Slashdot Log In
Reading Your Postal Mail Online
Posted by
kdawson
on Mon Nov 27, 2006 03:11 PM
from the now-you-really-better-do-backups dept.
from the now-you-really-better-do-backups dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Remote Control Mail gives us one more reason not to leave our computers. Their service lets you access your postal mail on the Web. They offer scanning of mail contents, shredding, recycling and shipping. There's a good writeup on Techcrunch, complete with a CAD animation showing some robotics technology (Flash Movie) that RCM is developing to automate mail handling. The service costs $25 to get started and $20 a month for individuals." Now if we could only reply the same way.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Reading Your Postal Mail Online
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 173 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
wait till NetFlix hears about this! (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Wednesday August 15, @03:36PM)
This is very cool! But I'm not sure what NetFlix and Blockbuster (among others) are going to think about this! Finally, an easy way to get DVD's onto my computer!
Doubleplusgood! (Score:5, Insightful)
Snail mail is the ONLY private form of communications we have left.
Re:Doubleplusgood! (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.whyshouldihaveone.com/)
Re:Doubleplusgood! (Score:5, Insightful)
Until of course someone steals your mail, reads through it all, and steals your identity. But hey, at least it keeps the crystal meth users [msn.com] busy. If someone wants to steal your mail, they'll find a way.
Also, Doubleplusgood? How do you equate the police of the Ministry of Love reading messages specifically looking for "crimes" against Big Brother, with automated document scanning by a private company that you hire? There are plenty of times when 1984 references are on target, but this doesn't seem to be one of them.....
Re:Doubleplusgood! (Score:5, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Wednesday December 27 2006, @02:27AM)
Does anybody have tinfoil hat instructions (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Does anybody have tinfoil hat instructions (Score:4, Insightful)
Excellent (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://blog-of-adrian.blogspot.com/)
Re:Excellent (Score:5, Insightful)
-dave
Shredding Is Now Easier (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.scorchingbeauty.com/)
There's some sort of loop involved... (Score:4, Funny)
(Last Journal: Monday October 02 2006, @08:42AM)
Reply online too! (Score:3, Interesting)
You can, with USPS's (US Postal Service) NetPost service [usps.com]
Extra services (Score:5, Funny)
For another $5 we can break up with your scary ex for you.
And for an extra $10 a month we can forward your up coming invitation to visit Iraq from your Uncle Sam to an address in Canada.
I'm in favor (Score:3, Funny)
(http://hennell.livejournal.com/)
Do they have a form of penalty system if your mail blows-up the shredder?
Non-letter contents (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Monday March 31 2003, @01:23AM)
If my gf sends me panties, will someone sniff it for me?
When the brother of the ex-president of Nigeria sends me his check, will they PayPal it to me?
See, unless it does all the things I use my snail mail for, it's useless to me.
And why did I want this ? (Score:5, Insightful)
- Get it from the mail box
- Open it
- Read it
With this service, I would:- Get it from the server
- Open it
- Read it
- Pay $20 per month
BRILLIANT ! Where do I sign?More seriously, I can see that this might appeal to people who travel a lot, but for everyone else ?
Other variations have been around a while. (Score:3, Insightful)
This sort of service-economy stuff is popping up in lots of little corners. If you're an office-less operation (say, a consulting group that work from the road or from your home[s]), it's pretty appealing. But yes, you've got to really trust all the players. But it does (gaa!) help you to "concentrate on your core competancies," assuming that dealing with the physical paperwork of billpaying isn't one of them.
Missing the Point (Score:3, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Monday November 21 2005, @12:24AM)
Of course for things like junk mail I'd much prefer it not be sent at all, but I'm happy to take the junk if it means being able to hold an occasional letter from an old friend or family member. To read it scanned on a screen would seem so wrong.
Oh my goodness, the fine print (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.remotecontrolmail.com/pricing.php [remotecontrolmail.com]
Gotta learn all about mail induction, flats, storage days, document prep fees charged by the minute but billed by the second, the assumption that eveyr piece of mail weighs a minimum of one ounce for shredding-weight-per-day calculations.
omfg
Thanks but I'll wait til I can figure out if this will cost $20 or $200 per month since I have no control over my inbound mail.
Unopened mail may not necessarily be secure today. (Score:3, Interesting)
Conclusion: Although the system in TFA does none of this, it still wouldn't hurt to assume that snail mail is *not* secure.
Old news in Europe (Score:3, Informative)