Comment Re:Gold bars you say? (Score 1) 80
Don got a gold bar in his knickers after hearing that.
Don got a gold bar in his knickers after hearing that.
"algorithmic funds" have been around for a long time. Letting neural nets guess rather than a hand-coded algorithm guess is not much different, conceptually. It's generally the type of investment that "high rollers" select.
Somebody forgot to validate the word-count
"AI will save Linux from Rust"
MBA 1: "Hmm, how can we squeeze more revenue out of this gizmo?"
MBA 2: "Short term revenue or long term?"
MBA 1: "Short term of course! It's all we do."
MBA 2: "Then stuff it with more ads!"
MBA 1: "Brilliant!
"Taiwan is booming"
Especially when Xi goes to grab it.
endless scrolling, a never-ending click-bait engine.
Maybe I'm a bigot, but I cannot unsee this stereotype of a Swedish Chef.
Take that, Orange Villain!
and radio ads that claim such should be sued to Pluto.
There was a tech slump around 1983 due to the video game crash, and again in 1992 due to mass "Glasnost" aerospace layoffs. There probably would have been one around 2009, but mobile devices were booming, taking up the slack.
Save up, the "business cycle" ain't going away.
I mean you are cherry-picking experts' opinions of that time after you know the outcome. Let's say there were 100 experts with an opinion back then. Let's say 20 predicted it was not transitory. You now quote the 20, pretending the 80 didn't exist. A propaganda trick.
A buffed Darwin Award
You are cherry-picking opinions after the fact
So all the well-educated economists just magically ignored that knowledge?
Most probably thought they were talking about a TV series.
Often statistics are used as a drunken man uses lampposts -- for support rather than illumination.