Replacement for Jewel Cases? 240
PsychoBrat asks: "I'm surrounded by jewel cases at work and at home, and although most of them are still holding together to some extent, a lot of them have either cracked fronts, broken hinges or snapped teeth. Slim cases generally annoy me because I can't tell them apart by looking at their spines, and wallets take too long to sort through. What do you use in place of the standard fragile jewel cases to keep all your discs organized?"
You mean.. (Score:5, Funny)
RAID is the solution. (Score:5, Interesting)
To find anything just required a quick search function. If the item is an audio CD ripped to FLAC then I que it up, if the item is an data CD then I mount the image file... My storage space has reduced from several large bookshelves full of CDs down to one small box... As for power consumption, I live in a cold sub-zero-celcius environment and any extra heating is welcome!!!
Better than RAID (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Better than RAID (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Better than RAID (Score:4, Interesting)
He could copy all his stuff to HD, run mkisofs, turn off all the CDROMs, and save a bundle on electricity + wear and tear.
Re:Better than RAID (Score:4, Funny)
I sometimes wonder what would happen to his house if someone sent him an email virus that caused all his computers to attempt to calculate the last digit of pi. Would his sound cards start singing "Daisy, Daisy"? Would some of the old boxes emit puffs of smoke and a few showers of sparks?
Actually, I might suggest he install a flashpan with a few serial-port-ignited pyrotechnic charges, just to wake up the gullible non-geeky visitors. Tuck it all behind a CD-ROM faceplate designed to blow open on detonation, that sort of thing.
Re:RAID is the solution. (Score:5, Insightful)
While permissions, ACLs, etc, can reduce the risk, RAID still doesn't protect your data from the more immediate threat.
Also note that RAID does not account for fire, flood, lightning and other things that may irreparably screw over the drives. Last I knew, Ontrac and others still charge by the size of the drive, and if you're using big disks, you'll pay a fortune. With RAID, generally the platters inside the disk must be relatively unharmed (no gauging, cracking, corrosion, etc) since you cannot do a recovery based on the file allocation tables since you don't have all of the data on the one disk. If they can transplant the platters into a happy drive, you may be ok, but I wouldn't bet my inheritance on it.
Now, if you can afford to create two RAIDs and keep one (if one is bigger, the bigger one) offline except when copying things that have changed in, you're in better shape- and even better shape if that is located in a different building or even locality.
Re:RAID is the solution. (Score:2)
Re:RAID is the solution. (Score:2)
Re:RAID is the solution. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:RAID is the solution. (Score:3, Interesting)
That's what I do, one drive is at home and once a month I rotate in the other drive.
Mind you I don't keep MP3s and AVIs on those drives, I keep family photos, scans of important documents, my wife's masters thesis and supporting material (last thing I want is to answer to her when hundreds of hours of work goes *poof*).
-nB
Repeat after me.... RAID IS NOT BACKUP! (Score:3, Informative)
RAID IS NOT BACKUP!
If you think having a parity drive makes your data safe, you WILL regret it. Even RAID1 won't save you when your power supply fails violently trashing multiple drives.
My solution? I built up a new RAID server with higher capacity drives, and leave the original server turned off as a mirror that I sync once every month o
Re:Repeat after me.... RAID IS NOT BACKUP! (Score:3, Insightful)
What if you fill up a few 500GB drives (the sweet spot (on sale) if you consider the side costs of drives, hot swap bays, controllers, power, percentage of server cost), and just keep them at a friends home, sitting on a shelf. How can that be illegal?
Consider:
1. It's not illegal to make up your own mix cd.
2. It's not illegal to keep that copy in your car.
3. It's not illegal to drive around with that copy in
Re:You mean.. (Score:2)
Re:You mean.. (Score:5, Informative)
I have 'ripped' them to a 250GB USB2 drive.
'Ripped' isn't really the right word. 'Copied' is more accurate. Each track is copied as an uncompressed WAV file. Each CD consumes approx 400mb of disk space. The WAVs are the same bit rate as the CD Audio; Nero will just copy them back without any conversion if I was to burn an audio CD.
