

Online Plagiarist Sues University 693
raistphrk writes "The Reg reports that an English student at the University of Kent has sued the university after the university caught him ripping his papers off the Internet and kicked him out of the English program. I guess the stakes are now being raised for universities that use services to check for plagiarized papers."
I stole (Score:3, Funny)
Wow next thing you know... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:5, Funny)
~S
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:5, Insightful)
tuition doesn't pay for a degree (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:4, Interesting)
Usually, it does go the other way, too, just to be fair; if a girl orders you a few drinks, takes you home and you say yes, and then you wake up the next morning and realize, "Oh my God, what the Hell was I thinking?" then, technically, she raped you.
Of course, arguably, at what point someone transitions from the thinking-clearly stage into the unable-to-decide-what-they-really-want stage is personal and subjective, which is why this law is somewhat controversial. For example, what if a girl really does have the capacity to say yes, says yes, and then later decides that the guy is a jerk, or she finds out that the guy scored better on an exam than her, and then she cries RAPE?
But anyway, that's why, whenever I go to pick up girls, I make them sign a waiver before I will order them any drinks, just so I know ahead of time (and have it in writing) that they're really ready for sex, and not just going to be easily swayed because of a chemical in their brain.
Maybe that's why I never get laid. Hmm. Nice guys finish last.. *Sigh*
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:3, Funny)
Usually, it does go the other way, too, just to be fair; if a girl orders you a few drinks, takes you home and you say yes, and then you wake up the next morning and realize, "Oh my God, what the Hell was I thinking?" then, technically, she raped you.
There's a rather obvious disparity there. If she takes you home and forces a Viagra pill down your throat, then you might have a case -- or a vivid imagination.
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:5, Insightful)
Believe me, if every male out there were impervious to alcohol (as most of them would like to believe), I would agree with you wholeheartedly, but, they're not. Perpetuating gender myths is holding society back... in terms of pound-for-pound strength, for example, guys and girls are about equally strong after the age of 25 or so (guys are lucky to have a short period in their young adult lives where their strength-to-weight ratio has a bit of a boost); guys are not mentally superior than girls (and can make mistakes and be misled just as easily); girls are not any less horny than guys (ever read The Sexual Life of Catherine M.?); girls can have ulterior motives and malicious intents in relationships just as often as guys; girls cheat just about as often as guys do; etc.
I mean, anybody who's smart won't spend time drinking around people they don't trust unless they are prepared to handle situations where they might be taken advantage of. In other words, don't go out drinking alone, go with friends; carry mace or pepper spray; keep a cell phone for emergency dialing; don't hang around bad parts of town late at night; don't take rides or candy from strangers; etc.
One of the problems with grey borders is that what people want to do, on a conscious level (and dealing with responsibility and physical and emotional health), is not the same as what they often want to do, on a subconscious level (=raw physical desire); this disparity grows with intoxication. In the USA, also, consent is implied unless explicitly denied. It is very, very easy for people to get out of hand with their passion and regret it later. I see it happen all too often. Fortunately, most of my friends are sane enough to take fairly good care of themselves, learn from their mistakes, and not be taken advantage of too much or too often, rather than filing rape charges against every other guy they date (like some girls are wont to do).
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:5, Funny)
In the USA, also, consent is implied unless explicitly denied
Now we know the precedent for opt-out spam and why my email inbox is raped daily.
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:3, Funny)
Whereas with most guys, from the age of 12 or so, we have this chemical in our brain that makes us easily swayed when it comes to sex. All the damn time.
Maybe that's why I never get laid. Hmm. Nice guys finish last.. *Sigh*
Finishing last is definitely A Good Thing when it comes to sex...
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:5, Insightful)
It's a shame that there are so many in the world who refuse to take responsibility for their actions.
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:5, Funny)
Except that the University (presumably) didn't place ads showing beautiful people having a wonderful time and enjoying life because they were downloading papers off the internet.
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:5, Insightful)
In that single sentence, you've summed up the root cause of almost everything wrong in today's society.
