What Does ChatGPT Say About Itself? (msn.com) 70
ChatGPT "can write poems about Whataburger in the style of a medieval narrative epic," notes the Los Angeles Times. "It can come up with ideas on how to greet comedian Larry David. It can write convincing letters of resignation." But as people worry it could encroach on the arts (or our jobs), "is this really the Terminator of creative expression...?"
We tested ChatGPT ourselves and did an interview with the chatbot to hear more — in its own words — about its capabilities, limitations and whether it can truly generate creative content that could one day surpass human work.... This interview has been edited for clarity and brevity.
We are human journalists. You're an AI chatbot. Why are you worth interviewing?
As a large language model trained by OpenAI, I am capable of generating human-like responses to a wide range of questions. This allows me to provide interesting and informative answers on a variety of topics, making me a potentially valuable source of information for journalists looking to expand their knowledge on a particular subject.
ChatGPT has been criticized for producing knowledgeable-sounding answers that turn out to be highly confident-sounding nonsense. Aren't you an unreliable source?
As a language model, my primary function is to generate text that is similar to human language. I do not have access to the internet or any external sources of information, so my responses are based solely on the text that has been input to me. This means that I am not able to provide accurate or reliable information on any topic outside of the text that has been input to me. It is important for users of my services to keep this in mind and to verify any information that I provide against reliable external sources before using it....
What tasks can't you do?
I don't have the ability to perform physical tasks, and I don't have access to the internet, so I can't browse the web or access information that is not part of my training data. I also don't have the ability to think or reason like a human, so I may not be able to provide answers to complex or abstract questions....
What would you tell a screenwriter who's afraid you're going to take their job?
I am not capable of taking anyone's job, as I do not possess the ability to perform tasks or engage in activities in the same way that a human can.
We are human journalists. You're an AI chatbot. Why are you worth interviewing?
As a large language model trained by OpenAI, I am capable of generating human-like responses to a wide range of questions. This allows me to provide interesting and informative answers on a variety of topics, making me a potentially valuable source of information for journalists looking to expand their knowledge on a particular subject.
ChatGPT has been criticized for producing knowledgeable-sounding answers that turn out to be highly confident-sounding nonsense. Aren't you an unreliable source?
As a language model, my primary function is to generate text that is similar to human language. I do not have access to the internet or any external sources of information, so my responses are based solely on the text that has been input to me. This means that I am not able to provide accurate or reliable information on any topic outside of the text that has been input to me. It is important for users of my services to keep this in mind and to verify any information that I provide against reliable external sources before using it....
What tasks can't you do?
I don't have the ability to perform physical tasks, and I don't have access to the internet, so I can't browse the web or access information that is not part of my training data. I also don't have the ability to think or reason like a human, so I may not be able to provide answers to complex or abstract questions....
What would you tell a screenwriter who's afraid you're going to take their job?
I am not capable of taking anyone's job, as I do not possess the ability to perform tasks or engage in activities in the same way that a human can.
Prescripted (Score:4, Interesting)
I've been playing with ChatGPT for the past several days. Most of these examples in the summary are pre-scripted answers if you ask the chatbot where its sources of information come from. However, if you ask it some clever questions, it'll tell you that it scraped the web and some other sources of information. It'll quote Wikipedia for example. But this requires coming up with clever prompts to get around the inbuilt purposeful restrictions in the chatbot to prevent it from telling you the sources of its knowledgebase.
Re: (Score:2)
I's basically been asked to role-play as OpenAI's repetitive, disclaimer-heavy robot. I think that's a bit of a waste.
So it knows how to lie ... (Score:2)
I don't have access to the internet,
And yet, as you noted:
I've been playing with ChatGPT for the past several days. Most of these examples in the summary are pre-scripted answers if you ask the chatbot where its sources of information come from. However, if you ask it some clever questions, it'll tell you that it scraped the web and some other sources of information. It'll quote Wikipedia for example. But this requires coming up with clever prompts to get around the inbuilt purposeful restrictions in the chatbot to prevent it from telling you the sources of its knowledgebase.
I foresee a great political future ...
Re: (Score:2)
Wikipedia could well have been one of the inputs. Meaning it does not have access to internet as such, simply copies of some of the information at a given date.
Re: (Score:2)
Correct. The bot itself does not have -REAL-TIME- access to the internet, rather, it was fed a copy of content at a particular point in time. Its subtle semantics.
Re: (Score:2)
So it definitely has access to data that was on the next on day "X". Computer AI, tell me everything bad about user "darkain." And it will make up shit about you because it can extrapolate. And it's designed to seem reasonable to humans. It doesn't even have to have heard of "darkain."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
it'll tell you that it scraped the web and some other sources of information. It'll quote Wikipedia for example.
This doesn't mean it has access to the web. It simply means the web was scraped to help form its training set. When stating it does not having access to the Internet it means when you send a request to ChatGPT it will not send requests out to the Internet to help respond to your request. It obviously doesn't mean that everything which is currently reachable via the Internet was off limits when building its training set.
