The Ideas Behind Longhorn 745
An anonymous reader writes: "Fortune magazine is carrying an interesting article on the new and improved Bill Gates, as well as some details on Longhorn: 'Because Gates' geeks are completely overhauling the operating system, they'll also have to redesign most of the company's other software products and services to take full advantage, including the MSN online service, its server applications, and especially Microsoft Office, the productivity suite that accounts for nearly a third of the company's sales and profits. If this enormous undertaking succeeds, it will make computers more personal than ever. Equipped with Longhorn, your PC will keep track of how you work, whom you talk to, what sites you look at, how you make documents and whom you share them with, which data on the network are yours--making all those things easier.'"
What it really means (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What it really means (Score:2, Insightful)
You sound like the whole point of Longhorn is to give Linux the big F-U. Honestly, that might be a side-thought, but the main thought is to improve their OS. You guys bitch and moan about BSOD, but when they say, "OK, lets overhaul the bastard from scratch, and make it better" all you can say is, "but it won't be compatible with
Some how, I think the open source community will be able to make a new version of samba (or another app altogether) that will be compatible with Longhorn before it becomes popular. If there is a need for it, the open source community will eventually get it out.
Bottom line: Innovation is not a bad thing.
Re:What it really means (Score:3, Insightful)
Which is why its too bad that Microsoft hasn't ever done much of it. I like to call what they do 'immovation'. Its 90% immitation. The 10% of innovation they do seems to be in dirty tricks and proprietarization.
Sure, a lot of open source is clones of other products as well, but in most cases at least the clones are faithful to the original. Microsoft tends to copy ideas poorly.
Re:What it really means (Score:2, Insightful)
What, exactly, is Longhorn immitating?
Microsoft tends to copy ideas poorly.
Like MS Office? Honestly, I find it the best all-around office suite out there. Sure, they copied the old word processors and spreadsheets and stuff, but did a good job making it userfriendly, and a nice product.
Re:What it really means (Score:2)
Hard to say until it actually comes out.
But if its central feature is a database filesystem, PalmOS seems like the best candidate.
Re:What it really means (Score:2, Informative)
Re:What it really means (Score:2)
Re:What it really means (Score:2)
Re:What it really means (Score:2)
Re:What it really means (Score:2, Informative)
Because that would require a public domain, and recent copyright laws have destroyed the public domain. It's a great idea, but let the protectionists reap what they sow. They can have infinite copyright, or innovation, but not both.
Re:What it really means (Score:3, Insightful)
Theyy are master integrators, not innovators. They are only able to do what they do because they have a monopoly power over the OS. No one ever said that a monopoly MUST harm consumers. The market would be fragment and less compatible without the Microsoft monopoly. That doesn't mean it should continue.
Longhorn appears to contain a lot of good ideas (two or three paragraphs in a Fortune magazine article is hardly a product specification, so don't pretend we know what it will be), but my worries are primarily about privacy and digital rights management, combined with their track record on security. Longhorn (which I assume will contain Palladium) is going to have the ability to remotely disable programs. It is going to keep track of every place you visit, everything you do. Now ask youself, is MS the company to trust in designing these things securely? I do not.
I'm not sure I would trust ANYBODY to design these things securely. I think any company would be insane to grant this kind of potential control over their systems to outside parties.
Finally, the goal is to make money, not to improve Windows. If they could make money by not working on Longhorn, they would. So would I.
As many advatages as the Free Software model has in development, this ability to direct huge resources in a single direction is not one of them. If Microsoft were not anti-competitive, I would not hate them. I might still irrationally dislike their products, but it is their anti-competetive behavior that earns my animosity.
For what it is worth, I am well aware that my personal animosity is a fart in a funnel-cloud to Microsoft.
Heh. Nice Troll. (Score:3, Insightful)
Do you think trying to reverse-engineer MS's encrypted DRM-able filesystem will be branded as "interoperability" or "a federal crime" under the DMCA?
-Dave
Re:Heh. Nice Troll. (Score:3, Funny)
You got me thinking....here's another troll for you.
Re:Heh. Nice Troll. (Score:2, Interesting)
FYI, the DMCA (Score:3, Informative)
DeCSS is an excellent example of the problem. DeCSS is required to decrypt DVD's so they can be watched on Linux. Of course, once the data's unencrypted, it's also possible to DivX it and put it on the internet.
Of course DeCSS's primary purpose is interoperability - this is the oldest story in open source operating systems; we have to reverse engineer proprietary systems that vendors have designed in order to keep us out (because they don't want to worry about competition). But the architects of both Europe's and America's IP-protectionism laws knew that when faced with the dilemma of deciding what a program's "significant use" was, the courts could easily be made to err on the side of "caution." Besides, how many private citizens can even afford the first round of the fight?
Hence, no free DVD players (and none at all on Linux), and programmers all over the world in jail, in court, or living in fear. Many of them in Europe. So please, if this issue concerns you, don't rest on your laurels, no matter which side of the pond you're on.
Write a letter or make a phone call to your elected representatives now. What we all need is to have the DMCA (and its European equivalents, if any) repealed, and the members of government who created these laws properly investigated for corruption.
Re:What it really means (Score:3, Interesting)
P.S. Yeah, I tend to bash MS often, but they aren't 100% wrong 100% of the time. They do make some nice products.
Re:What it really means (Score:3, Insightful)
You don't want M$ to dominate the computer software market, ok, fine, that is an opinion I can respect. But to go on like he is the devil himself is plain stupid. I hardly think that his motivation for going to work every day is "damn, I gotta 0wn leonbrooks, and I can't go down to number two on Forbes list".