The folder structure is as follows: There is also an XML file with all the album info in it including the CDDB query ID in case I need to requery CDDB without needing the actual CD. Additionally both
Why did I do it like this ? I'm lazy. I don't want to re-rip my collection. Ever. As disks get bigger, at some point ~7mb 256k mp3s are going to look tiny. On a good system ($2000 amp + speakers) mp3s DO NOT sound as good as the original CDs. My WAVs however, sound identical.
For my portable mp3 player (see, I'm not totally anti-mp3) I have an ActiveSync-type tool which converts selected albums from the Music Library to 256k mp3s. If I decided I want 384k or even 160k mp3s instead, I can just alter a setting in the tool, and batch re-encode to the player. As part of the mp3 encoding process the folder.jpg album cover is embedded into the mp3 using the IDv2 tag 'APIC' (my mp3 player displays these on screen).
For ripping the CDs originally, I wrote a tool that rips at the max speed of your optical drive. In my system it rips a CD in about 3 minutes. I can run 2 copies of the tool, and have each one ripping from a different drive simultaneously, although I think this saturates the IDE channel, as rip speeds decrease. This tool can also defeat 'most' DRMd CDs (not the latest batch tho).
Overall the system works great, this is the first time I've written up how it all works, so apologies if bits aren't clear. If anyones interested in the tools I use, feel free to contact me.
-Jar.
Re:You mean.. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:You mean.. (Score:4, Informative)
As the code is mostly my own, I can always update and convert the master library at a later date. So if FLAC or Lossless WMA (LOL!) becomes a better standard, I'll switch to that.
What I forgot to mention was the complete app list and it's dependencies.
Ripper: My Own Tool, CDRipper.EXE
-Querys CDDB
-Querys Amazons XML feed
-Uses Windows API for CDA control and track ripping
-Can run 'hands free', pops the drive tray when done, plays a sound, waits for new cd.
mp3Encoder: My Own Tool, MusicSync.EXE
-Internal code to work out what to sync.
-uses cmd line encoder (LAME at the moment*) to create mp3s
-uses AudioGenie.OCX (google it) to embed ID3 tags including APIC
(*I'm looking for a command line WMA encoder - does anyone know of one?)
-Jar.
Re:You mean.. (Score:4, Informative)
That's microsofts page on how to batch windows media 9 encoding.
Re:You mean.. (Score:2)
I'll mod you up, on one of your other posts.
-Jar.
150 CD book (Score:4, Informative)
Re:150 CD book (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:150 CD book (Score:2)
Re:150 CD book (Score:3, Informative)
Re:150 CD book (Score:2)
Re:150 CD book (Score:2)
Storage (Score:3, Informative)
Read the question. (Score:2)
The poster doesn't want binders...
Re:Storage (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtool s/item-Details.asp?EdpNo=548251&sku=B600-2004&CMP= EMC-TIGEREMAIL&SRCCODE=WEBNPR226 [tigerdirect.com]
--100 discs/unit, ~7 seconds max eject time, comes with its own database/search software. It's even stackable.
--Alternatives:
http://www.storeyourmedia.com/-100-cd-stackable-di sc-drum-bonus-wallet.aspx [storeyourmedia.com]
http://www.storeyourmedia.com/-60-cd-stackable-pod -titanium-blue-finish.aspx [storeyourmedia.com]
--I use the 40-disc version of this one, plus an Excel spreadsheet t
Re:Storage (Score:2)
Rip them all?? (Score:3, Informative)
As an aside, where the hell did the name "jewel case" come from. Its cheap arse polystyrene with some coloured paper and a lump of polycarbonate and aluminium inside. There is nothing even vaguely jewel-like about it?!!?
err!
jak.
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Rip them all?? (Score:2)
What kind of jewel cases have you been looking at?
Re:Rip them all?? (Score:2)
I DEFINATELY know that the material used to make CD's is PolyCarbonate (ok, occasionally PMMA) and that the back is an aluminium mirror... unless Im wrong
And thanks for the wikipedia reference earlier!! I really should have thought of looking there if it bothered me so much
Re:Rip them all?? (Score:2)
I should have clicked when you said polycarbonate that you were including the CD.
