Comment "Long Planned" is not "Long awaited" (Score 1) 13
Did anyone ask for this? Or will this be yet another AI product shoved down the throats of people that don't want it?
Did anyone ask for this? Or will this be yet another AI product shoved down the throats of people that don't want it?
Well that's a different, and entirely solvable, problem.
Hoist the colors, ye scallywag!
https://plasma-bigscreen.org/g...
Unfortunately it doesn't appear to be a drop in replacement for smart TVs, but you can get most of the way there regardless.
I don't trust any smartTV providers. LG may be the target of this story, but I'm sure all of them are guilty of this to various degrees.
I mean, good for them for taking this step. Should extend it through highschool, but the root cause of the problems they're facing isn't AI, it's old fashion real-human stupidity making critical education decisions.
If caught early enough, you can make lifestyle changes which dramatically impact the course of the disease.
Of course, there's nothing stopping you from making these changes now.
Diet, exercise, get off your screens and get some sunshine is always good medical advice.
Laughs in Californian.
As technology improves, the customer experience gets worse.
It's been that way for at least 15 years, probably longer. It's the weirdest damn thing to watch; we have all this power and sophistication, but development houses can't seem to get out of their own way and make a product that doesn't A) Suck balls, and B) gets worse with each iteration.
MS is the most famous example of this, but they're hardly alone in this practice.
If the justification for a new law is "it's for the children", then the law is junk and the politicians behind it are trying to con you with something.
Every single time.
More accurate to say the bill of rights prohibits the government ( largely ) from certain actions.
Taking this a step further, who enforces "human rights" in dealing with businesses and citizens, if not the government? Who's to say that's a good thing anyway. Why can't I restrict access to me and mine from someone saying things I don't agree with? That's if you believe your "human rights" are equally and fairly applied, of course, which we all know they aren't.
No, the only sane approach to something like freedom of speech is to restrict the government and otherwise let people do as they will.
"Rush"? They've had going on 3 years.
Looks to me that they blindly trusted Broadcom, despite all evidence to the contrary.
I didn't see it mentioned anywhere; what is t-mobile migrating to?
I guarantee there's someone, or a few someones, at t-mobile who saw this coming. They're mid level support or engineers. I'm sure they were screaming to all that they could find about what was coming, but upper management and the powers that be ignored them. None could confront the mass migration that was necessary if this group of someones were right, so they must be wrong.
Until they weren't.
And so this group will be rewarded with all the shit-work needed to get the migration done, while the very same people that ignored the timebomb ticking in their closet will be rewarded for their "vision" and "decisiveness".
God I don't miss corporate.
Are consumers really clamoring for this?
I've worked with both the state of CA and AT&T.
You're goddamn right I'm full of hate.
Hmm, I hate CA, and I hate AT&T ( may both rot in hell ). I literally can't lose no matter who "wins".
I hope they both destroy each other somehow.
Going the speed of light is bad for your age.