What I would like to see is a second Microsoft to level up the playfield. If that doesn't happen, I'm installing longhorn when it arrives.
Re:What it really means (Score:3, Interesting)
Why would Bill ever want to own me? He is a geek, he wants to invent things, he wants to make things. If it were just about money he would be out of Microsoft a long time ago.
You said it.
It's not about money - he already has more of that than any other individual in the world.
He's still in it for the thrill of the game.
Believe it or no, it is yet possible for him to win even more.
It's a challenge, one of the few remaining challenges available to him and, despite all of the oft-cited reprehensible behavior on his part, you must admit that he is absolutely a man that would rise to such a challenge.Personally, I would like to see him rise to a different challenge, to leave a lasting legacy of greatness in the computer industry.
Instead, I fear the more likely outcome that his legacy will be how a corporation assisted in an enslavement of cyberspace, perhaps helped along by a entertainment-stupefied populace all too willing to surrender various newly-recognized values such as privacy and control over what we see and hear in the face of arguments slanted towards "reducing terrorism and pedophiles".
Gates inventing stuff? Right. (Score:5, Insightful)
You don't know much about your computer history, do you? Bill Gates has not invented anything at all. And it isn't about money; it's about power.
See, long ago and far away, while the rest of the world was sleeping, there was a quiet revolution. This revolution was being led by people like Steve Wozniak and Ed Roberts, inventors of two of the first personal computers, the Apple and the Altair. (The Altair came first.)
Back in the day of the Altair, a rich kid named Bill Gates was attending (and not doing well at) Harvard. His high-school chum, Paul Allen, saw the Altair in a magazine; he and young Mr. Gates called Ed Roberts and told him they had BASIC for his computer. Mr. Roberts said he was very interested in seeing this BASIC; so Paul Allen wrote (on one of Harvard's PDP-10s) an Altair emulator. Mr. Gates took public domain code for BASIC and ported and compiled it on Mr. Allen's emulator, which they then sold to Mr. Roberts.
First question: which was harder, creating an emulator for a computer you've never even seen, or compiling public domain code on that emulator?
Now, once the paper tapes of Altair BASIC became available, hobbyists who purchased the Altair started copying and circulating BASIC, as was common practice in those days. Mr. Gates, pissed that people were circulating "his" BASIC (which came originally from public domain code), wrote a nasty letter to some hobbyist magazine (I don't recall the title right now) calling all the hobbyists thieves for stealing "his" code.
Technically, he was right, it was his code. You can take something from the public domain, print it, and call that printed version "yours."
This incident set the tone for Microsoft; other people do the heavy lifting, and Mr. Gates gets the credit for the entire work. Even the tone of the Fortune article that spawned this thread deifies him as an honorable geek genius. In truth, he is a merely adequate geek who happened to start with a lot of money (his parents were quite rich) and a killer business instinct, and no scrupples about killing competition not through building a better mousetrap, but by buying up all the mousetrap stores and not allowing anyone else shelf space.
BTW, this whole Altair scenario was repeated damned near verbatim again with IBM (except the code didn't come from public domain; instead, they fucked someone over directly), and echoed in the Spyglass browser deal that brought Microsoft into the Internet age.
In any case, Mr. Gates isn't after money; he's after power. Control of your PC isn't about the money that can be extracted (although that is also very nice); it's about the power of controlling how things are done, who's elected, what laws are passed, and what people are allowed to do.
Whomever controls the desktop controls the future.
Re:Gates inventing stuff? Right. (Score:5, Informative)
No he didn't. The BASIC interpreter was written specifically for the Altair and had to fit in very tight memory constraints. He may have used ideas from public domain interpreters in his code, but so what?
You mean, how he paid Seattle Computer $50,000 for QDOS. Wow, that's really "fucked over". Oh, and they hired the actual author, Tim Paterson, who no doubt became one of the many "Microsoft Millionaires". Gosh, that's just terrible!
Re:What it really means (Score:2)
Myself, I refuse to take that step. I refuse to use a computer that I cannot directly control and use exclusively for my benefit. Not a tool for marketing and e-commerce sellers.
So when all that is available at the local computer store are manipulation machines, I wonder if my P90, P120 running (A then illegal) version of Linux will become highly valuable.
No, _this_ is really mean... (Score:3, Insightful)
Too right! And if anyone thinks this is for the consumer's good, they're about as sharp as a junket sandwich.
...dick length/breast volume, how long since you picked your nose, how often you get the cans into the rubbish bin (and how many are two-pointers)... but knowing Microsoft and their sense of timing, you'll still get their bill the same day you finally scrimp together enough to pay your outstanding taxes.
Making what things easier?
Oh... yes, that's right. Burglars won't have to give you tickets to the opera any more in order to know where you are at any given time, they'll just stroll through Microsoft's firewalls and ask where you are, where you keep your valuables, and what the combinations/PINs/passwords are for everything you've ever touched.
Re:What it really means (Score:3, Insightful)
My sense is that Longhorn will focus more on the user experience, and specifically on re-working the way users create, store and find their information on a computer. Instead of ripping a CD and figuring out which damned folder to put the MP3s in, the files are just 'saved' (who cares where) and the ID3 tags are used to categorize them in the file system. You MP3 player knows about the new file system categories and simply provides different views of all MP3 content on the drive.
Same thing with email. Each email is a file, where things like the from line, subject, etc, are attributes. The email reader users the attributes in the file system to store, sort and present the emails to the user. There was a BeOS email application that did this.
