Not that surprising for anyone that follows Turkish politics. Erdogan isn't as bad as ISIS but he inch-by-inch is taking Turkey down the theocratic road of countries like Afghanistan. He practically had to be coerced into fighting ISIS. Very plausible he would have joined forces with ISIS to fight Kurds if it hadn't been for foreign pressure)
Most Turks you meet are super nice in person but for some unfathomable reason this crpto-fascist jerk keeps winning elections. If he keeps winning elections, Turkey is going to devolve into a theocracy like most of the rest of the middle east. Secular Atatürk was rational (especially for his era). Erdogan things he's an Ottoman sultan. Populist moron.
Good post. Actually the word I keep hearing is that Turkey isn't fighting ISIS at all but is using it as a pretext to only attack various Kurdish groups they don't like.
As an American who has traveled quite a bit to Europe and consider myself somewhat pro-Europe, I have given up on Turkey. (Disclaimer - I've never visited Turkey.) If you could talk to me in the late 1990s or very early 2000s, I was all for Turkey joining the EU. I have completely reversed myself and now while I have no say as I'm not an EU citizen, it is my strong belief that Turkey should not ever be allowed to joint the EU. I've learned over the past decade that if given a free choice, Muslims will willingly choose to enslave themselves. This has happened in Turkey and everywhere in the so called Arab Spring except Egypt. It sure got started in Egypt and then most of the people reversed themselves after realizing the full extent of what putting the Muslim Brotherhood in power really meant.
I blame the situation in Turkey on George W. Bush mostly. Bush started the ball rolling by making sure that the Turkish military understood that they weren't supposed to prevent Erdogan or his party (which was at one time illegal) from taking power. Now enough time has passed that I'm not sure if the Turkish military has any more people in power who might actually be opposed to Erdogan. Since Bush's presidency the US has had an irrational belief that more democracy in countries that have never had it can only lead to favorable outcomes for the USA without realizing that when you let people freely vote, they may just choose to elect someone you don't like. Turkey is a terrible "friend" to the USA and they're not going to provide much useful help against ISIS as long as Erdogan is in charge.
With 60 hosts and 1500 VMs I would certainly expect separate roles for enterprise architecture and system provision/admin..
This statement is quite right. Apparently the OP doesn't deal with auditors at all in his job. Lucky him. I do in mine and I have something like a Linux system admin job. For the product I work on, and I work for a Fortune 500 company that sells a lot of software products and services, I am the main contact person every year for auditors. Since the OP works for a publicly traded company, he should know that audits are required by US law. Every year I have to answer the same questions from the auditors about separation of responsibilities on the product I support. Honestly, I don't know how the OP doesn't know that getting that kind of access for an architect is going to raise all kinds of red flags in an audit that have to be explained. If I remember correctly, we have exactly 4 people who have root access to our servers who don't work on my team. They're software developers who've worked on the product for years and need that access in an emergency if we have a software related disaster that impacts customers. We have to jump through a lot of hoops to justify this on the audit. In fact, we've actually had our access restricted from some activities we used to do that fall outside of traditional system admin tasks just because it's easier for auditing purposes for us to not be able to do it anymore. In my job my group also doesn't have access to the storage, network or virtualization layers except as users/clients and all changes have to be done by others. Sometimes it's a pain, but at auditing time it makes my life easier as I can tell the auditors "We don't have the ability to change that, so you have to talk to group X on that one".
Being able to reassemble it is not the point, it's that you can re-wind time and get the information back out. With the normal idea of a blackhole, even if you could rewind time, you couldn't get the information back out.
No, you miss the point. He said basically "Having the information 'available' isn't really helpful because we have no way to get it." You simply proposed a theoretical way to get it that can't be done either at this time, possibly ever, so his assertion that we can't get it is still right. Unless you are a Q, telling us to "rewind time" as about as helpful as suggesting we simply change the gravitational constant of the universe.
Backed by IBM, the P-TECH program aims to prepare mainly minority kids from low-income backgrounds for careers in technology,
I think they meant to say:
Backed by IBM, the P-TECH program aims to prepare mainly minority kids for low-income careers in technology,
Given IBM's lack of interest in hiring or retaining American workers, that must surely be what they meant.
It's usually spread through the air. And it's not a big deal for a young healthy person to get it...
