Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Google Opens Gmail To All

Posted by kdawson on Thu Feb 08, 2007 09:54 AM
from the get-yours dept.
Reader Russian Art Buyer lets us know that GMail is now open for all ("Google Mail" in the UK). The service is no longer by invitation only. This welcome page shows an ever-increasing amount of storage available per user, currently about 2,815 MB.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Capacity drop? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Short Circuit (52384) * <mikemol@gmail.com> on Thursday February 08 2007, @09:55AM (#17934042)
    (http://shortcircuit.us/ | Last Journal: Sunday October 14, @02:01AM)
    I wonder if we'll see a drop in storage capacity with the increased number of users.

    Also, my GMail account still says I only have 73 invites left. If it's open, why don't they drop the limited number of invites?
  • Just checked... (Score:5, Informative)

    by nathan s (719490) on Thursday February 08 2007, @09:57AM (#17934078)
    (http://www.natesimpson.com/blog)
    ...and I don't see any way to sign up other than the "use your mobile" promotion that they've had going for a while. There's no link from TFA either.
  • Not really (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Monty845 (739787) on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:00AM (#17934118)
    Maybe the submitter has a different definition of all than I, but Gmail still requires either an invation or the ability to receive text messages. While the number of people who can't get text messages may be small, there are still many people who cannot sign up.
    • Re:Not really by bad_fx (Score:3) Thursday February 08 2007, @10:04AM
      • Re:Not really by Monty845 (Score:3) Thursday February 08 2007, @10:07AM
        • Re:Not really (Score:5, Informative)

          by jbarr (2233) on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:54AM (#17934748)
          (http://jimstips.com/)

          Maybe you should read the FAQ...
          Their FAQ pages have not been updated yet. As with almost all previous Gmail enhancementsit takes time to roll things out globally. When I navigate to Gmail.com using IE7 or Firefox, I see a nice "Sign up for Gmail" panel with a link that takes you right to a signup screen--no invitation is necessary. (Now, I'm using a company proxy that hits the Internet in Europe, so YMMV depending on your location.)

          Give it a day or so, and you should see the non-invitation link.
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Not really (Score:5, Informative)

            by jbarr (2233) on Thursday February 08 2007, @11:52AM (#17935498)
            (http://jimstips.com/)
            Per a user on the "Gmail Users" Google Groups, this may be only for certain non-United States locations. When I connect to Gmail from my home in the USA, I only get the SMS screen, but when I connect through my office (through a company proxy that hits the Internet in France) I get the non-invitation screen.
            [ Parent ]
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Not really by wpegden (Score:3) Thursday February 08 2007, @10:18AM
      • Re:Not really (Score:5, Informative)

        by montyzooooma (853414) on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:46AM (#17934652)
        But if you're signing up for a gmail account you're already trading a certain amount of privacy away anyway.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Not really by xdotx (Score:1) Thursday February 08 2007, @11:16AM
          • Re:Not really by toleraen (Score:3) Thursday February 08 2007, @11:54AM
            • Re:Not really by wiz31337 (Score:1) Thursday February 08 2007, @04:09PM
        • Re:Not really by rising_hope (Score:1) Thursday February 08 2007, @06:59PM
    • Re:Not really (Score:5, Informative)

      Gmail still requires either an invation or the ability to receive text messages.

      I haven't read the CNN article linked here, but I did read the article on my Wii last night. The long and short of it is that signup is geographically limited. Just about everyone not in North America is now able to sign up without going through the text message routine. The Google spokepeople have promised that North America will follow "soon".

      Hope that clarifies things.
      [ Parent ]
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Not really by kabocox (Score:2) Thursday February 08 2007, @10:33AM
    • How do I receive SMS on a land-line phone? by tepples (Score:2) Thursday February 08 2007, @12:27PM
  • Fastmail (Score:2)

    by kahei (466208) on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:01AM (#17934136)
    (http://www.hwacha.net/)

