

Microsoft Forgets To Renew Hotmail.co.uk 375
Saint Aardvark writes "The Register is reporting that Microsoft forgot to renew their hotmail.co.uk domain. A Good Samaritan renewed it for them, but was unable to get a response from anyone at Microsoft. Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it."
Good Samaritan.. (Score:4, Funny)
"Hey, I save this domain for you. It'll only cost you $60,000".
Re:Good Samaritan.. (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Good Samaritan.. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Good Samaritan.. (Score:2)
your wife (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:your wife (Score:3, Insightful)
It's probably because he's crashing the damn thing every other day.
Re:Good Samaritan.. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Good Samaritan.. (Score:3, Funny)
You'd think.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:You'd think.. (Score:2)
Re:You'd think.. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:You'd think.. (Score:5, Interesting)
The present situation:
Bit annoying.
hotmail.co.uk doesn't have any DNS records ATM...
Re:You'd think.. (Score:5, Interesting)
In the words of Nelson from the Simpsons... (Score:2)
That's awesome. Whoever renewed that domain should get a medal from Microsoft. That and a huge smack upside the head for not temporarily posting something humorous... like a huge image of Bill Gates's pie incident.
DOH!
They're very lucky (Score:5, Insightful)
Or maybe the porn squatters wouldn't touch it, considering that there might be a public outcry.
Re:They're very lucky (Score:5, Funny)
Re:They're very lucky (Score:5, Funny)
That's okay - these days, there's very little shame associated with not being able to type...
Re:They're very lucky (Score:5, Funny)
Re:They're very lucky (Score:3, Funny)
that will teach them.
Filters? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:They're very lucky (Score:2)
Re:They're very lucky (Score:2)
Is somebody gonna lose their job??? (Score:3, Funny)
Then maybe I can find one, I can make sure that all the domains that microsoft owns are renewed every time they are due, I bet they own a large enough number to make it a full time job too.
Such an opportunity (Score:5, Funny)
Doesn't anyone there have a brain? (Score:5, Interesting)
Jeez, even if that's all somebody did it would be worth paying someone $20,000/year just to avoid serious cock-ups like this one.
Re:Doesn't anyone there have a brain? (Score:2)
This marks the second time I've seen the word/phrase "cock-ups" used in a sentence. The first time was when I read the article this morning.
Is that some sort of across the pond thing? Because I can tell you what it means on this side of the Atlantic...
Re:Doesn't anyone there have a brain? (Score:2)
Re:Doesn't anyone there have a brain? (Score:2)
assuming that you're on the american side of the atlantic (you don't say), the phrase "cock up" in the UK refers to an embarrassing mistake. it's a little rude but not overly so.
dave
Re:Doesn't anyone there have a brain? (Score:2)
Though if the domains were registered say, 10 years ago, whoever was responsible for that task has probably moved on, and/or it was otherwise forgotten.
Re:Doesn't anyone there have a brain? (Score:2)
Is it really that hard to assign one person the task of being responsible for domain renewals?
Jeez, even if that's all somebody did it would be worth paying someone $20,000/year just to avoid serious cock-ups like this one.
Hell, I'll keep all their domains renewed for only $15,000 a year.
Re:Doesn't anyone there have a brain? (Score:2)
That's an awfully presumptuous bit of +5 Interesting babble.
How do you know a bill just wasn't lost somewhere? That kind of thing happens here in the real world, you know.
Why, oh, why didn't they redirect to (Score:2, Funny)
I mean, that would guarantee a response from Micro$oft....
Why Should they renew? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Why Should they renew? (Score:2)
Re:Why Should they renew? (Score:4, Interesting)
Is there any legal precedent here?
Hmm... (Score:2, Funny)
When the rights to microsoft.com expire, ... (Score:2)
Right/left? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Right/left? (Score:2)
Re:Right/left? - Hands in different pockets (Score:2)
Life without Hotmail (Score:2)
Re:Life without Hotmail (Score:2, Funny)
Actually, I think your butterfly flapping its wings will only cancel out my butterfly if it is flapping 180 degrees out of phase with mine. Otherwise, me thinks that your butterfly and my butterfly may be additive, at least during various flapping cycles (if you are slightly out of phase with mine). YOU, with your flapping butterfly's wings, mis-timed in relation to mine is causing the drought in the Western USA and leading to the wildfire danger.
I had my butterfly timed so as to increase the precipitat
Weird (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Weird (Score:2)
It is very very strange and suspicious that this was put back into the registration pool on the day it expired, when I am still waiting for domains I registered 3 years ago to drop out of detag status and become available for registration. (cypheria.co.uk, registered august 2000, expired aug 2003, still listed as detagged, cant detag it as I have lost the cert and can
No need to renew.... (Score:2)
hotmale (Score:3, Funny)
Rus
Registering a misspelled domain name (Score:3, Interesting)
Honestly, I sometimes think about registering Hotmial.com because when I manually enter the url, about 1 in 20 times that's what I end up typing.
