Slashdot Log In
Fan-created Star Wars Spinoff in The Works
Posted by
Hemos
on Mon Jul 31, 2006 10:55 AM
from the better-then-crazy-lucas dept.
from the better-then-crazy-lucas dept.
Lazarian writes "According to an article from the Edmonton Sun, director Mark Twitchell from the Northern Alberta Institute of Technology has begun filming Star Wars: Secrets of the Rebellion, a non-profit venture expected to be released in 2008. From the article:
"The 27-year-old Edmonton director begins shooting a feature-length independent Star Wars spin-off film at NAIT Saturday, and has amassed $60,000 to bring his dream to life.
"I'm the only guy crazy enough to do this, because I'm not allowed to turn a profit. The film is for hardcore fans who miss the character development of the original trilogy.""
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Fan-created Star Wars Spinoff in The Works
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 196 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Too bad IMPS died. (Score:5, Interesting)
Democracy does work! (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://andrewman327.stumbleupon.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday August 09 2006, @02:31PM)
Re:SFX and quality (Score:4, Funny)
(http://andrewman327.stumbleupon.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday August 09 2006, @02:31PM)
Found it!
Re:Democracy does work! (Score:4, Insightful)
Computer animation in movies is really something that I've come to despise. To me it looks considerably worse than old fashioned special effects, especially in lower budget horror and sci fi films, which are my favorite genres (or they were before everything started looking like a video game intro). That's not to say that they can't be done well, it just doesn't happen too often. I'd take the old effects in The Thing or Alien over most new films relying mostly on computer effects.
Re:Democracy does work! (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.intelligentblogger.com/ | Last Journal: Monday August 27, @11:47AM)
If this is anything like the fan videos that have come before it, it will probably have incredibly high production values (e.g. CGI effects, space ships, awesome compositing work, and realistic weapons), but will suffer from poor audio and acting.
For example, I was just watching the latest Star Trek: Exeter the other day. While the acting is not the worst (that title goes to a good-looking Star Wars fan film I saw a while back), it often suffers from the "spitting out the lines"-itis. Instead of training the actors and/or editing for proper timing, the actors are allowed to speak their lines one after another without any sort of pausing. The result is that they come across as emotionless actors speaking lines.
Now Shatner did have a propensity for overacting. (It's my... ship... my... ship!) However, he was at least acting. By not taking the time to slow down and deliver the lines, the actors never manage any real emotional expression. Which makes their lines that much harder to follow.
I say, "that much harder", because the voice audio is usually terrible in these amatuer productions. They need to either get a good mic *really* close to the actors, or they need to re-dub the audio in post-production. A combination of both wouldn't be such a bad idea. It would also help to try and clean up the audio that they do record. Try to remove any background noise or echoing (it's *really* hard to get perfectly clean audio without a sound booth) and boost the volume to be louder than the incessant background effects.
Exeter has one more annoyance that's actually quite unique to the production. They allow the actors to make nervous movements. While it's not that big of a deal for someone to rock a chair in real life, it's incredibly distracting in a movie. Hopefully they'll realize this and make their actors sit still for their lines.
That's my opinion, anyway. I imagine that someone trained in the field could provide more precise advice.
FWIW, I think it's amazing what fan films have been doing these days. If we wait a few more years, we may find that what used to be Internet fan films will become the Internet television of tomorrow. I just hope someone reboots Blake's 7. It would be a wonderful show to see back on the air.
Do not want (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.swaxhog.com/)
Re:Do not want (Score:5, Informative)
not the typical nerd (Score:3, Insightful)
uh huh. Are we ignoring the past twenty years of film school students, the vast majority of whom all envision themselves as the next george lucas and at some point in high school or college made a film that references/parodies/extends star wars in some way? Gimme a break, there's nothing special about this dork... if anything he's jumping on a trend after it's already been destroyed by the new trilogy. Great news team, Edmonton Sun.
Obligatory ... (Score:5, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/~Stavr0/journal/ | Last Journal: Thursday January 19 2006, @01:18PM)
Many Bothans will die to bring us this information.
For the fans? (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Thursday May 24, @09:11AM)
"I'm the only guy crazy enough to do this, because I'm not allowed to turn a profit. The film is for hardcore fans who miss the character development of the original trilogy."
I don't think this guy understands Star Wars at all...
One in a long long line... (Score:5, Informative)
(http://robvincent.net/ | Last Journal: Tuesday October 09, @01:55PM)
press release (Score:1)
Life Sucking Lawyers (Score:2, Insightful)
(http://127.0.0.42/)
Re:Life Sucking Lawyers (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://robvincent.net/ | Last Journal: Tuesday October 09, @01:55PM)
Isn't this piracy? (Score:1)
Of course the real reason that the project can't be for profit, is that the fan made movie would gross more than all three of the latest prequels combined revenues no doubt, proving that Hollywood and Lucas has it's head up it's ass. Not to mention destroying the self perpetuating system of Hollywood producers and studios that stifle creativity from outside or unfamiliar sources.