    How does gmail compare to fastmail? I've been using a fastmail account (the kind where you pay once to set it up and it's free thereafter) to consolidate my emails for years and it's ok but it's gradually being overwhelmed by the amount of spam I get. How does gmail stack up, especially in the area of spam killing? Does anyone have both?
    • Re:Fastmail by jrwr00 (Score:2) Thursday February 08 2007, @10:03AM
    • Re:Fastmail (Score:5, Informative)

      by Nimloth (704789) on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:14AM (#17934286)
      I do have both except I pay for the Enhanced account at Fastmail. GMail doesn't compare in terms of features, with Fastmail offering full Sieve scripting, I've got my domain hosted and sieve lets me do pretty much everything I ever wanted to do with email. It's also great for managing spam.
      Fastmail lets me use webDAV to access my file storage, and I just love IMAP/IDLE support. With Fastcheck installed that monitors my mailbox with IDLE, the notification often pops up before I get it on my Blackberry (PUSH-based), something Exchange has never managed to do at work.
      I get loads of spam in my GMail even though I've never given it to anyone, which I think speaks for itself. 1 or 2 spams a week with Fastmail and I've had it for 8+ years.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Fastmail by tmarthal (Score:1) Thursday February 08 2007, @01:48PM
        • Re:Fastmail by maeka (Score:2) Thursday February 08 2007, @06:27PM
          • Re:Fastmail by tmarthal (Score:1) Thursday February 08 2007, @06:42PM
      • Re:Fastmail by maeka (Score:2) Thursday February 08 2007, @06:11PM
    • Re:Fastmail by slumberer (Score:2) Thursday February 08 2007, @10:29AM
    • i love gmail (Score:5, Informative)

      by teh_chrizzle (963897) <kill-9.hobbiton@org> on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:44AM (#17934620)
      (http://kill-9.hobbiton.org/)

      i'll be the first to admit that i am a pretty serious google fanboy and i haven't used a fastmail account so proceed with caution.

      i have two public access unix accounts, one on SDF [lonestar.org] and one on hobbiton [hobbiton.org] (hobbiton stopped being public access like 6 years ago). two years ago there was a sudden astronomical increase in the amount of spam that i was getting on both accounts. both systems had not yet set up greylisting or some other anti-spam measures and so i was worried that i would have to abandon an email address that i have had for almost 10 years.

      i got a gmail invite from a friend and set up my new account, and gmail has an option where you can choose to send mail as another account and make that the default method for sending mail, so i set up my gmail account to send as the two unix accounts and then added the gmail address to a .forward for each shell account.

      so now i use gmail as the central store for all of my email. now that both shell accounts have graylisting and other spam filtering i take advantage of that PLUS gmail's ability to bucket spam, so i have not seen a spam email in something like 6 months. i could go back to the old way (i look really oldschool using ssh to check my mail with pine) but i have become so lazy and spoiled thanks to gmail that there is no real reason to go back.

      so, if you want to keep your old address and switch to gmail, it is possible, provided your old provider has some means for you to forward your mail.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Fastmail by SpinyNorman (Score:3) Thursday February 08 2007, @10:58AM
    • Re:Fastmail by Cochonou (Score:2) Thursday February 08 2007, @11:32AM
    • Re:Fastmail by akorvemaker (Score:2) Thursday February 08 2007, @04:36PM
    • Re:Fastmail by hollywoodb (Score:1) Thursday February 08 2007, @05:45PM
    • The main difference between Fastmail and Gmail by hadaso (Score:1) Saturday February 10 2007, @12:47PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • It's about time... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by jsight (8987) on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:02AM (#17934148)
    (http://uspoliticsandelections.blogspot.com/)
    Now if only they would add IMAP support and improve security, they might have a chance of being successful with Google for Domains.
  • here comes the spam (Score:1, Insightful)

    by superwiz (655733) on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:03AM (#17934168)
    (Last Journal: Saturday April 21 2007, @06:17PM)
    By invitation only was a perfect way to protect against spammers signing up quickly. Well, not perfect, but at least you could always know who the root of the spam tree was and could handle the whole tree. Now they (at Google) destroyed the reason for their own success.
  • Surge in users? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by EveryNickIsTaken (1054794) on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:05AM (#17934194)
    Great. Now we get to see how Gmail handles thousands of accounts being created just to send out spam.
    • Re:Surge in users? by DaFallus (Score:1) Thursday February 08 2007, @12:10PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Surge in users? by EveryNickIsTaken (Score:2) Thursday February 08 2007, @10:20AM
      • Re:Surge in users? (Score:4, Insightful)

        by daeg (828071) on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:37AM (#17934564)
        They have incentive to police spammers that use gmail accounts -- volume reduction. If every spammer that uses a gmail account sends enough e-mail to fill a full 2GB (in the Sent folder), that also nets 2 GB on the receiving end -- removing the spammer's account can reduce storage requirements by up to 4GB per spammer removed.