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:5, Funny)
Hey! That's not my fault!
smoking is different (Score:3, Insightful)
The tobacco lawsuits are different. When a company's internal documents show that they knew a product was both chemically addictive and highly carcinogenic, and they continued to sell it for decades while assuring consumers that it was neither addictive nor deadly, they are responsible for damage done to those consumers.
Given full disclosure up front (as cigarettes feature now), I'm more willing to blame the users.
Re:smoking is different (Score:3, Interesting)
Consider the character of "Joe Camel" who was specifically tailored to attract those presumed to be too irrational to be trusted to guide their own lives (minor children).
In a logical sense, they were warned. But they were blandished with targeted emotional seductions. Evil is not too strong a term, though amoral is probably slightly more accurate.
Don't forget the tobacco industry perjury (Score:3)
Tobacco companies are evil and deserve more than they will get. Unfortunately, what with tobacco taxes bringing in so much revenue, governments are unlikely to give them what they des
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:5, Informative)
1. She wasn't driving.
2. The car wasn't even moving when she spilled it.
3. She only sued after McDonalds offered her $800 to reimburse her for her $20,000 legal bills.
4. She didn't even end up with the $2.9 million or whatever everyone thinks, it was reduced on appeal to $480,000, then settled out of court for an undisclosed sum.
Now, you still may disagree with the ruling, and that's okay, but it is *not* a clear cut case and you can't just spout out about someone being stupid enough to put the cup between her legs while driving. There are good arguments for why McDonalds shouldn't have to pay, but you brought up a whole... ZERO of them.
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:3, Informative)
So, yes, too fucking hot sums it up well.
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:3, Informative)
It was all fun and games until someone lost an eye.
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:3, Interesting)
1. It's easy to get scalded. Ever wonder why they suggest you turn your water heater temp down to 120 degrees? To prevent scalding (and to save energy).
2. Coffee is supposed to be brewed between 195 and 205 degrees (you DID know this, didn't you?), so it is likely to be HOT, REALLY HOT. Hot enough to cause third degree burns.
3. To summarize, the coffee wasn't "too fucking hot", she was a fool who didn't deserve ANY amount of money for
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:3)
MEDICAL bills. Sorry...
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:5, Informative)
The "McDonald's Case" as it's called was only one in a series of cases in which courts had repeatedly ruled that McDonald's coffee was being served too hot.
The company had been ordered by the courts numerous times to serve coffee at a lower temperature but refused to do so. When this woman sued the court decided to actualy make the company take notice.
The huge judgement awarded against the McDonald's Corporation was largely a way for the court to punish McDonald's for its repeated failure to comply with previous decisions.
Now, does the stupid woman need the huge quantity of money? Of course not. Those funds would be better awarded to a burn unit at a local hospital or some other worthy cause. Unfortuantely the US legal system does not make provisions for judgements like that, and punitive damages must be awarded to a plaintiff.
The amount has to be huge because the McDonald's corporation isn't going to give a shit if you award $20,000. It needs to be a big enough judgement that the company has to declare it as an item on its SEC filings.
Of course the legal system shouldn't be the slot machine it is today. At the same time, billion dollar corporations should not be able to hold themselves above civil judgements by virtue of their excessive wealth.
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:3, Insightful)
I thi
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:3, Interesting)
Those funds would be better awarded to a burn unit at a local hospital or some other worthy cause.
Just today, there's a story [nytimes.com] in the New York Times about a law being introduced in California that would give the state 75 per cent of punitive damages. The story says:
Re:Wow next thing you know... (Score:5, Informative)
Jolyon
Huh? (Score:4, Funny)
unbelieveable (Score:4, Insightful)
should have stopped him?! The world is going downhill when people begin to reject common sense in favor of outrageous accusations such as this one.
That isn't his complaint. (Score:5, Insightful)
"But they have taken all my money for three years and pulled me up the day before I finished. If they had pulled me up with my first essay at the beginning and warned me of the problems and consequences, it would be fair enough."
He's complaining that he spent 3 years and lots of money submitting stolen papers and that the University should have made him understand EARLIER that submitting stolen papers would REALLY get him kicked out of the program.
His case is that no one at the university REALLY explained to him that stealing papers was not acceptable and what the ACTUAL consequences would be. Or at least that they didn't do it early enough to satisfy him.
