Did you take a poll or are you just straight up posting your delusions and feelings? People in cities are not unaware of "how bright" the moon is. This is an insane assertion to make, and even moreso to base a point on.

Maybe try living somewhere that's nicer? These are not problem I have in my community yet a lot of people here seem to be saying this is rampnat all the time. You must all live in some terrible places.

Illegal immigrants, who they all hire for cheap labor so there's no real effort to stop it. If there were the employers would be the ones facing legal action for hiring them. Simple supply and demand.

So you have fundament reading comprehension issues. As is typical these days. Great waste of my time.

On it's face this assertion alone make you absolutely delusional.

Way to race bait. The actual reason is a lost simpler and easier to believe: that's how most of the interactions go. But that's boring so you only see when things go wrong, because only radical edge cases make a splash on social media echo chambers.

It's going to be where they tow those ships that had their fronts fall off.

Try reading my entire comment and responding to all of it. Nobody is going to be "surprised" by how "bright" it can be a nighttime. This is not some closely held knowledge and you're not special for knowing it. What good is a few square feet of this illumination supposed to do? At what cost/benefit? Now scale that up and explain the cost/benefit.

In your attempt to look smart you look incredibly flat out stupid. You don't need to spend much time on basic arethmitic to see how financially unfeasible this will be for any purpose anyone has suggested it can be used for.

What is this inane comment supposed to mean? Instead of suggesting what people to to make them "surprised" explain in clear terms exactly what you think this will be useful for. Support your assertions.

That's been happening since the 70s with climate hysteria - we've been told for decades that the world is going to end in 10 years, that we're hitting a tipping point in 10 years, etc, etc, etc.

And let's be clear: the climate is absolutely changing, but it's clear nobody knows the mid term timing of larger impacts.

Considering this has been Broadcom's recent mid-term business model I bet their projections were pretty accurate, as they were informed with data from less public/controversial acquisitions where they've done the same thing. Just to companies you've never heard of that make parts for companies that you have.

Yes. Or it's not fit for its stated purpose.

And as you have figured out, it can't be done. Which means this is not worth doing for its stated purpose. Which means it's for a differeent reason. What do you think that reason could be?

How embarassing for you. You just keep digging the hole and proving my point. Are you so lacking in self awareness?

You should feel shame for posting something demonstrating your complete and total lack of ability to see issues in anything other than black and white. This type of "discourse" is exactly what you've been trained to use to turn off your own brain by whatever media you're consuming. It's not helpful and it make you look like a fool.