Slashdot Log In
Windows Vista Released To Manufacturing
Posted by
kdawson
on Thu Nov 09, 2006 08:42 AM
from the it's-a-wrap dept.
from the it's-a-wrap dept.
Many readers wrote in to make sure we know that Microsoft execs have signed off on the code and Windows Vista has been and released to manufacturing. As APC put it, "It's good to go — or as good as it is going to be until the first round of patching begins." CNN has a good roundup of Vista's long development history.
Related Stories
[+]
IT: Windows Chief Suggests Vista Won't Need Antivirus 361 comments
LadyDarth writes "During a telephone conference with reporters yesterday, outgoing Microsoft co-president Jim Allchin, while touting the new security features of Windows Vista, which was released to manufacturing yesterday, told a reporter that the system's new lockdown features are so capable and thorough that he was comfortable with his own seven-year-old son using Vista without antivirus software installed."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Windows Vista Released To Manufacturing
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 172 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
|
2
(1)
|
2
leaked (Score:4, Funny)
(Last Journal: Sunday September 19 2004, @10:03PM)
Good to go? (Score:5, Funny)
Norton Antivirus? (Score:3, Insightful)
CNN !=CNET (Score:5, Informative)
where is... (Score:5, Funny)
WTF?? (Score:5, Funny)
Overheard (Score:5, Funny)
Last version of Windows (Score:5, Interesting)
Time to milk the cash cow (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, but (Score:5, Funny)
Anybody Else Tired of Hearing This: (Score:5, Insightful)
From TFA:
Really? If each new release of Windows is marketed as the highest-quality, most secure, most reliable and most usable version of Windows then why has each new release of Windows had more security patches released than the previous version?
Just look at the amount of holes that have been plugged since XP SP2 was released. The heck with waiting for Vista SP1, I'm telling my clients to steer clear of Vista all together until Microsoft stops releasing patches to new vulnerabilities found in XP.
Remember kids... (Score:5, Funny)
Y
The tagging (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.parallelrealities.co.uk/)
Interesting counter point (Score:3, Interesting)
The other day, MS was trying to convince business to install both Vista and Office 2007 at the same time saying it would be easier on companies. If you read this article, MS basically provides a counter point why companies should not:
Given MS long history of releases and patches and patches to fix patches, only fools would not take on two simultaneous large scale MS deployments at once.
I predict.... (Score:4, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Monday March 20 2006, @08:33PM)
Disappointed (Score:5, Funny)
Well, it was a pleasant dream while it lasted...
wow! (Score:3, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Wednesday May 16, @12:43PM)
I'm waiting for the final. (Score:4, Funny)
Where's a good history (Score:3, Informative)
When Googling For More News On This.... (Score:5, Funny)
"Widows Fister" brings up completely different stuff...
Appropriate (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Last version of Windows (Score:3, Insightful)
Really? What was the gap between Win95 and Win98? Between Win98 and Win2k? Between Win2k and XP? Let me give you a clue [microsoft.com].
I'm not debating that Vista has taken a metric shit-load of time to drag itself to RTM (we didn't use to call Longhorn Longwait for no reason), but your assertion that each release takes longer than the last is demonstrably false.
there is really very little motivation for the average user to upgrade from XP to Vista
There's very little motivation (beyond not wanting to feel that their computer is old and out of date) for the average user to upgrade from any given OS to any other. Most people do not upgrade their OS, they upgrade their PC and use whatever OS comes with it. They upgrade their PC as and when they feel that their current one is too old and slow for their needs; that varies from person to person. Even some gamers are still using Win 98 (see Valve's survey [steampowered.com], scroll down to/search for "Windows Version"), and gamers are the group most likely to upgrade their OS.
Is anyone else convinced that this will be the last version of Windows as we know it?
I'm not convinced that it will be, but I concede that it might be. Don't expect Windows to go anywhere any time soon though, it's far too popular (as much as we might hate it) and makes MS far too much money for that to happen.