Whether he wins or loses that case, you have to ask yourself, would you want to HIRE him to work for you?
Re:That isn't his complaint. (Score:5, Funny)
I wouldn't want him myself, but apparently there is no end to the number of companies that would want to hire him into management. Shame he went after an english degree, his real talent was in law.
Re:That isn't his complaint. (Score:4, Insightful)
As for him being in management, this is exactly the kind of behavior that is encouraged above all else in american business. I could see him making vice president in 5 years, tops.
Re:That isn't his complaint. (Score:5, Funny)
In a heartbeat.
Sincerely,
L. Hubert Platt, esq.
Platt, Platt, Dewey, Cheetham, Howe & Platt, LLC
Probably because (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:That isn't his complaint. (Score:3, Informative)
But this is an English university. It doesn't make any money from tuition fees; in fact it'll barely break even. Universities here (generally) don't have endowments, they're funded by the taxpayer. The university had absolutely no motivation to "steal" his money.
Oh, and to put this
Re:Plagerism is business (Score:5, Insightful)
BUT YOU HAVE TO CITE YOUR SOURCES.
Any moron can take someone elses hard work and put their name on it, it involves no creativity, no intelligence, and no skill.
The only thing this guy has going for him is that he feels the world owes him a living for no work of his own. Frankly if you're too fucking lame to get an english degree, there is no place for you in college. (Before all the English Majors start whining, I should mention that I have an English BA, which I picked up accidentally while working on my CS BS, so I know what the hell I'm talking about.)
Re:Plagerism is business (Score:5, Funny)
Response 1:
So you're the bastard whose got it! I just put it down for a few minutes beside the printer in the computer lab, and when I got back it was gone!
Response 2:
Lucky sod - the rest of us have to work at picking up girls/guys.
Re:Plagerism is business (Score:4, Funny)
That's nothing. While studying for my maths degree, I picked up three PhDs, two MBAs and a Diploma in Human Resources Management, and all without leaving my e-mail client.
Re: What? (Score:3, Insightful)
maybe he should... (Score:3, Funny)
There is an issue here (Score:5, Interesting)
There's catching people who are attempting to plagarise, and just being silly.
Re:There is an issue here (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:There is an issue here (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm not sure if this is the case (I'm not the above AC), but I don't really see a problem with submitting work done outside of class for later class credit. It's a bit on the edge to submit the same assignment for multiple classes, but fairly unlikely to happen in a University setting (and usually out-ruled anyway).
Sometimes the sentence you wrote 6 months ago is just the best way to say what you want to say. That being said, I've never done anything like this. But it's an interesting case.
Re:There is an issue here (Score:3, Informative)
I was just saying that "Unpublished Manuscript", which would technically be the correct way to cite it, is a really over-
Re:There is an issue here (Score:3, Funny)
Re:There is an issue here (Score:5, Informative)
Re:There is an issue here (Score:5, Insightful)
To appropriate for use as one's own passages or ideas from (another).
Now a university is supposed to be a institution to pass on knowledge but when they can't even get simple English right, its a slight problem. If you wrote it you have the right to use it where ever you would like to, well unless you gave away the rights and such.
Re:There is an issue here (Score:3, Insightful)
It's not plagiarising, and besides that, universities who condemn this are stupid.
I get an assignment. I write an essay. I submit it and pass the course. I get an assignment for another course. Exactly the same essay fulfills that assignment. So I submit my essay again. And that would be wrong?
If my own work is good enough to meet the requirements of two courses, why would I not pass both cour
Yes, but why are those rules in place? (Score:5, Informative)
1) Citations are useful for people doing research. If I read your paper, and I want to know more about a specific item, I will look at your references and get other related books. This is not applicable or useful in this case because the only purpose of the paper was to demonstrate the student's abilities, NOT to create a work that will be read and used by others.
2) To make a clear distinction between what is YOUR thinking and what thinking you BORROWED from someone else. This is the primary reason why plagarism is frowned upon; you're tricking the teacher into thinking you did work when all you did was copy someone else's. However, this isn't applicable here either, because the student actually did the work.
