Slashdot Log In
New Stargate Series In the Works
Posted by
CowboyNeal
on Fri Dec 15, 2006 12:44 AM
from the on-the-horizon dept.
from the on-the-horizon dept.
Skythe writes "Gateworld reports that an exclusive, third Stargate series is in the works: 'The new series is in the concept phase, and is being actively worked on by the Vancouver creatives behind Stargate SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis. No concept for the show has yet been revealed.'
Gateworld also reports despite the cancellation of SG-1, the series is likely for a 2007 debut. I wonder if the direct-to-dvd movies will any influence on the new series, and what the concept behind the show will be?"
Related Stories
[+]
'Stargate: SG-1' Cancelled 605 comments
Ant writes "The Sci-Fi channel has announced that it will not be renewing its (very popular) original series Stargate SG-1 for another season.The spinoff series Stargate: Atlantis will get the nod, though, airing for a fourth year. SG-1 aired its 200th episode on August 18th, and the SF series is the longest-running SF show on American television." Gateworld has further details: "New episodes of both Stargate SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis continue Fridays this summer starting at 9 p.m. Eastern/Pacific, leading up to the mid-season finale on September 22. The second half of the season will begin in March, leading to SG-1's final bow on SCI FI in June."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
New Stargate Series In the Works
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 294 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
New Series (Score:4, Funny)
Re:New Series (Score:4, Funny)
(Last Journal: Tuesday June 12, @07:38PM)
I'm all for it! (Score:4, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Saturday August 18, @01:56PM)
Re:I'm all for it! (Score:5, Funny)
(http://66.249.93.104/ | Last Journal: Monday November 20 2006, @09:27AM)
Then I can gues... (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.sympato.ch/)
Then, I can guess that most language you've learned are
- Using alphabets for writing (as opposed to ideograph or syllable writing systems).
- Maybe even using some form of latin alphabet (as opposed to greek or cyrillic)
Reading is the most easy for you because you're quite familar with the symbols used to write language. The written form of words is the only thing that is actually new to you. Your eyes and your brain is already accustomed to the shape of most letters your going to encounter (you obviously are accustomed to latin alphabet, and maybe cyrillic and greek aren't too alien for you). If you had to start to learn chinese, Korean (with its very own concept of "alphabet disguised as a syllabary"), japanesse (OMG !!! 3 different writing systems !), old egyptian (Hieroglyphs), old Sumerian (Cuneiform), alternate forms to write old Greek (Linear B wasn't even designed to encode greek words), old bulgarian (using Glagolitic [wikipedia.org]) old Mayan (no, no. these aren't complexe beautiful painting, they are writings), reading won't be that easy, because you'll have to put up with a completly new writing system, that doesn't look like anything you're used to.
SG happen to describe a universe where most human cultures were kept to a more ancient and primitive form.
Most old real-life human civilisation had mostly an oral tradition, people spoke much more than they wrote those language. Being illiterate was quite common and normal. Writing was only a small very specialised job done by specifically trained people/slaves (scribes). Both because of it and in consequence of it, writing wasn't a practical simple system, but a very complex one, with thousands of different symbols. Language of similar linguistic groups may use completly different writing system (because of its complexity writing wasn't carried over by people over cultural evolution, but may have been reinvented adhoc when needed for very specific purposes) old greek is a good exemple (you have Linear B used during Mycenian times, then a long period of purely oral tradition, then the Greek alphabet being adopted). It's the opposite of modern situation (were Latin is the most pervasive form of writing and due to computer and internet popularity is even used in language that traditionally never used it : like romanji).
In the fictional universe of Stargate this may translate that only earthlings did evolve their writing systems into something practical and easy to learn (in the movie, writing was showed to be forbiden). Most other population may have kept a lot of different and complex writing, some of which aren't even alphabet but much bigger character sets (syllables or ideographs).
In which case, for a team to be able to communicate in the fictionnal SG universe
- for spoken language
they need to learn some basic words in most language. As language are supposed to be primitive, they're expected to speak different dialects of mostly old Indo-European language. This concretly could mean learning a dozen or so translation for most common words needed for basic communication. The rest is usually dialectal difference and can be completed with guess work as dialogue is going. (And as experience in other language accumulate this is becoming even easier). The actual barrier isn't as much the vocabulary as the potential social faux-pas that could exist in a fictionnal setting where culture and civilisation are scattered into a lot of small and separated sub-groups accross the galaxy.