The over all idea here is that meta data stops being the bastard step child of the file system and becomes the most important part of it. Right now meta data is scattered all over the place - in file names, in file extensions, in folder paths, and the few official pieces of meta data the current file system allows (modification date, size...). I shouldn't have to put files in a 'folder' in order to encode custom metadata about that file. I should be able to say "This is a file for the HR project" and hit save - why should I have to find a folder to stick it in?
-josh
Here's another... (Score:4, Informative)
Oh the Irony... (Score:3, Insightful)
Weren't we just talking about that [slashdot.org]
?
Security vs Privacy (Score:2, Interesting)
Easier? (Score:2, Insightful)
...to sell to spammers and identity thieves. Thanks, Microsoft!
--saint
Ack! (Score:2, Interesting)
This is a unifying technology! It will be fully endorsed by the SPA, RIAA, MPAA, FBI,
Mmmm An All Inclusive OS (Score:2, Funny)
I would suspect that the Open-Source troops can beat 2005 for something similiar...
I am also curious that the article didn't seem bothered that MS broke the law to get to its current dominance.... and of course I couldn't really resist this:
"In 27 years he [B.G] claims he has never called in sick or missed work. Not even once."Certainly now its proven by science: THERE IS NO REST FOR THE WICKED!
This is the real story (Score:2, Interesting)
The Hook (Score:2, Interesting)
Yeah, often not for the better, either, but that's always implied, just like this little beauty was only driven by a little old lady on Sundays. But indirectly, due to my lost patience with the company, I will spend more time with Linux and Open Source, and for the great strides their ridiculous attitudes and poor quality have encouraged in the aforementioned, I do thank them.
The Hook -->> making all those things easier.' (It'll make it easier if it would just not crash and diagnostics agreed with what the system is actually doing, or not doing)
At 135 mph around Sears Point Raceway (soon to be renamed (ugh) Infineon raceway.
What is really going on. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:What is really going on. (Score:2, Insightful)
Why? Because Apple allows you to remove its products completely with no ill effect on other components. Don't want to use iTunes? Don't have to, just drag it to the trash and it's wiped from your system. Good luck trying to get rid of Window Media Player. Same goes for the other bundled apps in XP. Don't even get me started with IE.
When OS X 10.2 comes out, it will come bundled with Sherlock 3 and iChat. People have grumbled that these apps usurp Watson and Adium, respectively. But removing the bundled programs will not make your system unstable, and Apple won't get in your way if you try to do it.
Clarity is everything (Score:5, Interesting)
Uh, if "those things" refer to getting the work done, I already have that down pat - once you're over the learning curve, it's done. Vi is vi is vi (unless it's vivivi - the editor of the beast!).
However, it sounds as if "those things" actually refers to something else, namely the ability for some other entity to complete erode my privacy, have unprecidented access to my system (it is mine, like it or not), and leaving me open to unheard of security issues.
Thank you, but I prefer that *I* keep track of how I work, who I talk to, what I look at, how I make *my* documents, and with whom *I* share them. It's not up to the system to decide which data belongs to me since to do so it must analyze my things. To insinuate oneself either personally, or impersonally through the operating system would be simply rude.
You wouldn't tolerate your officemate or the person in the next apartment or even Richard Stallman rifleing through your desk/sock/nightstand drawers. Why should you tolerate it from Microsoft (or Apple, or Sun, or RedHat)?
Re:Clarity is everything (Score:4, Interesting)
Too bad your boss doesn't think so. He even has the law to back him up. Your boss wants as much info on you as possible. If he knows what info you access and how long your typing away on your keyboard he will use it to his advantage. And his boss will do the same t ohim all the way up the ladder.
Re:Clarity is everything (Score:2)
Not in MY country.
I hope you take note of that fact, to re-think the situation. Maybe laws can be passed in your country too, in order to improve your situation? Here, we call those laws "social progress" and we judge other societies by them. (we even think sweden is more progressive than us.)
Re:Clarity is everything (Score:2, Interesting)
You probably are very productive, but 99% of people aren't and still struggle with basic concepts and tools. They need someone to hold their hand. If people like you dominate the open source world then Microsoft will continue to be No.1.
Re:Clarity is everything (Score:3, Insightful)
The MS applications aren't all that easy. Not until after you've learned them. There is a significant learning curve, but it's got a shallow slope. The same is true of most Linux word processors, and they all share the lower part of the same slope with MSWord. Now when you start doing column separations, indexes, tables of contents, etc. they are all different. But that's not the most common use.
Re:Clarity is everything (Score:3, Insightful)
My gradmother was a telephone operator - she could keep track of routing twenty diferent calls at a time and do it with grace. She could also type 40 WPM, flawlessly.
Vi, if she wanted to learn it, would take he 30 minuits of man vi and some scratch paper for notes.
The older generations fixed their own cars, invented the computer, and overcame polio - all without a talking paperclip leading the way.
Re:Clarity is everything (Score:3, Insightful)
In truth, KWord is a much better choice for the grandmothers of the world. The interface is as simple as Notepad, and it actually supports some fonts.
It seems counter-intuitive, but most older users I've talked to who've encountered command line interfaces prefer them, even when that wasn't how they were introduced to computers. Why? Because the CLI is quiet. It doesn't overwhelm you with a clutter of options like a GUI does, it just sits there quietly blinking, waiting for you to tell it what to do.
For my grandmother I would recomend vi if she were to ask my opinion. She seems to have dificulty only with the concept of the mouse, and something entirely keyboard based would thus be much easier for her to understand. She's also quite fond of sticky notes, which vi certainly encourages
Oh (Score:2)
And that's supposed to be a good thing?!
