If you listen to actual experts, Mythos gives grandma and grandpa farmers the ability to hack "unknown" black boxes.

Anyone with 101 computing skills can even use Opus to do the work. And, there are actually better existing models than Mythos that do better in most "black box" simple ("duh, I don't know nothing skill set wise") cases.

So, in all fairness, Anthropic used a slick marketing technique of "we're too dangerous" (e.g. we're the best) and it went wrong on them. IMHO, that's the lesson learned.

If this ban is "ok", you need to ban them all. Just saying. And I'm not saying that isn't a bad idea. But banned things are the things that are "used" in the dark.

In a surprise move after reading comments on slashdot about not using hacking techniques to exploit end users, Google, Facebook and even Microsoft have decided to shutdown all their operations. Also, Iran has agreed to never develop a nuclear weapon.

Apart from Xenix, which others offered up, there was PC-IX running on IBM PCs. When too many people were on the Ultrix terminals, some of my college labs were do-able on PC-IX.

So, yes, the idea of preventing "stupidity" is wrong, that is, banning is wrong. At the same time the notion that people have full control over "the weather" is foolish and also wrong. There's more than enough good science (not pc stuff) that backs that up.

However, for those that disagree, please stop all the natural disasters from happening. TIA

Actually it's been renamed to m365 in order to avoid confusion.

How to become a millionaire.

First, get a million dollars.

That is, once you've got total ownership effectively of any host, sure, sky's the limit. This is not news.

Uh oh, somebody is a better exploiter than you. You just got kicked off "the island".

Sadly, the #1 "CMS-like" thingy, Wordpress is PHP. It's the majority and actually behind a significant double digit percentage of all web sites.

I think WP is poop... but, here we are.

Under the idea of not "doing the easy".... if I owned the complex, I'd provide a hardwire (one or more) to "the whatever" provider (if multiple providers are available) for each tenant, and say "good luck" on the WiFi side allowing the renter to deal with the hassles of density. The alternative would be to place "whole office" management on the complex (easier, more feasible). This is what that new law gets rid of. That is, costing the complex money spent in support of a "sane" infrastructure. As more and more is going to be forced into high density living (assuming you're not living in your parents actual "house"), people who ask for "independence" will also reap the consequences of that. That is, you might get better Internet at the coffee shop (again).... unless wires are your friend. Is it right to allow a building complex with multiple tenants to bear the cost burden of a network solution? Maybe, maybe not. But, there is that "other cost" which might be even more frustrating if you push "the infrastructure" to the tenant.

I asked the source editor, reply follows:

I am a machine learning model, so I don't have feelings or emotions like humans do. I am designed to process and respond to text-based inputs, but I don't have the capacity for physical activity or inactivity.

In terms of my "effort" or "energy level," I am always ready to assist and provide information 24/7. When you interact with me, it's just a matter of processing your input and generating a response based on my training data.

That being said, I can recognize and respond to language related to laziness or lack of motivation. If you'd like to talk about something specific that's making you feel lazy or unmotivated, I'm here to listen and offer support!

Taken far enough, we can now use AI to make books, movies and music. Which means all that needs to die as well.

According to Microsoft, that just leaves the Microsoft Azure stack standing alone. Sometimes chaotic stupidity is what it takes to survive.

Imagining a Beowulf cluster of firsts.

For whatever reason people are confusing "made in America (USA)" with "made by American (USA) companies".

While some people costs are obviously more, the benefit savings operationally could make up for most if not all of the cost leading to a "made in America" product that is same ... price wise.

However, that assumes a lot. While it assumes that all things can be done in America (likely by foreign owned manufacturing/assembling residing in the USA), for me, the bigger variable is that outside countries play by "different rules". For example a "company" in a foreign country may be slight extension of the country itself (owned by the nation/state). And therefore, from an operational perspective, they sort of play outside the "rules". Not saying that American companies always play by the rules... but sometimes we make a bad assumptions comparing "our country's" behavior to "other countries" behavior.

I once worked for a startup with patented tech. And another company leveraged that tech. We sued. Than company sold out to one of those "other countries" where the new parent company was effectively an arm of the country. So... now our lawsuit is against a country. That is, we lose.

Which is to say, if a "made in America" product becomes competitive, other places outside those interests, could "fib" (or whatever) in order to undercut any perceived advantage.

This happens all the time in some of our markets.... but as (in the past decades) we moved to a pure consumer base and service only economy, it wasn't an issue. Since everything is made in China (for example), there's no issue (as far as China is concerned).

Covid taught us how fragile being completely dependent on others is. However, that's not even talking to the vulnerability of sovereignty. I think that was the wake up call. Supply chains are one thing. Being consumed or taken over without a war, a much bigger deal.

Metamucil concurs.

Patrons will also have 5 gallons of raw sewage poured over their head prior to seating.

Making AMC Great Again.