Slashdot Log In
Your Washer is Calling and the Dryer is on IM
Posted by
Zonk
on Thu Jul 13, 2006 05:48 PM
from the make-the-dryer-stop-calling-me-names dept.
from the make-the-dryer-stop-calling-me-names dept.
netbuzz writes "Laundry Time, an eight-week pilot program from the Internet Home Alliance, begins next week with three Atlanta families and the technology and services of Microsoft, HP, Panasonic, Proctor & Gamble and Whirlpool. The idea is to allow family members to receive alerts and control certain laundry functions from their PCs, cell phones and TV sets, presumably so they can spend more time with their PCs, cell phones and TV sets." I am all for tech for the sake of tech, but I'm pretty sure this is one of the signs of the Apocalypse Nostradamus prognosticated.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Your Washer is Calling and the Dryer is on IM
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 144 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

y0u r pwn3d suXX0rs (Score:2, Funny)
(http://www.dragonswest.com/ | Last Journal: Monday November 05, @07:35PM)
Your soiled shorts, CowboyNeal Underoos and Ring-around-the-Collar are now on full view on the internet.
Washine Machine (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://thestonepedo.dyndns.org/ | Last Journal: Friday March 17 2006, @03:32AM)
Re:Washine Machine (Score:5, Interesting)
Shocking alert.. (Score:3, Funny)
Wash-TV (Score:1)
(http://www.geekman.ca/)
from the article.. (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://slashdot.org/)
Cool! (Score:4, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/~Infonaut/journal | Last Journal: Tuesday July 31, @02:22PM)
This is so freakin' awesome! Talk about a product everyone has been waiting for with baited breath! I know I'll throw down some serious cash for *that* technology!
Hah! And people say Microsoft is losing its touch.
Do not want. (Score:5, Funny)
hotpoint14: I take off your pants, slowly, and gently massage them in my soapy warmth.
maytagman: Oh I like that baby, after pretreating with detergent, I put in my robe and wizard hat.
hotpoint14: What the f*ck, I told you not to message me again.
maytagman: Oh **** damn I gotta write down your names or something
PHASE two RFID integration (Score:5, Funny)
Reason 10 for why we need IPv6 (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.users.qwest.net/~waffleck-asch/ | Last Journal: Wednesday November 07, @04:46PM)
Use case: the Shared Laundry Room (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/ | Last Journal: Tuesday September 11, @05:30PM)
If you've ever lived in a college dorm, or in an apartment complex that provides a communal laundry room (and extracts cash from you, either in the form of quarters or a reloadable card), SOP is to put your clothes in the washer, go back to your room/apartment/etc., then come back when they're done. Chances are you've encountered the fatal flaw: When your laundry is ready to go into the dryer, someone else's clothes have often been sitting there, dry, for 10 minutes, and it'll be another half hour before they remember to pop in and take them out.
The low-tech solution for the one with clothes in the dryer is this: Check your watch when you start the dryer, do a little math, and come back in 45 minutes. If you're really worried you'll forget, set an alarm. You've probably got a kitchen timer at worst, and if you're reading Slashdot, chances are your watch has 25 alarm settings anyway.
The low-tech solution for the one waiting to use the dryer is to open it up and move the other person's clothes out of the way. Ironically, the solution to lack of consideration by one person is... lack of consideration by the other. Which can escalate into a cycle of anger, and neighbor feuds, and next thing you know there'll be a neutral zone and Jimmy Carter will be coming in to make sure that your complex doesn't break into open warfare. *ahem* Sorry about that...
Anyway, something like this could work as a remote "Your laundry's done, doofus, get it the hell out of the way" alert. You could use single-use pagers like restaurants do for reservations, but this way you don't have to worry about range, or (since people are using their own phones) someone walking off with the pager after they're done.
Pity that the one place it would be useful is also the least likely place for it to be implemented.
Re:Use case: the Shared Laundry Room (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.exile.org/)
The even lower tech solution is for all concerned to chill out and accept that rabid pursuit of exclusivity does not work when resources are shared.
The one waiting should check his watch and come back in 5 minutes.
If, after 5 minutes, the dryer is still full, the person waiting should remove said clothes from dryer. The person who shows up to find their clothes removed from the dryer should know that they failed to keep on top of their laundary and perhaps even apologize to the person who had to move their clothing asside.
In 20 years of sharing laundary facilities with friends and strangers I have encountered exactly one person who got upset about this policy. I still consider him an anti-social dweeb.
Boil tea and check e-mail.... (Score:4, Funny)
(http://cafepress.com/phototravel?pid=5934485)
Are the first things I do in the morning. I'd LOVE it, if the kettle would send me an instant message, in addition to just quietly turning off.