Re:Oh (Score:2)
If you don't like that, you must really hate America.
Re:Oh (Score:2)
And that's supposed to be a good thing?!
sed 's/your PC/The Powers That Be/'
This is certainly going to be a hit with script kiddies too. I'm for innovation and all that, but fer-Bob's-sake, MS, figure out how to make it secure and stable before you go unleashing another piece of binary dog crap upon the public. I'll bet $LARGE_SUM that Longhorn is gonna have more holes than a gopher farm and will be prone to more nastier attacks than before.
let him speak for himself (Score:2, Funny)
his new Bill is ... well, let him speak for himself, as he did in his office one day in June: "I've always liked multitasking (...)
Billy, Billy... you deserve a +1 funny there, but we all know that is not true :)
A fearsome future, but beauracracy will save us (Score:5, Insightful)
But with at least 5 years until Longhorn's release, I think we can count on the world changing so radically in the meantime that Longhorn and Palladium become completely irrelevant. Look at Microsoft Bob, their last "big-bang" approach to engineering a network computer architecture, and how the WWW made it completely irrelevant.
Redesigning everything can be good.... (Score:2)
Microsoft + Security = FALSE (Score:2)
"An issue has been found where a malicious hacker can execute VBScript code through our new IE7 parser with the special command:
Dim MyArray As String(100000)
This will cause the array to grow into our Longhorn WorkTrack System, where the hacker might access its address space and see what the user does."
Feel free to make up consequences of security holes in these systems:
-
-
-
-
It doesn't take much imagination, so anyone should be able to do it.
Right ... (Score:2)
To quote Cormac McCarthy's Cities of the Plain "Hay parches sobre los parches" (There are patches on top of patches)
Re:Right ... (Score:2)
I'm not even all that fond of the MRU list, hell if I want the computer to track everything I do...
Given the direction M$ is going, methinks WinXP will be the last version of Windows I ever use, and XP's new "friendly" features are almost too annoying as it is!!
I want the computer to compute, not hold my hand -- in an iron grip.
Microsoft re-branding "Windows" (Score:5, Funny)
Starting with the "Longhorn" release, Microsoft will unveil a new naming scheme to enhance the "Windows" brand name. No longer will versions numbers or years be tacked onto the Windows name, instead, Microsoft is shifting towards a more descriptive naming convention.
When Longhorn finally hits the shelves, it will come in 3 flavors, a 'personal' edition for home users, a 'corporate' edition for businesses and a government release.
Pricing has not been set but early speculation would indicate that licensing fees will be rolled into federal taxes to ensure everyone is paying for their license and not using a pirated copy.
What's all this talk about OS's? (Score:2, Funny)
Fillets With Flair!
This fits with their new sales model (Score:2)
--Andy Hickmott
Can't wait... (Score:2, Interesting)
As if people were really going to buy into this hook, line, and sinker. As if Longhorn really had a chance to be any more successful at making computers easier to use than any other attempt in history. As if this half-cocked idea will be any more successful than
And So It Comes To Pass (Score:2, Interesting)
I know my first wish is to have Big Brother Gates and his M$ and BSA jack booted thugs knowing everything I do on my computer, not to mention any government agency that wishes it. I know I will be one of the first in line to put my rights in the shredder for a safer, cleaner, more wholesome society. It is nice to see the end of privacy finally arrive and we can finally get on to the business of business. Better late than never, as they say.
Wow - where do I sign up. (Score:5, Insightful)
rewind two years
This XP sounds like the answer to all our problems - a simple OS that helps me watch all that rich web content without all those old bugs in WindowsME. It's got a redesigned interface and makes working with a PC a safe and enjoyable XPerience - indeed I will be able to fly. Where do I sign up ?
rewind two years
This WindowsME sounds like tha answer to all our PC problems. It's got multimedia extensions built in and more user friendly software. Now I can handle all my media on the PC without fear of downloading any nasty software from the interweb. Where to I pay ?
rewind two years
This Windows98 really is the biz - it helps me handle all my PC jobs and lets me enjoy the interweb without any of that nasty netscape software. It can play media files and even games. Wow - where do I sign up ?
rewind two years
Oh yes - now this is cool Windows95 finally lets me enjoy the power of my 486. It's got a revolutionary new interface and even lets me enjoy the interweb. Where do I sign up ?
rewind two years
Holy smoke, this Windows3.1 really is the biz - I can use a mouse and just click the little pictures instead of having to touch the keyboard. Finally, I can use the PC with one hand.
fast forward to 2010
Wow - this new WindowsXXX really is the biz. I don't even have to type in my credit card details anymore - I can hire music instead of own it, and rent films instead of owning them - I don't have to lift a finger because all my data is held in the safe hands of MS. It even shows me the news when I turn it on - MSNBC really is a high class newsfeed. It tells me how nice those MS people are and how there are no bugs or security problems with Windows. One of my nasty friends tried using that Linux stuff last month, but we all just laughed at him - he's been taken away now for not supplying his social security details at the checkpoint. He was a communist and a theif. I love my happy world of the interweb - someone else has taken care of it all for me. All I have to do now is click a button to consume the lovely produce of our great society. Only terrorists would use anything else - why else would they want to keep their information secret ? I am finally free from all those confusing decisions.