        They also will get a very nice benefit to closing spammer accounts -- their sent folders are 100% spam. What better way to see what tricks spammers are using than have 2GB of sent spam in one easy location? They can easily see what percentage of that spam folder was then in turn delivered as non-spam and how many users read it and marked it as not-spam.
        [ Parent ]
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Playing the same game MS played (Score:5, Interesting)

    by 140Mandak262Jamuna (970587) on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:07AM (#17934216)
    (Last Journal: Wednesday October 31, @08:33AM)
    First get all the data of the users into its servers, relatively easily, cheaply and painlessly. Like Word5' importing WordPerfect or Excel importing Lotus123 without any hitch. Once all the data is safely collected MS increased the switching costs and made it nearly impossible to get back to the competitors. Till date it keeps changing file formats, macro language, APIS, look and feel and tries enshrine even the bugs in Word5 as the new "standard" "open" document format!!!

    In the case of Google, it will find increasing the switching costs to get out of gmail not very easy. Reason are:

    1. It uses a simple browser as its interface and it does not have the same level of control over http protocols and XML protocols MS enjoyed over Windows platform.

    2. Users have become more aware of these issues. The resurgence of OpenOffice and fandom of Firefox shows that.

    3. Google says its motto is "dont do evil" and atleast part of its fan base is taking it at face value.

    Overall, IMHO, if google wrests significant portion of the data from the clutches of MS and shows how advantageous it could be for companies and users to keep their data in a format with eye on the switching costs it would benefit the consumers.

  • by popo (107611) on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:07AM (#17934224)
    Now will I receive as much spam as I do from Hotmail addresses?

  • Kinda irrelevant (Score:2)

    by Atilla (64444) on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:07AM (#17934226)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    Invite spoolers have been around for some time.

  • Worldwide BETA (Score:2, Funny)

    by dlim (928138) on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:17AM (#17934316)
    (Last Journal: Thursday October 11, @12:00PM)
    Open to the world, yet it's still a "Beta" application. Huh.
  • by Merkwurdigeliebe (1046824) on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:23AM (#17934372)
    So, I hope that we don't begin to see inumerable amounts of bot-generated Gmail accountslike one finds in other web-based email services.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:26AM (#17934418)
    That article is 2.5 years old.... There is no link at Gmail allowing a free signup without a cell phone.

    This is what Gmail says about signing up currently:

    Can I sign up without the invitation code? Or without a mobile phone?
    http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?ctx=m obile&answer=22245&hl=en [google.com]
  • wow (Score:1)

    by UPZ (947916) on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:46AM (#17934656)
    finally........i havent managed to score a gmail account yet!
    • Re:wow by petabyte (Score:2) Thursday February 08 2007, @10:57AM
    • Re:wow by PieSquared (Score:2) Thursday February 08 2007, @11:41AM
    • Re:wow by UPZ (Score:1) Thursday February 08 2007, @01:22PM
    • Re:wow by Zaatxe (Score:2) Thursday February 08 2007, @01:38PM
  • by beerdini (1051422) on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:54AM (#17934740)
    Welcome mass flood of spammers to Gmail! True there were some out there before, but now that it is open its just going to get thousands of times worse. Hopefully they tweak up their internal spam filter to allow for their own domain.

    I'm just glad I got in early enough that I have the names that I wanted before they got snatched up and added extra numbers or other junk to them.
  • bummer (Score:2)

    by Mantorp (142371) * <mantorp 'funny A' gmail.com> on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:55AM (#17934752)
    (http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Sunday October 28, @09:07PM)
    I was hoping to trade 1000 gmail invites for a joost invite
  • a nagging problem about gmail (Score:5, Insightful)

    by supernova87a (532540) <kepler1 AT hotmail DOT com> on Thursday February 08 2007, @10:56AM (#17934758)
    This may be a little off topic, but maybe many others here will benefit from discussing this same concern. I love Gmail, but there is a problem I see that's been slowly nagging me:

    I use Gmail to read the messages off my work/academic Pine accounts, and it has rapidly become my main way to check email because it has a great feature set, and Gmail doesn't pull some of the stupid tricks that other free email services do. I also use it to send messages (i.e. the "from:" field pretending as if it is one of the other work/school accounts I have), and rapidly I'm accumulating email on my Gmail account that now doesn't exist elsewhere.