Paper Sleeves (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Paper Sleeves (Score:2)
Paper is bad, mmmkay? (Score:3, Informative)
Paper is made of wood fibers and will scratch CD and DVD coatings. If you keep discs in paper sleeves you can end up "fogging" the disc with micro-scratches to the point where it won't be readable anymore, at least not without being repaired by something like this [cyberguys.com]. (Just for reference I have had great results from that particular unit, and it doesn't leave radial lines like the "Skip Dr." units.)
Instead
Re:Paper is bad, mmmkay? (Score:3, Funny)
Highly reccommended. My house has no scratches at all.
Don't try to be too smart? (Score:2, Funny)
Quaint little plastic disks? (Score:2)
Re:Quaint little plastic disks? (Score:2)
Re:Quaint little plastic disks? (Score:2)
Depends on ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Spindles! (Score:5, Informative)
It makes for efficient storage, but when you actually need to find a CD, it's even worse than thin cases or binders, because you have to shuffle through a huge stack of discs to find the one you're looking for...and that's assuming that you know which spindle it's on in the first place.
So...basically, for ease-of-location, spindles are a bad idea.
Spindles -are- great, just get organized (Score:2)
So if I'm looking for e.g. War Games, I merely have to grab the Movies spindle, open it up, look for the SciFi tab, and it's on
Re:Spindles -are- great, just get organized (Score:2, Interesting)
This way saves on digging through spindles
Re:Spindles! (Score:2)
I feel your pain (Score:5, Informative)
1. Ive purchased a few of those Nylon CD case thingies at Best Buy. Okay, I'm an idjit for not knowing the proper name for them, but hopefully you get the idea. I intentionally bought ones that are very different in design so I could tell them apart. I have a grey one that I keep the DVDs in and a black one for backups. I also have a blue one for some of my PS2/Dreamcast games etc.
2. I have a big hard drive that I've copied a number of the CDs to. Nearly all of my driver and application installs are there and I can just browse to the folder and get it started. I've also downloaded cracks for a few of my games so I could do that as well. (I love how that makes me a pirate even thoug I own the game.) Every year or so I buy a new hard drive and move the data over. Lately I've been using external drives so that this process would be a little more laptop friendly.
Eventually I'm going to rip my DVDs and do the same little trick I mentioned in step 2. I have a DVD +RW DVD burner that my DVD player happily plays, so on movie night I can just get a burn going and play it. (More specifically, start the burn the night before... but you probably get what I mean.)
With hard drives as big as they are these days, physical media is becoming more and more of a nuisance. Netflix is looking awfully good to me right now.
Re:I feel your pain (Score:4, Interesting)
I've actually taken this a step farther. I've pieced together a RAID 1 array, using an old computer, stuffed with a high powered power supply and lots of 400 gig harddrives. (They are cheap. Yes, I know there are bigger drives, but I can afford $150 out of a paycheck easier than $400+.) I have about 2 terabytes so far, but I figure that with PCI expansion cards, I can get up to almost 3 terabytes, with fairly secure data, easily. If you want to ommit the redundency, you can hit 6 terrabytes+.
I've got it hooked up on my LAN, where all my computers in my house can access it. I've ripped about half of my 300+ DVD collection so far using Nero Recode. I've got subtitles, alternate language tracks, and extras.
Coupled with a couple of fairly simple little sub $300 computers hooked up to my televisions, I've got access to my entire colletion anywhere in the house.
I've done the same thing with much of my software and CD's. (Daemon tools is your best friend!)
What's nice about this system is that it's cheap and you can buy in installments. The computer I use is a VERY low end system. All it has to have is the ability to network share. I've got an old Pentium Celeron at 1.0 ghz. Buy one hard drive and you are in business. As you need space, buy more. Hard drives are getting cheaper and more spacious every month.
I'm going to upgrage systems again and turn my current computer into a second server. Maybe then I'll get the rest of my DVD's ripped.
