Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Does this actually work? (Score 1) 400

by Slider451 (#43853445) Attached to: Xbox One: Cloud Will Quadruple the Power, Says Microsoft

Concur. I'm approaching 100 Steam games purchased over a 4-year period, plus another 20+ on GOG. I'd purchased maybe 5 games a year before that (after I stopped being a hardcore gamer in the 90s with a closet-full of large shrink-wrapped boxes; I don't miss those days).

I could lose everything from Steam and still consider myself ahead for what little money I spent.

Comment: Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f (Score 1) 782

by Slider451 (#43805135) Attached to: Microsoft Unveils Xbox One

"good-enough" = "passable to play most games". I'd even say "plays most games very well for most people"
Tom's also has a mid-tier and high-end system, which get you to your level of "good" for around $1,000. There's absolutely no need to pay more than that today.

This coming from a guy who spent thousands every year in the 90s to keep a PC (ok, a home LAN of PCs) at the bleeding edge, because new games always pushed the performance envelope and took advantage of rapidly-advancing tech. Those days are gone. Since most games these days are ports of console titles designed for 1080p on legacy hardware you simply don't need to spend top dollar anymore to get an enjoyable gaming experience. There's nothing wrong with wanting more. Just acknowledge it for what it is: indulgence.

Comment: Re:Order of Precedence (Score 1) 230

by Slider451 (#42900841) Attached to: New Medal Designed To Honor Cyber Soldiers

Qualifier: I deployed as a battalion S1 (human resources officer) whose responsibilities included the awards program for over 300 service members in three military branches.

There is a distinction if you know what to look for. Medals with "Star" or "Cross" in the name require action in a combat zone. Medals with "Service" in the name generally do not. Notable: The Distinguished Service Cross (Army award for valor second only to the Medal of Honor) is a combat medal that meets the first criteria, but the name is confusing because of the word "Service" in the title. Note that there are many non-combat service medals that rank above the Bronze Star Medal. Below the BSM, the service-specific Commendation Medals are also awarded in combat zones and can be affixed with 'V' devices for valor.

To add confusion to the debate, non-combat awards, such as the Meritorious Service Medal (non-combat equivalent to the Bronze Star) and service-specific Achievement Medals, have been awarded in Iraq and Afghanistan to service members who work exclusively inside the wire. Guidance is vague enough to cause great inconsistencies in award approvals across commands, and many complaints from service members.

Adding new awards like this adds further confusion to what many consider to be an arbitrary and subjective process, and are usually only welcomed by the few service members who were not recognized by previously existing awards.

Comment: Re:Reserve (Score 1) 525

by Slider451 (#41993239) Attached to: My relationship to military service:

"Reserve" makes sense in English for your situation. In the U.S. you would be in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), an inactive, non-paid status, but still on the military roles.

In the U.S. if you hold a current federal commission or enlisted contract, you're either active, reserve (to include the National Guard), or retired. If you lose your commission, by choice or not, or you don't re-enlist, you are discharged and officially a civilian. Depending on the nature of your service you may qualify for official veteran status for certain benefits, including medical care and education.

Comment: Re:Fascist bloodlust (Score 1) 380

by Slider451 (#41923895) Attached to: Bradley Manning Offers Partial Guilty Plea To Military Court

I also am an Army vet and I disagree. He can't just claim "Army Values" and walk away. While as a soldier you are compelled to refuse illegal orders, there are consequences (i.e. court martial) for acting on that compulsion. He will get his day in court to explain his actions and, if found honorable, be vindicated for the treatment he's received these last several years. However, it's more likely that he'll be found in violation of his oath of enlistment and the oath of secrecy he swore upon accepting a high security clearance. He is plenty smart enough to have figured out the proper way to expose wrong-doing. This was not it.

He keeps differentiating, flying off on a tangent.

Working...