Pink-5 (Score:2)
(http://userfriendly.org | Last Journal: Tuesday January 24 2006, @12:30PM)
The linked article is pretty content-lite, but I hope he produces something interesting and has a good time doing so.
I have been a big fan of Pink Five [trudang.com] for some time now. It's always been funny, but the production values have been getting significantly better as the story continues.
Although it is an apples-organges comparison, I find it interesting that fans with no budget can create movies that are more interesting and entertaining than George Lucas (Ep 1-) can with his billions!
Maybe passion is more important than the size of your wallet?
Film's budget break-down (Score:5, Funny)
(http://home.comcast.net/~stefan_jones | Last Journal: Monday May 16 2005, @06:21PM)
Transportation: $52
Equipment: $3,401
Special effects: $2,900
Insurance: $1,200
Legal fees in anticipation of lawsuit from Lucasfilm: $52,000
Re:Film's budget break-down (Score:5, Funny)
Commander Rob!!! (Score:2, Funny)
http://www.commanderrob.com/ [commanderrob.com]
Admittedly, the acting quality from the action figures is a little...um...stiff.
Tod.
Still illegal... (Score:2)
Star Wars Kid (Score:1)
99% of all Star Wars Fanfilms suck (Score:5, Interesting)
Just to clarify (Score:4, Funny)
Because I'm not quite sure yet: Are you in this movie? ;-)
And I'm supposed to believe... (Score:2)
I expect terrible actors, terrible direction and even worse dialogue. All compounded with: bad FX, worse audio and a poor cinematography.
Yeah... this sounds like it's going to save Star Wars.
Re:And I'm supposed to believe... (Score:4, Funny)
Would be difficult to do worse than 'Phantom Menace'. Though, to be fair, it's not the actor's fault that they suck ass in the movie.
"I expect terrible actors, terrible direction and even worse dialogue."
If they can write worse dialog than George Lucas, they deserve an award.
Who will they find... (Score:2, Funny)
(http://www.chatmag.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday November 09 2004, @07:41PM)
like
James T.
Kirk?
from the if-then-better-than dept. (Score:1, Insightful)
(http://www.halley.cc/ed/)
I know that in this day and age, it's too much to ask for the editors of a for-profit site to be competent in English, even if that's their native language. Even Associated Press articles have gotten past proofreaders with the occasional homonym slip.
The word of the day is than .
The word 'than' is used as a part of a comparison. Examples: it's better than nothing; it's less than thrilling; six is greater than four.
The word 'then' is used as a conjunction. Two common cases are if-then or to establish a sequence. Examples: if he enters the biathlon then he may compete; this biathlon starts with a biking component, then ends with a running component.
I have always boggled at how geeks must always structure and type things accurately to get computers to understand them, but then completely fail to express themselves as accurately in any other form of communication.
But how does he decide who shoots first? (Score:2, Funny)
(http://www.politemail.com/)
ugh... (Score:5, Insightful)
Lucas had shitty, crappy dialogue in the new trilogy, and that held a lot of the actors back... Natalie Portman and Ewan MccGreggor have done impressive stuff in the past, and the reason they looked so bad in these movies was due to the poor script, the actors did what they could with what they were given.
Now, when these indie SW films seem to get fans to play the parts. Even if you have a good script, these people have no idea what they are doing, and it shows. The same way that Lucas can make his actors look bad with a bad script, bad actors can make a good script look bad.
Here's to hoping he ropes in real actors, even if they don't give to shits about SW than using a bunch of fanboys who they they know what they are doing.
Why all the bashing (Score:2, Insightful)
More Obligatories (Score:5, Funny)
(http://thedevilsadvocate.org/)
"It's as if a thousand Lucas lawyers suddenly cried out, and then were silent."
"That's no Lucas bomb, it's a fan flick!"
"He better get those Mt. Dew Bottles to editing by tomorrow morning, or there'll be hell to pay."
And finally, said the director of the fan film to Lucas: "Would someone get this walking carpet out of my way."
Cast (Score:5, Informative)
Included in the cast:
Zach Jensen: Jedi Master Kit Fisto (Episode 2)
AND
Jeremy Bulloch: BOBA FETT!!!! Ok...he won't play Boba Fett in this movie.
More info... (Score:1)
http://www.xpressentertainment.ca/index.php [xpressentertainment.ca]
As bad as Hollywood. (Score:1)
Fanmade movies tend to not know their limitations (Score:1)
Erm, the "hardcore fan" is willing to watch anything; Even if the main characters would be played by stop-motion turds with little lightsabers; They'd watch -and- analyse the intriguing plot afterwards... for weeks.