This could be quite useful (Score:3, Insightful)
Here we go... (Score:1)
SOUNDS LIKE "SMART HOUSE" TO ME (Score:4, Insightful)
Guess what.... It was a dud! The idea is still a dud. Unless you have a self loading washer or dryer, a stove that gets out the food and cooks it for you there isn't mutch advantage here. So what if you are notified when the appliance is finished, unless it puts away the clothes or serves the food, you still have to pay the appliance a visit to finish the job.
Perhaps a more reasonable approach would be to have a bluetooth control that might allow you to remotly put in detergent or softener, but I'm not sure this has any apeal either. I put this in the same category as the flying cars "Popular Mechanics" promises are coming every 10-15 years.
It's all good... (Score:2)
Yawn! Wake me... (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Tuesday January 16 2007, @10:33AM)
Impending apocolypse? NO WAY (Score:1)
(http://www.dragonweezel.com/ | Last Journal: Monday January 29 2007, @01:47PM)
But seriously, Who here hasn't been distracted by a late night tech, coding, or gaming session and forgot about the laundry that you needed to do so you could go to work with something clean on?
What about the fact that the sooner you get your clothes out of the dryer the less wrinkles you have.
I think this is an awesome idea that is a little late in my opinion.
Hi, This is your washing machine... (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1066346/)
C1al15 for cheap......
I just wanted you to know that you can recieve a home mortgage of up to $453,000 for as little as $898 a month...
Let's start predicting the malware around it! (Score:3)
Imagine a remote controlled oven where your ex knows the keys to turn it on, possibly burning your apartment to the ground. Remote controlled locks that faciliates burglaries. A stereo connected to the internet playing "My heart will go on" at full volume for hours (because you're not home).
There are certain developments in technology I simply do not need...
reduce complexity (Score:2)
(http://www.math.harvard.edu/~knill | Last Journal: Thursday May 29 2003, @08:11PM)
On the other hand, I would not mind, if the computer would just be used as a reporting tool. The fridge or the laundry machine would have little web-servers installed, which when connected to the wireless network, would allow to check about their status and eventually control them remotely. The machines should still work by hand. Adding additional control is no problem for me but one should be able to turn it off and it should still work.
Remind me... (Score:1)
(http://www.xhtmlpro.com/)
I believe this is the one referred to (Score:2)
(http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Saturday November 03, @04:58AM)
"Hallucinating flying windows over water in metal boxes;
Invisible messages are lost with the socks;
Floods of water destroy all life;
As circles of glass turn blue and die"
That Hacker shrunk my clothes! (Score:3, Funny)
Funiest typo in a loooong time. (Score:1)
Microsoft writing the software ??!? (Score:2)
(http://lives.sourceforge.net/)
Dark and light clothes have been inserted together.
The wash program has performed an illegal operation.
Cancel Abort Retry
Not fully new, but can be useful (Score:1)
If made more reliable though and maybe check to see if it has been opened since it ended (to see if there are still clothes in there or not) then this could be perfect for dorms all over with limited numbers of machines. As for in the house, well I don't see any reason to start or stop it remotely due to the fact you would have to load/unload it. Also for telling you when it is done would still not be as simple as just starting your stopwatch if you have a digital watch.
Oh noes... (Score:1)
Time to go actually read the article...
IIT SSV Dorms have this (Score:1)
Additionally, you can have the washer/dryer with your clothes in it send a text message to your cell phone when your load is done.
I used it once for fun. Thats it... Its a great feature, sure... except unnecessary and probably cost way more than the benefits it carries.
Why not focus this technology integration into devices that could be useful: i.e. a stove that reminds you that its still on; a fridge that warns of spoiling milk or low quantities of some product.
College (Score:1)
(http://bizzle.slightlybetterthanyou.com/)
Real automation in washer/dryers (Score:4, Informative)
(http://www.animats.com)
All that user intervention is silly. What you want is a combination washer/dryer [lgwasherdryer.com]. These were first offered in 1958 [plan59.com], and they're still around. No need to move the clothes from the washer to the dryer. The latest models even dispose of the lint down the drain.
This is way ahead of having to communicate with the thing remotely.
Another idea that seems to have disappeared from washing machines is a soap tank. You just fill one tank with Liquid Tide, another tank with fabric softener, and it does the rest. That was tried in the 1960s.
Some of the more advanced machines, like the Maytag Neptune, sense the dirt content of the drain water and the water content of the dryer exhaust air to decide automatically how much washing and drying is needed. The Neptune can deal with an out-of-balance condition by itself, too.
Another useful facility would be to have the dryer do an extra few turns every few minutes after it is done, to prevent wrinkling.
Real innovation (Score:1, Interesting)
This would save time: load clothes to wash, unload when dry.
This would save space: I only have one big box to find a place for, instead of two.
This would save money: I'm only buying one big box, not two.