Re:I feel your pain (Score:2)
Re:I feel your pain (Score:2)
Re:I feel your pain (Score:2)
Redundancy and
OT: Game CD cracks & piracy (Score:2, Insightful)
Right there with you brother.
I started downloading the game cracks to avoid the hassles of the CD checks. With the CDs off in some never never land & the pirate checker on, I could never just play a game on a whim. I had to go dig the actual CD out of whatever plastic bin (toddler proofing)I put it in.
The problem is once I learned to download the crack, I had als
as cheap as a piece of paper (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:as cheap as a piece of paper (Score:2)
It also seems like it would be easier if there was an 8 1/2 x 11 PDF that was actually a template for the folding, you know with lines and whatnot on it.
Re:Steps with no fancy origami (Score:2)
This will produce a different case than what is described in the pdf. I have been using these steps since 1997 or so to make quick CD cases.
1. Orientate the paper so the short edges are at the top and bottom (portrait).
2. Place CD/DVD centered along the top short edge.
3. Fold the extra paper on the left and right over the CD using the left and right edges of the CD as a guide. This is a straight vertical fold.
4. Create a horizontal fold at the bottom of the CD. Use this fold to cover the CD
5. You shou
It Depends (Score:5, Informative)
1) How many CD's there are
2) How often you expect to use them
If there are many CD's, your choices are either thich jewel cases or the circular stacks with the pole in the middle, that come with a bunch of CD's. If you expect to look through them, you should buy the thick jewel cases (or a binder, actually). If you do not, storing them on the large circular things is great, because it does not take up too much space. Essentially, if you want to have it, *just in case*, go with the smallest, least obtrusive method. If you want to use them, then go with something that is easy to look through.
Having said that, I suggest you stop using CD's. Buy a large USB disk, create a backup directory with a bunch of subdirectories, and use that instead. Or even buy an external hard drive for backups. If it's really that important to you, it's worth the cost. Also, consider backing up over a network to another server, as opposed to physical media (or along with physical media).
Re:It Depends (Score:3, Interesting)
86 the Jewel cases. Unless you're shipping a CD, or using it in some other light industri
CD-single cases (Score:2)
Own any CD-singles? These come in a slim package similar to jewel-cases. Unlike most "slim" cases you find CD-Rs in, these have an enclosure for J-shaped paper inserts, designed for titles to show through the transparent spine.
So, versus jewel cases, you gain saved space, keep the ability to scan through a stack of them for the right disc, but also keep the fragility of plastic.
I can't imagine you'd find any enclosure system not based on a plastic package that lets you scan through a stack of them.
Identify constraints (Score:3, Insightful)
1. You want to organize a great number of physical items. This means you simply need a proportional amount of space, unless you use a more efficient (i.e. physical volume per byte) storage medium
2. You want a system that allows for easy access and identification of these items. This will require even more space, unless you offload access and/or identification to magical computer land.
Just writing those two things out has led me to think of a number of possible solutions outside grappling for some magical panacea to CD storage:
As for constraint #1, consider buying a hard-drive and migrating CD contents to the drive.
As for constraint #2, there are a couple of ways to go. You could buy/build some sort of system that stores and retrieves CDs for you. Then you wouldn't need a bulky jewel case, just a bar code. In a similar but simpler vein, just make a database of all your CDs. There is a surprising amount of information present in the cases, which is why you want full view of them. But get that information in a database and you can use a simple UID to identify CDs. Then you can store CDs in small cases or even a binder.
In fact, if you go to a UID system, you can put all your CDs in one of those big binders. If you keep them ordered by UID then you can access via binary search -- get your big O down to log(n)!
Re:Identify constraints (Score:2, Informative)
I went the no-tech and lazy way. I bought a bunch of the tyvek sleeves. I don't write on the sleeves, but I write directly on the disc with a marker. I throw the CD in any available sleeve, and put it in some reasonable order. I can usually find something quickly, but sometimes it takes a while.