Only a hardcore fan is willing to watch these fanmade movies; I am hard trying -not- to be a troll, but are there any fanmade StarWars-movies that -are- worth watching?
The few I've seen (of course) lack the visual quality of the original, but instead of confining themselves to areas where there isn't as much CGI needed, they always cram in a few (crappy looking) scenes, that for me, ruin the movie.
When will those directors of fanmade movies just realise their weaker points, and instead -really- focus on plot/actors
You aren't the first (Score:4, Informative)
"I'm the only guy crazy enough to do this, because I'm not allowed to turn a profit."
Actually, you're not the first and only guy, and I doubt you'll be the last. Come on, this was only a year ago! Star Wars Revelations [ifilm.com]
If I'm not mistaken, that one sucked too
Between Eps III and IV? (Score:1)
Meesa Dying! (Score:1, Offtopic)
We find out whatever happened to Jar Jar Binks.
Please, PLEASE let it be something involving horrible, unrelenting agony.
Leigh Brackett's Other Work (Score:3, Informative)
(http://darkcyclone0.tripod.com/snyktn.html | Last Journal: Thursday August 03 2006, @02:55PM)
I'd really like to see Space Opera make a comeback, but it seems unlikely with the failure of Serenity at the box office.
I'm confused.... (Score:3, Funny)
(http://localhost/)
Am I supposed to hate this because it is "new" Star Wars and will have lots of CGI, or am I supposed to love it because it is a fan film and not Lucas?? Tell me what to think!
Please hurry, I want to make up my mind before I see it...
Shit... (Score:1, Offtopic)
Why not make a mashup with original footage? (Score:1)
(http://www.livenudejournal.com/)
This will be a SW fan film with better acting. (Score:1)
Now, for the disclaimer - I'm friends with some of the folks with leading roles in this film. That said, the guy playing Han Solo probably does Solo better than Harrison Ford did. If you've seen "that Han Solo guy" at a con in the last 6 years, it was probably him. Plus he can act. He's been in a few independent films, including the lead role in University Heights [blueboxlimited.com]; in which he totally stole the show.
The Chewbacca is probably the best fan-created costume out there. The guy playing chewie did almost the whole costume himself & is a super-stickler for detail. Hell, he can even vocalize a pretty decent wookie growl.
Making a movie for profit? (Score:2)
(http://www.davidconnell.com/)
Crazy? I don't think so. It is well known that [wikipedia.org] even if you make a successful movie, you don't make a movie to make a profit [wikipedia.org].
DUDE!!!! (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Wednesday November 06 2002, @05:15PM)
The best part is that everyone involved in the project is such a huge geek, and Star Wars fan, that everything just comes together perfectly.
Everyone needs to go Slashdot XPress Entertainment [xpressentertainment.ca]. That's Marks' production company that's making the movie. There is a forums there too, and we have about a thousand pictures from the first 2 days of shooting that are soon to get put up there.
Awesome hero costumes, all the extras look great, and there are some extremely hot girls (heck, all of them are!). Perfect start to a movie, IMHO.
Also, I need help... I'm changing my sig, how does this sound?
I win this argument by default. I'M IN MOTHERF*CKING STAR WARS, BITCH!
This movie will be great (Score:1)
Is this Lucas type storyline or for real? (Score:1)
Seriously though, as much as I looove Star Wars GL really pushed the edges or reality but oversimplifying the enemy into bumbling goofs who just happened to have defeated an intergalatic federation (no ST pun there..well maybe) and controlled the galaxy for the past 18yrs with an iron fist. COMBAT trained pilots with thousands of hours of flight time making easy targets of themselves (try and get me to believe Luke's combat flight training wasn't him playing their modern day BF2), armor that is only for show (ewoks..damn ewoks), and military trained riflmen how can't hit a human target at 10ft. Blaaaaah!
A struggling alliance against an empire that actually has teeth and can use them makes for better entertainment than the typical "you charge that stormtrooper platoon and wipe them out with this chopstick while I stand out in the open and use my powers of Lucas cheats and a paperclip to make them miss me".
Sorry dude Lucas forgot that the 12yr target audience (and his current biggest fans) all grew up and are in their 20's-40's. Its bad enough that the EU stuff is butchered by crappy writing. Try doing this to a more adult audience....pleeeeease.
Re:Star Wars answer to Star Trek: Hidden Frontier (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Wednesday November 06 2002, @05:15PM)
I'm in the movie, and I can say, don't worry. The script is well balanced, and doesn't twist the SW universe into something it's not just so the production team can get their jollies. Besides, there are too many Star Wars Geeks on this movie... we'd kick Mark in the nuts if he tried.
PS: Mark... if you're reading this... uh... please don't cut me over this.
Matrix XP. (Score:2)
(http://www.scarydevil.com/~peter/ | Last Journal: Monday September 26 2005, @06:53PM)