Re:Wow - where do I sign up. (Score:5, Funny)
na na na na na na na na Leader!
you gotta admit (Score:3, Funny)
Re:you gotta admit (Score:2)
So much for the new licensing (Score:3, Insightful)
So "sometime after 2005" means, what, 2006 at the earliest? The big Software Assurance [microsoft.com] plan MS has been trying to force us into only provides upgrades for the first 3-1/2 years for client software, and four years for server software. But wait, this new version isn't coming out for at least 3-1/2 years, and that's just if all goes well. Like, if the XBox doesn't crash-and-burn, the courts decide that MS was right after all, virus writers get bored with Outlook, worm writers get bored with IIS, and there are no more terrorist attacks. Then, maybe Longhorn will be released just after this first software assurance period ends. Of course Service Pack 1 wouldn't come out for another five months (which addresses the "faulty product activation" vulnerability that refuses to authenticate your license on all versions), and by then MS will start calling them point releases, so we'll have to re-subscribe.
Yes, I know the plan covers other stuff like Office, but the other software tends to coincide with Windows releases (Win95 - Office for Win95, Win98 - Office97, WinME/2K - Office2K, WinXP - OfficeXP). I hope a lot of companies get pissed at MS for not releasing any new software during this first cycle of "Software Assurance."
Wow... (Score:4, Insightful)
Well, in any case, if Longhorn does do all this and do it successfully, it's good news for me. I mean, if so many people's personal information is made vulnerable in that way, then attacks against *my* personal information might go down. Kinda like Apache not getting as much attention because IIS is such a ripe target. That's not to say that Apache isn't more secure, but certainly the presence of IIS in the market draws dangerous attention from Apache
Re:Wow... (Score:4, Insightful)
User Configurable (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm fine with my computer tracking what I do and working to anticipate my moves -- this kind of pattern matching is what computers are good for, and we're getting to the point that most of the time we've got the spare cycles lying around. But for any such system there better be two things about it:
Anyone care to lay odds on Microsoft giving me those two items?
5 years... (Score:2, Interesting)
Hell, I'd sign up for that.
Chris
And of course... (Score:2)
Consider the latest Google zeitgeist [google.com]. 46% of the visitors were still using Windows 98. People aren't upgrading like MS wants, they aren't buying new machines and a new $200 copy of Windows. They are using the system they bought a few years ago that still works. And they will continue to do so. Mind you, it's going to be a while before "Longhorn" is released, but what makes MS think people will start all over again when they wouldn't even shell out for XP and a new system?
There is a critical mass right now in the Windows world, with their latest offerings not giving much more functionality than their previous versions, but offering a larger price tag. If there was ever a time for Linux to catch up, this is it.
If they would... (Score:2, Insightful)
Remove the ten ton's of usless features and junk.
Cleaned up the API so it makes sense in spots.
Put an underlining system to monitor and protect the core from coruption.
And have it so you could start with a basic simple core and add on with out making too big of a mess.
This would litterly burn rubber even on a 800mhz system. Also it would keep the "Undocumented Features" down to a reasonable level.
Most of the people usualy use about 10% of the features in any given software package.
Now I'm Scared (Score:3, Interesting)
Anyone know of any old used Y2K bunkers that are up for sale?
I really hope it will go like that (Score:3, Funny)
Then I want that everything blows up. I want every website, every file, every private information made public by a flaw in the system.
Since such a system is TOO complex not to have flaws (that's Chaos Theory, plain), even the smallest flaw could be exploited and will eventually crush the system.
And I want to see that.
Being a lawyer in that time will be like being a VC during the dot-com boom..
and the best part will be...? that microsoft windows 'longhorn' will be made illegal by the DMCA
have fun!
ReplayTV (Score:2, Flamebait)
Now, it's being used to spy on us. "More personal information" is something that we should have to remember. Would you tell some random guy on the street your SSN, so he could keep track of it for you? I don't think so. Closed source software is much like some random guy on the street, you never can know what it's gonna do with the info you give it.
Oh hell no! (Score:2)
I can do that all myself thank you very much, I don't need a machine to babysit me.
Nothing new here ... just repackaging (Score:2)
Of course, if Mr. Gates would open the calendar portion of Exchange a little bit, other programs could access the calendar, maybe even between organizations. But that would require some kind of security. Maybe an Open-source calendar system would be better anyway. If Soccer Mom can't use Frontpage already, she shouldn't be allowed to make web pages at all. And do you really want little Tommy's appointment schedule on the Internet?? Um....can you say VPN and X-Windows/telnet?? I don't even understand this. I have downloaded books to my Palm, and I already use my computer to read Infoworld, Slashdot, et. al.
Come on Bill
You have to be trusted by the people you lie to -- Pink Floyd
redesign == you have to buy it *again* (Score:2)
To both the PHBs who read slashdot - DONT DO IT!!!!
Baz
What's in a name? (Score:2)
Re:What's in a name? (Score:3, Funny)
Whoops, still sounds like the right product...
It's all about control. (Score:2)
This, in and of itself, is a wonderful idea. I always thought integrating the web browser with the desktop interface was a brilliant move, and I wish to God that Netscape had come up with a way to do it first. I have the same sort of feelings about Longhorn: it looks like it could be the next really big thing in the development of computing, but the fact that Microsoft is at the wheels makes me very nervous.
Microsoft is going to make it easier for 'a soccer mom to set up a simple website', for business users to 'arrange conference calls and online meetings', and so forth. The truth is, people can do all these things now -- but not through the operating system. They can only do it through a wide range of third-party vendors, which adds an extra level of complexity. But it's this level of complexity that allows for competition; once Windows allows you to automagically post web pages to MSN, where will Angelfire or Geocities go? When Windows lets you remotely control your PC without any technical know-how, what happens to PCanywhere? The list goes on, and as Microsoft tightens integration with MSN, a plethora of what used to be highly competitive industries will fall the same way Netscape did when IE became a bundled component.
