Slashdot Log In
Former Host and Writer of MST3K Launches RiffTrax
Posted by
CowboyNeal
on Thu Jul 20, 2006 07:14 PM
from the invention-exchange dept.
from the invention-exchange dept.
dougman writes "Today James Lileks mentioned his 'friend and all-around comic genius/good egg Michael J. Nelson' called, to tell him about his brilliant new project, RiffTrax. Here's the pitch:
'...free-lance commentary tracks. Bottom line: Mystery Science Theater 3000-style commentary for big famous beloved movies like Titanic or The Matrix. The hitch: you have to provide the movie. It's genius: no worries about copyright. You buy the commentary tracks for $1.99, rent the movie or get it out of your collection, load the commentary on your iPod or burn it to a disk, then watch them together in true you-got-peanut-butter-in-my-chocolate bliss. ... The first movie is Roadhouse."
Cool! I voted for The Matrix as the next one to be riffed." While I (and many others I know) preferred Joel, Mike was not without his share of funny moments too. Without Crow and Servo it just might not be the same, though.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Former Host and Writer of MST3K Launches RiffTrax
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 185 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Open Hangar Doors!! (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Thursday September 21 2006, @07:20AM)
Re:Open Hangar Doors!! (Score:4, Funny)
(http://www.slashdot.org/)
Nothing sadder than a bunch of Slashdotters competing to be "Alpha-dork".
Not an original concept (Score:3, Informative)
The dream of an MST3K reunion (Score:5, Interesting)
Sometimes silhouettes were funny (Score:5, Informative)
(http://lawpoop.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Friday May 28 2004, @06:51PM)
This reminds me... (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://recursion.ca/)
No worries? (Score:1)
Re:No worries? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:No worries? (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://xenu.net/)
Most movie reviews are very similar to an additional audio track, save for the fact that one is designed to be synced up to the movie, and the other is written on paper. Reviews often comment on aspects of the film, such as a specific scene or a recurring theme or something. The only real difference an audio track has is, once again, the fact that it is designed to be played along with the film.
Posting facts about a movie is also considered fair use. You can say "this movie is two hours long", or "the lens looks messed up in these scene", and this is not infringement. An audio track seems to be very similar to this.
Other types of media also follow these rules. It is not infringement to say "this painting is ten feet tall", or "Mark Knopfler used a Gibson Les Paul when he recorded 'Money for Nothing'". It is also not infringement to say "Charles Dickens sucks".
There's even prior art: Dark Side of the Moon [wikipedia.org].
Spend your money! (Score:2)
(http://www.steeltigersofdeath.com/ | Last Journal: Friday October 04 2002, @11:18AM)
Maybe some money will drag Joel in from whatever strange mountain cabin he's retreated to....
Re:Spend your money! (Score:4, Funny)
And for the multiple-tracked among us... (Score:2, Funny)
I suspect (Score:2)
(http://users.mtrx.net/funnypics | Last Journal: Monday September 25 2006, @11:29AM)
Remember SIMUL TREK? (Score:1, Interesting)
Deja vu (Score:2)
They typically floundered for a few minutes until they'd settled on a plot premise (always extemporaneously, they claimed) and then they would get on a roll. They were incredibly creative, kept everybody in stitches -- and when Sammy Davis Jr. did a commercial for I-forget-what schlocky consumer product, they outdid themselves.
rj
Share Crow with ShareCrow? (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.eyrie.org/~robotech/index.html | Last Journal: Thursday August 26 2004, @12:10PM)
(And check Commentary Central [commentarycentral.co.uk] for a bunch of freebie alternate commentary tracks, including my own for Lupin III: Castle of Cagliostro
This raises a good question.... (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://slashdot.org/~wowbagger/journal/87552 | Last Journal: Monday September 03, @08:07PM)
Imagine the fun the bots could have with some of the real stinkers that have been released too recently to be available to them: MST3K of Waterworld, or of, well, any Adam Sandler movie.