- for written language
They would need to learn several writing systems, most of which consists of thousands of different symbols and unlike spoken language, can't be grouped into closely related groups. Also, when you're not sure about the meaning you can't just ask the text to explain it.
To make comparison with other fictionnal situations : You're m
Re:I'm all for it! (Score:4, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/)
Next, on Stargate 9-1-1.
If they put Morena Baccarin in it (Score:2)
Hey! (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.jasonmurphy.org/)
No joke! (Score:4, Interesting)
Stargate: Vice City (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Stargate: Vice City (Score:4, Funny)
Damn them for cancelling SG-1 (Score:2)
(http://www.pembo13.com/)
Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3675.html)
Learn what? Futurama was much better than The Simpsons.
And you are like Hitler.
Come ON already (Score:2)
Re:Come ON already (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Come ON already (Score:5, Insightful)
If the show keeps going on like this it's no wonder it didn't survive. As much as I like SG-1, it's too similar to Dragonball Z for comfort.
I, for one, (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://kim.biyn.com/)
Given the production quality of SG-1 and Atlantis, I'm looking forward to any new Stargate series that comes out.
Re:I, for one, (Score:4, Funny)
(http://www.loraksus.org/)
Re:It does need a reboot. (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.jerrywong.net/)
IMHO the series is in dire need of a reboot, which is why I find myself enjoying Atlantis more than SG1. With a show like SG1 it's far too easy to rely on prior-knowledge and previous episodes, which rewards long-time fans but make the show increasingly unapproachable by new viewers. Since the show isn't gaining many fans, it experiences a net loss of viewers until it inevitably starves itself out and gets canned.
With Atlantis character development has to be pushed, enemies are still fresh, mysterious, and menacing. Part of the thing with the Goa'uld at the beginning was how little we knew about them. We didn't know their customs, we didn't know too much about their physiology, and we certainly had no idea how to beat them. Part of the problem right now is that they've killed off all the bad guys, necessitating the need to create ever more powerful bad guys - and now we're literally fighting gods. The show's also drifted away from the Stargate-y roots. I enjoyed episodes where the gate would meet strange new enemies through the gate, not... by going to hyperspace and waging intergalactic war in ginormous battlecruisers. Please. Leave that to Star Trek.
Not 2007, but 2008 (Score:1)
(http://www.mpcforum.com/)
i've never seen the show... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:i've never seen the show... (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.underachievement.org/ | Last Journal: Sunday January 21 2007, @10:58PM)
I would have thought 1 would be where Voyager sits?
I'd have to put it at 9.5 or 10, simply because I enjoy it as much as BSG.
The thing with Stargate is that just like BSG (Black Market), it has a few episodes that just aren't that great (The Light). Also shared with BSG, it's *much* better if you know the backstory and have been watching the show instead of trying to just jump right in (though there are episodes where this would be fine).
I've watched SG-1 since it first aired in 1997 and can say that I've enjoyed it. Overall it's been quite good and it has had some stellar episodes. Atlantis struggled the first season, but has gotten better over time and I'm looking forward to the rest of the 3rd season.
Maybe they can get good actors this time...? (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Sunday June 13 2004, @11:15AM)
Thank you (Score:1)
(http://fmlug.org/)
Two words... (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.nojailforpot.com/)
Series Premier (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Saturday August 18 2001, @11:04AM)
Immediately upon the arrival of the expeditionary team, modelled after the UN team but this time once again just American, the leaders of the expedition will find themselves whisked away to meet super-dooper Ascended beings, which the Ascended beings previously only suspected the existence of (not that they bothered to tell us), and make the Ascended beings look like tiny, wimpy children. One look at our gruff military hero with his background of killing and hitting and breaking and just generally, you know, surviving in our rough-and-tumble universe will convince our Super-Dooper Ascended beings that they really ought to consider pruning our entire multiverse due to excessive violence (since they, in their Super-Dooper Ascended state, haven't faced a threat to their existence in seventy-three trillion billion years, so they have totally forgotten what that's like), thus setting off a frantic five-season story arc to convince the Super-Dooper Ascended beings to not destroy us, or, failing all else, could you consider just destroying the Ori?