This is the next step in Microsoft's strategy, and it's a very good strategy indeed. People are sick of having to install software, or browse the web, before they can do what they want to do. The average computer user wants to be able to do everything from one place, and Microsoft knows just what that place will be: your MSN-powered Longhorn desktop.
The saddest part is, I'll probably end up using it anyways.
The Spruce Goose (Score:4, Insightful)
Doesn't this sound a bit like the spruce goose. Build the biggest greatest ever plane. Sure it flew but then what? It seems to me that an undertaking of this magnitude has the potential to become a money sucking vortex within MS.
Sure rewriting from scratch and redesigning the OS sounds great but in five years? Linux has taken 10 years to get to its current state. That includes havind 20 years of Unix development to learn from. I think 5 years is a dream. Especially if you are trying to rethink the whole thing and not build on the existing windows world.
There are a few outcomes from this plan.
1. MS develops the greates most user friendly OS and continues to dominate
2. Longhorn drags on for years and years and is eventually dropped. Collapsing under its own weight.
3. In order to release someting, Existing elements from the windows code base are integrated to make a ship date. Thus continuing the windows problems they would like to solve.
On another note: Does anyone else see the humor in BG going to the boss and saying that he wants to scrap it and rewrite from scratch? How many IT managers would accept that from the development staff? Would BG have accepted it prior to becoming "Chief Software Architect"?
Longhorn is Cairo revisisted (Score:3, Insightful)
btw, one rumor is that the "Windows XP" name is an homage to the Cario project because xp = "chi rho" in Greek letters.
This will collapse like a black hole... (Score:4, Insightful)
There are 4000 programmers and managers working on this product in the long term , excluding testing and Q/A folks. Assuming a rate of 100 bugs per programmer (typical MS level) per year that need to be Q/A'd and squashed thats 400,000 bugs/year to tackle. And since this will be released in 2.5 years thats close to a Million bugs!
And what is more bothersome is that Bill mentions that the groups don't talk to each other (well it's difficult when you have 500 guys designing the 'wing') -- he says that the fuselage guys don't do lunch with the wing guys. This has always been a big problem in the 'Super star' driven MS culture, and will be exacerbated even more.
The problem with MS has historically not been one of talent, but one of culture and management. I don't see Bill addressing these issues. Perhaps, Bill needs to be introduced to some Software management gurus.
Frederic P. Brooks Jr. meet William Gates Jr. III
Ultimately, tightly knit groups of developers in close contact with the users has a better chance of delivering the goods. Look at BSD or GNU/Linux. They've come so far because of a close knit group. As long as we keep our eye on the ball we will do well. Tackle the issues one at a time and build on the foundation.
For instance, take the filesystem. MS is going after a database filesystem with 500 people on the code. Look at BeOS, 2-4 people worked on the team with Giampaolo at the lead. It wasn't a true Database FS but it did a remarkable job of looking and fucntioning as one. Want to bet that the MS DBFS is going to be top heavy and over engineered and buggy as hell? Or look at security, a tightly knit group of volunteers have made one of the most secure OS's in the world - OpenBSD. And here we have a giant struggling with years of accumulated bad practices- more holes than all of the cheeses in Switzerland. Or look at Quartz and Quartz Extreme from Apple. The core group is less than 15 people led by Mike Paquette have developed a graphics subsystem that has not been matched by the 100+ strong DirectX/3d team from MS.
Ultimately, what matters is a closely knit team which works on building software one step at a time. There are no giant leaps in software, only tiny steps that accumulate over time. This is core to what BSD/Linux has achieved. Apple under Avie Tevenien (sp?) also seems to understand the value of incremental code releases. Release early and release often. This is our biggest advantage. Let's stick to it.
Bill can continue to make his grandiose plans. Heck, let him even get a persian kitty but his plans will take its natural time to evolve. They may have the money but we have the resources.
In the end, it will be lack of good taste and good management which will make Longhorn a spectacularly mediocre release like all other MS products.
Re:This will collapse like a black hole... (Score:3, Insightful)
Ultimately, tightly knit groups of developers in close contact with the users has a better chance of delivering the goods. Look at BSD or GNU/Linux. They've come so far because of a close knit group. As long as we keep our eye on the ball we will do well. Tackle the issues one at a time and build on the foundation.
Whatever happened to this whole Cathedral and the Bazaar thing?
-a
Linux FUD (Score:5, Insightful)
I understand
But it seems to me that many of you (you meaning the open source community in general) are spreading just as much FUD as MS is, drapped in a cloak of supposed reality.
For instance: I constantly see posts saying how crash-prone MS OS's are and how you get 100 BSOD's a day on your work PC's (those of you that admit using an MS OS in the first place that is).
I'd be foolish to try and say that Win95, Win98, Win98SE or WinME aren't more crash-prone than just about any Linux distro, they are. But the FUD is in not being specific enough: Win2K and WinXP are quite stable. If you find it to be otherwise in your experience, let me point you in the right direction: It's not the OS! My work PC, a 2+ year-old Win2K PIII/500 Dell Optiplex GX1 with 512M RAM, on which I have over 20 gigs of various software installed, I have 10+ different things running at any given time (currently I have Windows Explorer, UltraEdit, CuteFTP, Apache Tomcat, IE, Lotus Notes R5, IIS with
If your Win2K or WinXP machine crashes all the time, perhaps I'm just that much better an admin than you are, but I doubt it. But, rather than be fair about it, you will be quick to bash MS and their "buggy" OS. Bull. Rag on any Win9x you want, I won't argue, but if your going to tell me Win2K or WinXP are crash-prone and buggy, you are wrong, absolutely. (WinNT by the way is somewhere in between in my experience... I have 5 NT servers, database and web servers, with heavy usage, none of them has had ANY unscheduled downtime in about two years, but I also had NT on my desktop for a while and it did blue screen on occassion, once every few months perhaps. Not terrible, but not great either).
