Cable Industry Needs to Spend Heavily on Upgrades 126
BlueCup writes "A report from the cable industry's research arm suggests that Cable-television operators require another round of multibillion-dollar network upgrades to keep up with rivals in the fast-growing high-speed Internet hookup business. The conclusions underscore the challenges posed by the rapid growth of broadband video from YouTube and Google, and the looming threat of a planned $20 billion rollout of high-capacity fiber lines by U.S. phone giant Verizon Communications Inc."
Certainly True in Canada (Score:5, Insightful)
They need to get their act together or they'll start to lose customers. They have a 60 GB/month usage limit. What good is a 8 Mbit/s line when you can hit your bandwidth cap in a single day?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
That's a lie. From what I understand a docsis channel can trasnmit 27 mbit/sec., which is plenty of voice calls. With an average of 100-500 customers on each HFC node, they'd be hard pressed to fill up just one channel worth of voice calls -- basically, if every single customer
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
I worked for Time Warner for a number of years, ending a little over a year ago when I went into my own venture. TW was getting the technical details of rolling out their voice offerings to this area (Chicago/Milwaukee) and put some fairly horrible limits on home res services (how about advert'ing a 5mbit line on commercials/mail/etc.. then setting the QOS at 2mbit max..) It's pathetic.. It's a loophole that they say "up to -whatever number
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Latency is pretty horrible, and is usually at least 45 ms. The network is often subject to jitter and occasionally packets arriving out of order, which causes problems for voice.
DSL otoh has ping times
Re: (Score:2)
Packets ariving out of order is jitter... Unless perhaps jitter means something else in the wired world.
Re: (Score:2)
Packets arriving out of order is only a possible side effect of jitter. Jitter means that packets are arriving at varying intervals, rather than in a predictable manner. You can have one packet every 10 ms, then one in 40ms, then 20 in 30 ms, then 1 ever ms and *that* is jitter. Its usually caused by weird pathing, where different packets take different routes, so when jitter gets bad enough, you of
Re: (Score:2)
This is true, but you're making one fatal assumption: That they're putting 100-500 customers on a node. It isn't a cake w
Re: (Score:2)
Lots to like about Comcast on-demand (Score:1)
wonder how popular on-demand really is - I can't ever say that I've watched a show on-demand; just a few music videos. I'd think the use of the on-demand channels is mostly limited to a) those that have digital cable but not the DVR, b) those that actually want to watch the limited content available, and c) those who aren't frustrated by the confusing interface.
Our Comcast on-demand service has totally changed the way my daughter and I watch on television. Aside from things like live sporting events or
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
1-Are they losing customers now?
2-Do you see any hints of them losing customers in the immediete future?
3-Is anyone in Canada competing with them equally (this leaves out dial-up)?
If none of the above are the case then why throw out "a guess"?
"They have a 60 GB/month usage limit. What good is a 8 Mbit/s line when you can hit your bandwidth cap in a single day?"
And exactly how many of Roger's customers are hitting their cap? Why does th
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You're not trying hard enough.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I have their high speed DSL plan (West Toronto)and it's pretty damn nice. No bandwidth cap/shaping, and no Bell shoulder surfing. The one caveat is that their technical support line has probably five people on it so it takes a long time to get through. But if you're on
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
I have also heard from a friend on the inside that they will start to charge you for every gig you go over your limit starting in the next few months. You wont get cut off, or slowed down, you will just notice a big increase in your bill the following month. Im not 100% sure about this, but my friend who work
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
What kind of nonsense is that?
Re: (Score:1)
http://bc.whirlpool.net.au/isp.cfm/Telstra-BigPond
8 or 17Mbit with a 200MB cap, then excess charges at 15c/MB - this is the one they market at Mums and Dads who have no idea - then wonder why they have thousands of dollars of excess charges! Telstra also charge uploads+downloads, not just downloads. Get infected with a trojan or unknowningly leave a P2P running, have to sell the house... (yes, there have been cases like this)
That cable is also very limited in area it covers,
not the real reason (Score:2)
...at the best prices too! (Score:4, Insightful)
Do you hear that?