It's Not the Same (Score:2)
The moview were half the fun (Score:2)
(http://jlarocco.com/)
MST3K was great, but the hillariously bad movies were half the fun.
Two Dollars? (Score:3, Funny)
(http://hutnick.com/ | Last Journal: Monday March 12 2007, @09:15PM)
-Peter
PS: Remeber kids, there is no "-1: I don't get it." moderation option.
No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame. (Score:1)
(http://www.thefloatingrock.com/)
Michael J Nelson reads Slashdot (Score:2, Redundant)
(http://www.slashdot.org/)
it is in an open format right? (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Tuesday November 06, @02:39PM)
I think they should do the harry potter series..
I don't consider my improv particularly good, but I kept my friends in stitches riffing on that schlocky piece of crap.
Anyway..
so plz.. NO DRM okaaay?
No DRM (Score:5, Informative)
I just downloaded Road House from the site and it's in MP3 format. I doubt you have to worry about any DRM getting in the way.
Nice, but not quite the same (Score:1)
(http://www.syzygytech.com/)
No worries about copyright? (Score:2)
(http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Computer_Go)
If a "cut-list" for a DVD is considered possible copyright infringement as a "derivative work", you can sure as hell bet that a voice-over commentary intended for a DVD can be considered possible copyright infringement by today's overzealous copyright holders.
Dlugar
Parody and Criticism exceptions to the code. (Score:4, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Tuesday November 06, @02:39PM)
There are also numerous examples and case courses resolved against copyright holders in cases of parody and criticism.
Nelson has a mountain of case law on his side, but youre right, i wouldnt put it past these people.
EDLs are still A-OK. (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://kadin.sdf-us.org/ | Last Journal: Tuesday October 16, @01:46PM)
What was prohibited in that case was the reproduction that Clean Flicks was doing in order to produce the edited versions. They were taking a movie, editing it, and then selling the edited version -- yes, they were selling each edited version packaged along with an unedited version, but they were reproducing the film just the same. That's where they ran into copyright problems.
Other companies who took a different tactic towards the problem, and avoided the reproduction step (by delivering to the customer an EDL that would cause the player to fast forward through various 'offensive' parts) were allowed under the ruling [newsblaze.com].
There's a pretty good analysis of the verdict on FindLaw [findlaw.com], which isn't too long and is worth reading. In particular: "The defendants also argued that they were protected by the so-called "first sale" doctrine
If you're willing to spend some more time reading things actually written by folks who have law degrees, I recommend this substantial article from the Georgetown Law Journal [findarticles.com], which was written in 2004 and examines the viability under copyright law of several video-censoring technologies, including old-school razorblade tape splicing, CleanFlicks-type digital editing, and EDL-based 'skip over' systems.
Although CleanFlicks no longer offers the edited copies of DVDs, another company, ClearPlay, still offers an EDL-based product [clearplay.com] (which IMO is a much more elegant solution to the problem anyway, since it lets you pick what types of smut you personally dislike), as can be seen on their website.
This type of on-the-fly editing is legal, and was clarifed as such by President Bush's passing of the "Family Movie Act of 2005," which specifically allows you to make changes to an authorized copy of a motion picture, as long as you don't create a fixed copy of the edited version. The best part of the law? It's not limited purely to obscenity edits; according to one Forbes article [forbes.com], it could be used just as easily to protect a fan's removal of the more obnoxious parts of Star Wars Episode 1 as it could the removal of Kate Winslet's nudity from Titanic. (Sadly, apparently the technology can't replace Jar Jar Binks with a naked Kate Winslet. Yet.)
So the next time you think that G.W. hasn't done anything for you, it seems that he may have let some good slip through after all.
Speaking of which... (Score:4, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Monday March 31 2003, @01:23AM)
Can you please host the whole archive of shows again?
And new shows would be good, too. I'd love to hear Cliff rant on about the name Wii, or Taco get cranky over Vista.
And to not be totally offtopic... I can't be the only one who thinks it won't be the same without the shadows in the corner. Especially not without the robots. What I would love to see, though, is a group of totally insane people like the cast of SeaLab 2021 commenting on the movies.
