Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Games

Capcom 'Saddened' By Game Plagiarism Controversy 163

Posted by Soulskill
from the all-the-way-to-the-bank dept.
Capcom's recent release of action platformer Maxsplosion for the iPhone caused indie developer Twisted Pixel to call Capcom out for copying the concept from their successful Xbox Live game 'Splosion Man. Twisted Pixel said they had no plans for legal action, since they were "too small to take on a company like Capcom." The indie studio had even pitched the game to Capcom for publishing at one point, but were declined. Now, Capcom has released a statement denying that Maxsplosion's development team had any knowledge of the meetings and saying, "MaXplosion was developed independently by Capcom Mobile. Nonetheless, we are saddened by this situation and hope to rebuild the trust of our fans and friends in the gaming community."
Games

Cedega Being Replaced By GameTree Linux 124

Posted by Soulskill
from the what's-in-a-name dept.
An anonymous reader writes "TransGaming Cedega, the software forked from Wine that allows running Windows games under Linux, is being discontinued and replaced by GameTree Linux. This new software is also free. From the new website: 'TransGaming is pleased to announce the continued development of Cedega Technology under the GameTree Developer Program. This repositioning of the technology that powered the Cedega Gaming Service will allow the entire Linux community to gain free access going forward. Cedega is a cross-platform enablement technology that allows for Windows-native games to be executed on both the Linux desktop and embedded Linux platforms.'"
Books

Google eBookstore Launched 88

Posted by Soulskill
from the moving-the-pieces-into-place dept.
angrytuna writes "The New York Times is running an article this morning about the launch of the Google ebook store. Independent bookstores such as Powell's, based in Portland, OR, have partnered with Google in this, selling the format directly in addition to their other ebook offerings. The ebooks appear to rely on Adobe Digital Editions for DRM; instructions are provided to transfer from the 'cloud' to a handheld device. iOS and Android have a dedicated app for accessing the store, and will download for offline immediately; other clients like the Nook and Sony eReader seem to be relying on the ADE platform to manage the transfer for offline reading." NPR tried it out on a few different devices and posted their experience.
PC Games (Games)

Witcher 2 Torrents Could Net You a Fine 724

Posted by Soulskill
from the dodging-legal-threats-now-a-valid-gameplay-mechanic dept.
An anonymous reader writes with this quote from Eurogamer: "Gamers who download upcoming PC exclusive The Witcher 2 illegally could receive a letter demanding they pay a fine or face legal action. If gamers refuse to pay the fine, which will be more than the cost of the game, they could end up in court, developer CD Projekt told Eurogamer. 'Of course we're not happy when people are pirating our games, so we are signing with legal firms and torrent sneaking companies,' CD Projekt co-founder Marcin Iwiski said. 'In quite a few big countries, when people are downloading it illegally they can expect a letter from a legal firm saying, "Hey, you downloaded it illegally and right now you have to pay a fine." We are totally fair, but if you decide you will not buy it legally there is a chance you'll get a letter. We are talking about it right now.' Interestingly, The Witcher 2 will be released free of digital rights management – but only through the CD Projekt-owned digital download shop GOG.com. That means owners will be able to install it as many times as they like on any number of computers – and it will not requite an internet connection to run."
Iphone

Real Reason Why the White iPhone 4 Is Delayed 182

Posted by samzenpus
from the no-phone-for-you dept.
tekgoblin writes "There have been numerous reasons why the White iPhone 4 may be delayed with one reason being the color mismatch between the home button and the body. Well this time there is another reason. A source has told CultofMac that the reason for the delay is a light leakage issue caused by the case being clear. Light from the case leaks into pictures taken by the back and front camera on the white iPhone 4, causing distorted pictures. This problem is non-existent on the black iPhone 4, because of its already black case, so Apple has been looking for a solution to this problem, thus the delay of the White iPhone 4 till spring of next year."

