Could you name monetary cost or number of people killed that would make it important enough to do something about?
That is a silly question. If AGW is indeed the absolute truth and global warning would actually cause the death of people, then the answer is obvious: As the climate change is being cause by humans, less humans would mean less climate change. The more die, the less of a problem it becomes.
FWIW, global thermonuclear war in the 60's would have fixed this little problem. But noooooo, couldn't have that could we? Damn hippies and your "no nukes" jibber-jabber. Now look what you did!
To be honest, I don't mind it as long as it isn't over the top. Everywhere I look IRL, there are branded products. It only gets stupid when it is blatant. E.g. Every can of soda is exactly the same and in the same orientation all the time or every computer that is NOT a DELL has the brand masked.