Oh look I called it... (Score:1)
(http://xenu.net/)
Oh, and you might need to read the summary for that article to get the full effect, etc.
as for who was better (Score:1)
Lame (Score:2, Informative)
(http://traumstadt.org/)
Joel vs Mike... Sigh... (Score:5, Informative)
That's one thing that I've never understood about the Joel vs Mike thing.... The writing staff was pretty much the same for both (with the huge exception of Frank Conniff leaving. Things were never quite as.... surreal afterward).
jf
I had this idea awhile back... (Score:2)
I'm quite glad that Mike Nelson (and hopefully he'll drag in as many MST3K alums as possible, plus anyone good he's met since then) has taken up the torch. (You all do realize that while Joel was the initial public face, Mike was the head for the entire run of the show, right? It's a pointless war which one was better!) It's an idea that needed to be tried, and he'll do a far better job than I ever could have.
Re-subbed movies much better. (Score:2)
(http://www.hexagon.tk/ | Last Journal: Tuesday April 15 2003, @09:48PM)
Jonah HEX
Why don't they look? (Score:2)
(http://pio.longstair.com/)
I am not a lousy butler!
That nosewheel feels mushy!
He tried to kill me with a forklift!
The master will not approve!
I accuse my parents!
Hirohito Gamera! Hirohito Gamera!
No Lupita! No!
There was no monster!
It was after the apocalypse...
Daddy, I want a coke!
It stinks!
Hi, I'm Max Keller.
Master Ninja Theme Song!
Frank, push the button.
so let me get this straight (Score:1)
(http://www.lookingatnothing.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday October 19 2005, @08:55AM)
It's a win-win situation!
B.
odd timing... (Score:2)
(http://www.public.asu.edu/~corba3/)
Men in black MST3k easter egg (Score:1)
Special Media Player? (Score:2)
(http://www.kibbee.ca/)
This isn't anything new... (Score:1)
Mike vs Joel? (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Monday August 20 2001, @09:17AM)
Hercules returns (Score:2)
Roadhouse (Score:1)
(http://www.dealslab.com/)
Wizard People (Score:2)
Even though Neely thought that his use was legal, he decided not to fight. I hope Joel all the success in the world, but there is a good chance that he will get sued. Especially if they decide to do a live, or public version of one of his riffs.
-Matt
Clerks 2 already did it/is doing it (Score:2)
(http://www.phishyphotos.com/)
The thinking is that you can see the movie once to actually see the movie, then go again with your iPod and listen to the commentary while in the theater.
Pretty smart thinking, actually. And while I'm sure KS doesn't mind the additional money it would bring in, it's actually a pretty cool thing for him to do. I doubt a lot of directors would do something like this.
How ballsy will they be? (Score:2)
Do "The Passion Of The Christ" and I'll actually pony up the dough.
Sucks (Score:2)
(http://airship.home.mchsi.com/)
Joel was way better than Mike. Mike is your typical "writer who came out from behind the curtain because his ego couldn't stand not getting the laughs personally like he did when he was the class clown in high school". His delivery is flat; Joel had an actual on-screen personality. Mike may be a good writer, but he should have stuck with that.
We started this at The Floor Is Sticky (Score:2)
(http://rightfullyso.com/)
The Floor Is Sticky [thefloorissticky.com] released the first commentary to Star Wars: Episode I back in April... We need to do another one soon!
I guess it wasn't as original idea as I thought, although The Floor Is Sticky [thefloorissticky.com] shows are free!
Mr Sinus Theater (Score:2)
(http://www.totallygeek.com/)
Joel vs. Mike? they are friends! (Score:1)
Sorry if this has been posted already (Score:2)
(http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Wednesday April 26 2006, @05:27PM)
(The DVDs are colorized, but also include the original versions of the film, for concerned purists.)
Classic MST3k (Score:1)
(http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/)
Mike: And then the drunk guy says, "I can't help being an idiot; I'm Canadian."