It's the sound of tens of thousands of dollars in new bribes starting the march to Congress to make sure that our taxes pay for these upgrades while the cablecos continue to act as if they own the infrastructure.
Why just tens of thousands? Congress is notoriously cheap [opensecrets.org] the best government money can buy at the best prices too!
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Don't worry, it is somewhat kept in check by deep-pocket Telco's who want to keep the Cablers down to get a peice of the media pie. Think of it like Hitler and Mousolini being on different sides.......on second thought, don't.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Perhaps you are thinking of Verizon, MCI and Bell South.
And remember, it's now the Cable Companies that compete with the phone companies as their networks and products begin to overlap.
If you can't beat 'em (Score:1, Insightful)
Come on cable companies...ditch the coax and go fiber. Make the infrastructure interoperable.
Is there really any reason for them to stick with coax? Other than grandfathering themselves in...
Re: (Score:1)
Not to say that cable is dead ... but ... (Score:5, Informative)
Now? Cablemodem access is pretty much everywhere, and download speeds are pretty decent in general. DSL and Cable both have offerings in the 4-6mbit range, and now there is something else to look forward to...
Fiber. Downtown San Francisco has some of that Verizon fiber available in limited areas, and the access download speeds get into the 60-100mbit range. Let me say that again, since I'm sure a lot of people are going to say "he said WHAT?"
100 megabits. downlink. speed.
Yes, there are still some non-sensical "can't host a server" issues. Yes, uplink speeds are artificially asymmetrical (~60mb down, about 1mbit up. Still an improvement over cablemodem service speeds.) It's part of an experimental rollout, and hard to get installed. So was DSL, once.
HDTV, phone, internet access, 'digital radio', and more on a single line, all for around $100/month, at least for now.
Cable companies have something to worry about. Definately.
Re:Not to say that cable is dead ... but ... (Score:5, Interesting)
Nobody gets even close to that on DSL. In my area, we can get
Cable really doesn't have much to worry about. It's a lot easier to upgrade and repair cable networks than it is to upgrade and repair fiber, and cable lines can actually handle 100MB from the number of houses they're doing now without much problem.
The issue is that they've got all those pesky analog cable TV channels on there wasting space.
They're slowly phasing out all of the old, nondigital cable boxes and moving everyone over to digital. Once that's done, they'll be far ahead of fiber in terms of getting that last mile in place, and they'll be able to match the speeds fiber is currently offering.
It might cost more, but if I was a betting man, I'd bet more on cable being reliable and maintained over fiber. cable isn't a prototype. We know it works, and we know the network can handle it. Only the switches and the policies need to be changed. Despite the cost of that, I'm pretty sure its still cheaper than all that has to be done to make fiber a reality.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Not to say that cable is dead ... but ... (Score:4, Informative)
and run to a neighborhood hybrid fiber coax router that breaks it out to coax for 500
to 1,000 users typically.
The cable companies already deployed a lot of fiber just for digital cable.
Re: (Score:2)
Pleeze. (Score:4, Informative)
Of course the phone company told you it was good. They're the freak'n provider. What were you expecting "Oh, Mr. Johnson, that's really slow. We're providing some really crappy service aren't we?" they don't want to be held to any kind of standard for service, so they aren't going to agree with any notion there's a problem if you'll go with their answers.
And they'll be able to start charging everyone per TV for their services. Which is why they really want to get rid of analog cable. They're like Ma Bell in the 50's wanting to charge you per phone in your house regardless of how many actual phone lines you have. The only reason that was undone was the availablity of wiring for do-it-yourself extensions and the analog nature of the PSTN making it hard to track how many phones a person had.