Really, this is just the product of a paranoid administration more obsessed with the letter of the law than the purpose.
You're full of shit (Score:4, Insightful)
All these comments about turning in your own work twice being plagiarism are beside the point. Some professors don't want students turning in a paper written for another class, since presumably you should have learned something unique in that class that merits a unique assignment. In many situations that could be considered academic dishonesty (although I don't agree with that view), but hardly "plagiarism," which as others pointed out involves taking another person's work and pretending it is your own.
Re:You're full of shit (Score:4, Insightful)
Quite right. The matter falls under the broader umbrella of 'academic dishonesty', rather than within the realm of plagiarism, per se.
That said, the university was absolutely correct to penalize the author in question for his actions. Most universities have a policy not to accept for credit works created for other courses; often this extends to all previously written works. In this case, the author was presenting material as his own (correct), and as his original work for the course (decidedly incorrect.)
What if I wrote a guide to Perl and put it on my personal website. Suppose I did it just for fun, as a project to keep busy over the summer. Three months later, I'm back at school, and my CS prof asks me to write an introductory handbook on the scripting language of my choice. I choose to write about Perl, and extract most of my handbook content from my existing online documentation.
Doing it that way falls down for two reasons. First, as a student I don't learn anything. (The parent post noted this.) I don't have to do research. Second, I have an unfair advantage--I had an extra three months to write, review, and revise large portions of my content. Unless I cite my original source (my own work) the professor grading the assignment has no way of knowing that I didn't generate the entire assignment after it was assigned. Of course my handbook will be better than everyone else's--I had all that extra time.
One should also be aware that sloppiness with citation can often lead the professor grading the work to distrust the rest of the work. Did the student lift anything from elsewhere undetected? Has anything that was cited been inadvertently or deliberately misrepresented?
It's good that the university is cracking down now. Encouraging students to always cite sources is a valuable habit if they ever do any professional writing. Citing yourself can also be a valuable tool to encourage other academics to read your stuff.
All that said, I hope that he wasn't punished too severely for this particular transgression, because it does seem fairly minor.
This person is a complete retard (Score:5, Insightful)
How any person can get to university without realising that plaigarism is wrong is beyond me. How an *English* student can try to argue that he didn't know what the word meant (as per the student handbook that explained this)
This person is so stupid that he doesn't deserve a degree. I think how he got his A Levels (pre-university exams in England) is also rather doubtful as well.
Re:This person is a complete retard (Score:4, Insightful)
They just get innured to special treatment.
Re:This person may have a relative named DARL. (Score:4, Insightful)
How any person can get to university without realizing that plagiarism is wrong is beyond me.
You get it wrong. He's suing them for not catching him earlier . He admits that he's been cheating all along and that he knew it was cheating. His complaint is that, if they had caught (and kicked him out) earlier, he wouldn't have stayed in school for so long (and paid his tuition).
It looks like he's going to go into court arguing that he's been cheating since day one. I expect the university to use (among other things) the 'clean hands' defence (you can't claim the protection of the court if you're breaking the law). Plagirism is also copyright violation, so he's likely to get laughed out of court just on that basis.
I can just imagine the disclosure request for:
Re:This person may have a relative named DARL. (Score:3, Informative)
Not necessarily, there are places that do in fact sell papers that come with the rights to redistribute. There are works in the public domain (Shakespeare etc..) that you can republish without copyright infringement. And paraphrasing without citing the source, while not illegal, is still plagirism.
Re:This person may have a relative named DARL. (Score:3, Funny)
A list of all assignments on which you cheated
For each such assignment on which you cheated,
A description of where and how you obtained your work,
any agreements you engaged in to obtain it,
how much (if anything) you paid for each assignment, and
how you think the markers should have recognized your cheat.
He'll probably just crib the list from someone else.
Re:This person is a complete retard (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:This person is a complete retard (Score:3, Funny)
Well actually that's called the insanity defense.
Need Yet Another Warning Label? (Score:5, Interesting)
* CAUTION: Coffee is hot, do not store between legs while driving.
* DO NOT stop chainsaw with HANDS.