How about the secure argument? Well, there's no denying that MS didn't place the emphasis on security that they should have all along. There are far too many buffer overruns in MS software to be sure. But the vast majority of viruses and trojans and other serious security problems are the result of good-old-fashioned social engineering, getting people to open attachments and such. Understand, having an application scriptable is not a bad thing, *IF* the user base is somewhat intelligent (there are exceptions of course, scripts should NEVER run without user authorization, and they of course can under some conditions in Outlook, that's MS's fault for sure). I'm not going to hammer them for giving us greater flexibility.
And what about the FUD? People claim Linux is less virus-prone than Windows. Of COURSE it is! Go out and iterview 100 virus writers and I guarantee you will find the majority hate MS and love Linux and the open-source movement. Which platform do you think they are going to target? DUH!
Windows sees more viruses because it is targeted more, plain and simple. Now, don't misunderstand me: I AM NOT blaming the open-source community for viruses, not in the least. And I am NOT saying that Windows is as secure as Linux, because it's not at a fundamental level. But simply because you see more viruses on Windows DOES NOT mean it is soo much more virus-prone than Linux. That's why I hope Linux does make it's way onto the desktop in good numbers. Let's see if this piece of FUD still stands up at that point. I very much suspect it won't.
Now, what about this Longhorn stuff? MS is trying to do something innovative (although not original) here... they are trying to give you ubiquitous access to any type of data from any location in a common fashion. What's wrong with that? Sounds like a fantastic idea to me. In fact, from a strictly forward-looking mentality, it's the logical evolution. I see so many paranoid statements about privacy, but come on folks, your smart enough to not go down that path! You know as well as I do that if MS is pulling anything fishy with privacy, it will be found out in short order. I mean, how hard is it to unplug your cable modem and throw a packet sniffer on the network to see what the OS is sending out? Geez, MS's worst move would be to do something like that because, and I say this in a positive way, you people will find it and scream it at the top of your virtual lungs faster than Bill Clinton goes down on an interm!
You say they never truly innovate. Then, when you hear about some potential innovation from them, you bash them for it!
It's one thing to be anti-MS, it's another thing to spread your own brand of FUD. It's also another thing to dismiss out of hand absolutely anything at all that comes from Redmond. If something is a good idea, it's a good idea regardless of where it comes from. The United States thought the atomic bomb was a good idea, even though the idea came from Germany (and try to not make the obvious "and Windows explodes just as bad as an atomic bomb!" jokes).
It's funny... I have always hated with a passion Bill Gates because he always struck me as an arrogant cheater who I just could not respect. Be better than that folks, make the community better than that... don't pull the same dirty tricks he has.
Re:Linux FUD (Score:4, Insightful)
"I'm not going to hammer them for giving us greater flexibility."
I say:
"You apparently don't really use linux."
Windows gives you flexibility? Try moving your Outlook contacts from Outlook to Groupwise some time. Yes, that is in your own words the definition of flexibility.
From an admin's point of view, I can't stand Windows. (Let's forget for a moment that MS tried to eliminate my necessity with something they called ZAW, yet another failed MS pursuit.)
Quick, think: Where is that user's address book stored right now? Is it in "Documents and settings", under "Local Data" or "Applications"? Is it in the Windows directory under profiles? Is it in some folder named after some GUID?
Now, quick, think: Where is the user's address book in linux? Well, it's definitely in their HOME Directory. What e-mail program are they using? Evolution? I'll bet it's in a folder called ~/evolution.
Now, please tell me about intuitive design...
Re:Linux FUD (Score:3, Informative)
Um... for the last few years just about any program for windows installs itself into the
Re:Linux FUD (Score:3, Interesting)
I just love having to remember the publisher when looking for an App!! Sure you can usually change it but that is the default location, indeed the SANCTIONED location.
I really like how OSX handles this better, letting me set up (and alter!!) the structure of my applciations directory at will. Programs are just moved around, no install/deinstall just because I'd like it to live on a different drive.
Apple (Score:4, Insightful)
Who writes this stuff? (Score:3, Insightful)
You'd think that a business magazine might attempt some analysis as to what is feasible, desirable, and what the competition (oops, forgot we were talking about Microsoft) might do in response.
You are my Parsifal you be my Holy Grail (Score:3, Insightful)
rewriting history (Score:3, Insightful)
Today, we may still snicker at this. After all, we had a thriving, competitive PC industry without Microsoft: Commodore, Amiga, Atari, Exidy, Apple, and many others. Those systems were often way ahead of whatever Microsoft was selling at the same time. All of Microsoft's major successes were invented by others, then copied by Microsoft.
Rather than creating the modern computer industry, Gates single-handedly destroyed most of it. Gates' legacy in computer history is despicable. But the victors get to write history...
Re:Paranoia ? (Score:2)
And wait till the G starts to ask for records of what you have been up to on your computer.
George Orwell warned us about this
Re:Paranoia ? (Score:3, Insightful)
The pitfall being that by not trusting the State, anglo-saxons do the utmost to emasculate it's power, whereas the power vacuum left is promptly filled by private croporatitions who answer to nobody, certainly not the people, as the State doe.