Unless you're so
Incredible (Score:3, Informative)
Amaray DVD Cases [usplastic.com]
They come in regular size and super-slim. You can place artwork inside that covers the front, back, AND spine. If you don't want artwork, you can get them in clear form. They fit on a standard bookshelf. They're made of durable, flexible plastic so they won't wear to anywhere near the same degree as CD cases. They can hold manuals, and other materials on the inside. You can get them in forms that hold multiple disks. Etc., etc., etc.
Basically, they're the nearest thing to a perfect case.
Re:Incredible (Score:3, Funny)
Looks like an ad (OT) (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm wagering the reason you're getting no love is that you linked directly to a page to buy the thing. There's a fair bit of anti-commercialism on Slashdot, and some might feel you're sort of astroturfing.
And, sometimes, "Redundant" is the best way to mod down a post if "Troll" and "Flaimbait" and so on don't work. It comes with the added bonus you're a lot less likely to get hit on M2 with it, because who's going to read all of the comments to see if you're really and truly redundant?
Re:Incredible (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm not trying to defend jewel cases here, they're obnoxiously brittle and the little disc-hub latches don't work very well. But when people talk about DVD cases fitting on bookshelves like it's something new, I want to smack them.
Re:Incredible (Score:2)
Simple. They don't just fit on bookshelves, they fit on bookshelves well. When you pack a large number of CDs next to each other, the weight and friction places a great deal of strain upon the cases. This dramatically reduces their life-expectency, and may lead to scratching, chipping, and cracking. Even worse, the edges of the CD cases can cause even more friction when trying to add or remove a jewel case from the shelf. Thi
Re:Incredible (Score:2)
I take it you've never packed CD cases together? Jewel Cases have a "lip" on the edge that is intended to make it easier to open the case. In addition, the rear edge of the case protrudes a bit above the plastic door. The side edges are generally ribbed, presumably for extra traction while holding them.
Now if you pack CDs tightly together, not only does the lip and rear ridge catch, but the doors tend to be compressed against each other. The result of removing a
Re:Incredible (Score:3, Interesting)
But yes, DVD cases are better than CD cases because the plastic isn't as brittle. They even make them at CD height, for those that don't like the "looks good on a bookshelf" thing.
A Few Solutions (Score:3, Insightful)
If you are talking about a relatively small number of disks that you are going to access often, then the best solution is probably just copy the disk images to your hard drive. It's pretty simple to mount an image under Linux, and I believe there are programs available to do it under Windows too (though some games I think break this programs to prevent piracy). I'm not sure about OS X, since I've never actually had to do it.
If you don't feel like (or can't) rip disks to your hard drive, and are still working with only a couple hunderd disks, then you might consider one of those holders that hangs on the wall. Not sure what they are called, think geek was selling them a while back. Basically, it's a big thing you hang on the wall, and put your disks in them so they face out. These work best if you don't have a bunch of disks that look the same (though you could always use a bit of tape and marker to label them).
If you have a lot of disks that you need to get to occasionally, then the best solution is probably just to buy replacement jewel cases. They are pretty cheap in bulk and you can just transfer the liners into the new jewel case when the old one busts. This scales pretty well and you can just stick them on a shelf and quickly find what you need.
Finally, if you have things that you almost never need to get to, or if you need to get to a bunch of cds at the same time (say, an OS disk, plus all driver disks, and software) then CD spindles seem to take the least amount of space. Just group the disks by task or category, then label them.
If you go the replacement jewel case route, you might just consider getting DVD cases. I find that they are a bit more sturdy than regular jewel cases, and still fit well in rows on shelves.
Re:A Few Solutions (Score:2)
The OS X disk tools make it incredibly easy to rip disks, then use the virtual media as if it were real media. For example, the Super Wing Commander disc I acquired was in serviceable condition, but I wouldn't trust it to continue operating for the long haul. So I ripped the disc, and stuck the physical media into storage. Whenever I want to play a game, I simply double click on the disk image to mounts it and go.
Ejectors (Score:4, Informative)
A disc carousel (Score:3, Interesting)
http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/04/21/imation_di
Re:A disc carousel (Score:2)
Why, oh why, won't someone come out with a disc carousel with a CD/DVD ROM drive integrated into it.
