Comment: "The Tool" (Score 1) 128
You mean the university email system that delivers the malicious email?
I have a crazy idea, tell users not to give personal information out by email. It's that simple.
NEVER give out personal information by email.
|
|
You mean the university email system that delivers the malicious email?
I have a crazy idea, tell users not to give personal information out by email. It's that simple.
NEVER give out personal information by email.
I just start typing what I want.
Typically if it's bookmarked chrome will autocomplete it as I type.
Same thing on my phone, I just start typing the app/contact name into the google search bar.
Also with google drive, I'm either in "recent" or search, it's faster and easier than navigating a directory structure.
I have a layout/tree, but that's basically habit as opposed to any functional reason.
Often I want "super snappy", in which case I use gnumeric, which is super snappy.
If I want portability and access, I'll just leave it in sheets, or skydrive
LO/OO/Excel really don't offer much of a benefit to me, at least in my personal life.
It's free-ish and fully compatible.
Openoffice is just too slow, on my Linux box I use google sheets and gnumeric.
I don't think transparency is their goal.
Their goal is to push their political adgenda which is basically anti- anything big & powerful.
Transparency is just a cover.
The reality is we need transparency and accountability to control the big powers effectively.
However, realistically they also need some secrets to function effectively.
It isn't black and white like crypto, with a public algorithm and secret key where everyone (with a clue) is in agreement where the line is.
In the real world the division of what should and should not be shared is not as clear.
At which point UAV anti-anti-UAV platforms will become useful.
UAV AAA and anti jamming platforms would be nice, but then there will be more decoys, all this technology will be rendered moot, and we'll be back to the importance of good intelligence.
that only works a few times.
Lasers are cheap, buy one. If you want photos, go to Costco.
The problem is that there is no technical difference between the legal robocallers and the illegal robocallers.
What is the technical difference between a charity calling to sell you something and a company calling to sell you something?
Recipients of the call don't see any difference, the phone system sees no difference. The scripts are likely no different.
I had a blackberry before my Galaxy S2.
It did everything I needed just fine, I moved on to get the larger screen and a better web browser, not because of any shortage of apps.
As far as demanding uncompressed images from a cell phone camera, that's laughable. The camera quality, while improving is so bad that there really is little benefit to RAW. If you want RAW, get a real camera.
That was my concern, they'll be dropping piles of casings all over the place.
It isn't even liability and all that legal stuff.
If the allegations are serious enough, they will destroy you LONG before you get your day in court. That's the real problem today.
A claw hammer is very good at being a nail installation device and a pry bar.
Those are two different tasks.
Yeah those bastards should work on implementing some sort of incognito mode when you're on the internet.
If sale is legal, you could have ALWAYS made your own.
If possession is prohibited, you'd still be breaking the law.
The existence of a 3D printer changes little, it just takes it from possible, to trivial.
Some people don't like bookmarks, or they use their browser like "todo" lists.
Not that I advocate such an approach, but I understand it.
For any particular project I might have a handful of links that are open at one time.
I typically don't have 100 tabs open, but 20-40 is pretty typical.
One good reason why computers can do more work than people is that they never have to stop and answer the phone.