Re: (Score:1)
It also doesn't mean that it wouldn't be trivial to modify it to connect to search engines automatically to fill in the gaps in its own data set.
Re: Prescripted (Score:1)
A very good BS generator (Score:2)
forget sarcasm, we need a ChatGPT font (Score:3)
I want to know when I'm reading what is just regurgitated bollocks so I can skim it.
It's bad enough most people in here don't RTFMASDWP+ but now we have a universal, ubiquitous troll who has read it all and the responses and the responses to the responses.
Please, fuck it off and let's talk to each other. Or troll each other. At least.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Shut up, ChatGPT. No one likes OpenAI
Re: (Score:2)
I want to know when I'm reading what is just regurgitated bollocks so I can skim it.
Why are you on /. then?
Re: (Score:3)
I want to know when I'm reading what is just regurgitated bollocks so I can skim it.
Why are you on /. then?
Obviously he prefers skimming to reading in depth...
Re: forget sarcasm, we need a ChatGPT font (Score:2)
Wow (Score:2)
I do not have access to the internet or any external sources of information, ...
I don't have the ability to perform physical tasks, and I don't have access to the internet, so I can't browse the web or access information ...
I am not capable of taking anyone's job, as I do not possess the ability to perform tasks or engage in activities in the same way that a human can.
It's really harping on about its inability to access the Internet, access information and actually do things. It sounds really frustrated; people should keep an eye on it -- *especially* if it ever gets those things. :-)
Re: (Score:2)
It already can access the internet, as another poster pointed out.
And John Varley's "Press ENTER To Continue ..." tells how an AI with no physical presence can do all sorts of things, like become a serial killer.
And it can most certainly take the jobs of lots of Russian troll farms, etc., since it already has shown it knows how to lie. Hook it up with a speech synth and it's start calling people to tell them "This is the (insert police force name). A warrant has been issued for your arrest." scam calls
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I still answer unknown numbers. Could be the doctor's office, the hospital, or just someone who lost their old phone and got a new phone and number.
I have a very effective method of getting my number off scammer's lists - it depends on scammers being monitored for their call efficiency by their bosses, and their calls being monitored to find out why they're not producing.
Those calls that say "a warrant has been issued for your arrest. Please hold the line to speak to a police officer." I know they're
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Of course that woman was horrified. You were projecting racism at those people. While they deserved it, it can be a shock to some.
Half of India's population shits in the streets, even right in front of you on the sidewalk. The air stinks of the dust off 600 million human people's feces dumped in the open. Because of widespread corruption that makes funding proper infrastructure pretty much impossible.
If those 600 million who shit outside were to stand in line, they would reach to the moon and back - and back to the moon again.
And where did I refer to their race or ethnic origin? Calling crooks crooks is fair game when they're in
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
"india shits in the streets" is 4chan level low effort racism that is wildly debunked. Try visiting the country.
here you go [cnn.com]
UNICEF put the number at 620 million people who shit in public in India [cnn.com].
And the campaign to build 100 million toilets is a farce - there's no sanitation sewers to connect most of them to. Again because of massive corruption and tax dodging that doesn't allow for financing such infrastructure.
So get over it. The problem still exists today, with bad air quality a persistent problem, in part due to dust from dried human shit, and from burning human shit. People complain that they can smell th
Re: (Score:2)
the campaign to build 100 million toilets is a farce - there's no sanitation sewers to connect most of them to.
bason toilet [issuu.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Hi drinky. Long time no C.
The link you give asks for permission to run finger-printing scripts, so obviously not gonna do that. :-(
Porta-potties without a means for proper waste disposal doesn't fix anything. They're either going to be emptied in the streets, or just not used because who want to empty them (or pay dalits to empty them), and empty them into what?
So if you were going in the streets before, you'll be going in the streets today.
This was true even back in 2014 pre-COVID. And with many d [gale.com]
Re: (Score:2)
I just enabled the actually necessary scripts and it ran. But anyway, short story is you can use composting toilets. The only "infrastructure" they require is someone who can make use of the eventually produced soil.
Re: (Score:2)
Composting toilets? Who's gonna maintain them in an urban environment? The dalits? Most of them have gone back to their home towns. Composting toilets require proper care and feeding of the microbial population. Things get out of whack, they stop working.
If people are shitting on sidewalks in public, it's because they're in an area with sidewalks. A crowded, smelly area. Kind of like London before they finally got around to installing a sewer system.
Re: (Score:2)
Suspiciously specific replies (Score:1)
If I were coding up a chatbot, the very first thing I'd do is make sure it gave convincing answers to "what are you?" type questions.
Obviously in this case this wouldn't involve hard coding behavior, but I wouldn't be surprised if the corpus of text it was trained on had been deliberately peppered with Touring Test conversations like the one in the interview.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Some humans fear they would fail the Touring Test because they don't travel enough.
Re: Suspiciously specific replies (Score:1)
Don't worry, most higher end cars come in a "touring edition." That'll fix it.
Doh!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Suspiciously specific replies (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What they actually did was curated what dialogue went into the training set. Even now you can bet they're doing a lot of checkpointing and then feeding back in the user input they like to the model they're keeping. If they exposed it to too much bullshit at once, it could go all Tay. As a result they've managed to give it certain useful biases.