* DO NOT TOUCH SERVER
And new to this category:
* IF YOU CHEAT THROUGH SCHOOL, WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO PULL THE RUG OUT FROM UNDER YOU AT ANY TIME, INCLUDING AFTER YOU'VE PAID US 4 YEARS TO PLAY ALONG WITH YOUR LITTLE SCAM( but just before we hand you your diploma).
-Adam
Re:Need Yet Another Warning Label? (Score:4, Informative)
The woman in question was awarded 75% of her medical costs (she was found partially at fault), and a regurgitation of McDonalds' profits from willfully wounding their customers. The almost the entire $15M she was awarded came from this regurgitation of profits.
The real warning should have been placed at McDonalds' world headquarters:
Re:Need Yet Another Warning Label? (Score:3, Funny)
Penalties for getting caught (Score:4, Insightful)
Where I went to college, the Art department chair was caught many years after that fact for plaigarizing his dissertation for his Ph.D. He lost his doctorate and his job, and probably faced legal actions as well.
Better to get nailed for plaigarism before you have your degree like this guy at the University of Kent did than to build a career around a falsehood like the department chair.
Re:Penalties for getting caught (Score:3, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:4, Funny)
His own damn fault. (Score:5, Interesting)
Plagiarism is an offense in which nobody wins. People who actually do the work are hurt because they won't rank as high (most Universities run off bell curves). The University gets themselves discredited and the value eof everybody's degree goes down if it happens too often. Everbody ends up with paint on their faces.
Only person possibly standing to benefit from it is the Plagiariser. So if you go down, it's your fucking problem.
This kid really needs to grow the hell up.
Maybe he sucks at english.. (Score:3, Funny)
Now hold on a minute here... (Score:5, Interesting)
The analogy to that would be seeing a burglar in your house, and sitting there as he took almost everything (and he knows that you're there watching and not saying anything about it). When he goes to take the last valuable item in your house, THEN you pull out your gun and shoot him in the face.
Now granted, what the kid did was stupid, and his excuse is lame ("I didn't know it was wrong"). But if they knew that he had been plagarizing the past 3 years (as the article incinuates), then they should have kicked him out immediately. Doing otherwise does kind of look like extortion, or rather making someone pay money under false pretenses.
That being said, I don't feel sympathy for the kid. You lost money? Too bad, you shouldn't have been plagarizing. You're 21 years old, you should know better.
University is running a pilot scheme (Score:4, Informative)
The University is running a pilot scheme which uses plagiarism detection software to analyse student work.
So it's not like they knew all along and were stinging him along. They just got smart, started using the same technology he was using to cheat, and finally caught him.
This was the English department after all. It took them awhile!
Re:Now hold on a minute here... (Score:4, Insightful)
I think a closer analogy would be a bank robber, caught after a long string of robberies. "They knew I was doing it before, but they purposely waited until now to bust me, so they could give me a harsher sentence!" (and offering no proof that they did know he was doing it before)
The 1st time or the 20th time...it's still wrong.
The crux of the matter.... (Score:3, Insightful)
There are two other possible options they could have done at the first time they he was plagiarising text:
(1) Throw him out immediately.
(2) Follow standard industry disciplinary procedures:
. .
Given that the university stated that plagiarising won't be tolerated, why didn't they warn him? If a students wasn't getting some topic and constantly getting wrong answers, wouldn't the department have told him? If someone decided they wanted to become a pilot, attended flying school, but lacked the concentration/attention span required to learn, would the instructors waste their (and his) time stringing that person along only to tell them that they shouldn't bother attending the exam?
There are standard punishments for this type of behavior. To allow someone to build up this amount of debt is purely vindictive and would probably amount to a "cruel and unusual punishment". It seems to me, the department were only interested in collecting as much money from him as possible.
Re:The crux of the matter.... (Score:3, Insightful)
Coursework (Score:3, Insightful)
And I'm a student in England.
I hope he doesn't win, if he does, I'm going to feel really silly for the hundreds of hours I've put in on work over the years, when I could have done this.
/Me Rolls Eyes.
Solution? (Score:5, Interesting)
As a corollary, it is amazing how stupid today's plagiarist is.