If we're lucky, our heros will fail. *smirk*
I like Stargate. I'd even say I like it a lot. But it was already a bit implausible that Our Heros could beat the Gua'uld. Not impossible, perhaps, given the Gua'ulds cultural weaknesses and their basic inability to band together meaningfully, but implausible. Taking on Ascended beings is just utterly unbelievable, and also has the problem of that basically being it. There's nothing above Ascended beings, really. Even if there is, it wouldn't really matter to us; how would we really distinguish between Ascended beings and my Super-Dooper Ascended, considering that Ascended beings already seem to possess the ability to throw us into an arbitrary simulation if they so chose? There really is no power above that from the human point of view; Ascended beings do not seem to be what you might call Gods of the Universe but they are basically Gods over individual material beings, able to fully control their minds, senses, etc.
I'm not sure Stargate needs a full re-boot in the comic book or the "Enterprise" sense, but they need to sit down and rethink what they want to be about: Do they want to be another Star Trek, which is where they are headed in many ways? Do they really need to have a Single Overarching Threat, especially given that they've basically maxed out that story line? Do they really want to become Yet Another Time Travel Show, which they've so far mostly managed to avoid but are in immanent danger of being sucked into that black hole? There's still a lot of interesting stories to be told, but only if they change some of their story arc templates.
And what is it about space exploration shows that inevitably turns them into space warfare shows?
New series name... (Score:2)
Every week they travel to unimaginable worlds, meet (and kill) new people, then write about it on their SG blogs ...
Wake me if Claudia Black shows up.
Can we please not have another McKay character? (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3675.html)
Can we please please please not have another jarring character like McKay like in Stargate: Atlantis? Not only is he completely over-the-top antisocial, but he seems to make everyone around him lose any sense of tact that they might otherwise have had.
And that formula of having McKay/Carter start explaining the technical details of something, only to be interrupted by the superior officer who doesn't understand the jargon, is getting very very tired. Please kill it.
Re:Can we please not have another McKay character? (Score:4, Informative)
Yes, the technical mumbo-jumbo thing is irritating, but thats simply a sign of bad writing. It's a plot device or easy deis ex machena that they try and legitimize, but they are by far not the only show to be guilty of it.
I'd by far rather see an end to the lame warrior-types, I've seen more character depth from pre-gen D&D character sheets.
canada, eh? (Score:1)
I'd love to see "Ba'al, the early years" (Score:3, Interesting)
IMHO, of course.
As foretold in in the series itself... (Score:1)
How about existing plotlines (Score:2)
(http://www.sinister.com/ | Last Journal: Monday September 03 2001, @10:09PM)
BIG BOOM! (Score:1, Funny)
big boom
BIG BOOM!
Please translate from Marketing-speak (Score:2)
Gateworld reports that an exclusive, third Stargate series is in the works
In what way is it exclusive? Perhaps it excludes plot, character development, and good writing?
The new series is in the concept phase
OK...
and is being actively worked on by the Vancouver creatives behind Stargate SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis
Stop. Back up. What the hell is a "creative"? In my dictionary that's an adjective, not a noun. Nounizing adjectives is almost as bad as verbifying nouns...
No concept for the show has yet been revealed
which must be a tricky thing, since it is in the "concept phase". I think I'll wait for the "being phase" (assuming it gets the green light), or the "nothingness phase" (assuming it doesn't), before deciding that this is worthy of attention.
the series is likely for a 2007 debut
Keerist. I give up.
The US government only has so much money. (Score:2)
(http://web.mac.com/crackedbutter | Last Journal: Monday January 01 2007, @07:57PM)
Reboot like a Mummy? (Score:2)
(http://www.masmol.com/)
Because most of other "reboots" would be more like a soft reset with similar crews and directions
Wormhole Xtreme! (Score:2)
For example, instead using of a military trained crew, they could have a completely random set of civilians who accidentally become unwitting participants, ala Sliders, where they have to contend with both each other and each world they end up on. It could also play on the campy nature of various sci-fi shows from the 1960s-1980s (like Star Trek: TOS or the original Battlestar Galactica), where things just work out for no reason other than to advance the plot.
