Apple Partners with Ford 187
conq writes "BusinessWeek reports on Apple's latest partnership with Ford. This new accessory will be available in all Ford, GM and Mazda 2007 models allowing users to control thei iPod through the car's stereo controls. From the article:
'Currently, most MP3 players connect to vehicles via tape-deck or FM radio adapters. The devices are relatively cheap, ranging from $20 to $90, but are often difficult to operate while driving and can distort sound quality. But the iPod jacks, situated in glove compartments, let drivers easily operate players with existing stereo controls and charge a device's battery without an additional adapter.'"
OK But... (Score:4, Interesting)
These things look nice. I would love one in my van. I tried 3 or 4 different FM transmitters before I finally got a CD-changer interface so the iPod plugs directly into the back of the stereo (which took a long time to find because of my car). That said, there is one thing that worries me.
What happens when Apple changes the interface? You don't expect them to keep the same dock connector forever. Does the system have an alternate input (standard line-in, for example)? Is there a cable that can be changed so you can use dock-connector 2.0 (or whatever)?
Just something to think about.
Really, I wish some kind of audio input bus would be put into cars to simplify all this stuff. You either have to get a special (and expensive) adaptor to fake being a CD-changer, or use the FM transmitter. Now let's say I have an XM receiver and a iPod and I want both plugged into my car stereo? I can't do it (without hacking a dock interface connector for the XM). Or what if I want to add HD radio? Or plug in a tape player (which my car lacks). Just a simple line-in jack would be fine with me. I don't need the rest of the fancy stuff (although it's nice).
My guess is this is just vendor lock in since there was basically no demand for it before iPods (and their ilk) and you could always use a tape adapter (although more and more cars lack cassette drives).
Re:OK But... (Score:1)
Personally, the proprietary connector is one reason I got an archos - every system just recognizes it as a fat-formatted mass storage device.
Re:OK But... (Score:2)
The iPod is also "a fat-formatted mass storage device". I don't see what the proprietary connector has to do with that anyway.
Re:OK But... (Score:2)
There are plenty of alternatives to iTunes that support the iPod (including under Linux, for example Amarok has kick ass iPod integration), so you're not really locked in. It's not like those devices that use a proprietary Microsoft protocol and are therefore completely unusable
Re:OK But... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:OK But... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:OK But... (Score:2)
That is definitely true. One of my favorite things about using my car to listen to CDs is the little button on the wheel I can hit to change to the next track. I don't really care about my stereo being able to tell me what track I'm listening to, but having the controls make the iPod work would be great. As it is I I would have to hit the button on my iPod to change tracks.
In fact, that is one of the reasons I have kept my 3G iPod and didn't buy a 4G. Because of the cutouts in the plastic for the buttons a
Re:OK But... (Score:2)
They make iPod remotes... (Score:2)
It's not manufactured by Apple -- I'm not sure who makes it, actually, although when I'm done writing I'll try some Google searches -- but I've seen them in person. It's a little black receiver box that mounts flush to the bottom of the iPod (via the Dock Connector), and then has a pass-thru connection on its bottom, so that the 'pod can still charge.
Then it has a small remote control that you can put anywhere in the vicinity, and adjust the volume
Re:OK But... (Score:2)
Re:OK But... (Score:2)
Emmett
Re:OK But... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:OK But... (Score:2)
Psh, all the cool kids use CPANPLUS [cpan.org] now. Among other things, it will build packages for your distro, and keep those up to date for you. Check it out.
Re:OK But... (Score:2)
Guess you've never bought a car before, huh? It's kinda like with magazines, the September issue comes out in August.
Re:OK But... (Score:2)
Re:OK But... (Score:2)
Study by AAA: iPod = Road Hazard (Score:3, Insightful)
Judging from the numerous articles (in this particular discussion) praising the fun of using an iPod within an automobile, I suspect that
Re:Study by AAA: iPod = Road Hazard (Score:2)
Depending on the set of numbers that you use from this study, "adjusting radio/cassette/CD" causes between 1.5% and 3% of all automobile crashes.