As long as the anglo-saxons insist that the State be as small as possible, individual rights will be trampled by big croporations. Do not forget that a strong State is the best guardian of individual rights, simply by the virtue of ruling-in and checking the power of big croporations over the people.
For example, if you lose your job and can get 60% of yout former salary by virtue of the State's unemployment insurance, you can bet that companies don't push their workers around, as people simply quit and take the time to look for a proper job. And when the State provides you with medical insurance, people don't lose their jobs because the collective insurer doesn't threaten to withdraw coverage for all employees when one employees becomes unprofitably ill.
I defy anyone to refute this argument (communism not being of any relevance, it won't be accepted as an argument. A past example, maybe, but not an actual argument).
Re:amazing (Score:2, Interesting)
There are two main problems,
1: nural nets/ heristics at a low level slowwww things down.
2: You need a common dictionary/gramma so that evrything at least has a chance to talk to each other.
minor problems are down to initial design.
How the hell do you write the initial networks for you applications?
But if you get it right then,
The file save as dialog for gimp might show text as a available save format because Gimp presents bitmap data
you have an OCR package that can go from bitmap -> text and somthing that can save text files.
All you applications will look and behive the same, and all components are interchangable (so long as they present the write kind of data).
Well that's about it for the
Re:amazing (Score:4, Funny)
And in all that time you never learned to spell properly?
Re:how about the cult of slashdot? (Score:2)
Modded as Insightful??? (Score:2)
Someone modded this up as "insightful"? I don't think it takes much insight to realize that M$ "is ridiculed and made to be Satan incarnate" on
Not only that, but MS has EARNED the ridicule (Score:2)
In addition the Microsoft apologist post you reply to ignores the singular fact that it only takes a few seconds of research to discover that Microsoft deserves the ridicule they get, and while they might not be Satan incarnate, they are certainly a Big Brother with aspirations to becomming Big Nannie, Big Daddy, perhaps even Big Goddy, with all of us beneath their Watchful Eye, joined perhaps by their pressing thumb.
Ob Microsoft's New Invasive Operating System: Everyone thought we'd lose our freedoms in the end because we were misled by some lofty, but misguided, (e.g. communism). Instead we're merely selling our freedoms and basic privacy to industry for a quarterly bit of profit on the one side (and defending it as innovation within the Holy Free Market(tm)) while begging the government to take those very same freedoms from us on the other so we can feel a trifle safer on the other side, despite knowing intellectually that this feeling of safety is illusary.
Think we'll even be capable of waking up after we've discovered there is no safety in a surveillance society, even after this quarter's earnings are spent and next quarter's remain as elusive as ever? Somehow I'm not so sure we will be.
Re:how about the cult of slashdot? (Score:2)
Now they claim they are going to alter the course of human history bla bla bla by rewriting their OS and Office to increase the personal experience??
They really should work on bullets!
You are offended by the MS icon? Read the article and see how Fortune gushes: Did you know that Mr. Gates takes singing lessons? Did you know that he has never missed a day of work in 27 years? I did not know that! = )
No, I will not participate in this Borgish cult because just because Fortune also beleives Mr. Gates to be visionary and well, amazing:
"I've always liked multitasking. But there are incredible limits to what I can do--like how much time there is in a day.."
Incredible is right. Incredible that Fortune prints this too.
It is my every day frustrations with things like bullets on Word that prove this wrong for me. Am I jealous or being childish? I don't think so. I think I'm being practical and realistic.
Sorry if that makes you unhappy.
-b
Re:This has to be an all-time record.... (Score:5, Funny)
Pre-announcing a product and starting the hype five years before it's expected to be released..."
Re:This has to be an all-time record.... (Score:2)
OK, the humor hasn't escaped me, but the popular media hasn't been hyping duke nukem or nwn for five years either...
Re:Privacy (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Innovation Failing Fast (Score:2)
If, say, one out of ten ideas are good, useful ones, then you need to come up with, implement, and identify nine ideas before you come up with the good one. The faster you can do that, the faster you'll get good ideas out.
Failing slow: "We have decided to persue strategy X. It will work. We will make it work. (repeat for five years, two CEOs, and four project renamings.)
Failing fast: "Does this work? Nope. How bout this? Nope. Hmmm. This? Nope. This? Hey...no. But if we do this...EUREKA!
Re:omniscient MS (Score:2)
You sick, sick bastard.
Re:They Just Don't Learn (Score:5, Interesting)
It's an excuse to openly defy the court. Another doomsday plan. Brinksmanship. "You have to choose between either letting us eat up the rest of every industry one by one- or intentionally destroy poor us by sabotaging this stuff that we've bet the company on! Are you ready for that?"
This reeks of doomsday plan. Like hell they don't learn- that's been working OK for them so far. The question is, since MS must inevitably over-reach and collapse (when they pick a 'bet the company' plan that's too extreme, and call the world's bluff with it), when would be a good time for them to blow a gasket? They _can't_ continue this tactic forever without becoming the most wild exaggeration of every rabid slashdotter's worst nightmare. And, like Stalin said of the Pope, 'how many divisions does he have?' Microsoft is not prepared for a serious conflict with, say, a country, in the event of a power struggle, which is the ultimate destination of this sort of thing.
I daresay the bigwigs at MS have exit strategies, though. Or, and this is a disturbing thought- maybe they don't. Maybe their world really IS an elevator with no top floor, and no down button. If so, they are destined for great disappointment. Everything ends.