Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

BBC Uses Skype Links In Murder Hunt

Posted by kdawson on Sun Dec 17, 2006 11:12 PM
from the free-and-anonymous dept.
Nico M writes "The highly publicized UK murder hunt for the serial killer(s) of five young sex workers in Suffolk is using Skype to ask the public for information. BBC News is embedding freephone Skype links to both the police incident room and Crimestoppers UK. Is this the first time Skype has been used in this way?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Sex workers? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Dan East (318230) on Sunday December 17 2006, @11:21PM (#17282736)
    (http://dexplor.com/)
    Sex worker, is that the PC term for prostitute?

    Dan East
    • Why yes... by Frosty Piss (Score:3) Sunday December 17 2006, @11:29PM
    • Sex worker, is that the PC term for prostitute?

      I am amazed that so few slashdotters (reading the first 10 posts or so) are unfamiliar with that term. (Do you all live under rocks or something?)

      Its basically a superset of prostitute - including people in the industry who don't actually fuck for money, ie strip dancers, porn stars, topless waiters, dominatrixes (sp?) etc.

      Nothing PC about it.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Sex workers? (Score:5, Funny)

        by lastninja (237588) on Sunday December 17 2006, @11:56PM (#17282920)
        including people in the industry who don't actually fuck for money, ie strip dancers, porn stars, topless waiters, dominatrixes (sp?) etc.
        What kind of boring non-fucking porn do you watch?
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Sex workers? by Marbleless (Score:2) Monday December 18 2006, @12:01AM
      • Re:Sex workers? (Score:4, Insightful)

        by b0s0z0ku (752509) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:16AM (#17283018)
        I am amazed that so few slashdotters (reading the first 10 posts or so) are unfamiliar with that term. (Do you all live under rocks or something?)

        A lot of Slashdotters are American and the term isn't really used in the USA, probably since prostitution is illegal in most parts of the country (excepting Nevada but not Las Vegas city). So terms that "legitimize" it are less likely to be used.

        -b.

        [ Parent ]
        • prostitution is illegal in most parts of the country

          Seriously? Illegal? (not just regulated?)

          Why is it illegal to sell a (much in demand) service in the land of the free?
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Sex workers? (Score:4, Informative)

            by b0s0z0ku (752509) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:33AM (#17283100)
            Seriously? Illegal? (not just regulated?)

            Yeah, illegal, except for "rural" Nevada. Enforced to various degrees depending on where you are, and there are always loopholes for people setting up brothels ("it's a massage parlor, dammit!"). As to why - probably due to religious taboos to a large extent. After all, the USA *was* founded by Puritans.

            I hate to say it, but better illegal than legal *and* legally recognized by the State as a "normal" profession like in Germany. There was the recent case of an unemployed lady there who was refused continuing unemployment benefits because she didn't take a job as a "sex worker." (Cite: [telegraph.co.uk]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/ne ws/2005/01/30/wgerm30.xml [telegraph.co.uk] ) I'd be ok if it were legal for the purpose of harm reduction but not overtly encouraged by the State.

            -b.

            [ Parent ]
            • Re:Sex workers? by notwrong (Score:3) Monday December 18 2006, @01:23AM
              • Re:Sex workers? by b0s0z0ku (Score:3) Monday December 18 2006, @01:27AM
              • Re:Sex workers? (Score:5, Insightful)

                by MichaelSmith (789609) on Monday December 18 2006, @02:41AM (#17283600)
                (http://netapps.com.au/)
                Agreed about the "legal but voluntary" part. As far as US police, I don't think that they try *that* hard. They may run an occasional sting operation in some cities to look like they're doing something or if the residents of the neighborhood complain, but the law isn't enforced all that severely.

                The big advantage of having prostitution legal and recognised as such is that you can require regular checks for STD's, as well as enforce standards for working conditions.