I hooked my ipod into my mr2 (manual, natch) by way of the tape deck and left the iwred remote thing between the shifter and P-brake. With its known position and four buttons, it was easier than changing channels on my radio.
If using an iPod causes a fatal automobile accident, will some victim of such an accident eventually try to sue Apple?
Well, duhh, what
Re:Study by AAA: iPod = Road Hazard (Score:2)
"Specifically, because you used it in your car, when you weren't capable of doing that and driving"
"Well..Apple made the product"
"And they held a gun to your head and said, use your iPod, don't drive"
"No, but they made something dangerous, and sold it to me"
"So, if I beat you nearly to death with my briefcase, you sue its manufacturer."
"No, I sue you. But that isn't fair"
"No it isn't. If you beat yourself nearly to death with your briefcase, you sue its man
Re:Study by AAA: iPod = Road Hazard (Score:2)
I won't argue that point. Doing ANYTHING other than driving is distracting. That said, which do you think is worse? Reaching over for the radio or iPod and then trying to use it (worse if you have to do the menus on the iPod as opposed to a single button press to switch radio stations); or pressing a button on your steering wheel that will control your iPod?
Added convenience, better sound quality, costs less, slightly less dangerous.
I don't see a down side.
Re:Study by AAA: iPod = Road Hazard (Score:2)
I think the ass-wipes are all waiting for an iPhone, so they can do both at once.
Adding more technology to stupidity never improved anything, it just makes stupid things happen faster.
Re:OK But... (Score:3, Funny)
,i>What happens when Apple changes the interface? You don't expect them to keep the same dock connector forever.
Why yes, I do. it's not like there's anything on the horizon that would obsolete the current interface.
Re:OK But... (Score:2)
I bought the IPOD2CAR from Peripheral http://www.peripheralelectronics.com/web/ipod2car . asp [peripheral...ronics.com] for my 2003 Jeep Liberty. Looking at the list [peripheral...ronics.com] of compatible cars there are very few missing especially domestically. They also have an AUX2CAR [peripheral...ronics.com] which uses RCA plugs (i.e if you want to hook up something else through a different connecter (i.e RCA, Headphone, anything with direct line out). But to answer your question of what happens if Apple changes their
Re:OK But... (Score:2)
That's the way the one I bought worked. There is a connector that looks like a PS2 connector on one end of the cable and an iPod dock connector on the other. It would be pretty trivial for me to hack a new one, but I assume they would sell me one with the new connector.
But my question is, is that the way the ones that are built in (like these Fords, the BMWs, etc) work? Or is the cable permanantly attached to the back of the stereo and thus a major hack job to change?
Re:OK But... (Score:2)
1. An extra port on the back of the radio that the cable plugs into
2. choice between XM, CD changer or MP3 player (similar to IPOD2CAR does right now)
3. some kind of data bus interface ala SCSI
I've seen this before... (Score:2)
"Best" solution doesn't exist, this is next. (Score:2)
An plain-old analog input to the car's audio system would be nice, and in fact a lot of aftermarket stereos have them (my Aiwa headunit i
Interesting, but... (Score:4, Insightful)
Nice, but I want better... (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't want to have to remember to lug my ipod out to the car, I want my car to be an iTunes client. It should have wifi and 100GB, and should sync whenever I pull into the garage (or within range of my home wifi network).
I'll leave the interface on the radio as an excercise for product developers, but neither the iPod interface nor the 'pretend it's a big CD changer' is the right approach.
Re:Nice, but I want better... (Score:2)
For me, I like having only 1 device to sync up anyway. I don't even like setting up all the playlists for my and my wife's iPod, let alone adding cars in there as well.