O.K. some possible hurdles are:
- Manufacturers would have to charge twice as much to recoup lost revenue (or make them break twice as fast). I, for one, would be willing to pay the same amount for an all-in-one box as I currently do for two boxes.
- Something about putting a high current heating element in a device that slings around a high volume of water. O.K. surely the safety issues can be overcome, we do have water heaters, afterall.
- A washer is probably not very effecient for drying. O.K., so a little engineering would be required, but come on, look at everything else we can do, it can't be that difficult.
- Dryers tend to have larger tubs, for fluff. O.K., I don't know how they'll get the users to not stuff it so full that it won't properly dry.
Please add your thought.
All I want... (Score:2)
(http://thenoxx.deviantart.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday November 30 2005, @04:14PM)
A better idea (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Tuesday May 16 2006, @10:41PM)
Paging Washers and Dryers (Score:2)
(http://www.hawknest.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday October 05 2004, @04:11PM)
BUT when you in a rush and you want to do the full wash/dry cycle and you don't want to sit in front of the machines in basement or "laundry center" of your abode.. getting a page (SMS TXT) to your cell phone that the wash cycle is done would be handy.. I wouldn't pay a lot extra for it but if I had it I would use it.. and I would look for/seek that feature in machines I was buying..
Now if you have a modern dryer that can detect moister and it's nearing the end of the dry cycle getting a Txt that tells you that the cloths aren't done (yet) and giving you the option to remotely add on more time to the dry cycle would be neat, but I'd probally put the dryer on auto mode and let it decide on it's own to add more time (in which case I would LOVE a txt saying (your 40 mins. of drying is now taking 55 mins)..
I'd also love a txt reminding me that the cloths have been done for 3 hours and I might want to take them out before I get yelled at...
Ok, this has gone far enough. (Score:4, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Thursday November 10 2005, @01:30AM)
And NOW... now home automation suddenly becomes a sign of Big Brother? What the fuck? I couldn't care less whether the government knows that my jeans are done drying, let alone the people I share my LAN with. On top of this, I don't see any sort of sign that these machines will become commonplace, let alone mandatory and/or mandatorily monitored by the government... and for what, water restriction enforcements maybe? Yeah, I suppose it could be a possibility, but for fuck's sake let's worry about that trivial and unlikely scenario when/if it gets a little closer to becoming reality.
I don't care how dumb this idea is, it's not a sign of Big Brother. You want Big Brother, turn on the fucking 6 o'clock news. It may not be mass surveillence, but it's far more representative of the Big Brother mindset than some gimmicky net-ready home appliance.
One thing... (Score:2)
2 things I learned as a child: don't misspell the Procter, and don't bring up the Satanist urban legend. The first gets them annoyed, the second gets you a batch of literature in the mail or a nasty telephone call.
laundry done? (Score:2)
Really works great, makes for a lot of unfolded laundry
What moron connects their dishwasher to the net? (Score:1)
KISS (Score:2)
washboard? (Score:2)
(http://www.jonathanfilbert.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday October 13 2004, @10:54PM)
This might be better than working the double shift to pay for that $1400 washer/dryer set, and then spending extra on the gym membership to stay in shape, all the while exhausted.
The Fanuc Robotic Kitchen (Score:2)
(http://www.animats.com)
Fanuc, the Japanese robot manufacturer, actually does have a robotic kitchen for their employee cafeteria. [fanuc.co.jp] Robots make up meals and do the heavy pot cleaning. It's not totally automatic. Yet.
Hackers reference. (Score:1)
(http://12.183.160.165/~ccfreak2k/index.html | Last Journal: Tuesday October 03 2006, @12:11PM)
Does anyone else think of the second scene from Hackers? (Hint: it's the one where Dade takes control of the TV center)
Red Dwarf quote (Score:1)
Lister: I don't want any toast and he doesn't want any toast. In fact no-one round here wants any toast, not now, not ever! No TOAST!
Toastie: How about a muffin? Lister: Or muffins,we don't want muffins, no toast, no teacakes, no buns, baps, baguettes or bagels. No quassants, no crumpets, no pancakes, no potato cakes, and no hot-cross-buns, and definitely no smeggin flap-jacks!"
Toastie: Ahh, so you're a waffle man.
Lister: We don't want any smegging bread based products. Why can't you see that.
Toastie: I am a Toaster, I toast therefore I am. If you didn't want any toast why did you repair me?
Nostradamus (Score:2)
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Firien)
Already have it (Score:1)
pfft, IM is nothing (Score:1)
Dryer Delights... (Score:2)
(http://www.bluefeathertech.com/ | Last Journal: Friday November 04 2005, @11:51AM)
Hey, lose something, get something back. It all balances out in the end. I'm thinking three socks for that red-orange rubbery thing that Mila Jovovich held up to the camera in 'The Fifth Element...'
Keep the peace(es).
New technology? (Score:1)