Sounds like a bad idea. I wonder which cloud provider wrote this directive?

Apparently you have no understanding of how things work.

A very large percentage of people (in the U.S.) only have one choice for a broadband Internet connection and its one of the companies who have spent a lot of time and money lobbying against net neutrality.

I bet Russia has a few vendors showing interest.

Try
gcc --reverse prog -o prog.c

What could possible go wrong?

http://dilbert.com/strip/1995-... good times.

That is my expectation as well

It's accurate. According to retdec.com, RetDec only supports 32bit architectures.

I hardly think that government policies encourage people to sleep on the street. Other than policies which pump up housing prices and remove affordable housing from the market, but I don't see those as "enabling sloth."

Are you proposing bringing back the workhouses from Dickens? If yes, go fuck yourself.

I'm not surprised that this administration has fallen for the shiny veneer of cloud services. However, the idea that this will improve security is laughable. I agree that we need to a technological overhaul using the latest protection but cloud services are not the solution and far from the panacea they claim to be.

Posted by timothy on 2002-01-03 17:38

And they are wonderful people for doing this. But, keep in mind that the other 99.9% when there is no emergency going on, they are using it to chat with people on the other side of the globe.

So I--and all my neighbors--have to give up on 1Gb/sec Internet so that you can chat with Ivan in Ukraine?

Apparently you can even use it for classified documents.

This. They should just be more awesome like you are.

You are cayenne8, aren't you?

So your response to Petty crimes is a death sentence? Has it occurred to you that maybe you're part of why society is so fucked up in the first place?

www.notavirus.com/really_this_is_safe.jpg.exe

Sorry, but T-Mobile's service won't be any different. They're just re-selling content that is owned and controlled by someone else.

Move along. Nothing to see here.

The amateur radio service has allocations above 1 GHz. Lots of them.

What part of "TRS-80" and "late 70's" would lead you to think anything else?

I'm guessing the reverse engineered C++ code is gonna cost a hella amount of time to reverse engineer the reverse engineered code the tool generates.

I've reversed engineered C. C++? Not seeing how a tool is gonna be a lot of help. Basing this on going from C to ASM is pretty straightforward. Going from C++ to C is problematic, especially as you are going C++ -> ASMas opposed to C++ -> C.

I'm guessing you missed the ending "is a myth."

i uploaded a file containing several c files into a lib. everything seems to work as i would expect. i selected the c file i wanted but then it failed saying file wasnt found.

Maybe you don't realize that the reason people use HF to communicate out of a region that has lost long distance comms is because the RECEIVING END still has service and can send help? As in, all the RF interference from the RECEIVING END'S BPL will keep the receiving end of the emergency communications from being able to hear it.

We have an HF radio in an EOC to serve the county Emergency Manager, but it has so much interference that it is absolutely useless. When the backup generators kick in to provide power for the HF radio, they'll also be powering the crap that is causing the interference. What a great system. Glad we have it.

The fact that government policies enable sloth doesn't help things. Round 'em all up and put 'em to work if they won't do it themselves.

These days that would be described as "Committing alt-left violence against some Very Fine People."

"... using high-frequency airwaves that travel along power lines"

And up things really go down?

Interesting perspective...

It's very strange that the SPCA of all organizations is acting like that rich tech bro a few years back who published a diatribe about how the homeless people on his building's street weren't being sufficiently controlled by the city.

My idea for fixing the problem is to re-open state mental hospitals. Almost all of the homeless problem is due to mental illness and drug addiction. Where I live, there are 5 massive, closed mental hospital complexes within 50 miles that housed thousands of patients each before the deinstitutionalization wave of the 70s and 80s. Why not reopen them as voluntary treatment centers again? Instead of beating and lobotomizing patients, give them the help they need to fix whatever problem is interfering with them having a normal existence.

Baloney. In America "the Internet" (datacenters, switches, routers, etc.) use about 70 billion kwhrs. That is less than 2% of power consumption.

We save that much just by people dimming the lights to watch Netflix.

How much energy to run the Internet?

1. We could have had immigration controls on EU citizens. Other countries did, limiting numbers for the first few years, and it worked. The Labour government chose not to.

Similarly, EU migrants can't claim benefits right away and can be asked to leave if they are unemployed for a few months. We choose not to enforce the latter at all.

Now that EU citizens are leaving, we don't have enough doctors and nurses. Will Brexiteers volunteer to wait for British staff so that the rest of us don't have to wait longer?

2. You propose paying companies like Nissan to offset the tariff costs. Aside from being state aid that even under WTO rules is problematic, it means that every company that exports can forever demand compensation.

Also, did you hear Honda's statement to the Brexit committee? 30 minutes of stock, hundreds of trucks from the EU with parts every day. Border controls will be a huge problem and the government hasn't even started to build new truck parks or recruit the tens of thousands of staff they need.

3. These regulations have been good for us. Do you really want to work longer in worse conditions too? In any case, if we drop them, trade becomes harder. It's called a non-tariff barrier.

4. As demonstrated by our own parliament in the last year, the EU is much more democratic and is actively reforming and improving, unlike us.

6. As we will find when we leave, our "net contribution" actually gets us a lot more back in terms of trade and joint cost savings. For example, we will have to run our own medicine approval agency, at our expense.

Stow the virtue signaling outrage.

I'm a retired 'Nam vet, 30% disabled, all Service Connected. My cat and my sister's dog are both rescued from the local Animal Shelter. And, I've seen the problems the homeless can cause by squatting in a neighborhood, and they're not pretty. However, using robots to chase them away isn't the answer, because it just leads to people smashing the robots to defend whatever little speck of space they're trying to use to sleep, that leads to the police coming in and it just gets worse and worse. What's the answer? I don't know, but I do know that this isn't it.