So a cop just has to say he saw something illegal, honest and you lose your 5th Amendment rights?
Until we have quantum computers, which probably isn't that far off now.
It's going to be interesting when spy agencies get them and start decrypting all that decades old data they could never get into before.
The NSA has exploits for iOS so doesn't need Apple's help. This is about the police and maybe the FBI who don't have access to those tools (yet).
I think the GP has a point. Of Apple defied the order what would happen? Tim Cook in handcuffs? There would be hipster riots up and down the country, not to mention investors and friends of the government getting very upset as their stock price crashed.
It would be risky but if they really stand by their principals like they say they do...
The changes they made were in response to the Bin Laden assassination and the failure of their cell based organisation to make headway.
If he had stayed in the US he would have been locked away and never seen again. The trial would have been in secret because the information was secret, and he wouldn't have been allowed to communicate.
The justice system is broken and trying to fix it from the outside is a legitimate course of action.
I have a Nexus 5 with a long boot time encryption password and a shorter unlock pin. Seems it was already fixed.
To what data are you referring? Google holds keys for some stuff like email, which is sent in plaintext anyway and which they need to offer webmail access. They claim not to have the keys to synced browser data though, and apart from some innuendo and "of course they do" you offer no evidence to the contrary.
Unlike Apple, Google can't recover your backups if you are completely locked out of your account and don't know the password. That suggests that they really don't have the key.
Besides which, local encryption on your phone is designed to frustrate thrives and other people trying to rape your phone like the police. It also makes wiping easy and effective when you want to sell it.
The language is very specific. Maybe they didn't get a request for bulk data, maybe they just had to provide a back door into everything so that law enforcement could serve itself. Then again, maybe not, we have no way of knowing, which makes all American company's claims that they resist the government worthless.
I guess you have not seen how people swipe through the gates at stations. It certainly would be more hassle so I can see people sticking with their NFC cards for the daily commute. Does it work even if the phone is locked?
Google Translate, or Bing if you are desperate.
The difference with Apple Pay is that they can't use a stolen phone
Really? Are you saying that the phone needs to be unlocked before it can be used to make a payment? Sounds incredibly inconvenient.
With current phone payment systems there is no need to unlock the phone or open an app before using them, you just touch the phone to the payment terminal with the screen off and it pays. It would be annoying when trying to use the phone during busy periods to get on public transport or pay for stuff at the station otherwise.
Before someone screams that it's insecure, NFC debit/credit cards don't need to be "unlocked" either. The payment limit is so low that the banks just eat the losses which are more than made up for by you using NFC instead of cash all the time, and any thief will be more interested in the phone itself.
You mean mean the Google Wallet that isn't available in large parts of the world?
Well, Apple Pay isn't available anywhere in the world yet, so Google is still ahead.
They need to deploy terminals? That's a fail right there.
I agree, Apple screwed up there. Good job Google's system works with existing terminals.
More recent stats: http://bcnranking.jp/news/1408...
Why pick stats from one particular month instead of the latest ones?
Also note that the iPhone has few models, where as sales for other manufacturers are spread over many more different ones. According to those stats over 70% of phones sold are not iPhones, and that's despite the extremely heavy promotion.
I use it with a sleep monitor to read back data. Many other health devices use it. It's better than Bluetooth for things that don't need real time monitoring because it's much lower power. My sleep monitor supports the iPhone but the battery lasts a few days instead of a few weeks if you have one.