Comment: Re:Did he say Billions? With a "B"? (Score 1) 421
Comment: Did he say Billions? With a "B"? (Score 2) 421
Comment: SCADA vulnerabilities are quite real (Score 2) 292
Comment: Re:Speaking as a structural firefighter in the US (Score 1) 67
Comment: Re:Speaking as a structural firefighter in the US (Score 1) 67
Comment: Re:Speaking as a structural firefighter in the US (Score 1) 67
Comment: Re:Speaking as a structural firefighter in the US (Score 2) 67
Also, the pill would add very little -- the transmitter worn on the chest that relays the data -- that's another matter.
Comment: Re:Speaking as a structural firefighter in the US (Score 3, Interesting) 67
Comment: Speaking as a structural firefighter in the US (Score 4, Informative) 67
Our work is not like the movies. Yes, we wear heavy gear. Yes, it's quite hot in that gear even if there is no fire on a warm day. Inside a several hundred degress (F) building, it does it's job quite well. (Wool may be used as an insulator -- though I don't think so -- but only inside the carbon fiber and gnomex coverings which are far more important).
We go into a building wearing an air bottle good for about 30 minutes for most people in good shape. A bit less if you're working hard, a bit more if you stretch it. After about 2/3 of that time (20min) a low air alert vibrates the mask letting you know it's time to leave. You have ten minutes before it becomes a problem.
When we exit the building we go immediately to a "rehab" area manned by EMT's. We take off our coats (on a winter day you can see the steam coming off us) and are required to drink a 20oz bottle of water. The EMTs take heart rate and blood pressure readings as we enter rehab, and before we have to pass their requirements for health and safety -- basically that both heart rate and bp are dropping back toward normal readings.
Nothing in this pill is going to change the requirements of the job. Carrying more stuff just makes the job harder. We're already laden with 80 pounds of stuff entering the building.
Comment: Re:Germans acquire an advanced weapon! (Score 1) 338
Comment: Calling company may be 2nd or 3rd party (Score 1) 614
I've been looking into (just a bit) the most annoying of the ones that gets to me -- the fake "CARD SERVICES" calls. These are the ones that robocall numbers, ignoring the donotcall lists, play the recording calling themselves "card services" and offer a lower rate. Pressing to be removed does no good. If you do hold or press to talk to an operator, if you try to ask for a supervisor, a company name, a call back number, or to be removed from the list, they hang up (often cursing at you first).
If you do play along, they will pre-screen you and eventually pass you on to some kind of debt consolidation company. I don't yet know if it's one company or a group of them, but I do know that the telemarketers are not employees of that company. I believe they get paid either based on the number of successful transfers, or more standard "lead generation" once they capture your information.
The problem with playing along to find out who is ultimately making the money from the scam, is that to get to that group of people requires you to turn over too much private information to be worth the risk.
The company which profits from this kind of activity should, IMCO, but subject to RICO forfeitures.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act
You have to go after whoever profits from the calls, and do it aggressively.
Comment: I don't know if THIS is the right one... (Score 1) 658
I don't know if the Tata is the right way to go, but I do think there is a market for commuter car that's small and safe enough for surface roads, may be prohibited on highways (like a moped) but is enclosed and heated. I think there are plenty of in-town commuters who would opt for such a high mileage vehicle if it were done well enough and still stay cheap.
Comment: Re:Keyword: Android (Score 0) 140
You nailed it. I wish I had mod points today to mod you up.
Comment: It's too "much" -- not like TheSteve. They should (Score 1) 49
It's far too much detail on the surface. TheSteve wouldn't like it. They should simple do a wax image of a black turtleneck folded, on a pair of folded jeans, with a pair of thin glasses neatly folded on top.