                [ Parent ]
            • Re:Sex workers? by kestasjk (Score:2) Monday December 18 2006, @01:42AM
            • Re:Sex workers? by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Monday December 18 2006, @02:25AM
            • Re:Sex workers? (Score:5, Informative)

              by 1u3hr (530656) on Monday December 18 2006, @02:25AM (#17283546)
              I hate to say it, but better illegal than legal *and* legally recognized by the State as a "normal" profession like in Germany. There was the recent case of an unemployed lady there who was refused continuing unemployment benefits

              Note there are no names or dates in that stpory. It's an urban legend. Never happened. http://www.snopes.com/media/notnews/brothel.asp [snopes.com]

              ...a story was sensationalized for political purposes and passed from one news source to the next, and somewhere in the rewriting and translating process what was originally discussed as a mere hypothetical possibility has now been reported as a factual occurrence.
              [ Parent ]
            • Re:Sex workers? by pafrusurewa (Score:1) Monday December 18 2006, @08:08AM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          • Re:Sex workers? by RealGrouchy (Score:1) Monday December 18 2006, @12:35AM
          • Re:Sex workers? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday December 18 2006, @12:46AM
          • Re:Sex workers? by a.d.trick (Score:2) Monday December 18 2006, @01:55PM
          • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Sex workers? by Grismar (Score:1) Monday December 18 2006, @01:33AM
        • San Francisco... by msimm (Score:2) Monday December 18 2006, @02:13AM
        • Re:Sex workers? by Phillip2 (Score:2) Monday December 18 2006, @12:21PM
      • Re:Sex workers? by martijn-s (Score:1) Monday December 18 2006, @01:33AM
    • Re:Sex workers? (Score:5, Funny)

      by mhore (582354) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:38AM (#17283118)
      Sex worker, is that the PC term for prostitute?

      No. The term you're thinking of is Penile Stimulation Engineer, or something to that effect.

      Mike.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Sex workers? by nacturation (Score:2) Monday December 18 2006, @03:33AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • No, it is the respectful term. by jotaeleemeese (Score:2) Monday December 18 2006, @04:06AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • sex workers? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by puto (533470) * <theflatline@yahoo.com> on Sunday December 17 2006, @11:34PM (#17282814)
    (http://www.myprohost.com/)
    Well although my nick is Puto, which is technically male whore in spanish, and for the umpteenth time I am not gay and I know what it means it some countries.

    But when in the hell did hookers become "sex workers"? What happened to prostitute?

    Whore, escort, streetwalker, lady of the night, etc. Sex workers?

    I guess this is like the "sanitation engineers"(garbagemen) or "network engineers"(i got a website and a linksys router and have 15 workstations to manage at work.)

    Puto

  • This is probably a really bad idea (Score:5, Informative)

    by AmiMoJo (196126) <mojo@@@world3...net> on Sunday December 17 2006, @11:43PM (#17282856)
    (http://world3.net/)
    This is probably not a good idea, because there is no anonymity with Skype. It is trivial to log the IP address of anyone calling. At least with a normal phone number, you can just use a public payphone and there is no real chance of being identified.

    Anonymity is really important, especially if they want other sex workers to contact them. After all the recent "crack-downs" and "zero tolerance" policies, not to mention the bad reputation the police have, is it any wonder that prostitutes dont want to talk to them?
  • i cant see them (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 17 2006, @11:52PM (#17282900)

    nowhere in the article can i see Skype mentioned or see any Skype links, perhaps the submitter has a Skype BHO (browser helper object) or a Firefox plugin that creates Skype links from phone numbers

    iam on WinXP with FF2 and IE7 but i have Skype 2.5 (not the hideous mess called v3.0) perhaps Skype V3.0 installs such a facility by default
  • Why do people suddenly care? (Score:1, Insightful)

    by pembo13 (770295) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:18AM (#17283030)
    (http://www.pembo13.com/)
    This women have been suffering for ages now. And have been killed by all sorts of people before. Why do people suddenly care about them? Society is very wierd. I personally think these women needed help long before one dude started taking them out.
    • Re:Why do people suddenly care? by b0s0z0ku (Score:3) Monday December 18 2006, @12:38AM
    • Re:Why do people suddenly care? by TheoMurpse (Score:3) Monday December 18 2006, @03:09AM
    • by evilandi (2800) <andrew@aoakley.com> on Monday December 18 2006, @05:01AM (#17284130)
      (http://www.aoakley.com/)
      pembo13: Why do people suddenly care?

      The answer: This case involves a large number of murders within a short space of time in a quiet semi-rural area where murders are exceptionally rare and crime very low.

      Let's not kid ourselves that anyone (significant) cares about prostitutes, especially not drug-addicted ones. This is about five murders within a fortnight in a middle-class provincial town (100,000 folks). Ipswitch [wikipedia.org], contrary to London-based journalists misunderstanding, doesn't have a "red light district". It has a corner of a road near a truck stop. Not even one whole street. Think almost the furthest town you can imagine from The Bronx. Think Agatha Christie's "Miss Marple".