Comment: Re:Whew (Score 1) 601

by suffe (#32925022) Attached to: BP Claims Gulf Well Has Been Stopped
Wow, this post actually made me feel good about myself.

No car to work - check (bus running on biomethane)
Do buy reusable shopping bags - check (actually, bought once and used since)
Recycle trash - check (into 6 different categories, I think)
Don't use air conditioning - check

And I'm not actually even trying that hard. I just go about my daily life, not exactly spending hours thinking about these things. The fact that so many people can't even take these simple, non-intrusive, steps to curb real problems is pretty sad. Granted, I live in a city where they make a lot of these things easier for you but so could any city. Cities are run by people and, unlike the aforementioned corporations, not driven in the same way by profit. Also, something usually overlooked, these are actually economically sensible things to do. Not a single thing on that list increases monetary outlays, it lessens them!

Comment: On a bus (Score 1) 274

by suffe (#32457574) Attached to: Actually visible to me right now, IRL:
I'm sitting on a bus, typing this on my netbook. Say what you want about them, but I'm sure as hell not dragging my full size laptop out of the bag (yes, I have that one with me too).

Internet connection working flawlessly, using my Nokia phone as a wi-fi spot (also in aforementioned bag). I pay 7$ a month for the unlimited data plan.

It would be too much to say that life is sweet, as I'm actually on a bus and pretty tired, but as far as bus rides go, this is the way to do it.

Comment: Re:them ancient egyptian hieroglyphics (Score 4, Informative) 195

by suffe (#32312930) Attached to: New iConji Language For the Symbol-Minded Texter
Actually, they worked in three different ways. Pictograms, sounds and determinants.

If you were in a "hurry", had a lack of space or artistic reasons, you could just draw the symbol for bird and be done with it.

You could also use them to describe sounds (like a modern alphabet). This would combine a few symbols into a word that could be sounded-out.

Lastly, you could use them to simply be more clear, to help _determine_ the meaning of a word. You'd spell out the word for bird and then draw a bird (and underline the bird to distinguish it from the rest).

Interesting sideline to all of this is that you can write with hieroglyphs from both left to right and right to left. Doesn't really matter which one you pick. If you want to read it, just keep an eye out for the birds again. The direction of their mouths indicate which way to read the text.

Comment: Re:Yeah. That's it. (Score 1) 271

by suffe (#32298726) Attached to: ImageLogr Scrapes "Billions" of Images Illegally
I'm not sure why you say that. Certainly both are problematic but I'd say the copying of the images are the worst of the two. If they just put the original url in an IMG tag and didn't provide a link back, while bad, it wouldn't be as bad. It lets you retain a certain degree of control (even though they are leeching of your bandwidth) and might (I say might) even be perfectly legal.

As someone who hosts content on Flickr, I can say with absolute certainty that I find it a lot more annoying when someone copies one of my photos to their own server and links back to my flickr account then when they just load a photo straight from the flickr servers without a linkback.

Comment: Re:Islam is dangerous. (Score 1) 1224

by suffe (#31967394) Attached to: <em>South Park</em>'s Episode 201 &mdash; the Expurgated Version
Then please tell me why jews at large are not stoning people for having sex with someone that is married to another person.

Also, please tell me why the reformists that you describe in your reply to me can not be in a majority, at some point in the future. If their views are so internaly consistent in a "muslim logic way" that they can carry over to the current somewhat sizeable minority then clearly what is stopping them from spreading is not the inbuild reasoning of the 'new' interpretation.

The problem of the middle eastern region is a cultural and governing one as well as a historical one. A mindset that rests outside of Islam and is prevalent in many other parts of the world. They could all be Hindi and the exact same patterns would turn up.

And please bear in mind, through all this I am simply forgoing the argument of who are in a majority and minority, outside of the controlling forces. For the sake of argument I'm willing to accept your view because even with that handicap, your reasoning comes out short.

