They can't get people to use their products based on merit, so they force them to do so based on legacy and removing choice.

I already uninstalled the new Notepad for its idiotic tabs feature and opening all the crap I had open last time, which I don't want.

NPR does the typical propagandist thing and distorts the claim and debunks that. "Claim: Clinton played a key role in helping Russia gain control of U.S. uranium supplies." That wasn't and isn't the claim.

The claim is that her and Obama oversaw the Uranium One deal which sold Uranium to Russia, which is true. Both Clinton and Obama had oversight and authority over the nine CFIUS agencies that approved the deal, and they allowed it to go through. Therefore, the buck stops with them.

I love seeing boomers like yourself seethe and spit vitriol and then link to something as laughably propagandistic as articles like that, though. It's your own brainrot. You've lost the ability to discern reality from what your precious trusted MSM tells you to believe. I think it might stem from a lack of religion in your life; you need something to fill the hole.

Remember when Clinton and Obama allowed the sale of Uranium to Russia?

LOL!!

Updoots to the left my dude LMAO get fucked DRUMPF he's a dementia man!

*Edit:* wow, thanks for the gold my guy

I remember when they made that change too, and it baffled me, until I realized that their new goal was to abuse their users and that they were starting to decline. That was around the time of Google Buzz, if I recall, when Search started to act like it knew better than you (even though the results were always worse).

Also don't get me started on them buying DejaNews, integrating it with Google Groups, and then killing it--Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

Is it better than an AI search engine, like perplexity?

People still use Google? Their AI is total shit. Now you get dogshit search along with dogshit AI.

This question is at least three years too late. Around GPT-2 Sam Altman established his marketing/scam loop of:

1. is sooo dangerous we'll never ever EVER even show you, let alone release the weights!
2. okay fine, you can look at but it's so dangerous we'll never ever let you touch it!
3. okay fine, celebrities and influencers are allowed to touch but definitely not you, it's way too dangerous!
4. okay fine, you can touch thing but it's so flippin' dangerous that we're going to have to charge you a fee, and those weights? no way, humanity can't handle that! only our for-profit non-profit that makes billion dollar deals with defense contractors can be trusted with that!
5. erm wow you violated our terms of service for responsible usage of . You've lost the possibility of early access to

Also somewhere in there Sam Altman gets expelled from Kenya for refusing to comply with orders to stop scanning locals' irises in exchange for shitcoin.

I'm being an asshole because it's to underscore a point about how people like yourself engage with this conversation. You don't even have the basic facts and you mouth off like you're knowledgeable, but you're not. Look at the garbage you've spewed in just a paragraph:

> The prosecution was considering a no jail plea bargain, but MIT would not agree to the deal.

Wrong. MIT didn't WANT Aaron Swartz prosecuted from the get-go. It was Carmen Ortiz who pushed for charges, wanting a desirable conviction under that digital crime act.

>It's a fact that Aaron was facing a realistic outcome of 6 months or less, with a oossibility of no time

He would've had to have admitted that he was essentially a digital domestic terrorist. He wanted to fight the charges because he was innocent of what they were accusing him of. It was bullshit about opening a locked computer cabinet to download _public domain articles_ being equivalent to high-level wire fraud and CFAA violations. The maximum penalties were 35 years in prison and $1M in fines. These laws were not intended to prosecute someone who did what he did.

I'm angry because boomer retards have a certain synaptic failure where they're unable to process anything beyond "well uh if he had just taken that plea deal, he'd only have to serve a few months in tha prison [and pay just a few tens of thousands of dollars, plus a hundred thousand dollars in legal fees--never mentioned]".

>He's your martyr.

Wrong, and you don't know anything about me. And irrelevant to the argument. Fuck off.

>Your problem is that he's not our martyr. From your AI Yes, it is accurate that Aaron Swartz

You need your rest

Not this shit again. Getting tired of explaining this to retarded boomers, who don't change their opinions anyway. But in the interest of explaining this to others: https://www.perplexity.ai/sear...

Reddit once found the idea of deleting any content so antithetical to its purpose that they made it an April Fools Day joke: https://web.archive.org/web/20...

Shortly after Aaron Swartz was driven to suicide by the malicious prosecution of Carmen Ortiz, Reddit censored even that page.

I linked directly to the news source claiming NYC would be underwater by 2008.

I've never seen so much butthurt on Slashdot as this. This is what happens when you poke a hole in boomers actual religion. Nothing pisses you off more than someone exposing that part of what you believe is wrong, and you're willing to lie and gaslight to try and squirm out admitting you were wrong. Boomer idiot. You mind's gone

I made the claim that the news said NYC would be underwater by 2008. I then linked directly to the news source claiming NYC would be underwater by 2008.

I've never seen so much butthurt on Slashdot as this. This is what happens when you poke a hole in boomers actual religion. Nothing pisses you off more than someone exposing that part of what you believe is wrong, and you're willing to lie and gaslight to try and squirm out admitting you were wrong. Boomer idiot. You mind's gone.

I linked directly to the news source claiming NYC would be underwater by 2008.

I've never seen so much butthurt on Slashdot as this. This is what happens when you poke a hole in boomers actual religion. Nothing pisses you off more than someone exposing that part of what you believe is wrong, and you're willing to lie and gaslight to try and squirm out admitting you were wrong. Boomer idiot. You mind's gone.

My claim:

>Like how the news in 2008 was saying NYC would be underwater by 2015? Is NYC underwater? Is the coastline of NYC any higher?

I then linked to the news claiming in 2008 NYC would be underwater by 2015.

I've never seen as much butthurt on Slashdot as this simple and proven fact. This is what happens when you question boomers actual religion. Retard.