It'd be a nice break from the mind-numbing geek speak of Amanda Tapping/Micheal Shanks characters. It's just walk into a problem specific to the episode, fixing it and returning, only to start again next week.
How About The Ultimate Sci-Fi Showdown? (Score:1)
And this time I want to be reincarnated into something completely different!
suggested titles (Score:1)
(http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Thursday November 04 2004, @06:51AM)
- Stargate: Voyager
- Stargate: Sliders
- Stargate: Quantum Leap
- Stargate: Farscape
- Stargate: Land of the Lost
Now that they are launching a third series, I have some more suggestions:New title revealed! (Score:3, Funny)
(http://tinyurl.com/88mfc)
CSI: Cheyenne
The Premise (Score:5, Funny)
More in Spring & Two Movies in Works (Score:1)
"Following the success of the 1994 film "Stargate," Stargate SG-1 debuted in 1997, and spun off Stargate Atlantis in 2004. The two shows return to SCI FI Channel in the U.S. with new episodes in April. The spring run of 10 episodes each will mark the series finale of SG-1, and the third season finale of Atlantis.
Stargate Atlantis returns for its fourth season later in 2007.
Meanwhile, SG-1 will continue with two movies, presumably direct-to-DVD, currently aiming for a fall 2007 release."
http://www.gateworld.net/news/2006/12/exclusive_t
Ugh.. (Score:2)
(http://www.dentar.com | Last Journal: Tuesday February 11 2003, @11:00PM)
I am glad to hear it. SG1 is surprisingly good (Score:1)
for it.
The series so far have hinged on the gate remaining a secret to the
general populace. Perhaps they should jump ahead to a time when the
general populace first "gets" space travel and access to the gate and ships.
There would be a lot of problems. People often want to do things
they arent ready for yet. There would be turf wars as people competed
for prime locations on other planets. Clashes with natives. Opening
various pandora's boxen. Political tensions as the wave of earthers
hits the galaxy. The SG teams could be like rescue rangers getting
silly colonists out of problems and dealing with various hostilities.
Just an idea....
Not the Third Series... (Score:3, Informative)
(Last Journal: Thursday July 01 2004, @09:03PM)
You really have to ask? (Score:3, Funny)
I'm guessing it will involve a bunch of Air Force nerds who travel through a magic gate to other planets which all oddly resemble either California or British Coloumbia, and once there, do whatever the Star Trek crew did in whatever episode of Star Trek the script for this particular episode of the new Stargate was lifted from. And they'll throw in a popular nerd or two from some other nerdy show to ensure that nerds bother to watch.
Just another confirmation (Score:1)
First possible cast member named (Score:1)
chevron 9 (Score:2)
Direct-to-dvd Movies? (Score:2)
Stargate SG2: Beating A Dead Horse (Score:1)
Man do I hate Stargate (Score:2)
(http://slashdot.org/)
Just had to get that off my chest. It's a sad state of affairs for TV science fiction when the Stargates are considered some of the "better" shows.
Re:Yay, just what I wanted (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.underachievement.org/ | Last Journal: Sunday January 21 2007, @10:58PM)
And with some minor modifications Star Trek is Doctor Who which with some minor modifications is Battlestar Galactica which is very similar to Lost in Space which seems a lot like Futurama, a show that brings back memories of Andromeda which is like that old show...
Science fiction based around space travel is simply a variation on a theme. Some guys have this thing (Stargate, Enterprise, TARDIS, Galactica, Jupiter 2, Planet Express) that takes them around the galaxy and they meet these bad guys and they have to outwit them and they do nice things and sometimes bad things and gosh that's all there is to it.
Some have more direction (new BSG, DS9) than others which just wander around (TNG, Dr Who) while some do a bit of both (SG1). Nobody is claiming that Stargate is a brilliant new idea, just that it's an idea it's been well executed and well received (based on it's 10 years on the air if nothing else).
Re:Third? (Score:2)
They did it for the lulz,
They did it for the lulz,
They did it for the lulz.
Re:Yay, just what I wanted (Score:2)
(http://haltingpoint.blogspot.com/)
Re:Plot Summary (Score:1, Informative)
Why not another Star Trek? (Score:2)
(http://www.cyclomedia.co.uk/ | Last Journal: Tuesday December 12 2006, @06:48AM)