While a US employee is stil vulnerable to such things, the companies have made it cheaper to go after the overseas employees since X amount of money goes further overseas than it does in the US.
Another reason is that some if not all developing countries have really weak legal systems. I can't imagine anybody actually outsourcing to Russia any more, but the legal system there is extremely corrupt and if a foreign company tried to sue a Russian citizen in a Russian court, it wouldn't be difficult for the citizen to bribe the court to throw out the case. I've heard similar stories about India and how there are never any repercussions for Indian citizens who steal and sell information from foreign companies they work for.
And who would take a loan at that rate for any reason? I get gambling addiction is a thing, but even so you'd think some part of the brain would go, "I'd have to quadruple my money just to pay back the loan I took to make the bet. What are my chances?" That's not even gambling at that point. That's guaranteed failure.
It's hidden behind a paywall unfortunately so there's no point in providing a link, but within the past 4-6 weeks or so, the online sports website The Athletic did a profile of a guy who lost everything by sports gambling. He went into a lot of detail on what happened and his thought process during the gambling. He basically believed that he couldn't lose so when he did, he kept placing riskier and higher money bets to try to get back his losses. At times he did win, but that just fueled his belief that he could win his losses back. He got loans from reputable banks and credit unions to cover his losses and provide more money to gamble with. For example, let's say he's got $12,000 worth of losses. He'd just apply for a credit union loan for, say, $18,000 to cover the $12,000 losses and have $6000 to gamble with. And then if he loses the $6000, he gets a loan from a different bank or credit union for $25,000 to pay off the previous loan and still have some money to gamble with. It seemed to never occur to him that he could actually get worse off. Addiction is terrible and it often leads people in its grasp to make irrational decisions. It doesn't help that many gambling apps have celebrities pitch them or commercials without celebrities where the commercial implies that you simply can't lose at sports gambling and everybody around you is making money at it and able to offer you advice to help you win. See that guy in front of you at the grocery store check out line? He probably knows how many 3 point shots Miami is likely to hit tonight in their NBA game vs. Boston. They leave you with the impression that if you aren't gambling, you're passing up free money you could make gambling. For Americans, the late Pete Rose is an example of how addictive and destructive sports gambling can be. He got a life time ban from his sport and is ineligible to be elected to the baseball Hall Of Fame because he gambled on the sport while playing and managing in it. His ban allowed him to apply for forgiveness and reinstatement and his last appeal a few years ago ended with the ban continuing with the MLB commissioner stating that Rose was told in no uncertain terms that he had to stop all gambling on everything to have any chance at reinstatement and they could easily prove that he continued to gamble on various sports including MLB anyway. That's how addiction is.
I haven't shut down any computer in my house in years and I don't know anyone else who does. I reboot for patches or I let it go to sleep- but that's it. Are people really turning their computer on and off all the time?
Career (30+ years) IT guy here. I don't turn off computers in my house (currently have 2) unless I'm going out of town as I don't need to access them remotely. One of them is a Windoze box and it will install critical patches at night and reboot, but generally speaking if I'm in town, my computers are up. People act like the power costs for leaving them running all the time are astronomical, but they really aren't. Only in the summer do I ever pay $100 or more for electricity in a month.
The sad thing is that I just read in an Apple forum that "well, if you're using the iMac for memory intensive tasks like video editing, you're doing it wrong and should use one of their pro offerings!". Like...why?! Since it runs the same (admittedly powerful) CPU, the only thing really holding it back would be the RAM and storage. So Apple is purposefuly castrating these so not to steal marketshare from their other products.
They don't seem to be actually holding back storage options on the iMac unless your desire is for something extremely large. I haven't taken apart one of the newer iMacs, but I can tell you that for Intel based models, although Apple strongly discouraged doing it, it was possible to open them up and replace the manufacturer supplied disk drive. Adding external storage via USB or Lightning is possible. Now memory is another story. I don't think they are purposely "castrating" it as you say so much as their chip design simply doesn't allow for more than 32 GB of memory for some design reason. As best I can tell, and I only did a quick look into this, the Mac Pros that support more memory actually run on Intel chips.
Canâ(TM)t upgrade even if i wanted to.
They put arbitrary cpu generation requirements in windows 11. 7th Intel is too old, but apparently the almost identical 8th gen is fine
I've got an AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X CPU and it also isn't supported for Windows 11. As best I can tell the CPU requirements are fairly arbitrary and I imagine my CPU can actually run it, but the real issue is that Windows 11 requires disk encryption and forcing this onto faster CPUs was a way to make it not suck as bad.
Airliners keep telling us to put devices into airplane mode or we risk crashing the plane! -Now it's OK?
Yeah. I know. I flew on Delta Airlines domestically this month. They told us to put our devices in airplane mode for take off and landing, but at all other times we were not only free to use them, they strongly encouraged us to use their free wi-fi. The in-flight entertainment system had more choices if you were willing to connect to wi-fi. For example, maybe you got all the episodes of a season of a streaming TV show vs. only 5 if you didn't connect. It seems like Delta and other airlines want some of your personal info that they can only get when you use their wi-fi.
What I am curious about is that most of these trials appear to be European/UK based with no US trials that I can see. I'm honestly curious as to the reason for this if anyone knows.
BioNTech is a German company but they do sell vaccines in the USA. They got approved to sell a new COVID vaccine in the USA very recently. I'm guessing that the FDA is dragging their feet on approving trials, as they often do, because "people might die" if they have a bad reaction to the vaccine. Well, people are certainly going to die, at least some of them, if their lung cancer doesn't respond well to available US treatments, but stuff like that has never swayed the FDA in the past. They probably will approve it for US trials, but it might be 2-3 years from now.
My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells down by the seashore.