Plus, the external converter has the added bonus of making it hard to do automated VCR recordings of shows while you're away from home (hello, DVR rental fee!).
Why does nobody recognise digital cable for what it is; an excuse to roll back fair use and home recording rights, and find another way to nickel and dime the consumer?
Until there's legislation passed removing the encryption from cable (so makers of stand alone DVR's and VCR's can integrate digital tuners in their products) or requiring cablecos to provide as many boxes as a customer needs free of charge this will continue.
Re: (Score:1)
With digital cable there is way more abundance of content available. On-demand has so much stuff on it is impossible to watch it all; so I don't think the average consumer is being hurt as much as you guys wish to think.
The money is in the triple play packages and customer support. You c
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, but what if you went away for awhile? Would you be able to record shows off three differnt digital channels (at differnt times of course) while you were gone?
Re: (Score:1)
There is live tv guide so you can select everything in the future. It works, provides plenty of content and is cheaper than before with triple play.
h [timewarnercable.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Okay, and when did they stop selling DVD-recorders? And non-cableco PVR's?
This arguement applies to them as well.
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't blame TiVo. (Score:2)
IR controllers hooked up with serial are unecessary for many provider's digital converters. The S-video port on the converter can be used by the TiVo to control the reciever. But I expect this port to disappear with the HDMI push and some cableco's already disable it.
It's funny how when
Re: (Score:2)
Yup, and the support costs for all those boxes is huge, too. Which is why they get passed on to the consumer.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Let's not jump the gun yet. (Score:2)
The telecoms may be looking at a bleak future ($$$) after some lawsuits, and who knows what legislation (if any- but I expect telecom's lobbyists to go into overtime over this one)
may transpire.
If nothing else, it will be VERY interesting in the forseeable near-future. Hopefully we won't have to lube up and bend over 'cause of these two things.
*dons tinfoil hat and backs into corner with "trapped rat mental
If only there was something faster..... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
That assumes that he has shell access on the server. Which isn't all that common at the low-end of web hosting.
I probably would've run an FTP client with multiple threads (say 4 or 8) to better maximize the throughput. That way while some threads are waiting for responses, you've still got data transfering. Unfortunately, that requires that your provider allows for multiple connections to the FTP server (somewhat uncommon).
Re: (Score:2)
Is everyone else downloading 1GB files that they need Right Now Dammit?
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, aren't you?
Try telecommuting when a particular job involves media files. Fortunately it's rare, but it's getting more and more common at our company where job folders are starting to climb into the double and triple digit megabyte range.
(I'm starting to wonder if a 6TB SAN is going to be big enough...)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Because there are 20-200 houses for every neighborhood fiber-cable router. It would cost a lot of money to run fiber to every house, which would probably include replacing all the boxes on the side of everyone's houses.
Re: (Score:2)
C//
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Upgrades required... (Score:1)
-r
Re: (Score:1)
Don't touch it! It keeps the galaxy together: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter [wikipedia.org]
They need to upgrade and drop prices! (Score:4, Funny)
And they keep flooding my snailmail box with flyers trying to get me to sign up for digital TV, voip and RR for the low, low price of $120 a month + taxes, so figure $130 a month. No thanks. Don't want it or need it.
I just want internet only. I have a cell phone and TV sucks.
As for RR here, the speed is decent, it's stable and dependable and they've never jacked me around like SBC did on DSL. I'll do without before I ever do business with SBC so I'm stuck with RR..
I wouldn't mind paying what I pay if they would up the speed. I hear some places in the US are getting 3x to 4x the speed I get for half the price. WTF??? Bump up our speed or cut our bills you cheap bastards!
Re: (Score:2)
for me to get a whopping 3mb down and (I think) 1.5mb up it costs $60 a month WITH digital cable.
