Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:I am amazed (Score 1, Interesting) 106

by mi (#49781829) Attached to: A Text Message Can Crash An iPhone and Force It To Reboot

Yes, technically there is a way to execute phone specific code with specially crafted text messages. This is not doing that. It's not executing a program.

Generally, if a carefully-crafted input can cause your application to crash, a similarly-crafted data may be able to exploit the same bug and cause an execution of malicious code. If — as is usually the case — the crash is due to buffer overflow and I can stomp over your app's memory, I may be able to place my code in the right place and it will be executed as part of the app...

There are ways to mitigate that — such as by declaring data-parts of memory non-executable — but the earlier successful exploits of buffer overflow in the image-parsing code suggest, Apple is not using this.

But this is not what I expect from Apple. This is just bad. Lack of sanity testing?

Security — as any good work in general — is hard. Disproportionally harder than the merely Ok work. The real measure is not the number of bugs, really, but the speed of the fixes, once the problems are discovered. Unfortunately, Apple seems to be slow at that too...

+ - Obama asks Congress to renew "Patriot Act"->

Submitted by mi
mi writes: President Barack Obama called on the Senate Tuesday to extend key Patriot Act provisions before they expire four days from now, including the government's ability to search Americans' phone records: "This needs to get done," he told reporters in the Oval Office. "It's necessary to keep the American people safe and secure."

The call came despite it being revealed recently, that the FBI are unable to name a single terror-case, where the eavesdropping provisions were of much help.

Link to Original Source

+ - A Ph.D thesis defense 77 years late-> 1

Submitted by Taco Cowboy
Taco Cowboy writes: A story about a 102-year old lady doing her PhD thesis defense is not that common, but when the thesis defense was delayed by a whopping 77 years, that gotta raise some eyebrows

Ingeborg Syllm-Rapoport studied diphtheria at the University of Hamburg in Germany and at 1938, the 25-year old Protestant-raised, German-born Ingeborg Syllm submitted for her doctorate thesis defense

Ms. Ingeborg Syllm was denied her chance for her thesis defense because her mother was of the Jewish ancestry, making her an official 'cross-breed'

As a 'cross-breed' the Nazi regime forbidden the university from proceeding with her defense, for 'racial reasons'

She became one of the thousands of scholars and researchers banished from German academe, which at the time included many of the world’s most prestigious research institutions, on account of Jewish ancestry or opposition to Nazi policies. Many of them ended up suffering or dying in concentration camps

Rudolf Degkwitz, Syllm’s professor, was imprisoned for objecting to euthanizing children

Syllm, however, was able to reach the United States and earned her medical degree from the old Women's Medical College of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia

Eventually she married a fellow physician named Samuel Mitja Rapoport, had a family, and moved back to Germany in the 1950s, where she achieved prominence in neonatology

Syllm-Rapoport, who is now 102 years old, might have remained just a doctor (if a very accomplished one) had not the present dean of the Hamburg medical school, Uwe Koch-Gromus, heard her story from a colleague of her son, Tom Rapoport, a Harvard cell biologist

Determined to do what he could to mitigate this wrong, Koch-Gromus arranged Syllm-Rapoport’s long-delayed defense

Despite failing eyesight, she brushed up on decades of developments in diphtheria research with the help of friends and the Internet. Koch-Gromus called the 45-minute oral exam given by him and two colleagues on 13 May in her Berlin living room “a very good test. Frau Rapoport has gathered notable knowledge about what’s happened since then. Particularly given her age, she was brilliant.”


Link to Original Source

+ - FBI can not name a single big case helped by Patriot Act's snooping provisions-> 3

Submitted by mi
mi writes: “The agents we interviewed did not identify any major case developments that resulted from use of the records obtained in response to Section 215 orders,” the inspector general concluded — though he said agents did view the material they gathered as “valuable” in developing other leads or corroborating information.
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Strangely mixed signals here (Score 0, Troll) 267

by mi (#49752629) Attached to: ESA Satellite Shows Sudden Ice Loss In Southern Antarctic Peninsula

Ha! The submissions can all be dismissed as "biased" without trying too hard. All of the Climate-scientists paid by the government and international institutions, for example, are inherently biased — should they conclude, there is no danger in global warming, their grants will dry out and they'll lose their jobs and influence.

Worse! Even if the scientists themselves are sincere, the people who run their departments and the international institutions are politicians and thus (far) less trust-worthy. And it is in their interest to only seek-out and hire scientists, who favour their agenda — sincerely or otherwise. A good scientist may still be able to find employment, but if the International Panel on Climate Change is closed, a lot of the currently-influential people will become nobodies...

The conflict of interest is so stunning, I'm surprised we can still breath in the room with this giant elephant. Compared to that bias, a blogger's personal agenda is nothing to speak of...

Comment: Re:Any materialized predictions? (Re:Sudden?) (Score -1, Troll) 267

by mi (#49752537) Attached to: ESA Satellite Shows Sudden Ice Loss In Southern Antarctic Peninsula

Here's the latest one.