Comment: Re:Islam is dangerous. (Score 1) 1224

by suffe (#31966510) Attached to: <em>South Park</em>'s Episode 201 &mdash; the Expurgated Version
I guess we are going quite of track here and this thread is becomeing a bit old. I'll just again agree with you and disagree at the same time.

I think the reason for that fact is simple. Most of the world contains oppression. In fact, non-opression is like an island in a sea of opression. Russia and China are the easiest ones to pick up on because of their size but it's not like South America, in general a Catholic stronghold I believe, is that harmonious. India, known for Hinduism, isn't eactly a beacon of personal liberties. Africa, ranging from muslim to christian to all sorts of other things, are in many, many ways a complete mess.

If you want to argue that a lot of the places I just mentioned isn't as screwed up as, say, Saudi Arabia or Iran then I'd like to point out that for example Malaysia and Indonesia, two countries that are by no means top-notch countries, do however have muslim majorities and are run at least on par with some of the less bad oppressors, if there is such a thing.

To make it clear, I make no apologies for them. It's just my beliefe that when you look at the world and you see what a sorry state it is in, it is not more sorry because of the muslims but because of people seeking power, in whatever form they can get it. It is my firm hope that one day everyone can say whatever they want to say, that everyone will feel safe and that life for everyone will be good. I don't think we'll get there by pointing the finger at the wrong reasons though. I think we need to figure out the real reasons, find real sollutions and simply try to look at the world through other peoples eyes.

That said, fuck the bastard that wants to tell anyone else how to behave and the assholes that try to control people by fear. Plenty of muslims fit into that role and so do other people.

As a sidenote, thank you for this short discussion. In general, slashdot is not that conductive to deep reasoning and even though we do not agree with regards to a lot of things, I think we agree on some points and if we were to have a real, live conversation I think it would turn out we stand pretty closely on all the main issues. We just differ on what we think are the reasons for them not being in place.

Comment: Re:Islam is dangerous. (Score 1) 1224

by suffe (#31965758) Attached to: <em>South Park</em>'s Episode 201 &mdash; the Expurgated Version
I'm sorry you had to respond again. The page I had loaded in my browser was not properly refreshed and so I didn't notice all the discussions bellow.

While I'm willing to agree you have a point as such, I still do think the future holds lots of mild interpretations.

One reason to think this is the millions upon millions of 'shepherds' that define themselves as muslim and live perfectly peacefull, happy lives next to denominations and non-denominations of all kinds.

Another one is to keep remembering, like I said, that EVERYTHING can be re-interpreted. For example, I'm sure you can find reason to hold that the 'wars' you speak of need not be violent ones. They can be economical, moral, of the mind, what not. I'm not trying to get into a discussion as to if they need or not, I'm just giving the first example that pops into my head. I'm sure people that study the religion day and night for 40 years can, and will, come up with more convincing arguments. I'm sure they will attract more followers than me.

Comment: Re:Islam is dangerous. (Score 1) 1224

by suffe (#31959166) Attached to: <em>South Park</em>'s Episode 201 &mdash; the Expurgated Version

Because koran is put forth as unchanged word of god, it is impossible to find any excuse to reinterpret it.

Some of the things you say might very well be true and I certainly find some of it interesting, but you seem to be leaning a bit heavily on this pillar (semi-pun intended). From the simple fact that followers of Sunni and Shia (not to mention all of the other smaller factions) are abundant there obviously is room for interpretation. Why would a more modern one not be possible?

For that matter, though I'm by no means an expert, I seem to remember that the OT is supposedly the word of god as well. I guess you could argue that jewish oral traditions might have miss-remembered and made it not the word of god anymore and that by translating it the meaning has changed, but I think a lot of people would disagree. I see plenty of interpretation regarding this work going on. Including, but not limited, to the muslim, jewish and christian readings.

Either or, the point is, it is ALWAYS possible to interpret things in a different way. I bet even the five word Hallmark birthday cards can be interpreted in five-factorial ways, at the very least. It's a human trait.

Why do we want intelligent terminals when there are so many stupid users?

Working...