      To give context, the town is only a few miles from where Constable painted The Hay Wain [wikipedia.org], possibly the most famous English countryside scene of all time. Imagine five naked dead women on the banks of that painting- the bodies were found in similar locations. THAT is why people suddenly care, because it is so incredibly unusual given the semi-rural location.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Why do people suddenly care? by benzapp (Score:2) Monday December 18 2006, @09:23AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • First time for what? (Score:5, Funny)

    by SQL Error (16383) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:26AM (#17283062)
    Is this the first time Skype has been used in this way?
    For making phone calls? Probably not.
  • Mobile Phone Tracking (Score:4, Interesting)

    by MrSteveSD (801820) on Monday December 18 2006, @12:35AM (#17283108)
    I wonder if the murderer was stupid enough to have a mobile phone with him when he dumped the bodies. All you would have to do is do a search of all mobile phones that have been in those particular cells at the estimated times of death of each victim. The bodies were dumped in the surrounding countryside so it might narrow it down to a few phones. Another possible line of attack is that the murderer's mobile phone would have been in the same cell as each victims mobile phone for some amount of time. Once you have his mobile number, the game is up. Even if it was not purchased in his name, the phone would spend most of its time where he lives, so it would be simple to narrow it down to the row of houses where he lives.
  • by rdwald (831442) on Monday December 18 2006, @01:03AM (#17283228)
    Most of them already dead inside.
  • google (Score:1)

    by ticklish2day (575989) on Monday December 18 2006, @02:29AM (#17283560)

    I must make it a point to recommend this awesome tool called a "Search Engine" to you. In my humble opinion (IMHO), the best "Search Engine" I know is named Google and is available at www.google.com [google.com]. It's free and easy to use.. To go there, please click the text that is underlined in the previous sentence. There is a rectangle that us geeks call a "text box" where you can type "words". For example, why don't you type "skype dead hookers" or "skype police investigation" into it and click the button named "Google Search"? You will then be magically transported to a page with lots of things on it that you can click and figure out the answer to your question.

    Fellow slashdotters, please add to this comment with more detailed instructions on how to search using Google (screenshots welcome).

  • There are NO SKYPE LINKS in TFA (Score:5, Informative)

    by 1u3hr (530656) on Monday December 18 2006, @02:33AM (#17283576)
    Anyone with information that would help Ipswich detectives is urged to contact the incident room on 0800 096 1011 or speak to Crimestoppers in confidence on 0800 555 111.

    Which idiot wrote the headline without even looking at TFA?

  • Story is false (Score:5, Informative)

    by Geoffreyerffoeg (729040) on Monday December 18 2006, @03:19AM (#17283752)
    (I posted this further down as a reply to an anon comment, so it got buried.)

    Guys, this story is false. I see no Skype links. Do you see any Skype links?
  • Slightly Offtopic (Score:3, Funny)

    by CmdrGravy (645153) on Monday December 18 2006, @04:10AM (#17283936)
    (http://www.joe-bunting.com/club)
    There was a great interview with one of the Chief Constables involved in this case about the number of calls they were receiving from the public

    Interviewer: There's been a massive public response to your request for information hasn't there, how are you coping with the sheer volume of information you are getting ?
    Police: Obviously we're very pleased with the positive response and we're working through everything we receive.
    Interviewer: A lot of its very helpful but you were just telling me you're also getting a lot of calls about peoples dreams and what cards or dice have told them ?
    Police: Er, yes we are. That sort of information isn't a high priority
    Interviewer: Clearly you're being polite, it's just a waste of your time isn't it ?
    Police: We would rather concentrate on serious information
    Interviewer: These people are just getting in the way of your investigation by phoning up with this, frankly, nonsense aren't they ?
    Police: Well yes, we would rather they didn't bother us with superstious nonsense.
  • Slashdot's most offensive moments (Score:5, Insightful)

    by gjuk (940514) on Monday December 18 2006, @04:26AM (#17283988)
    So, someone posts a non-story about Skype being used by the police and bbc to report infomration on murdered women. Slashdot users don't discuss the fakeness of the story, or the skype marketing angle, or the future of telecoms. They feel it appropriate to make declarations and guenuinely offensive 'humour' about murdered women.
    Seriously, these women may be prostitutes, but the key facts are: 5 people were murdered in a market town in the space of a couple of weeks. These people were people; daughters, mothers, sisters. They were all, I believe, hooked on drugs. And one day they may have got off drugs and enjoyed a normal life. Not now. The fascination some /.ers have shown for the 'sex angle' makes me worry about who I'm associating with here, and says far more about the writers than the victims.
  • advertising (Score:2)

    by owlnation (858981) on Monday December 18 2006, @05:05AM (#17284152)
    If the BBC is using Skype - and there seems to be some doubt about this - then someone should be asking serious questions about their charter. The BBC is forbidden from advertising and is directly funded by a license fee.