Crow: Hahahaha. You're right! They're so pathetic, Mike!
Mike: Right, exactly.
Servo: Enough! There's been too much Canada-bashing for far too long. I say no more.
Mike: Don't you mean, "No more, eh?"
Crow: Good one, man! They are so stupid!
Servo: Stop it now! Instead, let us offer our northern brothers and sisters this song of tribute. Oh, I wish I was back in old Canada, a land which I never shall lampoon. How I pine for the ice covering Lake Manitoba and the beauty that is Saskatoon.
Mike: Oh, I got one. Oh, I wish I was stuck in the hills of Alberta drinkin beer with some big, dumb guy trapping fur.
Servo: Hey!
Mike: As he scraped and he chisled all the moose dung off his boot, I would learn that he's the prime minister.
Servo: Oh, stop that.
Crow: Oh, I wish I was in the land that gave us Peter Jennings, Alanis Morrissette, Mike Myers too...
Servo: Ah!
Crow: No, I take that back, I wouldn't go there even if you paid me! Oh, Canada, you are a place I must eskew.
Servo: Now this is not in the spirit that I intended.
Mike: Oh, come on. Give in. I mean, they gave us Ed the Sock... and Rush.
Crow: Yeah, what are you defending? They're such feebs!
Servo: Okay, I'll try.
Mike: Alright, good man!
Servo: Oh, I wish I was blowing up Prince Edward Island, then going on to bomb Ontario. Hehe. The destruction of Canada and all of its culture is by far my favorite scenario.
Mike: Okay, I think that's a little strong. You can back down...
Servo: Oh no, you were right, Mike. This is much more fun! Just where the hell does Canada get off sharing a border with countries far superior to it?
Crow: Yikes!
Servo: Why, you lousy, stinkin', Francophonic, bacon-lovin' bastards, your country's just a giant piece of sh...
Crow: Woah, woah, woah, woah! Geez!
Mike: Okay, I think that's enough! I think we've punched it. Cambot, okay. Thanks. Alright.
Servo: Sorry.
Crow: Wow.
Servo: I have no sense of proportion. I'm a disgrace to my uniform.
Mike: I know. That's, that's okay. Now calm down now. Mustn't hate, mustn't hate...
Crow: At least so overtly.
Mike: Exactly, right. Must disguise our hate. Just a little, okay? We'll be right back. Shh, shh. It's okay now, Dudley. Calm down, calm down.
Servo: Pardon é mois! Pardon é mois!
Report (Score:2)
(http://www.hiddenglade.com/threesecond/)
"Imagine what it'd be like to make out with Milla Jovovich and get a mental image of Carrot Top. Talk about 'collapsing the circus tent'."
Re:Good idea but... (Score:4, Interesting)
Record the show and wait an hour or 5 before playback and you could have Henry Kissinger pitching snide remarks to Gretta Van Susteran while watching War of the Worlds.
Wait a month and you could have some really cool total-replacement sound tracks of Bush calling a world cup game.
Re:Thanks in Advance (Score:1)
Re:Thanks in Advance (Score:3, Informative)
(Last Journal: Saturday November 04 2006, @02:28AM)
Re:Good idea but... (Score:1)
(http://www.everythin...pl?node=mr100percent | Last Journal: Thursday September 27, @02:22AM)
Re:Lileks? (Score:1)
Re:No one thought of PAL vs NTSC? (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Tuesday May 24 2005, @09:11AM)
Re:Good idea but... (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Saturday January 15 2005, @07:43PM)
Re:BOOTBLACK! (Score:1)
(http://slashdot.org/)
However I believe your affection for Adult Swim is misplaced, you can only find those shows funny if you have suffered severe brain trauma or you're abusing some schedule IV substances.
HESH WANTS MARRIED SEX!
Try "DVD PODBLAST" (Score:1)
(http://www.steelray.com/)
http://dvdpodblast.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com]
Re:Red-State Edition DVD Commentaries (Score:2, Funny)