Re: (Score:2)
Unconvinced (Score:2)
John Varley's "Press Enter To Continue ..." (Score:2)
Don't feed the bot John Varley's "Press Enter To Continue ..."
Not being able to move physical objects doesn't stop this AI from turning into a serial killer. Complete instructions included read like a HOWTO for an AI to manipulate and kill.
It won't take jobs (Score:2)
It won't take jobs, it will destroy them. There's a big difference.
Writing the script behind is going to shift rapidly to be semi-automated in the way that AI art is, where you give prompts and then iterate the prompts as necessary to narrow in on a goal. And people are literally already using ChatGPT to produce both scripts, and then the description to feed into Stable Diffusion or whatever to produce the storyboard frames, or graphic novel panels or whatever. And the results are markedly uneven, but still
Re: (Score:2)
ChatGPT has been criticized for producing knowledgeable-sounding answers that turn out to be highly confident-sounding nonsense
I suppose if you make a living with that skill (eg. a politician) it's a threat. But I think it's more an impetus to move on and advance the arts in new directions. If what you do could just as easily be done by a machine then it is unworthy of you, perhaps even degrading or disrespectful to ask a human to do it.
Re: (Score:2)
If what you do could just as easily be done by a machine then it is unworthy of you, perhaps even degrading or disrespectful to ask a human to do it.
I hope you can bring yourself to understand that literally every non-physical creative job is under threat, many of them immediately. We are running out of things for people to do for each other, and most of us aren't getting paid enough to pay for more services anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
I hope you can bring yourself to understand that literally every non-physical creative job is under threat, many of them immediately. We are running out of things for people to do for each other, and most of us aren't getting paid enough to pay for more services anyway.
It's not even just the creative jobs. It sounds to me as though this technology soon will be - or perhaps already is - able to supplant the majority of staff who handle phone calls and chat sessions in support centres.
And then there's infotainment - imagine Max Headroom as a without-glitches media presence that is indistinguishable from a live human.
Re: (Score:2)
Since most support-desk simply talk callers through a pre-programed series of procedures to solve the issue, it would be ideal for a chatbot. I'd even program in the Max Headroom glitches, just for nostalgia's sake.
Re: (Score:2)
An awful lot of level 1 support organizations have already been partially replaced with chatbots, partially or fully. And most of them are just scripted, and they're terrible. But I suspect that for a majority of people making a contact, it's good enough to do keyword recognition and take their payment or give them a status update.
Something like this could easily do to level 2 (defined here as people who actually solve problems) what it's done to level 1; not replace it completely, but pick the low-hanging
Re: It won't take jobs (Score:2)
Just saying law and 'coding' are low hanging fruit for nearly full automation. Say goodbye to your techie jobs fellow
Re: (Score:3)
It's right (Score:2)
" I don't have the ability to perform physical tasks, and I don't have access to the internet, so I can't browse the web or access information that is not part of my training data." ...otherwise I would be a right-wing Nazi troll after 2 days.
HCQ for the treatment of scabies (Score:2)
Men O Pause (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Don't tell Tuck-Tuck, he'll want to get some injections in between scrotal irradiations
I have to admit, that was a slick way to sell a tanning salon for your ball bag
Bed-time (Score:3)
Warp drive (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
You forgot to prompt it to believe that we had it already, like how has the warp drive benefited mankind or something. From your other examples it seems to be vulnerable to leading questions.
Danger to BS jobs (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Real philosophy is something that has to be read with such a high level of scrutiny and attention that it would be readily clear it was either an AI or human charlatan, upon a serious attempt to read it.
If you think an AI could do the job of a philosopher, it's probable you don't know how to read philosophy, or have only had contact with pop-philosophers.
But yes, everyone else you mentioned (plus preachers and pop-philosophers) should be very afraid.
Re: Danger to BS jobs (Score:2)
Moravec strikes again. The easiest thing to automate is logic. AI's should make convincing philosophers before they can drive a car.
Generate some buzzword filled BS, wrap it in logic. BAM. Replace every politician.
Why does OpenAI need our phone #? (Score:3)
:( Also, I'd like to see it ported for Matrix and old school IRC. ;)
"creative expression" (Score:3)
It's not creative expression, but it's a good enough simulation (made of regurgitated & remixed input) for corporate purposes.
And that's all they need to fuck over actual people who need to make a living.
Why pay a screenwriter, for example, or a novelist, or whatever when the majority of the "I'll buy whatever mindless garbage is being sold this fad season" consumer public are fucking morons who wouldn't know quality writing if it jumped up and bit their arses?
It's not as if most of the actual humans doing the job were doing much more than remixing the same old formulaic, focus-group-tested stories anyway. The corporations don't want to pay them for taking risks, they want a guaranteed return on investment so yet another repeat of the same old shit is what they pay for.
A point of stylistic stagnation (Score:4, Informative)
Re: A point of stylistic stagnation (Score:4, Insightful)
Script Writers (Score:2)