Something like Sony's 400 CD/DVD changer, but that will handle CDROMs too.
Load up your CDROM game disks into the thing and never search for the CD again when you want to play,
and don't have to hassle with game cracks. Seriously, how hard can that be?
Spindles (Score:3, Interesting)
What did you do? (Score:2)
Tell ya what I do (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Tell ya what I do (Score:3, Informative)
I use the 128/192 CD binders that hold (4) CDs per page in a 2x2 grid (8 CDs per leaf). Each binder holds a category / classification and I simply store them in calendar order (these are data archives where the disks are named SYS2005[ABC] or BKP0512[ABC]). Works fairly well and lets me pull data off the shelf behind me in quick order but w
Univenture (Score:3, Informative)
Now I swear by the Viewpak XG by Univenture [univenture.com] (bottom of the page). They are heavy duty vinyl slips with a soft backing for 1 CD/DVD, a slip for the front cover of the album, and a back slip behind the CD for the back cover of the album.
They have packages without the artwork slips if you don't need them.
These things are real slim, robust, and if you need to order alphabetically or whatever, it's very easy to add or subtract from your collection without having to mess with everything (ie, in a binder).
They also sell Storage Boxes [univenture.com] that are just the right size for the packs, or course you can just use shoe boxes or home-made wood crates like me.
Univenture has at least one customer for life. Long live physical media!
In praise of univenture (Score:3)
The main advantage of Univenture disc sleeves is that they don't scratch the disc. This holds true whether you leave the discs in the sleeves for a long time or constantly take the discs in and out of the sleeves. I have been actively using them for YEARS with no visible disc scratching. In addition, their disc wallets have paper labels on the spines, w
Caddies, or a big changer/jukebox (Score:3, Informative)
I also got an NSM 100-CD jukebox on ebay. It has SCSI for the drive, and RS-232 to control the robot. I managed to find specs for the control protocol on the net, so wrote a program to control it. At one point I had an automount lashup that would automatically load the right disc when it is accessed, but it didn't work quite right, so I was going to reimplement it using FUSE. I haven't gotten around to that project, either.
Nowadays hard drives are just too cheap. Might as well consolidate all those discs in one place.
Paper (Score:5, Informative)
I went through this a couple of years ago. I had just under 2K CDs and spent a few weeks investigating storage alternatives which included everything from the consumer oriented 100-CD display racks for your living room, to large capacity wooden shelving, to painfully expensive specialised office cabinets. Complete waste of time.
Now, everything gets put into a paper window-less sleeve. Each CD gets a number, the relevant info is keyed into a database, and a simple label is applied to the outside of the sleeve. I figure it takes me about 20 seconds for each CD. Compare that to the time and expense of designing/printing/cutting up inserts for jewel cases (slim or otherwise), and you get the idea. If a database isn't your kind of thing, grepping a simple list should work just fine. As a side note, I entertained the idea of printing on the sleeves directly using a LaTeX template, but decided against it and use simple adhesive labels exclusively. Note that I opted for window-less sleeves to avoid having to design and print and insert for each CD.
As for "storing" all the CDs, I just modified a drawer by sectioning it off so that each section would hold exactly 100 CDs. The CDs are stored upright (to protect the CD) and arranged front to back, so finding and retrieving, say, CD number 0983, is quick and easy. Two drawers == 2K CDs. Easily expandable.
As for the old jewel cases, well, they were in mint condition so I gave them to a friend that collects music. Last I heard, he gave them away to a friend of his. I've reclaimed a huge amount of space in my office, and the clutter is gone. I have no "dusting" or similar nonsense to contend with, and made my life is a bit more sane by sticking a few plants on the shelves that were once reserved for CDs. Knowing that my CDs are protected in a cool dry place doesn't hurt, either.
You can buy sleeves directly from any paper manufacturer. There's plenty that offer specialised CD selections that will be happy to sell to you. Alternatively, you can buy a box of 1K from a reseller on eBay for just a few bucks.