We have the big package where we have a regular digital reciver, a broadband box (a DVR) Basic Cable, Extended cable, HBO, Cinemax, Stars & Encore no phone (cause really when the power goes out so does your phone, plus everyone who does have it we have talked to said the serivice is HORRIBLE, it's out more then it's working) and we pay something like $140 a month for it. they cha
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
It's not all about speed... (Score:1)
Regrettably, Comcast's 6dn/0.75up for $60 turned out to be a better deal for nerds and non-windows users (aka anyone not afraid of hosting their own ssh/web/etc).
With RCN we have 10dn/0.75up for $50, but RCN charges us a $20 penalty to unblock incoming port 80. If you do end up paying their ransom money, you can't have multiple ip's on RCN with port 80 access. Back on Comca
Net neutrality? (Score:4, Insightful)
"Industry controlled 'research' group claims big bills to be paid for infrastucture that video-streaming websites will push out. WEe need to be able to charge Google and other to 'prioritise' their traffic or we won't have enough money. Net Neutrality is therefore a bad thing"
They're already upgrading in a sense... (Score:5, Interesting)
Now, the main threat to cable operators is alternative forms of television - satellite and IPTV. The satellite operators don't have to pay the cable operators to broadcast their signals, and the phone companies are also monopolies that are rapidly expanding - FIOS, VDSL - techologies that can deliver more video bandwidth than cable, and still have room left over for lots of data.
In an attempt to try to beat the phone companies to the triple play (television, data, phone), the cable companies sank a lot of money into proprietary digital television systems (Motorola and Scientific Atlanta). The telephone companies have been researching alternate systems, and I figure that they'll be able to beat the cable companies based on cost alone.
Right now, the cable companies are trying to convert to digital cable as quickly as they can - for every analog channel that they move off to digital, they can put in between 5-10 analog channels. This space can then be redeployed for cable modems/EMTAs (for data and phone usage). But, there's a downside to this - every new digital subscriber costs the cable company hundreds of dollars in the form of an expensive PVR (a proprietary PVR that cannot be swapped out because of the proprietary encryption). So, they're screwed either way.
-- Joe
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
You know what scares the crap out of the cable companies? As they race to score a triple play, they are finding that once fast data is there, the o
Re: (Score:2)
FYI most telecoms in the midwest are deploying ADSL2 (ITU G.992.5 Annex M) which yeilds ~24Mbit down 1Mbit up. This is actually t
Re: (Score:2)
Oh you mean the 45Mb/s I AREADY paid for? (Score:4, Informative)
http://saveaccess.org/node/288 [saveaccess.org]
http://www.newnetworks.com/scandalquotes.htm [newnetworks.com]
http://www.blogmaverick.com/entry/123400026707348
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060131/2021240
Why is it... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
come on.. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"come on.. just buy into level3 or other that have already done the pure fiber/ip networks..."
Last I checked, Level3 didn't own fiber that runs anywhere near my house. And if it does (by chance) run near my house, it doesn't run into my house. The last mile is so crucial. As stated numerous times in these comments, the Cable Companies already have a large fiber plant that runs TV and Data, but the last mile runs over coax. And for people saying: "So build out the last mile," you need to realize how expe
Depends on your ISP (Score:4, Interesting)
One of the reasons I stick with them is they don't traffic shape. They occasionally cap 24/7 bittorrent users (if a user on your node complains). But they don't limit the download and upload ports.
While it took a long time for me to get cable, I think its worth it- Cablevision's network seems future proofed (well, as much as you can be)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Cablevision's had some *huge* financial troubles --- mainly as a result of dumping so much money into their infrastructure. During one of their financial crises, they completely pulled out of my town in the middle of one of their massive upgrades, leaving the people there high and dry with a fractured network that no sane company would want to buy.
