:08AM
      • Re:.ca (Score:5, Funny)

        by Gordonjcp (186804) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:36AM (#18602813)
        (http://slashdot.org/)
        Do you remember what the outside looks like?

        Of course he does, he's got all these movies of it...
        [ Parent ]
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Depends on the household as well by phorm (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @10:21AM
      • Re:.ca by blackomegax (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @06:22PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:.ca by TheThiefMaster (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:24AM
      • Re:.ca by creepynut (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:49AM
    • Re:.ca by tzanger (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:33AM
    • Re:.ca by toleraen (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:36AM
    • Re:.ca by lambini (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:44AM
      • Re:.ca by lambini (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:26AM
    • Forwarding letters by Wrexs0ul (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:49AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Linux (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 04 2007, @06:34AM (#18602139)
    and what if you're downloading linux distributions or other operating systems? ISO's for DVD's are consistently around 4gb. IF you download one dvd iso and one cd iso theres a good chance you will already be over the limit.
    • Re:Linux by Paradigm_Complex (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:29AM
      • Re:Linux by Fred_A (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:42AM
    • Re:Linux by igotmybfg (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:32AM
    • Re:Linux by Cereal Box (Score:1) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:39AM
      • Re:Linux by aclarke (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:06AM
      • Re:Linux by _Sprocket_ (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:29AM
        • Re:Linux by Cereal Box (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @10:02AM
          • Re:Linux by _Sprocket_ (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @10:31AM
      • Re:Linux by davper (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:44AM
        • Re:Linux by Cereal Box (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:57AM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Linux by swv3752 (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @12:21PM
        • Re:Linux by Cereal Box (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @02:35PM
      • Re:Linux by Cereal Box (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @09:06AM
      • 6 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Linux by visualight (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @07:46AM
      • Re:Linux by Spazmania (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @10:46AM
    • Re:Linux by arth1 (Score:2) Wednesday April 04 2007, @08:19AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Well, in Canada... (Score:4, Funny)

    by lavid (1020121) on Wednesday April 04 2007, @06:35AM (#18602141)