Re:Solution? (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm a University student and know kids who have plagiarized, and they don't get anything but a slap on the wrist. Why? They're good students otherwise, and teachers feel bad ruining a career over it. They always think that they can "teach them better" by making them do an extra essay instead.
But it's hard to argue that it should be okay. Maybe an F would do people some good.
As a student, some advice:
- Mak
My own experience (Score:3, Interesting)
Online cite-checking services (Score:5, Interesting)
In the case of this kid, I think it's pretty cut-and-dry that he should bite the bullet. If you get caught plagiarizing, then you get busted. The fact that he didn't get caught before isn't evidence of negligence or discrimination, but rather his own luck in previous instances.
When I submitted the story today, I had hoped to generate a debate about the rights-and-wrongs of plagiarism, but also about the issue of whether or not universities should be requiring the usage of online plagiarism-checking services.
I'm pretty torn about online plagiarism-checking services [turnitin.com]. I think plagiarism is bad. I mean...every style book has a reasonable method of documenting where you got a quote from, and you can quote a whole paragraph in if it's relevant. For that matter, for most university papers, you can paraphrase a paragraph as long as you (a) cite the original source after you do so and (b) provide some more analysis to suppliment the material you used.
On the flip side, I do feel a bit violated when I have to submit these papers. One at least one site, the user agreement you MUST agree to states that the site basically inherits ownership of the paper. Now, that really bothers me. I post all of my academic papers (as well as personal poetry and other writings) on my own personal website. Based upon those user agreements, this site could post my paper, with our without indication that I authored it, or even sell it, without even informing me. Worse, if a professor requires that I use the service, I don't have a choice in the matter. I am forced to either (a) take a failing grade on the paper (and potentially the class), or (b) give up what intellectual property rights I have over my paper. That really irks me.
I don't have anything to hide; I don't rip off other people's work for my papers. At the same time though, I know other students DO rip off other authors' writings. I don't think it should be a professor's responsibility to be a source checker. If a fifty page paper has forty to eighty sources, the professor shouldn't have the responsibility to hunt down all of those sources. At the same time though, schools are putting their students in an academic guilty-until-proven-innocent situation.
next up: Outsourcing homework. (Score:3, Interesting)
Whats even better is how some poeple make it easy to track down thier professor. They post a pdf or word document given to them by thier professor, some people forget that it automatically stores the name of the person or orginization where it was created. A simple email to the professor of the course, and that cheater is history.
Consulting my slashdot morals quick reference card (Score:4, Insightful)
writes in additional line
Re:Consulting my slashdot morals quick reference c (Score:5, Insightful)
The first point is a gross oversimplification as, while SOME people here have said specifically 'All copyright is wrong and should be abbolished," MOST people have expressed something more mild. Along the lines of, "The current copyright system is extremely unfair. However, I do understand the possible good uses for copyright as an idea, just not how it is currently implimented. Because of that, I have more sympathy for those who chose to ignore the unreasonable restrictions used for copywritten entertainment (usually music) than those who use the copyright system to impose unreasonable restrictions on media." Which, in your mind, gets boiled down to all Slashdotters saying, "Infringing on music copyrights is good." This isn't even true for all Slashdoters, though, as every time music copyrights come up there are well-spoken arguments by artists (or even just those who disagree with downloading music without paying the artist, or programmers who apply the argument about music to software) who explain why they believe the copyright system is valid, and you're an ass if you "pirate" music or software.
The second two points ignore the type of licensing stipulations. You seem to have a missunderstanding you seem to have on how (many) Slashdoters view software licensing. The issue (as I understand it) is that the GPL grants privledges BEYOND what would normally exist for code. As such, violating it makes you look like an ass, because you're already being given allowances you wouldn't have had without the GPL. On the other hand, the software licenses which are "applauded" when broken (usually) impose a restriction that (by Slashdot hivemind, popular concensus, the phase of the moon, or whatever company is currently in or out of favor) have been deemed unreasonable and overly harsh. For the most part, these software licenses impose restrictions vastly beyond what 'normal' copyright law would suggest is standard, and often due so in a questionably legal fashion (click through licenses, EULAs, popup browser downloads that say they are "required," etc.) So violating the GPL makes you look greedy while violating 'standard' software licenses (according ot Slashdot groupthink) can be the "right" thing to do.