    However, sometime in the far off future, Gmail may decide not to work one day, or there may be a new technology to replace it. We can't know for sure. So I would like to be able to have a backup of that mail just in case. As much as I trust Gmail and like Google, I need some way to keep my mail on my own, because if it were all lost, it would be awful.

    Couldn't they offer a service, for some reasonable amount of $$, where they would burn my entire Gmailbox onto a DVD and send it to me? With the size of my mailbox, POP downloading is becoming impossible, and this would also be a great way to give users some peace of mind.

    or has anyone else felt this worry, and come up with an interesting/workable solution??
  • I'm curious about GMail's spam filtering abilities. I've heard that it is pretty good. Can Slashdotters recommend the best way to pass my company's email through GMail and then back to the intended recipient? For example, I have a catch-all address which receives @mycompany.com's email when the recipient doesn't exist, and it just sits there in the catch-all inbox until I clean it out (since my email server's spam filter isn't pushing all the spam to trash). I can configure the catch-all to forward to a gmail account and hope that filters out more of the spam, but is there a better way to do this? And what about legitimated address email, can I filter it through GMail to catch the spam better?
  • Tongue, meet cheek. (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 08 2007, @11:06AM (#17934896)
    This is a 3 year old dupe [slashdot.org]!

    Selective quoting of discussion follows:

    Prepare to be underhwelmed [slashdot.org]

    What is left in webmail? The best Google can do is offermore default space than Yahoo and Hotmail. This will cost them money - Yahoo currently soaks $19 a year out of anyone wanting more than 4 MB. Maybe they can do filtering better, but I don't see them outdoing spamassassin etc. Ultimately its just another email address. The geek cachet will wear off quick after everyone you despise starts using googlemail.


    Bad move [slashdot.org]

    it's a bad bad move on google's part. The infrastructure needed (and the sysadmin) to provide a robust, spam-free , web based email system is of a sheer magnitude greater than just being pure search.
    For starters , the tech support will ramp up ,and add to google's costs. And Googlemail will become the numero uno target for spammers.
    If I were the Google founders, I quite honestly wouldn't bother - it's to much hassle and dilutes the Google "brand".
    But then again, the IPO is coming up, so having a "webmail" component is an easy sell to "analysts" in Five Points ...ahem... Wall Street I mean.


    I really can't see it catching on guys!
  • Now if only... (Score:2, Insightful)

    by proxy318 (944196) on Thursday February 08 2007, @11:11AM (#17934956)
    They'd let you use some of that storage for Picasa's web albums. 250MB for pictures, almost 3GB for email? That's kind of ass-backwards.
  • Yahoo Mail Beta blocks Linux (Score:2, Informative)

    by Xtravar (725372) on Thursday February 08 2007, @11:13AM (#17934988)
    (http://tardzilla.com/ | Last Journal: Friday July 01 2005, @11:23AM)
    And at the very same time, Yahoo Mail Beta has blocked Linux users. Maybe it's time to switch.
  • Brazil only (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 08 2007, @11:14AM (#17934998)
  • illusion of exclusiveness (Score:3, Insightful)

    by mixtape5 (762922) <hckymanr@yahoo.com> on Thursday February 08 2007, @11:35AM (#17935294)
    (Last Journal: Tuesday April 19 2005, @05:12PM)
    G-mail is hardly exclusive. Anyone that wants a g-mail account can get one. Even if this story is not true, and they have not "opened it for all". I'm sure many of us have gmail accounts with a lot of remaining invites...all anyone who wanted a key has to do is ask around.

    Personally I think its a marketing strategy used by gmail to make people feel special by having it "invite only", but by making so many invites they have destroyed the exclusiveness of it :s
  • by cuby (832037) on Thursday February 08 2007, @11:45AM (#17935420)
    Blogger (also a famous google service), recently started the migration of all accounts (optional, for now) to the new ones based on the GMail login. For this reason they must open the subscription to everybody of Blogger who doesn't have a GMail account. From this to open up all the doors is a small step... I think they started the integration of all the company services under the GMail account. It's easier to login but also to track all the users...
  • UK? All of Europe (Score:2)

    by Random BedHead Ed (602081) on Thursday February 08 2007, @11:56AM (#17935546)
    (http://www.edholden.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday January 20 2004, @11:15PM)

    As I understand it, it's not just Google Mail here in the UK, but throughout all of the EU, since it's actually a German company that owns the Gmail trademark here.

