Comment: Re:VHS had mediocre audio quality (Score 1) 442
Better than cassette? Ya sure, but then that's not hard. "Just below DAT?" no, not so much. With Hi-Fi enhancements yes it could get about 70dB SNR (CD and DAT are 96dB) on a new, unused tape. As with all analogue, it degraded over time and suffered generation loss.
I'm not sure about actual quality, but at least there is an important technical difference between regular and Hifi audio on VHS. One uses a portion of the tape in the same way as audio cassettes, the other encodes audio into the video storage area, where there is more bandwidth.
Incidentally, some early digital audio systems used videotape as their storage medium, again because of the high bandwidth. An encoder/decoder was used along with a regular VCR. DAT uses a similar mechanism with rotating heads to achieve the necessary bandwidth.
Comment: emerge details... (Score 1) 187
Comment: Re:10 CENTIMETERS NOT INCHES!!!! (Score 1) 421
s/10in/10cm/
That's what she sed.
Comment: Re:Turing Tax (Score 1) 100
Comment: Climate, schmimate (Score 1) 1367
Comment: Re:Boobs in Newspaper Stands (Score 2) 562
Of course that's got nothing on the red light district in Amsterdam, but I can see I'm getting off
Fixed that for you.
Comment: Re:Suomi :-) (Score 3, Informative) 106
Comment: Re:Don't count this out yet (Score 4, Funny) 211
Signed, old assembly language programmer guy
I see what you did there.