Anyway, while what you are asking for WOULD be cool, this is still better than what was there before - and that's at least movement in the right direction... I ended up soldering in a patch cable between the remote tape deck (weird, huh?) and the head unit on my Blazer, and it was a pain, and it didn't charge the iPod, and you still had no c
Re:Nice, but I want better... (Score:2)
For our cars, one has the tape player, and my wife's has an Mini-Disk deck, so she has a radio transmitter on her mini. The Prius we're on the waiting list for has the 1/8" mini jack, but doesn't do any iPod control.
I've got a new head unit sitting in my office that has CD control, and I
Re:Nice, but I want better... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Nice, but I want better... (Score:2)
Maybe you need an iPod Pequeno (http://www.engadget.com/2005/11/20/steve-jobs-pr
Re:Nice, but I want better... (Score:2)
The key is I need to move the iPod to and from my computer often to get the latests podcasts (primarily what I listen to in the car), so it's not just remembering to move it when I rip new CDs.
I have an iPod in my car (Score:2)
First, built in means it would probably never be upgradeable. It also means that it would probably be in some inaccessible location should it ever need service (try changing the cabin air filter in a G35 Coupe). Got a friend going along for a trip? Plug thei
Re:And I want better still. (Score:2)
Re:And I want better still. (Score:2)
(Seriously, my bad.)
Re:And I want better still. (Score:2)
in the glove box? (Score:1, Troll)
Re:in the glove box? (Score:5, Interesting)
Yes, people who scare easily and are generally scared of everything. It scares them.
I bet that will be the cause of more than one accident...
Adjusting your iPod while driving is already probably causing accidents. That's a selling point for this feature. It makes it easier to change songs without looking away from the road.
iPods are about music, not about avoiding car accidents. Everything in the world doesn't have to be about avoiding car accidents.
Re:in the glove box? from OP (Score:2)
Re:in the glove box? (Score:2)
But these are drivers we're talking about...
Bah (Score:5, Insightful)
Being the owner of other brands of players (superior sounding, at that), I find how everyone only supports Ipod very frustrating.
A USB port could have other potential uses, too. For instance, adding a hard drive unit that could interface with the audio controls, that would enable you to truly bring your music collection wherever you go. Or, quickly charging other devices via USB. The possibilities would be endless.
USB is perfect. (Score:2)
When no computer is connected, it's all like a normal car. Add a computer (iPod, Mac Mini, Linux SBC, etc.) and the computer gets to operate everything.
The other way around (Score:2)
no way -- the car is not upgradeable (Score:2)
I may keep a car for more than 10 years. Can you tell me what sort of tech we'll be using then? It's bad enough to take a bet on USB, but it's either that or Ethernet.
One could offer both connections of course. If both are used, the added USB storage is visible to the added computer.
Re:Bah (Score:5, Funny)
Ahhh... yes. Mac users' revenge. I speak for Mac users everywhere when I say, "Cry me a river."
Re:Bah (Score:3, Funny)
and "Build a bridge to get over it." :)
3rd Party Mods for Prius (Toyota) (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.vaistech.com/sli.html [vaistech.com]
They even have a video-in unit.
All that said, I am just as happy with the line-in for our 2006 Prius (any audio source works, and I can control almost as easily with the iPod in the cupholder.
Re:3rd Party Mods for Prius (Toyota) (Score:2)
The iPod2Car [peripheral...ronics.com] Toyota version works well enough for my 04. Steering wheel controls work, but no video (I like seeing my map all the time anyway). I bought a little Monster dashboard attachment and placed the thing to the left of my steering wheel (little vertical space available on the Prius dashboard). Works great.
Re:3rd Party Mods for Prius (Toyota) (Score:2)
Yeah, we got the 05, wife wanted new car to replace hers, she didnt like anything else out there (she's from Europe, so most big cars sucked for her), so she kept the 05. Then I got my own the next year... got too addicted to "stealth mode" :-)
The iPod2Car Toyota version works well enough for my 04.