    Funny, I handed out my first invitation to another prospective user (my wife) just three days ago. I have 99 left, and don't need them.

  • Gmail doesn't work with tabs (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Pigeon451 (958201) on Thursday February 08 2007, @12:17PM (#17935816)
    My biggest gripe is Gmail doesn't work with tabs. When using webmail, I open email into tabs I want to read, and by the time I've finished clicking say 5 or so emails, they have finished loading into my browser and I can switch tabs to view them. Gmail doesn't allow tabbed browsing. Also I find Gmail's interface a bit clunky and limiting, much like Microsoft's products are.
  • by mavenguy (126559) on Thursday February 08 2007, @12:20PM (#17935840)
    Here in the US I was able to get my first GMail account without an invite or use of mobile phone. Right after Google announced GMail they let people request an account. There were certain Google services that automatically qualified one immediately for GMail ( I forget which one(s)), but I didn't have one of those, so I waited.

    Finally, about 10 months later I received an invite directly from Google, not from any third party.
  • Excellent (Score:1)

    by Plutonite (999141) on Thursday February 08 2007, @12:23PM (#17935878)
    So now we can go about the business of signing up without pretending there's something in the way, eh? Should have been done a while ago I think, around the time people started having 90+ unused invites in their accounts. Maybe it's that google is getting more confident about their storage capability, but I doubt it.

    if friends*1000 invites_available_per_capita
            open_it_up_for_gods_sake()
  • by Mainusch (20215) on Thursday February 08 2007, @12:33PM (#17935984)
    (http://www.weber-amps.com/)
    If there were hoops to jump through before, they were so negligible that I don't even remember jumping through them.
  • SMS w/ ICQ or AIM (Score:2)

    by Conception (212279) on Thursday February 08 2007, @12:48PM (#17936196)
    If you need a mobile phone, do you perhaps only need an SMS client? I couldn't find any documentation on how to send to AIM or ICQ without just replying, but in theory, could you enter something into the google reg page so it messages your AIM account rather than a phone?
  • by Corpuscavernosa (996139) on Thursday February 08 2007, @01:02PM (#17936398)

    Invitations to open a Gmail account are still required in North America, Asia and most parts of the South America, but Google spokeswoman Courtney Hohne said those restrictions will be lifted "very soon."

    http://www.physorg.com/news90096289.html [physorg.com]

    Now this article was posted 18 hours ago so unless that's "very soon", invitations still seem to be required.

  • by capebretonsux (758684) on Thursday February 08 2007, @02:06PM (#17937332)
    All I get is the standard invitation-only page, with no sign-up links. I realize from reading other posts that North America isn't included in the non-invitation sign-ups yet, but I don't even have the option to use a mobile phone either. At least the page doesn't allow for my carrier (Rogers) and I don't see 'Canada' as an option under the mobile sign-up page. It's a pity, really, because I've been waiting for a long time to get a gmail account and dump my hotmail account forever. Guess I have to be patient...
  • Storage and ads (Score:1)

    by zuhaifi (1060950) on Thursday February 08 2007, @02:09PM (#17937378)
    Google is offering a lot of storage for free, which doesn't seem economical. But the company hopes to make money off of e-mail by serving up ads tied to the content of e-mail in your box.
  • by fangorious (1024903) on Thursday February 08 2007, @03:57PM (#17938892)
    If you have it, you don't need it. If you need it, you don't have it. If you have it you need more of it. If you have more of it, you don't need less of it. You need it to get it. And you certainly need it to get more of it. But if you don't already have any of it to begin with, you can't get any of it to get started, which means you really have no idea how to get it in the first place. Do you? You can share it, sure. You can even stock pile it if you'd like. But you can't fake it. Wanting it. Needing it. Wishing for it. The point is, if you've never had any of it, ever, people just seem to know [youtube.com].
  • GMail is popular (Score:2, Informative)

    by meist3r (1061628) on Thursday February 08 2007, @04:05PM (#17939016)
    By the way: It's Google Mail in germany too because some other company holds the rights on a "G-Mail" brand.
  • I made the switch from hotmail to gmail a few years ago, mid 2004, and I've never been happier! Each to their own.
  • by Nathan (2717) on Friday February 09 2007, @01:04PM (#17951044)
    (http://www.mybrainhurts.com/)
    That's funny, I was able to sign my dad up for gmail with no invite on December 25th. Hrm.
  • It is also GMail in the UK
  • 8 replies beneath your current threshold.