While that is generally true, specifically the 1918 flu pandemic killed a large number of people in the age range of 25-34. It's believed that they died due to the effects of a cytokine storm whereas middle aged people did much better at surviving that flu. You had to get up to about age 75 and above to start seeing the kind of mortality rates that hit the sweet spot of 25-34 for this flu. This doesn't invalidate the fact that your post is good as is your advice for people to get their flu shots.
I really hope that the majority of the agents laughed at this stupidity.
This was before my time so I can't say so with any authority, but the impression I get is that most agents probably believed it. Keep in mind that this was a time when the greatest fear of many American parents was "juvenile delinquency" and they honestly blamed comic books for it. The Senate even had hearings about comic books and juvenile delinquency. William M. Gaines, who would go on to publish Mad Magazine, was forced to testify in front of a Senate panel on the subject. How seriously the US government took the "Communist threat" is why I can't accept that Lee Harvey Oswald was allowed to return to the USA after supposedly defecting and was never punished for defecting. Something was going on there and I will believe forever that Oswald had a CIA connection that the government still doesn't want to talk about.
Epson seems to be inching into the right direction: http://hardware.slashdot.org/s...
I bought an Epson printer once maybe 5-6 years ago. It refused to recognize the ink cartridges that came with the printer from the factory. There were official Epson ink cartridges. Know what the fix for this is? Get another printer. No joke. There is no fix. You have to replace the printer. So I returned it for a refund and went with Canon. The Canon has its own issues, mostly being vvvvvveeerrrrryyyy ssssssllllloooooowwwww to warm up, but I've never had it refuse to recognize an official Canon ink cartridge.
NEVER confess to anything! All they've done is to hang themselves.
This is Europe, not the USA. They're likely to get pretty light sentences at most if not just probation and a fine. If Hitler were miraculously still alive and arrested today in Europe, he wouldn't get the death penalty and any sentence more than a few years might be viewed as excessive given his age.
So let me get this straight these people are so dangerous that they can't fly yet aren't dangerous enough to be brought in for questioning, gotten off the streets for the safety of the general public, and are likely not under direct surveillance? I am a bit confused here.
It's actually not all that difficult to consider situations where the above is true. For example, imagine that the NSA is monitoring the email and social media activity of Joe Blow, an American born recent convert to Islam who has expressed the opinion that ISIS is pretty cool and should be supported. Is expressing such an opinion really a crime? Nope. But showing such sympathies might just be enough to get him put on the no fly list even though he's committed no crime. And bringing him in for questioning might cause him to go underground with his statements of support and any work he might do to follow up on it. Some of the recent arrests of Americans accused of supporting terrorists have happened because the Americans felt safe enough to openly talk about supporting ISIS. and to act on those statements of support by buying weapons and other things.
Now if somebody here wants to argue that words alone are not enough to do anything about, that is a different argument. I am simply providing a plausible scenario for your questions.
Going to a foreign country to visit and having a drone flying over your head... Really? Always finding new ways to display an astonishing lack of class.
As an American, I am in agreement. And note that as is always the case, the ones who bitch the most about this and completely lose their minds over it will never, ever, visit New Zealand or any place with such laws. I had a friend some years ago (we're not friends any more because he's basically nuts and I had enough) who last flew in an airplane around in 1998 or maybe 1999. Definitely well before Sept. 11, 2001. You couldn't say anything at all to him about traveling anywhere by air without him going into a tirade about TSA. He has no reason to ever fly again in his life and likely never will and he has never personally experienced TSA checks, but it sure didn't stop him from ranting and raving about it. Same thing here for the drones and those who complain.
The gun thing is also important. I'm not a gun nut... but I believe I have a right to be dangerous in my own country and in my home. Not for hunting... not even for self defense... to be DANGEROUS. I feel that is an important check on anyone that would try to intimidate the people. If they understand that the people can and will turn on them with an instant militia of millions. That forces the elites to be careful.
No, it actually doesn't. You're an idiot and I can easily prove it. The "elites", which seems to be your code word for the US government, has nuclear bombs and drone missiles. Let me know how your army of people with pea shooters does against them. There seems to be an endless number of people here in America who actually believe that the "people" with their handguns can actually overthrow an "evil" US government. Ha ha ha. Again, let me know how your army of peasants does against nuclear bombs. If the supposedly "evil" government decided that killing you and your pals was in its best interests, you'll be dead.
If I have not seen so far it is because I stood in giant's footsteps.