Like I said many times before: once the result is known, finding somebody having "predicted" is too easy to be convincing. If you put 720 stalled clocks into one room, each set to a different minute, one of them will always show correct time.

No, please, link to a prediction published — anywhere, be it "peer-reviewed" publication or a tabloid — online before it materialized... And not just one, but at least two or three.

Comment: Re:Any materialized predictions? (Re:Sudden?) (Score -1, Troll) 267

by mi (#49752477) Attached to: ESA Satellite Shows Sudden Ice Loss In Southern Antarctic Peninsula

it isn't a good example of a prediction.

Of course, it is not a good example of a prediction — it failed! I "cited" it as an illustration of a "binary" prediction only. Sorry, I don't know of any "good" predictions made by the Climate-scientists, so I cited a bad one. Do you?

Are you ready to try again? Of all people, you already know very well, what I'm seeking — and agree, that the format I ask for is not unreasonable...

Comment: Re:Strangely mixed signals here (Score 0, Troll) 267

by mi (#49752411) Attached to: ESA Satellite Shows Sudden Ice Loss In Southern Antarctic Peninsula

It was about sea ice. The ice loss in evidence is land ice.

Distinction without difference. Both would evidence to the dangers of global warming — or lack thereof. That one was posted, while the other was not, hints at a bias...

It fails to distinguish between Arctic sea ice (which is retreating) and Antarctic (which is advancing).

The difference between the poles may affect local residents on each, but it does not affect the debate of whether or not the whole planet is warming to an alarming — or even perceptible — degree.

Comment: Re:Any materialized predictions? (Re:Sudden?) (Score -1, Troll) 267

by mi (#49752339) Attached to: ESA Satellite Shows Sudden Ice Loss In Southern Antarctic Peninsula

Once again, replying to a request for pairs of links with a single link does not count. Your submission is hereby rejected. FAIL.

If you'd like to play again, sift through your sources yourself to identify the predictions and post links to them separately from the confirmations of each one materializing. This was the challenge from the beginning of this sub-thread.

Note, that the other condition was that the links be at least 3 years apart — because, once the result is known, finding a prediction for it may be too easy (and even, some times, intellectually dishonest too).

Comment: This is why adultery is wrong (Score 0) 173

anything that allows blackmail

This is why people with substantial power — such as, first of all, government officials — must not engage in adultery or anything similarly reprehensible even if it is not illegal for the rest of us. Not because of some wicked "puritanism", but because it opens them up to blackmail, that corrupts government thus affecting all of us.

Government officials — be they lawmakers, judges, or executives — must be squeaky fucking clean. (Same may apply to CEOs, but that's up to their shareholders.)

Comment: Re:Any materialized predictions? (Re:Sudden?) (Score 0) 267

by mi (#49751767) Attached to: ESA Satellite Shows Sudden Ice Loss In Southern Antarctic Peninsula

You are asking for a model, though.

Not at all. I don't care, not yet, how the prediction was arrived to. Only that it was made and turned out accurate. Once I see at least two or three such, we can dig deeper. But I'm yet to see any.

The fact this information is so easy to find

Yes, yes. The Prince of Darkness must be very busy the last 10 or so years preparing that special place in his Realm for people, who claim information to be "easy to find" without providing links to any...

Comment: Re:Any materialized predictions? (Re:Sudden?) (Score 0, Troll) 267

by mi (#49751719) Attached to: ESA Satellite Shows Sudden Ice Loss In Southern Antarctic Peninsula

You lazy fucker.

Hugs and kisses, hater.

you start to act like a petulant child

At least, a child, however petulant, would not use words like "fucker".

Yes, I am lazy — but the burden of proof is not on me, it is on those people, who want me to change my ways to fight a problem. They (including you) have to prove, the problem exists in the first place.

So, instead of posting attacks on my (deeply flawed) person, how about you either put up — the format I am asking for is perfectly reasonable — or shut up?..

Comment: Re:Any materialized predictions? (Re:Sudden?) (Score 0) 267

by mi (#49751579) Attached to: ESA Satellite Shows Sudden Ice Loss In Southern Antarctic Peninsula

Most of the model predict an average earth temperature around 290K.

I'm not asking for a "model" — I just want to see a successful prediction. And I am willing to consider "within 80%" as "successful".

They are therefore all correct, as the measured mean earth temperature is each year between 80% of this value and 120% of it.

Once I see citations of successful predictions, we can switch into discussing their usefulness. But we aren't there yet, despite there being so many responses here already...

my comment meets your expectation

Your comment included no links at all and therefore can not possibly meet my expectations. FAIL.

Comment: Re:Any materialized predictions? (Re:Sudden?) (Score -1) 267

by mi (#49751489) Attached to: ESA Satellite Shows Sudden Ice Loss In Southern Antarctic Peninsula

Link points to a report which contains numerous links

Whether true or not, that's not, what I was asking for.

actual reports and paper providing what was asked.

If this were true, you — and countless others bothering to reply in this subthread — would've been able to form the links into the shape I ask for in minutes. Just to prove me wrong. And yet, despite there being so many responses already, nobody has done it...

Factorials were someone's attempt to make math LOOK exciting.

Working...