(Un)fortunately for the town, an insane company purchased the netwo
No it doesn't (Score:3, Informative)
Looming threat? (Score:1)
Multi-unit Dwelling Too Hard? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Fiber is'nt enough (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
I know it's REALLY hard to understand... But ISPs have MASSIVE amounts of transfer speed. Just trust me. Ok, the cable companies generally have less than the Bells (OBVIOUSLY), but they both have an INCONCEIVABLE AMOUNT OF 'BANDWIDTH.' We aren't talking about a single OC-3, or half of the time, ev
Re: (Score:1)
Exploiting coax to the max (Score:1)
The overall price of hardware that supports fiber optic transmission i
Up (Score:2)
and DSL....
They don't so much need upgrades as to get off of their asses
and finish the last mile.
The bastards provide digital cable, but are too cheap to
finish the transition to broadband internet.
There should be some kind of law that mandates uniform service
across all customers of such a utility.
Socialism? (Score:2)
What a bunch of sooks (Score:1)
Obviously you havent bee to Australia
Telstra and Optus Australia's two major Telcos also have major dependance of their Cable TV Empire, so purpose limit the quality of Internet available
Clear statement as low Maximum DSL speeds of 1500kb was implemented to minimise competition to their FoxTel TV
10GB 8mbit cable approx $40US a month.
10GB 1.5mbit Adsl approx $30US a month
billions of dolla
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Because they're so big and bloated that it would be almost weird for them not to have a number of moons?
That's a good question, though. You can already get satellite internet if you really want it, but it's expensive, relatively slow, and has high latency, given the distance of the satellite. Why would anybody who has other high-speed options actually want satellite internet?
Re: (Score:2)
that would have on their "high speed internet" options. It they
convert to satellite for video, they still need infrastructure to
do the internet and phone over, and satellite wont cut it, as far
as I know. So, satellite for just the video puts them in the
position of having to maintain all the old plumbing, along with
getting the new satellites operational. I dont see how this works,
but, heck, I've been wrong before, so I thought I would ask.
Re: (Score:2)
This isn't a great answer, but I'll offer it. My dad goes on camping trips a lot. I remember him mentioning that he brought his dish with him a couple of times. If he could have gotten internet that way, bonus!
That said, I wouldn't c
Re:True (Score:4, Informative)
Your local news stations also use satellites to deliver live television broadcasts from various places. For everything else, they use tubes.
Re: (Score:2)
I had a feeling that satellites were used to deliver the
signal to the cable providers, the main branch I used to
drive past on the way to school, all those long years
ago had a dish visible from the freeway.
I was wondering if that was what the original post I was
responding to was refering to, or to satellite delivery
to the end consumer.
And if it is delivery to the cable co, the I would have
expected thay they would have the satellites already.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
just more channels of junk. This could be an opportunity to have
more specialized, more niche stuff.
They are. (Score:5, Interesting)
They are. In buzzword land it's called "triple play". (Data, VoIP, and IPTV.) "Quadruple play" if you add wireless linkage. The overall phenomenon is "The Convergence" - of all forms of communication into a single packet-switched network.
And the wireline services will eat cable's lunch if they don't upgrade. The minimum Cable needs to do is fiber-to-the-curb, after which they can use the coax for the last few feet. Meanwhile the copper pair people are doing the same thing (when they don't run a fiber all the way to the house.) With a shorter run (blocks rather than miles) they can push tens of megabits or better down the copper.
The key is getting enough PRIVATE bandwidth to each house for several video feeds. Then you can switch what gets fed to the house at the curbside router or switch, the central office, or the head end. At that point the settop box or media-center computer becomes a remote control for the distant switching and cable's large-but-shared bandwidth advantage vanishes.
So within the next year or two, as IPTV with video-on-demand deploys among the wireline carriers, cable has to invest in splitting the neighborhoods fine enough to give everybody their own several video streams worth of dedicated bandwidth. Otherwise they can't deliver a version of the video on demand "killer ap" - and it kills them.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Or do you want them to put LEO satellites into orbit and maintain them and launch new ones and have a huge switching network that would cost them nearly as much as just laying new cable with much more headache?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Who the hell are you to tell us what we can do with our network?
KFG