As a final note, you may want to investigate something similar ready-made in the form of small metal or plastic boxes that resemble miniature hanging file folders; you can find these in most office-supply stores. The problem I've found with that approach, however, aside from the price, is that each hanging insert is prenumbered (a problem if for large collections) and requires you to squeeze 2 CDs into each. Hardly a safe approach considering how tightly they fit, not to mention that if you remove the entire insert from the box, you'll be carrying around 2 CDs instead of just the one you wanted.
YMMV.
Hard plastic boxes (Score:3, Informative)
I buy the hard plastic boxes that hold 10 cds each from rima.com, Hard Plastic Box for 10 CDs, 20-Pack [rima.com]. Of course, I put each CD in an individual CD sleeve.
In some cases, I put the device driver CDs together in boxes. In other cases, I'll put the various CDs for a particular CD in a box. And just slap a label on the front.
They take up a whole lot less room than individual cases and are much better at grouping things together.
Here's what I do: (Score:2)
I love the trigger cases, keep extra ones on hand to send when clients need CD sent to them. Paper sleeves don't protect in the mail, and jewel cases
Library CD cases (Score:2, Informative)
CD cases. Demco (http://www.demco.com) used to
sell polycarbonate ones (i.e., bulletproof glass)
which were fantastic, though expensive,
but don't seem to carry them any more. They do
have a selection of polypropylene ones that are
still better than the usual polystyrene (enter
"cd cases" in their search engine). This
site has links to a few other vendors:
http://www.dansdata.com/discsavers.htm [dansdata.com]
Build a cabinet (Score:3, Interesting)
I've thought about building a cabinet for storing CDs along the same lines as the punch card cabinets. Build drawers that are just the right size to store jewel boxes.
Right now I just stack them up in file cabinets. A CD cabinet would be a whole lot better.
The solution you can't get any more. (Score:2)
ext3 (Score:2)
This is serious advice; using it.
A good place to ask (Score:2)
Anyone seen that episode and know who makes the disc holder the victim owned?
Switch to HDD (Score:2)
Mount the disc images from your HDD - you can easily sort them there - and put your original discs in storage, you won't need to access them often.
Answer (Score:2)
b) If you have several hundreds/thousands of CDs/DVDs then just store them on spindles - those usually transparent cylindric boxes they sell blank media in. Keep a database though so you have some chance to find what you need!
I also have a dozen or so empty slim cases for moving things in and out.
Re:Answer (Score:2)
Again these are indexed in a database.
DIY (Score:3, Interesting)
Only one option. (Score:2)
Flight cases (Score:2)
I use CD Index 2 for keeping track of all my DVD-Rs, BTW: http://home.so-net.net.tw/minghsiu/ [so-net.net.tw]
It should be obvious... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
ironic solution (Score:4, Interesting)
It's kind of surprising, but the cost of storage per disc can be less by storing them in a carousel cd-changer than in any shelf designed to hold cds (or any other shelf for that matter). For a long time I had two, both capable of holding 400+ discs. Each player cost less than $250, and for shelves capable of holding that many cds I found those to be typically more expensive. Kind of weird, but true.
And, even though you may not be playing discs anymore (assuming you tote your music around as mp3 or some other non-cd format), these carousel players typically support display information about each disk (though mine required typing the info in via a keyboard), so you can easily get to specific discs.
I don't know if these changers are still made, but I'm betting you can find them on ebay for an even better price anyway.
Re:Clamshell cases! (Score:2)
telling me those paper inlay& covers do NOT br (Score:2)
CD covers are stronger, because they are made out of plastic and not paper which can rip in many circumstances; although; I still lack faith in their robuustnes
Re:Origami CD Case (Score:2)
It would be inappropriate for me to mention my employer, but a word of advice - if you want to mail a disc, and you want it to get where its going unscathed and in one piece - put it in a HARD CASE, taped shut with shipping tape. (You can re-use a case an AOL CD came in, even - some of them are quite sturdy) Then print an address label and stick it on. I would highly advise not to mail discs in anything less, ever. (And I wil