Then I think about how many other people with Hotmail accounts might be doing the same thing and how much smoke might start rising from my server, slap myself, and forget the idea for a while.
MSs internal domain database? (Score:2, Interesting)
PAT
Re:MSs internal domain database? (Score:2)
They probably do.
But the expiry search only looks for today's date....
Re:MSs internal domain database? (Score:2)
Ah, there's the problem. That's probably what they have, and it BSODed on them.
... 'Cause we all know how hard it is to have a cron job that just does a "select domain_name from domain_names where expiry_date = date() + 1".
Webservices and XSD (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Webservices and XSD (Score:2)
maximum renewal length (Score:4, Interesting)
The microsoft.com domain expires in May of 2012, hotmail.com in March of 2010, so why aren't they purchasing all of their domains for long periods?
Re:maximum renewal length (Score:2)
Just because the domain expired... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Just because the domain expired... (Score:3, Informative)
It also depends if the registrar in question decides to ignore the expiration of the domain and makes it available, not by checking the registry but their own local db.
Just 'cause it doesn't get deleted till 54 days later doesn't mean the registrar can't sell the rights away.
Re:Just because the domain expired... (Score:2)
A spokeswoman for Nominet UK - the registry for all
For Nominet's part, she confirmed that "all the standard renewal procedures were followed regarding hotmail.co.uk".
ie it was up for grabs.
Phillip.
Obligitory Simpson's quote... (Score:2)
P
Anyone have any idea why this happened? (Score:2)
Re:Anyone have any idea why this happened? (Score:2)
Excuse me? MS is not the biggest and hardly the most influential.
That would be General Electric, and MS is way down on the list from them.
However, Harvard likes to think that Gates is the most influential business leader... [hbs.edu] - HBC has to tag along on someone's coat tails, after all.
Not a shining review... (Score:5, Funny)
It was pointed to Amazon (Score:3, Informative)
Had a laugh about it, then told her to use Hotmail.com. I forget if the site it was pointed to was amazon.com or .co.uk, but it was definitely at one of the Amazon sites.
Cheers,
Ian
Forget the goatse.cx guy.. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Forget the goatse.cx guy.. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: your sig (Score:2, Informative)
Not that you have ever called me a pretentious jackass, but I tohught you might like to know.
And the best bit... (Score:2)
Domain Name:
hotmail.co.uk
Registrant:
Microsoft Corporation
Registrant's Agent:
Dark Marketing Ltd [Tag = DARKUK]
URL: http://www.darkmarketing.com [darkmarketing.com]
Who would have ever believed that Microsoft would go over to the dark side?
doublewide is slashdotted... (Score:2)
Now that's DARN tight petty cash control! (Score:2)
Nobody in MS's UK division has the authority to reimburse $35?!?! Now that's what I call some serious centralized cash management!
Next week on Slashdot ... (Score:2)
Microsoft misses the rinse cycle
Microsoft forgets to buy lottery ticket this week
Microsoft misses the ice cream truck
anything else?
I don't see how... (Score:3, Interesting)
The reward... (Score:2, Funny)
Why it's being given back to Microsoft. (Score:5, Interesting)
Stupid, dumb, dumb, dumb. On the one hand, Microsoft has more lawyers than God. For another, it's just wrong to register a name with the express intention of screwing someone else. And lastly, it's definied by ICANN as registering a domain in bad faith [icann.org].
And now you know.
Want to know what really happened? (Score:2, Funny)
Time for a dupe on this one :) (Score:5, Funny)
I'm waiting for this sentence to be real funny tomorrow - when this story is being posted again.
Need a TODO list (Score:5, Funny)
1. Fix bugs in IE CSS support
2. Develop a hack proof Web Server
3. Kill Linux
4. Purchase OS X machines
5. Fire guy that photos our loading docks
6. Register all htomail domains
7. Breakfast at tiffanies
8. Laundry
9. Supplies computers to 3rd world countries that don't even have electricity.
10. Sleep
How would I contact Microsoft if I wanted to? (Score:5, Insightful)
In the specific case of security holes, Microsoft has repeatedly complained when people publish exploits without contacting them first, and yet in many cases the researcher who found the problem had been trying to contact Microsoft for weeks without getting any response.
I suppose the best way I could think of might be to send email to individual Microsoft employees I know of who might be willing to listen - there are some who post regularly to public newsgroups and mailing lists (and even Slashdot!) and one of them might pay attention. But how long would it take them to figure out who to contact to fix the problem?
Not that it's better in many other large companies. Anyone know of any large corporations where they're actually handling this well?