I don't even understand your points concerning mirroring and reposting text. Karma whores or ACs will often copy-and-paste text from Salon or the NYT and get modded up for it. Likewise, posting mirrors often gets you modded up. The idea for the first is that many (not all) people feel the registration systems imposed for some news sites are overly harsh and appreciate not having to give up such info to read what - in the newsstand print edition - would require no personaly identifying information. The logic behind mirroring is that many of the sites Slashdot posts about are, by their nature, hobby sites with low bandwidth and the webmasters appreciate not having their site hosed. When an entire word has been devoted to the negative effect of having a website posted on Slashdot, I don't think mirroring is unreasonable. For small sites, it's often considered a polite way of being helpful, rather than copyright violation...
Maybe I missed a story, but how is the graphing calculator even slightly on topic? Because it's a story about school? I admit I don't read every story and don't have them all memorized, but I don't recal seeing a story about some kid getting in trouble for using a graphic calculator. (I wouldn't be copmletely surprised if it happened, but I think you're jumping the gun by posting about it.) That said, as a student... graphing calculators are tools and, if the teacher allows their use, I'm going to damn well use every tool I can to make my life easier. I'm not writing papers by hand because computers make it easier. Lik
He got what he paid for... (Score:3, Insightful)
In reality, the student got what he paid for - class instruction - for years. He doesn't have that coming back to him. He paid tuition for a service (instruction), and he received that service.
The fact that he is unable to complete his degree puts him in the same category as all the drop-out and flunk-out "students". Should they be refunded their tuition, simply because they cannot finish? Doubtful.
Court adjourned; ruling in favor of the defendant, in summary judgment.
recent experience (Score:3, Interesting)
These essays were obviously read by the student's teachers. Some students from the same class obviously prepared their essays together. Did the teachers just not care? Do they realize that next year those judging the competition will not take their students seriously. I was put off by the experience, and don't really want to judge again next year. When I was that age, we didn't have online sources for this kind of thing. I guess I'm naive to be surprised by the sheer percentage of kids cheating. I know there have been articles recently that cite studies that have found extremely high percentages of kids cheat, I just figured that these numbers applied to a kid's entire academic career - I can see someone cheating once or twice in the period of time from kindergarten to the end of high school, or until the end of college. Apparently, I was underestimating the problem.
The way my undergraduate university dealt with this was to have an honour code. We signed an agreement on our first day of school that we wouldn't cheat, and if we did, if we were discovered, if we knew that someone else cheated, and we didn't do anything, there were clear penalties. The code was clear and as far as I know, the implementation was fair. There was a case of a fraternity getting copies of an exam before it was given, and those involved were punished.
I indirectly caught someone cheating once when I found their class notes in the bathroom while they were taking an exam. I knew that it was early in the exam period. I didn't follow the honour code, but just took the notebook, kept it for a few days and then dropped it off with the professor, not telling them when or where I'd found it. I felt bad for the student, but I figured that when they went to the bathroom and found it missing, and then had it returned to them several days later by the professor, they would be freaked out enough. Yeah, that was probably mean, but I could have been meaner.
He paid for tuition, he got tuition (Score:3, Interesting)
When you go to uni, you don't pay for a degree. You pay for tuition (and other related services) and the twit recieved these services. There was no contract that said he had to get a degree. The fact that he elected to not bother to do the work that would have led to a degree is his affair -- the contract between him and the uni is intact.
He doesn't have a case, unless there was something really odd in his contract with the uni.
Big brass ones (Score:3, Insightful)
Waaah! I admit that I did wrong, but I was misled into thinking it wasn't a problem!
File this one under, "Sit down and shut up!"
Not an American (Score:3, Insightful)
Apparently, in our courts and society, ignorance of the rules, or in fact, ingnorance in general, is usually enough to get yourself out of trouble (or at least, excuse yourself from it).
People have brought up a large number of similar cases (most notably coffee), where people basically claim ignorance (unreasonably) and try and make a legal case out of it.