Yeah, heard some ppl had troubles with it, and there was a group buy for the VIAStech one in PriusChat, so I joined. My VAIStech has some sound quality issues (perhaps I need to inst
Nothing to see here (Score:2)
Ford? Uh oh. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Ford? Uh oh. (Score:2)
Aah, American cars (Score:1, Funny)
Glove compartment? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Glove compartment? (Score:5, Insightful)
I agree, I'd like to have a slot I loaded my iPod into (I even started building one a few years ago), but it's not like putting it in the glove compartment is some crazy counter-intuitive place that nobody would ever want.
Re:Glove compartment? (Score:2)
Re:Glove compartment? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Glove compartment? (Score:3, Insightful)
Cost savings. You have any idea what it would add to the cost of the vehicle to design something to plug an iPod into? Instead of a 50$ addition for the additional wiring.. you are adding a few hundred dollars because now they to re-engineer the dashboard to fit the iPod.
It is cheaper to just run the wire to someplace no one really uses much anyway.
Also it is theft deterant; out of site, out of mind.. and the iPod is still in your car when you get back.
Re:Glove compartment? (Score:2)
If it was visible, thieves would smash the window to steal your iPod.
Re:Glove compartment? (Score:2)
One Token Ring to Rule them All, One Search Engine to Find Them, One WAN to bring them in, and TCP/IP Bind them...
It should be "One Token Ring to Rule them All, One Search Engine to Find Them, One WAN to bring them in, and DNS to BIND [isc.org] them..." ;-)
Re:Glove compartment? (Score:2)
Frankly, I think most cars could use a sock drawer, as well.
bad choice (Score:2, Funny)
... when all cars have iPod dock connectors.... (Score:3, Insightful)
Apple and Ford is a perfect match (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Apple and Ford is a perfect match (Score:2)
Re:Apple and Ford is a perfect match (Score:2)
Why Ford? Why not "automakers"? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why Ford? Why not "automakers"? (Score:2)
I am reminded of those stickers you used to see on computers (Sun?)... "made in one or more of the following countries... "
Hope it is better then the Honda crap.. (Score:2, Interesting)
Ford as in (Score:2)
Are the people that find me strange actually right?
Not really "new" (Score:3, Informative)
and ford is one of the last... (Score:2)
BMW was one of the first. VW's were around the same time. Then Prius owners got the same thing. Lots of companies brought back "mp3 player" jacks for their stereos.
My mother has had a changer-plug interface in her volvo for 2-3 years now, from Blitzsafe.
How is this johnny-come-last press release even remotely worthy of front-page status? How much did Ford's PR firm pay to get this put there?
About time. (Score:5, Informative)
Honda already did this in 2006 models. It's called the iPod Music Link and you control the music from the steering wheel or the audio system. Read their official announcement at Honda.com [honda.com]
Other words, this is not news. Ford is just playing catch up as always. Honda owns the auto industry and is always one step ahead of the others.
Re:About time. (Score:2)
And BMW did it a few years (2004 to be precise) before that, but I don't think it was quite as full featured... and now they're releasing one just like this. Honda was years from first on this.
Re:About time. (Score:2)
No, I own the auto industry and I lease it to Honda. That's only part of why I'm so cool, though.
Boom! (Score:2)
(FORD) Found On Road Dead (Score:2, Offtopic)
There is a specific reason (multiple ones), I'm replacing my wifes Grand Caravan with a Toyota/Honda/Nissan.
American auto makers Suck, no matter how many gadgets (gimmicks) they throw in.
Enjoy,
Re:(FORD) Found On Road Dead (Score:2)
American labor is more expensive than Chinese labor.
If you slash the number of hours of labor put into a car to compensate for your more expensive labor, guess what happens to reliability?
Not just Ford (Score:2)
They're 3 different companies. (Though Mazda is 1/3 owned by Ford.)