Re:How would I contact Microsoft if I wanted to? (Score:3, Informative)
Yes, this is the right way to contact the MS Security Response Center. This is what most people who actually find vulnerabilities do. And no, it's not better to email individual employees - they will just forward your email to MSSRC.
Re:WHAT THE F$%! (Score:2, Informative)
Plus they would have been torn apart later in court. remember, you can only legally steal domain names if you're a bunch of Tree huggin' hippies [wwf.com]
Re:WHAT THE F$%! (Score:5, Interesting)
As I explained it to reporters at the time, if I went and made your mortgage payment I wouldn't own your house.
This particular case seems to be different than the passport.com case, though. It looks like the
Have you actually followed that link? (Score:2)
Re:How nice (Score:5, Interesting)
Later on, Mr. Chaney decided that the check was worth some money, so he put it up on Ebay for auction, promising to donate the proceeds to a charity of the buyer's choice.
My company won that auction and we purchased the check for $7000 which was then immediately donated to the Sisters of the Road Cafe in Portland, Oregon. We've still got the check, a check for $500.
Microsoft paid Mr. Chaney $500 dollars as a gesture of good will. They didn't have to do that, you know.
MS is not being childish, they probably are too busy throwing ice water all over themselves to cool off their extreme embarrassment that this has happened twice now.
(posting anonymously so that nobody can associate my username with the company I work for)
Re:How nice (Score:2)
Proof that not all people who post as Anonymous Coward talk bollocks can be found here [com.com] courtsey of CNet.
The winning bid was $7,100 by John Corrigan, founder of SwiftView.
Re:How nice (Score:2)
(posting anonymously so that nobody can associate my username with the company I work for)
That's a good idea. I can't imagine letting your shareholders know you spent $7000 on a $500 cheque would do much good for your stock price...
Re:How nice (Score:2)
Palad1, karmawhoring as the rest of us
Re:How nice (Score:2)
pclminion?
Re:Expense account math? (Score:2)
Re:How nice (Score:4, Informative)
Re:How nice (Score:3, Funny)
Re:How nice (Score:3, Insightful)
John Sauter (J_Sauter@Empire.Net)
Re:How nice (Score:2)
Re:How nice (Score:5, Informative)
What I don't understand is how your company still has the check if it was "immediately donated to the Sisters of the Road Cafe?"
We still have the check MS sent to Chaney. What was donated to SotR was the $7100 purchase price, along with $2500 matched by Chaney. We encouraged MS to also contribute but they didn't.
Are you saying the guy who held the ebay auction donated the 7000.00 to Sisters of the Road Cafe...and your company still has the check?
As far as I know, he never sent the money to Chaney but donated it directly. I actually went down to SotR with a few other people later that day and got my face in the newspaper :-)
That whole deal sounds fishy to me, as I fail to see why anyone would pay 7000.00 for a check worth 500.00, with no guarantee at all that the person who held the Ebay auction would really donate the money to charity.
Mr. Chaney's name was well known, he is a consultant of some kind, and we didn't see any reason that he would risk destroying his professional reputation to get $7000.
It seems to me that if your company just wanted to be charitable, it would have been better just to pick out a charity and donate to it. At least that way you knew where the money would go AND been able to take it as a tax deduction.
We wanted to be charitable but let's not kid ourselves here, we got a lot of PR for a relatively low price. CNet was on the phone literally within seconds of the auction close. The reason we selected SotR for the donation is because one of the company cofounders already knew about that particular charity, and I assume he's made donations to them in the past. Whether or not it was tax deductible wasn't an issue. I don't think anyone was even thinking about that.
And as someone else already pointed out, Microsoft saved 500.00 bucks because the check was never cashed!!!
We couldn't have cashed it even if we wanted to since the check was never endorsed and it was made out to Michael Chaney, not us.
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:How nice (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Reward (Score:2, Informative)
On January 15, 2000, I received the check from Microsoft for $500, in addition to a new copy of Visual Studio 6.0 (which I need to compile and run the decss program to decode my DVD's so that I can play them under Linux). I put the check up on ebay to raise money for charity.
Re:Reward (Score:2)
I'd want a personal hand-signed cheque from Bill Gates for $35. Hey, he's not the CEO, but he's the founder and all that rot.
And hey, by not cashing it, it might mess up the accounting systems as Bill waits for his $35 expense to be processed. :-)
Re:why did he renew it? (Score:3, Funny)
Makes sense to me!
Re:You girls are getting desperate (Score:3)
I was not aware that reporting the news counts as bashing. I suppose if the President of the U.S. was arrested for drunk driving and CNN decided to report on it, that that would be "pathetic" and "anti-Bush?"
You're an idiot.
It's called a legal department (Score:2)
Re:Not a problem (Score:5, Insightful)
People who travel a lot.
Next question?