    To the point where kids TV show "Blue Peter" would have handcraft items on making things out of old packaging, any branding or logos on the packaging had to be blacked out.

    No way should the BBC be promoting skype - blatantly or otherwise. Brits, ask the BBC for your license fee back. Ask your MP why this is happening. If the BBC wants to be honest about their advertising then fine, scrap the license fee.

    Of course, the BBC smuggles PR, payola, and viral marketing into news, tech and entertainment items all the time - and I'm sure someone somewhere gets a nice backhander for those. The News dept is the one most guilty of marketing products.

    However, to be this blatant should result in someone being fired.
    • Re:advertising by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday December 18 2006, @05:16AM
    • Re:advertising by 1u3hr (Score:2) Monday December 18 2006, @05:47AM
    • Re:advertising by glesga_kiss (Score:2) Monday December 18 2006, @07:10AM
    • Re:advertising by Angostura (Score:2) Monday December 18 2006, @07:12AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Sex Workers Okay? (Score:1)

    by nerdussuperior (1041196) on Monday December 18 2006, @06:35AM (#17284406)
    It can seem like an enjoyable way to make alot of bucks if it wasn't that it often destroys there self-worth. There is something about intimate contact and cash that makes women just feel like things being used. People naturally look for respect, even from strangers. Somehow I think sex workers get little of that.
  • Offensive tag (Score:2)

    by NemosomeN (670035) on Monday December 18 2006, @08:29AM (#17284920)
    (Last Journal: Friday May 20 2005, @08:54AM)
    tagged "deadsexworkers" in response
  • Murderers MySpace Profile! (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 18 2006, @08:39AM (#17285044)
    The murderers myspace profile is here [myspace.com]. Found it after reading this article [bbc.co.uk]
  • by smoker2 (750216) on Monday December 18 2006, @08:59AM (#17285206)
    (http://www.dvstocklocker.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday October 20 2004, @06:21PM)
    I am going off at a tangent here, but as the post have mainly gone towards the sex angle, I thought I'd bring it up.

    Here in the UK, I was reading a Littlewoods mail order catalogue (just for christmas gift ideas) and came across a new toy for young girls.

    It's a *POLE DANCING* kit !

    What is wrong with this picture ? I mean, have the womens liberation movement ceased to exist ? I mentioned this to a friend of mine and he replied that he already knew about it, and that his daughter had been doing it as a course at school ! WTF.

    I am all for liberisation etc, but surely this is a bit over the top. I mean, do they teach these children what the fucking pole represents ?

    I tried to get to Littlewoods website to find a link, but the net is slow here right now, google has some good links to a story on it though, as it appears Tesco [google.co.uk] had a similar product. I remember a time when women got pissed off if you bought a young girl a pram and a doll, now apparently we can train them to be erotic dancers, at public expense ! Jesus H Christ, on a bike. What's next, My Little Pony Fuck 'n' Suck outfits, Crotchless panties (age 5 to 6), Leather gear for the discerning 8 year old ?

    Amazon have the same product [amazon.co.uk] and it even includes toy dollars ! They also have a toy lapdancing kit, which seems to have the words "not a toy" hastily tacked onto the description.

    Sometimes you do actually have to think of the children.
  • by Karganeth (1017580) on Monday December 18 2006, @11:54AM (#17287766)
    Have you heard about that dyslexic santa in Ipswitch? He keeps leaving prozzies under the trees.
  • Yeah .. hilarious (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 18 2006, @12:29AM (#17283078)
    Imagine if every anti-U.S. story on /. were tagged with deadiraqis. The /. left would be up in arms. Dead hookers is ok though. Because you know, they weren't human.
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Finally (Score:2)

    by Angostura (703910) on Monday December 18 2006, @06:50AM (#17284444)
    Not particularly funny.
    [ Parent ]
  • 10 replies beneath your current threshold.