And besides, as we all remember from several years ago, Ford really sucks. [fordreallysucks.com]
Re:Not just Ford (Score:2)
Of course Ford and GM are quite distinct, but Mazda is virtually a Ford division. Ford's ownership is a 33% plurality, not a majority, but Ford effectively controls Mazda, and product development cooperation between the Ford brands these days is very tight. Ford considers Maxda one of their brands. (see www.ford.com)
So, the proper headline would be about Apple mak
DAMN IT! I just bought a Mazda 6GT Hatchback! (Score:2)
Fords problem (Score:3, Insightful)
But this has been Ford's, and American auto manufacturer's problem. They're behind the times.
I bought a Ford Escape 2005 (in 2004) a few years ago. Asked if their stereos could handle the iPod (I already had an iTtrip). The sales guy says "a what". Ended up talking to the sales manager, discussed it with him. He bluffed that he knew what I was talking about.
While this is great news, in that it can only help sales, they should eat the cost and build it into every single auto they manufacture. The iPods are that prevalent that the small cost (and write-off) to them is relatively insignificant, compared to the positive sales and attitude towards the American manufacturer.
And yes, I come from a long line of family who's worked for Ford. It's depressing to see them doing so poorly. But that's another topic in and of itself.
What about Third Party Solutions? Hint: Alpine (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:What about Third Party Solutions? Hint: Alpine (Score:2)
The scroll speed really needs to follow the speed at which you turn the dial.
...Amusing timing. (Score:2)
Perfect match! (Score:2)
Not new... (Score:2, Interesting)
why (Score:2)
Look, by having the iPod interface on the car stereo, you're just treating the iPod like an externa
Re:Or... (Score:5, Insightful)
But...it's pretty obvious why auto manufacturers don't want you to use your audio hardware in their cars. They'd like you to spend lots of money on buying their crappy audio systems. In particular, they exploit a kind of 'bug' in human reasoning. If you're buying a $20,000 car many people will think little of wasting $1000, say, on a stereo worth $500 because the $500 seems insignificant compared to the total price of the car and the expense slides under many people's radars, even though under normal circumstances those people would balk at being ripped off so badly.
Re:Or... (Score:2)
Not quite. Many auto manufacturers are sympathetic to the people who put aftermarket devices in their vehicles. In fact many design their systems to include extra circuitry and possibly connectors such that it makes it much easier for aftermarket devices to be installed.
The extra feature in this case is a line in jack consisting of 2 pairs of twisted and shielded wires (possibly just twisted). Note that
Re:Or... (Score:2)
But...it's pretty obvious why auto manufacturers don't want you to use your audio hardware in their cars. They'd like you to spend lots of money on buying their crappy audio systems.
Stock stereos have a tendancy of being half way decent. While I personly don't care if my buttons match my car, there are those who go out of their way to get factory radios specificly cause it looks right. They do raise the value of your car and should be kept if at all possible, ev
Re:Or... (Score:2)
While I agree FM adapters suck.... i'm not understanding why a deck to rca adapter would suck. They tend to be proprietary, spendy, and akward to jack in. But suck? Why would they suck in contrast to a straight RCA or 1/8 inch inch jack?
GM has them... (Score:2)
http://www.engadget.com/2005/03/18/gm-adds-line-in -aux-in-jack-to-their-cars/ [engadget.com]
They started this a couple years ago, so the Cobalt, Sky, Vue, Ion, Solstice, HHR, G6, Impala, Monte Carlo and many others already have it.
It baffles me why it took so long and why other companies like VW who claim they are in touch with America's youth still don't have them.
Re:Allow me to be the first to say... (Score:2)
You would think you could control it by some normal means just like you could a CD player or a radio
Re:The real question (Score:2)
What are you talking about? xnu doesn't have a "dmr" source directory - UN*Xs haven't had that since V6.
Re:Misread Title (Score:2)
Re:I need one of these (Score:2)
Re:mp3 player radio (Score:2)
My current head unit is a JVC KD-G720 which also includes a USB port on the front. I like it better then my old JVC uni