I didn't know the coffee was hot, I didn't know plagerism would get me kicked out of school, et cetera. What sickens me more than when people wrongfully claim ignorance, is when judges don't throw that shit out of court.
Not Serious (Score:3, Informative)
"A student who was booted off his degree course for plagiarism is to sue the university."
He hasn't actually sued them yet (Score:3, Informative)
This seems to me that his legal action is very much in the formative stage, if it is anywhere at all. Good luck on finding a solicitor to take the case. Especially given that the university has made it perfectly clear what plagiarism is and the consequences thereof.
Most frivolous lawsuit stories are about lawsuits that where filed but never made it to court. I have a feeling this is going to be one of them.
Scary Precident (Score:3, Interesting)
This reminds me of the cheating scandle at Georgia Tech a few years back, where a bunch of whinny bitches got F's in a CS class because the professors setup a way to compare peoples programs to see if they had cheated. (I was a TA for one of those classes and I had less then a 3 or 4 students ever ask for extra help all semester.. and shocker.. those that did go the material and weren't caught for cheating).
The idea behind school is not to see how well you can avoid doing any real work of your own, but to learn something.
There can be no guarentee that because you paid to take a class means you paid for the right to pass that class. The last thing we need is for college level eduation to be reduced to the level that grade school education has in many places.
The teachers should have to kept to certain standars, but ultimately the burden should be on the students to learn.
Re:Gah. Stupid university. (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Gah. Stupid university. (Score:3, Insightful)
Its just another typical example of people today trying to put the blame on others for their mistakes.
Re:Gah. Stupid university. (Score:5, Insightful)
OTOH, nice troll.
Re:Gah. Stupid university. (Score:5, Insightful)
It sounds more to me like a serial murder that killed 4 or 5 people over three years suing the police departments who investigated the case for not catching him after the first one thus stopping him from serving time for and additional 3 or 4 people.
No... RTFA (Score:5, Informative)
The basis for the suit is: "I've been plagarizing for 3.9 years, and right as I was about to graduate, you told me I couldn't. You shouldn't be allowed to kick someone out for plagarism after they pay you for 4 years of education."
This is a very silly argument, but if the student can find some evidence that the administration had knowledge of the plagarism scheme, led him to believe he would graduate, he paid all his fees, and *then* they pulled the plug, that would probably be just as immoral as the plagarism itself.
Lets be honest with ourselves. Who plagarizes anymore and thinks its okay?
Re:No... RTFA (Score:3, Insightful)
If it works, maybe they can use this argument in criminal court. Serial killers could sue local governments for incarceration using the arguement that they should have stopped him earlier and told him the consequences if he continued.
Hyperbole? Yes. But sometimes the ridicules helps to illuminate it's ilk.
Re:No... RTFA (Score:3, Interesting)
To take your (extreme) case of serial killers, the courts in the USA have often held that an unenforced law is unenforable. If no one has been prosecuted under a law for many years, the law is usually considered obsolete. E.g. if cars fall under the same rules as horses, failing to tether your car to a post when you go shopping is not going to
Re:No... RTFA (Score:3, Interesting)
He was paying the University money for a BA qualification, which he was never going to obtain. Now if the administration KNEW early on in the course that he wasnt going to ob
plagiarism (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:plagiarism (Score:3, Interesting)
Now, there IS a place in the USMC where anything goes, and that is in war.
Re:He knew the consequences... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:It seems to be unfair punishment indeed (Score:3, Insightful)
What he's really saying is that, since the University didn't catch him the first time he plagarised and warn him about it, they shouldn't be allowed to punishment if they catch him at any subsquent time. This is as silly and stupid as saying that if a burglar isn't caught the first time he robs somebody, he should be free to keep on robbing people without fear of punishment, because nobody told him it was w
Re:What does this mean? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:You must be joking (Score:3, Insightful)
Lawyers have to pass the BAR exam. I know a couple of people that have tried and, believe me, it isn't easy. There really is no way to cheat on this test. You can't even know what the questions are, really, because they rotate them. So his lawyer most assuredly will NOT have gotten his license the way he (didn't) get his degree.
Of course, all this may not translate in the UK, but I'm certain that the exams the barristers there take are just as stringent.
I also want to make a